Die digitale intra- und extraorale Abformung

Digitale Prozessketten gewinnen zunehmend mehr an Bedeutung in der modernen Zahnheilkunde. Zu Beginn jedes digitalen Prozesses steht die Erstellung eines dreidimensionalen Datensatzes durch intra- oder extraorale Scans der Patientensituation. Ziel dieses Beitrages ist es, eine Übersicht über intraorale und extraorale Scanprozesse sowie eine kurze Zusammenfassung der aktuellen Literatur zu dieser Thematik zu geben.

• Literatur

• 1 Groß D. Wer war Philipp Pfaff?. Zahnarztl Mitt 2016; 106: 134
• 2 Chee WW, Donovan TE. Polyvinyl siloxane impression materials: a review of properties and techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 68: 728-732
• 3 Hamalian TA, Nasr E, Chidiac JJ. Impression materials in fixed prosthodontics: influence of choice on clinical procedure. J Prosthodont 2011; 20: 153-160 doi:10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00673.x
• 4 Gorraci C, Franchi L, Vichi A. et al. Accuracy, reliability, and efficiency of intraoral scanners for full-arch impressions: a systematic review of the clinical evidence. Eur J Orthod 2016; 38: 422-428
• 5 Rekow ED. A review of the developments in dental CAD/CAM systems. Curr Opin Dent 1992; 2: 25-33
• 6 Boitelle P, Mawussi B, Tapie L. et al. A systematic review of CAD/CAM fit restoration evaluations. J Oral Rehabil 2014; 41: 853-874 doi:10.1111/joor.12205
• 7 Pott PC, Stiesch M. Digitaler Workflow – computergestützt zur optimalen Patientenversorgung. Bayer Zahnarztebl 2017; 46-51
• 8 Pott PC, Eisenburger M, Borchers L. et al. CAD/CAM Materialien in der Zahnheilkunde – Werkstoffe, Verarbeitung und Biokompatibilität. Dig Dent News 2012; 6: 16-27
• 9 Medina-Sotomayor P, Pascual-Moscardo A, Camps AI. Accuracy of 4 digital scanning systems on prepared teeth digitally isolated from a complete dental arch. J Prosthet Dent 2018;
• 10 Kim RJ, Park JM, Shim JS. Accuracy of 9 intraoral scanners for complete-arch image acquisition: A qualitative and quantitative evaluation. J Prosthet Dent 2018; 120: 895-903.e1
• 11 Treesh JC, Liacouras PC, Taft RM. et al. Complete-arch accuracy of intraoral scanners. J Prosthet Dent 2018; 120: 382-388
• 12 Abdou J, Elseyoufi M. Accuracy of Intraoral Scanners: A Systematic Review of Influencing Factors. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2018; 26: 101-121
• 13 Renne W, Ludlow M, Fryml J. et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: An in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons. J Prosthet Dent 2017; 118: 36-42
• 14 Takeuchi Y, Koizumi H, Furuchi M. et al. Use of digital impression systems with intraoral scanners for fabricating restorations and fixed dental prostheses. J Oral Sci 2018; 60: 1-7
• 15 Malaquti G, Rossi R, Marziali B. et al. In vitro evaluation of prosthodontic impression on natural dentition: a comparison between traditional and digital techniques. Oral Implantol (Rome) 2017; 9: 21-27
• 16 Sason GK, Mistry G, Tabassum R. et al. A comparative evaluation of intraoral and extraoral digital impressions: A in vivo study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2018; 18: 108-116
• 17 Ahrberg D, Lauer HC, Ahrberg M. et al. Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 2016; 20: 291-300
• 18 Lim JH, Park JM, Kim M. et al. Comparison of digital intraoral scanner reproducibility and image trueness considering repetitive experience. J Prosthet Dent 2018; 119: 225-232