Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-0861-1595
Erratum: Brazilian Plants: An Unexplored Source of Endophytes as Producers of Active Metabolites
Erratum
Correction: Brazilian Plants: An Unexplored Source of Endophytes as Producers of Active Metabolites
Savi DC, Aluizio R, Glienke C.
Planta Med 2019; 85. doi:10.1055/a-0847-1532
In the above-mentioned article, some lines in [Table 2] were misrepresented and corrected as follows:
Host plant |
Strain |
GenBank code |
Identification reported in the literature |
Phylogenetic identification performed in this study |
Incongruence |
Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
– = No difference in the identification. All figures noted in this table are available as Supporting Information |
||||||
Eugenia bimarginata |
UFMGCB2032 |
KF681521 |
Mycosphaerella sp. |
Phaeophleospora sp. (Fig. 17S) |
Mycosphaerella was divided into several genera, and the isolate belongs to the genus Phaeophleospora |
[29] |
Baccharis trimera |
UFMGCB4425 |
KJ404206 |
Alternaria sp. |
Alternaria sp. Sect. Alternata (Fig. 3S) |
With phylogenetic analysis, the isolate is identified at the section level |
[76] |
UFMGCB4428 |
KJ404203 |
Chaetomium sp. |
Another genus than Chaetomium (Fig. 7S) |
Low sequence quality |
||
UFMGCB4580 |
KJ404213 |
Diaporthe sp. |
Diaporthe sp. (Fig. 25S) |
– |
||
UFMGCB4453 |
KJ404204 |
Diaporthe sp. |
Diaporthe sp. (Fig. 25S) |
– |
||
UFMGCB4451 |
KJ404215 |
Phomopsis sp. |
Diaporthe sp. (Fig. 25S) |
– |
||
UFMGCB4570 |
KJ404212 |
Epicoccum sp. |
Epicoccum sp. (Fig 10S) |
– |
||
UFMGCB4468 |
KJ404201 |
Guignardia sp. |
Phyllosticta sp. (Fig. 19S) |
– |
||
UFMGCB4429 |
KJ404217 |
Nigrospora sp. |
Nigrospora sp. (Fig. 15S) |
– |
||
UFMGCB4436 |
KJ404209 |
Nigrospora sp. |
Nigrospora sp. (Fig. 15S) |
– |
||
UFMGCB4571 |
KJ404211 |
Podospora sp. |
Podospora sp. (Fig. 20S) |
– |
||
UFMGCB4498 |
KJ404214 |
Preussia sp. |
Preussia sp. (Fig. 21S) |
– |
||
UFMGCB4528 |
KJ404216 |
Preussia sp. |
Preussia sp. (Fig. 21S) |
– |
||
UFMGCB4510 |
KJ404202 |
Preussia africana |
Preussia africana (Fig. 21S) |
– |
||
UFMGCB4423 |
KJ404196 |
Preussia pseudominima |
Preussia minima (Fig. 21S) |
– |
||
UFMGCB4592 |
KJ404199 |
Preussia sp. |
Preussia sp. (Fig. 21S) |
– |
||
Lychnophora ericoides |
RLe7 |
KF057056 |
Streptomyces albospinus |
Streptomyces sp. (Fig. 24S) |
Housekeeping gene sequences are required for species identification |
[35] |
Hyptis suaveolens |
F7 |
KF554491 |
Aspergillus terreus |
Aspergillus sp. Sect. terrei (Fig. 4S) |
With phylogenetic analysis, the isolate is identified only at the section level |
[36] |
Piper hispidum |
JF766997 |
Phlebia sp. |
Phlebia sp. (Fig. 18S) |
– |
[49] |
|
Mikania glomerata |
KT962838 |
Diaporthe citri |
Diaporthe sp. (Fig. 9S) |
Based on phylogeny, it is not possible to identify the isolate as D. citri |
[37] |
|
Piper hispidum |
JF766998 |
Diaporthe sp. |
Diaporthe sp. (Fig. 25S) |
– |
[58] |
|
JF767007 |
Diaporthe sp. |
Diaporthe sp. (Fig. 25S) |
– |
|||
Lippia sidoides |
KU639597 |
Lactococcus lactis |
Lactococcus lactis (Fig. 11S) |
– |
[86] |
|
Lychnophora ericoides |
RLe9 |
KF057070 |
Streptomyces sp. |
Streptomyces sp. (Fig. 24S) |
– |
[33] |
RLe8 |
KF057057 |
Streptomyces sp. |
Streptomyces sp. (Fig. 24S) |
– |
||
RLe6 |
KF057069 |
Streptomyces cattleya |
Streptomyces sp. (Fig. 24S) |
Housekeeping gene sequences are required for species identification |
||
RLe4 |
KF057055 |
Streptomyces cattleya |
Streptomyces sp. (Fig. 24S) |
Housekeeping gene sequences are required for species identification |
||
RLe1 |
KF057065 |
Streptomyces cattleya |
Streptomyces sp. (Fig. 24S) |
Housekeeping gene sequences are required for species identification |
||
RLe11 |
KF057067 |
Streptomyces cattleya |
Streptomyces sp. (Fig. 24S) |
Housekeeping gene sequences are required for species identification |
||
RLe13 |
KF057064 |
St. angustmyceticus |
Streptomyces sp. (Fig. 24S) |
Housekeeping gene sequences are required for species identification |
||
RLe10 |
KF057058 |
Kitasatospora cystarginea |
Kitasatospora or Streptomyces (Fig. 24S) |
Housekeeping gene sequences are required to differentiate Kitasatospora from the genus Streptomyces |
||
RLe03 |
KF057068 |
Streptomyces mobaraensis |
Streptomyces sp. (Fig. 24S) |
Housekeeping gene sequences are required for species identification |
||
RLe12 |
KF057053 |
Streptomyces albospinus |
Streptomyces sp. (Fig. 24S) |
Housekeeping gene sequences are required for species identification |
||
Schinus terebinthifolius |
LGMF626 |
KM510497 |
Alternaria sp. Sect. Alternata |
Alternaria sp. Sect. Alternata (Fig. 3S) |
– |
[48] |
LGMF692 |
KM510498 |
Alternaria sp. Sect. Alternata |
Alternaria sp. Sect. Alternata (Fig. 3S) |
– |
||
LGMF713 |
KM510499 |
Bjerkandera sp. |
Bjerkandera centroamericana (Fig. 6S) |
B. centroamericana was described after the publications of the cited paper [48] |
||
LGMF627 |
KM510503 |
Diaporthe sp. |
Diaporthe sp. (Fig. 25S) |
– |
||
LGMF653 |
KM510508 |
Diaporthe sp. |
Diaporthe sp. (Fig. 25S) |
– |
||
LGMF655 |
KM510505 |
Diaporthe sp. |
Diaporthe sp. (Fig. 25S) |
– |
||
LGMF657 |
KM510509 |
Diaporthe sp. |
Diaporthe sp. (Fig. 25S) |
– |
||
LGMF694 |
KM510507 |
Diaporthe sp. |
Diaporthe sp. (Fig. 25S) |
– |
||
LGMF701 |
KM510512 |
Diaporthe sp. |
Diaporthe sp. (Fig. 25S) |
– |
||
LGMF698 |
KM510513 |
Penicillium sp. |
Penicillium sp. section Citrina (Fig. 16S) |
With ITS phylogenetic analysis, the isolate is identified at the section level |
||
Piper hispidum |
JF766989 |
Lasiodiplodia theobromae |
Lasiodiplodia sp. (Fig. 12S) |
With ITS phylogenetic analysis, the isolate is not identified at the species level |
[38] |
|
JF766998 |
Diaporthe sp. |
Diaporthe sp. (Fig. 25S) |
– |
|||
JF767000 |
Diaporthe sp. |
Diaporthe sp. (Fig. 25S) |
– |
|||
JF767007 |
Bipolaris sp. |
Bipolaris sp. (Fig. 27S) |
– |
|||
JF766997 |
Phlebia sp. |
Phlebia floridensis (Fig. 18S) |
With ITS phylogenetic analysis, the isolate was identified at the species level |
|||
JF767001 |
Bipolaris sp. |
Bipolaris sp. (Fig. 27S) |
– |
|||
JF766996 |
Colletotrichum sp. |
C. gloesporioides complex (Fig. 8S) |
With ITS phylogenetic analysis, the isolate is identified at the complex level |
|||
JF767002 |
C. gloesporioides |
C. gloesporioides complex (Fig. 8S) |
With ITS phylogenetic analysis, the isolate is identified at the complex level |
|||
JF766993 |
Bipolaris sp. |
Bipolaris sp. (Fig. 27S) |
– |
|||
JF766992 |
Bipolaris sp. |
Bipolaris sp. (Fig. 27S) |
– |
|||
JF766991 |
Alternaria sp. |
Alternaria sp. Sect. Alternata (Fig. 3S) |
With ITS phylogenetic analysis, the isolate is identified at the section level |
|||
JF766990 |
Alternaria sp. |
Alternaria sp. Sect. Alternata (Fig. 3S) |
With ITS phylogenetic analysis, the isolate is identified at the section level |
|||
JF767006 |
Colletotrichum sp. |
C. boninense complex (Fig. 8S) |
With ITS phylogenetic analysis, the isolate is identified at the complex level |
|||
JF767005 |
Bipolaris sp. |
Bipolaris sp. (Fig. 27S) |
– |
|||
JF767004 |
Colletotrichum sp. |
C. gloesporioides complex (Fig. 8S) |
With ITS phylogenetic analysis, the isolate is identified at the complex level |
|||
JF766988 |
Phyllosticta capitalensis |
Phyllosticta sp. (Fig. 19S) |
P. paracapitalensis was described after the publication of this paper [38], and using only the ITS sequence, it is not possible to differentiate this species from P. capitalensis |
|||
Sabicea cinerea |
SNB-GSS10 |
KF164383 |
Diaporthe sp. |
Diaporthe sp. (Fig. 25S) |
– |
[57] |
Baccharis trimera |
PS6 |
KM925013 |
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens |
Bacillus sp. section Subtilis (Fig. 5S) |
The isolate did not cluster with any type strain of Bacillus section Subtilis and may represent a new species |
[76] |
M10 |
KM925011 |
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens |
Bacillus sp. section Subtilis (Fig. 5S) |
The isolate did not cluster with any type strain of Bacillus section Subtilis and may represent a new species |
||
M28 |
KM925012 |
Bacillus subtilis |
Bacillus sp. section Subtilis (Fig. 5S) |
The isolate is in the same branch as B. subtilis and B. tequilensis, therefore, using only 16S rRNA, it was not possible to identify the strain at the species level |
||
Musa spp |
ALB629 |
JQ435867 |
Bacillus subtilis |
Bacillus sp. section Subtilis (Fig. 5S) |
The isolate did not cluster with any type strain of Bacillus section Subtilis and may represent a new species |
[40] |
Vochysia divergens |
KY458125 |
Actinomadura sp. |
Actinomadura sp. (Fig. 1S) |
– |
[54] |
|
KY421547 |
Actinomadura sp. |
Actinomadura sp. (Fig. 1S) |
– |
|||
KY411896 |
Aeromicrobium ponti |
Aeromicrobium ponti (Fig. 2S) |
– |
|||
KY411900 |
Microbispora sp. |
Microbispora sp. (Fig. 13S) |
– |
|||
KY411898 |
Microbispora sp. |
Microbispora sp. (Fig. 13S) |
– |
|||
KY423496 |
Micrococcus sp. |
Micrococcus sp. (Fig. 14S) |
– |
|||
KY458126 |
Sphaerisporangium sp. |
Sphaerisporangium sp. (Fig. 22S) |
– |
|||
KY423333 |
S. thermocarboxydus |
Streptomyces sp. (Fig. 24S) |
Housekeeping gene sequences are required for species identification |
|||
KY421546 |
Williamsia serinedens |
Williamsia serinedens (Fig. 23S) |
– |
|||
Microbacterium sp. |
Microbacterium sp. (Fig. 26S) |
– |
Publication History
Article published online:
21 February 2019
© 2019. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany