Anästhesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 2020; 55(05): 334-339
DOI: 10.1055/a-1002-8080
Im Fokus
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Barrieren für Gespräche über Tod und Sterben in der Medizin

Barriers to Conversations About Death and Dying in the Medicine
Carola Seifart
,
Katharina Nagelschmidt
,
Pia von Blanckenburg
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
20. Mai 2020 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Für viele Menschen sind Tod und Sterben etwas Schmerzliches (in vielerlei Hinsicht), dessen Vorstellung tiefgründige, starke Ängste berührt oder auslöst. Häufig wird versucht, das Thema zu vermeiden und von sich weg zu schieben. In der Medizin aber lässt sich das Thema nicht aussparen – und es gibt gute Gründe, gerade darüber zu sprechen.

Abstract

Conversations about death, dying and the end of life are usually difficult. They can turn out to be both a burden and a challenge for those engaging in these talks. There is evidence that talking early about end-of-life-topics shows positive effects concerning medical and psychological conditions of patients. Open communication addressing these topics can be part of family- and patient-centered talks in an intensive care department, known as a quality indicator of intensive care medicine. Further, these conversations are important and necessary in palliative care for providing a “good death”. Nevertheless, these conversations are delayed or do not take place due to communication barriers of doctors, patients and caregivers. Barriers to end of life communication of physicians contain individual, personal or role-specific factors, lack of medical knowledge, including insecurities of prognosis, professional attitudes, clinical routines and the worry of harming patients with these talks. Regarding barriers to communication of patients and their family members, it could be differentiated between emotional, cognitive, relationship-related and external factors. It could be valuable to recognize these barriers to increase the possibility of end of life conversations in the near future.

In daily medical routine end of life topics should be addressed early and actively. Especially the readiness for these conversations should be tested repeatedly and talks should be offered regularly. Critical events such as relapse, modulating therapy concepts and knowledge of unrealistic treatment expectations should be regarded as prompts to offer conversations about dying and end-of-life care actively.

Kernaussagen
  • Das Sprechen über Tod und Sterben ist schwierig und wird wegen vielfältiger Barrieren bei Ärzten, Patienten und Angehörigen häufig vermieden.

  • Eine frühzeitige Kommunikation über Sterben und die letzte Lebensphase kann positive medizinische und psychologische Effekte haben und sollte im medizinischen Kontext nicht ausgespart werden.

  • Barrieren auf ärztlicher Seite lassen sich neben persönlichen und rollenspezifischen den Bereichen (klinisches) Wissen, prognostische Unsicherheit, (berufliche) Einstellungen, klinische Routinen sowie der Sorge um die Auswirkungen auf Patienten zuordnen.

  • Auf Patienten- und Angehörigenseite gibt es emotionale, kognitive, kommunikative, beziehungsbezogene und externe Barrieren.

  • Gespräche sollten immer wieder angeboten und die Gesprächsbereitschaft geprüft werden. Klinisch kritische Ereignisse, Rezidive, Umstellung auf ein palliativmedizinisches Therapiekonzept und das Wissen um unrealistische Erwartungen sollten Anlässe sein, ein Gespräch über Sterben und die Versorgung am Lebensende anzubieten.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Fabrizio E, Vergano M, DeMeglio L. The patient who felt from a skycraper. Intensive Care Med 2018; 44: 1770
  • 2 You JJ, Dodek P, Lamontagne F. et al. What matters in end-of-life-discussions? Perspective of patients in hospital with serious illness and their families. CMAJ 2014; 186: E679-687
  • 3 Brighton LJ, Bristowe K. Communication in palliative care: talking about the end of life, before the end of life. Postgrad Med J 2016; 92: 466-470
  • 4 Leung JM, Udris EM, Uman J. et al. The effect of end-of-life-discussions on perceived quality of care and health status among patients with COPD. Chest 2012; 142: 128-133
  • 5 Heyland DK, Ilan R, Jiang X. et al. The prevalence of medical error related to end-of-life communication in Canadian hospitals: results of a multicentre observational study. BMJ Qual Safety 2016; 25: 671-679
  • 6 Wright AA, Zhang B, Ray A. et al. Associations between end-of-life discussions, patient mental health, medical care near death, and caregiver bereavement adjustment. JAMA 2008; 300: 1665-1673
  • 7 Mesters I, van den Borne H, McCormick L. et al. Openness to Discuss Cancer in the Nuclear Family. Psychosom Med 1997; 59: 269-279
  • 8 Fried TR, Bradley EH, OʼLeary JR. et al. Unmet Desire for Caregiver-Patient Communication and Increased Caregiver Burden. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005; 53: 59-65
  • 9 Park EM, Check DK, Yopp JM. et al. An exploratory study of end of life prognostic communication needs as reported by widowed fathers due to cancer. Psychooncology 2015; 24: 1471-1476
  • 10 Shirado A, Morita T, Akazawa T. et al. Both maintaining hope and preparing death: effects of physiciansʼ and nursesʼ behaviours from bereaved family membersʼ perspectives. J Pain Symptom Manage 2013; 45: 848-858
  • 11 Keeley MP. ‘Turning toward death together’: The functions of messages during final conversations in close relationships. J Soc Pers Relat 2007; 24: 225-253
  • 12 Yamashita R, Arao H, Takao A. et al. Unfinished Business in Families of Terminally Ill With Cancer Patients. J Pain Symptom Manage 2017; 54: 861-869
  • 13 Zhang AY, Siminoff LA. Silence and Cancer: Why Do Families and Patients Fail To Communicate?. Health Communic 2003; 15: 415-429
  • 14 Waller A, Sanson-Fisher R, Zdenkowski N. et al. The Right Place at the Right Time: Medical Oncology Outpatientsʼ Perceptions of Location of End-of-Life Care. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2018; 16: 35-41
  • 15 Leung JM, Udris EM, Uman J. et al. The effect of end-of-life-discussions on perceived quality of care and health status among patients with COPD. Chest 2012; 142: 128-133
  • 16 Davidson SN. End-of-life care prefernces and needs: perceptions of patients with chronic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010; 5: 195-204
  • 17 Seifart C, Riera Knorrenschild J, Hofmann M. et al. Let us talk about death: gender effects in cancer patientsʼ preferences for end-of-life discussions. Support Care Cancer 2020; DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-05275-1.
  • 18 Almack K, Cox K, Moghaddam N. et al. After you: conversations between patients and healthcare professionals in planning for end of life care. BMC Palliat Care 2012; 11: 15
  • 19 Visser M, Deliens L, Houttekier D. Physician related barriers to communication and patient-family centered decision making towards the end of life in intensive care: a systematic review. Crit Care 2014; 18: 604-623
  • 20 Granek L, Krzyzanowska MK, Tozer R. et al. Oncologistsʼ strategies and barriers to effective communication about the end of life. J Oncol Pract 2013; 9: e129-e135
  • 21 Hancock JM, Clayton JM, Parker SM. et al. Truth-telling in discussing prognosis in advanced life-limiting illnesses: a systematic review. Palliative Medicine 2007; 21: 507-517
  • 22 Pfeil TA, Laryionava K. Reiter-Theil. et al. What keeps oncologists from addressing palliative care early on with incurable cancer patients? An active stance seems key. Oncologist 2015; 20: 56-61
  • 23 Piggott KL, Patel A, Wong A. et al. Breaking silence: a survey of barriers to goals of care discussions from the perspective of oncology practitioners. BMC Cancer 2019; 19: 130
  • 24 You J, Downar J, Fowler R. et al. Barriers to goals of care discussions with seriously ill hospitalized patients and their families: a multicenter survey of clinicians. JAMA Intern Med 2015; 175: 549-556
  • 25 Pattisin N, Carr SM, Turnock C. et al. ‘Viewing slow motion’: patientsʼ, familiesʼ, and doctorsʼ perspectives on end-of-life treatment intensity. J Clin Nurs 2013; 22: 1442-1454
  • 26 Barnato AE, Tate JA, Rodriguez KL. et al. Norms of decision making in the ICU: a case study of two medical centers at the extremes of end-of-life treatment intensity. Intensive Care Med 2012; 38: 1886-1896
  • 27 Jox RJ, Schaider A, Marchmann G. et al. Medical futility at the end of life: the perspectives of intensive care and palliative care clinicians. J Med Ethics 2012; 38: 540-545
  • 28 Klinkhammer G. „Sterben in Deutschland“. Leben mit dem Tod. Dt Ärztebl 2012; 109: 547
  • 29 Meeker MA, Jezewski MA. Family decision making at end of life. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2005; 3: 131-142
  • 30 De Heer G, Saugel B, Sensen B. et al. Advance directives and powers of attorney in intensive care patients. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2017; 114: 363-370
  • 31 Nagelschmidt K, Leppin N, Seifart C. et al. “The word ‘death’ … is almost like a voodoo word” – A Systematic Mixed Method Review of Barriers to End-of-Life Communication in the Family Context. BMJ Support Palliat Care [submitted].
  • 32 Fried TR, OʼLeary JR. Using the experiences of bereaved caregivers to inform patient- and caregiver-centered advance care planning. J Gen Intern Med 2008; 23: 1602-1607
  • 33 Towsley GL, Hirschman KB, Madde C. Conversations about End of Life: Perspectives of Nursing Home Residents, Family, and Staff. Palliat Med 2015; 18: 421-428
  • 34 Bachner YG, Carmel S. Open Communication Between Caregivers and Terminally Ill Cancer Patients: The Role of Caregiversʼ Characteristics and Situational Variables. Health Communic 2009; 24: 524-531
  • 35 Lum HD, Jordan SR, Brungardt A. et al. Framing advance care planning in Parkinson disease: Patient and care partner perspectives. Neurology 2019; 92: e2571-e2579