Introduction
Vasculitis is inflammation of blood vessel walls and its extent and clinical course
depend on the size and location of the affected vessels [1]. Vasculitides can be classified into large-, medium- and small-sized vessel vasculitis
according to the Chapel Hill Consensus Conference on the Nomenclature of Vasculitidies
[2]. Vasculitis affects various organs including kidneys, skin, joints, lungs, and the
gastrointestinal tract. Among these organs injury, gastrointestinal involvement can
manifest as severe problems such as inflammation, ischemia, hemorrhage, obstruction,
or perforation [3].
Among vasculitides, IgA vasculitis (IgAV) and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis
(EGPA) frequently damage the gastrointestinal tract [4]
[5]
[6]. Endoscopic characteristics of IgAV or EGPA have been described in the literature
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]. To date, however, only a few studies have investigated the entire gastrointestinal
tract in patients with IgAV or EGPA by endoscopy. Furthermore, no previous studies
have compared endoscopic findings between patients with IgAV and EGPA.
We conducted a retrospective analysis to compare clinical, endoscopic and pathological
characteristics between patients with IgAV and those with EGPA whose entire gastrointestinal
tract was examined endoscopically.
Patients and methods
Study population
The current investigation was based on retrospective data collection. We reviewed
medical records at Iwate Medical University, Kyushu University, and Matsuyama Red
Cross Hospital from 2008 to 2017 and identified all patients with a diagnosis of
IgAV or EGPA. Among those patients, we excluded patients in whom gastrointestinal
endoscopy was not performed. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional
Review Board at Iwate Medical University, Kyushu University, and Matsuyama Red Cross
Hospital. The study was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration (6th
revision, 2008).
Data collection
Demographics of study subjects were extracted via chart review. Evaluated characteristics
included age, sex, allergic diseases (bronchial asthma or allergic rhinitis), laboratory
data, organopathy, endoscopic findings, histologic findings, and treatment. Laboratory
assessments included white blood cell (WBC), eosinophil, hemoglobin, platelet, serum
creatinine and C-reactive protein (CRP), and urinalysis to screen for hematuria and
proteinuria before initial treatment. Organopathy included skin involvement (purpura
or urticaria), lung involvement (lung infiltrate, nodules or pleural effusion on chest
radiograph or computed tomography), neurologic involvement, muscle involvement, and
gastrointestinal involvement (abdominal pain, hematemesis, melena, hematochezia, nausea/vomiting,
diarrhea and constipation).
The upper gastrointestinal tract was examined by esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD).
The jejunum and/or ileum was examined by capsule endoscopy (CE) or balloon-assisted
endoscopy (BAE). The colorectum was examined by colonoscopy. Endoscopic examination
was performed when patients manifested clinical symptoms suggestive of gastrointestinal
involvement, such as abdominal pain, hematemesis, melena, hematochezia, nausea, vomiting,
diarrhea and constipation, or when they manifested signs of gastrointestinal bleeding
including hematemesis, melena, hematochezia, and anemia (a hemoglobin level < 10 g/dL).
We also performed endoscopy for asymptomatic patients in consideration of evaluation
of subclinical gastrointestinal involvement or when they had an indication for use
of steroids. Endoscopic examinations were performed within 14 days after onset of
IgAV or EGPA. Endoscopic findings included mucosal erythema, erosion, ulcer, and/or
hematoma-like protrusion.
Characteristic histological findings of IgAV were defined as small vessel vasculitis
with polymorphonuclear leucocyte infiltration (leukocytoclastic vasculitis), while
those of EGPA were defined as small and medium-sized vessel vasculitis, eosinophilic
infiltrates, and/or extravascular granulomas [4]
[11]. As for treatment, steroid, cyclophosphamide, and/or intravenous immunoglobulin
(IVIG) were used. We treated patients with intravenous or oral proton pump inhibitor
(PPI) when they had upper gastrointestinal lesions or they were treated with a steroid.
IgAV and EGPA diagnosis
Diagnosis of IgAV and EGPA was based on American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria
[4]
[12]
[13]. We defined IgAV if patients had two or more of the following four criteria: age
20 or less at disease onset; palpable purpura; acute abdominal pain; and biopsy showing
granulocytes in the walls of small arterioles or venules. Also, we defined EGPA if
patients have four or more of the following six criteria: asthma; eosinophilia greater
than 10 % on differential WBC count; mononeuropathy (including multiplex) or polyneuropathy;
non-fixed pulmonary infiltrates on roentgenography; paranasal sinus abnormality; and
biopsy containing a blood vessel with extravascular eosinophils.
Statistical analysis
Parametric data are expressed as mean ± SD. Nonparametric data are expressed as numbers
and percentages. Comparisons between any two groups were performed by the Mann-Whitney
test or chi-squared test where appropriate. P < 0.05 was considered to be significant. All statistical computations were performed
with JMP version 13 (Statistical Discovery Program, Cary, North Carolina, United States).
Results
Clinical features and laboratory data on IgAV and EGPA
Fifty-two patients who had a diagnosis of IgAV or EGPA (33 IgAV; 19 EGPA). [Table 1] compares clinical and laboratory characteristics between the two groups. There was
no significant difference between them groups in terms of age, gender, hemoglobin
level, platelet count, creatinine level, CRP, or treatment by steroid.
Table 1
Clinical and laboratory characteristics between patients with IgAV and those with
EGPA (%).
|
IgAV patients (n = 33)
|
EGPA patients (n = 19)
|
P value
|
|
Age
|
46.4 ± 24.7
|
56.4 ± 15.3
|
0.2061
|
|
Gender
|
|
|
0.5737
|
|
|
16 (48.5)
|
11 (57.9)
|
|
|
17 (51.5)
|
8 (42.1)
|
|
Allergic diseases
|
|
|
2 (6.1)
|
19 (100)
|
0.0001
|
|
|
0 (0)
|
4 (21.1)
|
0.0143
|
|
Laboratory data
|
|
|
11505 ± 5295
|
24076 ± 5904
|
0.0001
|
|
|
178 ± 165
|
13824 ± 6792
|
0.0001
|
|
|
13.5 ± 2.0
|
13.1 ± 1.7
|
0.3467
|
|
|
268212 ± 95444
|
297000 ± 93761
|
0.3184
|
|
|
1.0 ± 0.9
|
1.0 ± 1.1
|
0.7466
|
|
|
4.5 ± 6.8
|
5.6 ± 5.4
|
0.1898
|
|
|
28 (84.8)
|
3 (15.8)
|
0.0001
|
|
|
27 (81.8)
|
7 (36.8)
|
0.0042
|
|
Site of involvement
|
|
|
33 (100)
|
10 (52.6)
|
0.0001
|
|
|
0 (0)
|
13 (68.4)
|
0.0001
|
|
|
0 (0)
|
16 (84.2)
|
0.0001
|
|
|
0 (0)
|
6 (31.6)
|
0.0013
|
|
|
33 (100)
|
8 (42.1)
|
0.0001
|
|
Treatment
|
|
|
32 (97)
|
19 (100)
|
1
|
|
|
0 (0)
|
3 (15.8)
|
0.0438
|
|
|
0 (0)
|
11 (57.9)
|
0.0001
|
|
|
32 (97)
|
19 (100)
|
1
|
Continuous values are indicated as mean ± SD (standard deviation).
IgAV; IgA vasculitis, EGPA; eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, WBC; white
blood cell, CRP; C-reactive protein, IVIG; intravenous immunoglobulin, PPI; proton
pump inhibitor.
Patients with EGPA more frequently had bronchial asthma (100 %) and allergic rhinitis
(21.1 %) than patients with IgAV (6.1 % and 0 %, respectively). WBC and eosinophil
counts in the peripheral blood at disease onset were significantly higher in patients
with EGPA (24,076 ± 5,904/μL and 13,824 ± 6,792/μL) than in those with IgAV (11,505 ± 5295/μL
and 178 ± 165/μL, respectively). Conversely, rates of microhematuria and proteinuria
were higher in patients with IgAV (84.8 % and 81.8 %) than in those with EGPA (15.8 %
and 36.8 %, respectively).
Regarding symptoms of organopathy, the rate of skin involvement and gastrointestinal
involvement were higher in patients with IgAV (100 % and 100 %, respectively) than
in those with EGPA (52.6 % and 42.1 %, respectively), whereas rates of involvement
of lung, nerve, and muscle were higher in patients with EGPA (68.4 %, 84.2 % and 31.6 %,
respectively) than in those with IgAV (all none).
As for treatments, 51 of 52 patients (98 %) were treated with steroids and PPI ([Table 1]). Cyclophosphamide and IVIG were administered to several patients with EGPA and
none of those with IgAV.
Frequency of endoscopic abnormalities
EGD was performed in all 52 patients. CE or BAE was performed in 27 patients (IgAV
18; EGPA 9). Colonoscopy was performed in 44 patients (IgAV 26; EGPA 18). [Fig. 1] shows frequency of lesions detected by endoscopy. Patients with IgAV had duodenal
lesions more frequently than those with EGPA (75.8 % vs. 21.1 %; P = 0.0002). No significant difference was observed between patients with IgAV and
those with EGPA regarding frequency of lesions in the esophagus, stomach, jejunum/ileum
or colorectum.
Fig. 1 Frequency of lesions see on endoscopy. Esophagus, stomach, and duodenum were observed
in 33 IgAV patients and 19 EGPA patients, the jejunum or ileum was observed in 18
IgAV patients and 9 EGPA patients, and the colorectum was observed for 26 IgAV patients
and 18 EGPA patients. IgAV patients had more lesions in the duodenum than did EGPA
patients (75.8 % of IgAV; 21.1 % of EGPA; P = 0.0002).
EGD findings
EGD findings in patients with IgAV and EGPA are shown in [Table 2] and [Fig. 2]. In the esophagus, ulcer was observed only in one patient with IgAV, and other findings
were not seen in both groups. In the stomach, mucosal erythema was seen in six of
33 patients (18.2 %) with IgAV and none of 19 patients with EGPA (P = 0.0481). Incidence of other gastric lesions and location of each lesion in the
stomach did not differ between the two groups (upper/middle/lower, 7/4/2 in IgAV and
3/0/0 in EGPA).
Table 2
Endoscopic findings in patients with IgAV and EGPA (%).
|
IgAV patients
|
EGPA patients
|
P value
|
|
EGD findings
|
n = 33
|
n = 19
|
|
|
Esophagus
|
|
|
0 (0)
|
0 (0)
|
0
|
|
|
0 (0)
|
0 (0)
|
0
|
|
|
1 (3.0)
|
0 (0)
|
1
|
|
|
0 (0)
|
0 (0)
|
0
|
|
Stomach
|
|
|
6 (18.2)
|
0 (0)
|
0.0481
|
|
|
5 (15.2)
|
2 (10.5)
|
1
|
|
|
2 (6.1)
|
1 (5.3)
|
1
|
|
|
1 (3.0)
|
0 (0)
|
1
|
|
Duodenum
|
|
|
18 (54.6)
|
4 (21.1)
|
0.0227
|
|
|
2 (6.1)
|
4 (21.1)
|
0.1751
|
|
|
11 (33.3)
|
0 (0)
|
0.0041
|
|
|
7 (21.1)
|
0 (0)
|
0.039
|
|
CE or BAE findings
|
n = 18
|
n = 9
|
|
|
|
13 (72.2)
|
3 (33.3)
|
0.0969
|
|
|
10 (55.6)
|
4 (44.4)
|
0.6946
|
|
|
10 (55.6)
|
5 (55.6)
|
1
|
|
|
3 (16.7)
|
0 (0)
|
0.5292
|
|
Colonoscopic findings
|
n = 26
|
n = 18
|
|
|
|
10 (38.5)
|
9 (50)
|
0.5419
|
|
|
8 (30.8)
|
9 (50)
|
0.225
|
|
|
6 (23.1)
|
3 (16.7)
|
0.7161
|
|
|
4 (15.4)
|
0 (0)
|
0.1327
|
IgAV; IgA vasculitis, EGPA; eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, EGD; esophagogastroduodenoscopy,
CE; capsule endoscopy, BAE; balloon-assisted endoscopy
Fig. 2 Esophagogastroduodenoscopic findings in patients with IgA vasculitis (a, b, c ,d, g, h, i, j) and those with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (e, f, k, l). a Mucosal erythemas in the middle third of the stomach. b Erosions in the lower third of the stomach. c Ulcer in the middle third of the stomach. d Hematoma-like protrusion in the middle third of the stomach. e Erosions in the lower third of the stomach. f Ulcer in the middle third of the stomach. g, k Mucosal erythemas in the duodenum. h, l Erosions in the duodenum. i Ulcers in the duodenum. j Hematoma-like protrusion in the duodenum.
In the duodenum, mucosal erythema (IgAV 54.6 %; EGPA 21.1 %, P = 0.0227), ulcer (IgAV 33.3 %; EGPA 0 %, P = 0.0041), and hematoma-like protrusion (IgAV 21.1 %; EGPA 0 %, P = 0.039) were observed more frequently in patients with IgAV than in those with EGPA.
Incidence of erosion was no different between the two groups. Lesions were more frequently
located on the second portion of the duodenum in patients with IgAV (bulb/2nd portion,
12/22) than in those with EGPA (bulb/2nd portion, 3/4; P = 0.0034). All patients with IgAV or EGPA who had EGD findings had multiple lesions.
CE or BAE findings
CE and/or BAE findings in patients with IgAV and EGPA are shown in [Table 2] and [Fig. 3]. Incidence of mucosal erythema, erosion, ulcer or hematoma-like protrusion did not
differ between two groups. All patients with IgAV or EGPA who had CE or BAE findings
had multiple lesions. Lesion location was no different between the two groups (jejunum/ileum,
17/15 in IgAV; 7/7 in EGPA).
Fig. 3 a, b, c, d Capsule or balloon-assisted endoscopic in patients with IgA vasculitis and e, f, g those with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. a Mucosal erythemas in the ileum. b Erosions in the ileum. c Ulcers in the jejunum. d Hematoma-like protrusion in the jejunum. e Mucosal erythema in the jejunum. f Erosions in the ileum. g Ulcer in the jejunum.
Colonoscopic findings
Colonoscopic findings in patients with IgAV and EGPA are shown in [Table 2] and [Fig. 4]. Incidence of mucosal erythema, erosion, ulcer or hematoma-like protrusion did not
differ between the two groups. Lesion location was no different between the two groups
(cecum to transverse colon/descending colon to rectum, 10/10 in IgAV; 4/12 in EGPA).
Fig. 4 a, b, c, d Colonoscopic findings in patients with IgA vasculitis and e, f, g those with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. a Mucosal erythemas in the descending colon. b Erosion in the rectum. c Ulcer in the ascending colon. d Hematoma-like protrusion in ascending colon. e Mucosal erythemas in the rectum. f Erosions in the rectum. g Ulcer in the rectum.
Endoscopic findings in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding
Symptoms and endoscopic findings in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding are shown
in [Table 3]. There were nine patients with IgAV and two patients with EGPA who manifested gastrointestinal
bleeding. Seven patients had hematochezia, two patients had melena and anemia, and
one patient had hematemesis. Under EGD, one patient had esophageal lesions, three
patients had gastric lesions, and six patients had duodenal lesions. CE or BAE was
performed in seven patients, all of whom had small bowel lesions. Of nine patients
examined by colonoscopy, four patients had colorectal lesions. However, none of those
11 patients with gastrointestinal bleeding were treated with endoscopic hemostasis.
Table 3
Endoscopic findings in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding.
|
Cases
|
Age/sex
|
Clinical diagnosis
|
Signs of gastrointestinal bleeding
|
EGD findings
|
CE or BAE findings
|
Colonoscopic findings
|
Endoscopic hemostasis
|
|
1
|
83/M
|
IgAV
|
Hematemesis
|
Mucosal erythemas and hematoma-like protrusions (D)
|
Ulcers
|
Normal
|
NP
|
|
2
|
64/F
|
IgAV
|
Hematochezia
|
Normal
|
Mucosal erythemas and erosions
|
Normal
|
NP
|
|
3
|
25/M
|
IgAV
|
Hematochezia
|
Mucosal erythemas (D)
|
Mucosal erythemas, erosions and hematoma-like protrusions
|
Mucosal erythemas and erosions
|
NP
|
|
4
|
20/M
|
IgAV
|
Hematochezia
|
Mucosal erythemas (D)
|
NE
|
Mucosal erythemas, erosions and hematoma-like protrusions
|
NP
|
|
5
|
78/M
|
IgAV
|
Melena, anemia
|
Ulcers (E, S, D), and hematoma-like protrusions (D)
|
NE
|
NE
|
NP
|
|
6
|
55/M
|
IgAV
|
Melena
|
Mucosal erythemas and ulcers (S, D)
|
Ulcers
|
Normal
|
NP
|
|
7
|
73/F
|
IgAV
|
Anemia
|
Normal
|
NE
|
NE
|
NP
|
|
8
|
53/M
|
IgAV
|
Hematochezia
|
Normal
|
Mucosal erythemas, erosions and ulcers
|
Normal
|
NP
|
|
9
|
68/F
|
IgAV
|
Hematochezia
|
Ulcers and hematoma-like protrusions (D)
|
Mucosal erythemas, ulcers and hematoma-like protrusions
|
Normal
|
NP
|
|
10
|
61/M
|
EGPA
|
Hematochezia
|
Normal
|
Ulcers
|
Mucosal erythemas and ulcers
|
NP
|
|
11
|
27/M
|
EGPA
|
Hematochezia
|
Ulcers (S)
|
NE
|
Mucosal erythemas
|
NP
|
M; male, F; female, IgAV; IgA vasculitis, EGPA; eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis,
EGD; esophagogastroduodenoscopy, D; duodenum, E; esophagus, S; stomach, CE; capsule
endoscopy, BAE; balloon-assisted endoscopy, NE; not examined, NP; not performed.
Response to therapy in gastrointestinal involvement of IgAV and EGPA
Follow-up endoscopy was performed in a certain proportion of patients with IgAV or
EGPA after treatment. Follow-up endoscopy included EGD in 17 patients (15 patients
with IgAV and two patients with EGPA), CE or BAE in seven patients (four patients
with IgAV and three patients with EGPA), colonoscopy in 12 patients (seven patients
with IgAV and five patients with EGPA). Follow-up examinations revealed that the preceding
lesions had healed or completely disappeared. All patients were treated with a steroid
and PPI. Two patients with EGPA and one patient with EGPA were treated with IVIG and
cyclophosphamide, respectively.
Characteristic histologic findings in IgAV and EGPA
Characteristic histologic findings – leukocytoclastic vasculitis, eosinophilic infiltration,
small-seized vessel vasculitis, and extravascular granuloma – in IgAV and EGPA are
shown in [Fig. 5]. Biopsy specimens were taken from the skin, esophagus, stomach, duodenum, jejunum/ileum
and colorectum in 41 (IgAV 31; EGPA 10), 11 (IgAV 3; EGPA 8), 36 (IgAV 23; EGPA 13),
50 (IgAV 35; EGPA 15), 31 (IgAV 21; EGPA 10), and 35 (IgAV 18; EGPA 17) patients,
respectively. The rate of detection of the above characteristic histologic findings
in all regions did not differ between the two groups (IgAV, skin 83.9 %, esophagus
0%, stomach 4.4 %, duodenum 17.1 %, jejunum/ileum 14.3 %, colorectum 11.1 %; EGPA,
skin 80 %, esophagus 12.5 %, stomach 23.1 %, duodenum 26.7 %, jejunum/ileum 30 %,
colorectum 29.4 %).
Fig. 5 Characteristic histologic findings in a IgA vasculitis and b, c, d eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. a Leukocytoclastic vasculitis. b Eosinophilic infiltration. c Small-sized vessel vasculitis. d Extravascular granuloma.
Discussion
In the current study, we found more frequent gastric mucosal erythema, duodenal lesions
including erythema, ulcer and hematoma-like protrusion in patients with IgAV than
in those with EGPA. We also revealed that incidence of jejunoileal involvement was
high in both patients with IgAV and those with EGPA.
IgAV, previously referred to as Henoch-Schönlein purpura, is a systemic small-vessel
vasculitis that develops via an allergic mechanism and is characterized by purpura
associated with leukocytoclastic vasculitis [2]. Gastrointestinal symptoms occur in up to 85 % of patients with IgAV [14]. Therefore, endoscopy has been used to detect the gastrointestinal involvement in
IgAV. Nishiyama et al. [8] reported that gastrointestinal involvement under EGD and colonoscopy was observed
in seven of 10 cases (70 %) in the stomach and in the duodenum, five cases (50 %)
in the terminal ileum, and six cases (60 %) in the colon. In a report of seven cases
by Esaki et al. [9], involvement with IgAV was found in two cases (28.6 %) in the stomach, six cases
(85.7%) in the duodenum, six cases (85.7 %) in the ileum, and four cases (57.1 %)
in the colon.
On the other hand, EGPA, formerly known as Churg-Strauss syndrome, is a multisystem
disorder characterized by allergic granulomatosis and necrotizing vasculitis developing
after the appearance of peripheral and tissue eosinophilia [2]
[6]. The gastrointestinal tract is involved in approximately 20 % to 50 % of patients
with EGPA. Pagnoux C et al. [15] reported that incidence of gastrointestinal involvement using EGD and colonoscopy
was 17 of 62 cases (27 %) using EGD and six of 62 cases (10 %) using colonoscopy.
In those studies, however, the entire gastrointestinal tract was not examined by endoscopy.
To our knowledge, no previous studies have examined entire gastrointestinal tracts
in patients with IgAV or EGPA using EGD, CE, BAE and colonoscopy.
Our results showed that incidence of esophago-gastric involvement was low, that of
colorectal involvement was intermediate, and that of jejunoileal involvement was high
in patients with both diseases. In addition, incidence of duodenal involvement was
higher in patients with IgAV than in those with EGPA. The previously reported incidence
of esophago-gastric and colorectal involvement was unstable, because the number of
cases in the previous studies is small. However, our results suggested that IgAV seems
to involve predominantly the small bowel including the duodenum.
Endoscopic findings of IgAV were first reported in 1973 [16]. Akadamar et al. [16] showed that the main endoscopic findings of IgAV in the stomach and duodenum were
mucosal congestion, redness, petechial, multiple ulcers, nodular change and hematoma-like
protrusion. In another study, it thus seems likely that multiple irregular ulcers
in the second portion are characteristic of duodenal involvement in IgAV [9]. As for colonoscopic findings in patients with IgAV, only a few case series or reports
are available. Zhang et al. [7] showed that erythema, edema and petechia were common in the colon. There have been
several cases regarding the diagnostic role of CE in patients with IgAV. The main
endoscopic findings were erythema throughout the small bowel, and severe erosions
or ulcers were found in some cases [17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]. In the current study, we also confirmed similar findings in our patients. Thus,
the above-mentioned endoscopic findings are considered characteristic in the entire
gastrointestinal tract including the jejunoileum of patients with IgAV.
As for patients with EGPA, only a few studies with endoscopic findings are available,
probably because most of the gastrointestinal lesions previously discussed have been
in patients with gastrointestinal tract perforation [22]
[23]. In such previous studies, ulcers or erythematous and nodular mucosa in the stomach,
and/or ulcers or multiple small polyps in the duodenum were identified [15]
[24]. In some case reports, CE or BAE revealed that erosions, submucosal edema with lymphangiectasias
and erythema, or ulcers of various shapes, such as multiple punched-out, small or
irregular ulcers, were seen in the jejunum and ileum [25]
[26]
[27]
[28]. Colonoscopy showed mucosal erythema, erosion, ulceration, dark red sign or various
red flares [10]
[29]. In the current study, we also confirmed similar findings in our patients. Thus,
the above-mentioned endoscopic findings in the entire gastrointestinal tract seem
characteristic in EGPA.
In the current investigation, we compared endoscopic findings between patients with
IgAV and those with EGPA. As a result, mucosal erythema in the stomach, and mucosal
erythema, ulcer, and hematoma-like protrusion in the duodenum were seen more frequently
in patients with IgAV than in those with EGPA. Incidence of mucosal erythema, erosion,
ulcer or hematoma-like protrusion in the jejunum/ileum and colorectum was no different
between the two groups. In a previous study regarding EGD findings in primary vasculitis,
the duodenum was the most frequently involved site [30]. Also, EGD findings including erosion, petechiae, submucosal hemorrhage or ulcers
were seen in 142 of 148 patients (95.9 %). However, that study did not clarify what
EGD findings are characteristic of each disease.
To date, no previous studies have compared characteristic endoscopic findings between
patients with IgAV and EGPA. In the current study, we compared the endoscopic findings
between the two groups. As a consequence, we found that incidence of jejunoileal involvement
was high in both groups, and we also presume that gastric mucosal erythema, and mucosal
erythema, ulcer, and hematoma-like protrusion in the duodenum may be characteristic
endoscopic signs for IgAV.
There have only been a few studies on frequency of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients
with IgAV and EGPA. In previous studies, clinical signs of gastrointestinal bleeding
were found in 17 % to 49 % of patients with IgAV and 9 % of patients with EGPA [7]
[8]
[9]
[31]
[32]. Our results showed that frequency of gastrointestinal bleeding was 27 % (9 of 33)
in patients with IgAV and 11 % (2 of 19 patients) in patients with EGPA. We can also
confirm that gastrointestinal involvement of IgAV and EGPA favorably responds to therapy
regardless of presence of bleeding. There have been several case series showing fair
to good response of gastrointestinal lesions in the diseases observed by endoscopy
[7]
[20]
[28]
[29]. It thus seems likely that medical treatment is the first choice of treatment for
gastrointestinal involvement in IgAV and EGPA.
We can also confirm that incidence of characteristic histologic findings in the gastrointestinal
tract was lower compared with that of the skin. Histopathological findings of IgAV
are characterized by leukocytoclastic vasculitis [4]. Nishiyama et al. [8] reported that all 11 biopsy specimens from EGD and colonoscopy in patients with
IgAV showed nonspecific inflammatory cell infiltration and diagnoses were made from
skin biopsies. The main histopathological findings in EGPA are extravascular granulomas,
small and medium-sized vessels vasculitis, and eosinophilic infiltrates [11]. These findings are rarely seen on biopsy sections. This was probably because most
biopsies are limited to the superficial portion of the mucosa and cannot reach the
deeper vessels. A vasculitis diagnosis should be made with consideration of all clinical
and pathologic information, but gastrointestinal involvement in patients with vasculitis
may be life-threatening because of complications such as severe ischemia, infarction,
and perforation. Therefore, accurate diagnosis and early treatment is important to
avoid fatal outcomes, and endoscopic examination helps to define the site and extent
of gastrointestinal involvement.
The current study has some limitations. We were not able to examine the entire gastrointestinal
tract in all the patients diagnosed as having IgAV or EGPA from 2008 to 2017. Considering
the rarity of the disease, we consider that our 52 patients are a decent number on
which to base a study on IgAV and EGPA. In addition, this was retrospective study
with a small sample size. Additional prospective studies of large cohorts are, therefore,
needed in the near future.
Conclusion
In conclusion, our study revealed frequent duodenal involvement, gastric mucosal erythema,
and duodenal mucosal erythema, ulcer, and hematoma-like protrusion in patients with
IgAV. We also foound that incidence of jejunoileal involvement was high in patients
with IgAV and those with EGPA. These findings support use of small-bowel endoscopy
as a helpful procedure for diagnosis of small-bowel lesions in IgAV or EGPA.