Pharmacopsychiatry 2020; 53(03): 115-121
DOI: 10.1055/a-1083-6842
Original Paper
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Buprenorphine/Naloxone Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder: Clinical Feasibility and Optimizing Assay Precision

Hesham Farouk Elarabi
1   National Rehabilitation Center, UAE, Shakhbout City, United Arab Emirates
2   King’s College London, Addictions, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
,
Nael Hasan
1   National Rehabilitation Center, UAE, Shakhbout City, United Arab Emirates
,
John Marsden
2   King’s College London, Addictions, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
,
Doaa Radwan
1   National Rehabilitation Center, UAE, Shakhbout City, United Arab Emirates
3   Faculty of Medicine, Institue of Psychiatry, Ain Shams University Cairo, Egypt
,
Abdu Adem
4   Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, UAE University College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
,
Samya Almamari
1   National Rehabilitation Center, UAE, Shakhbout City, United Arab Emirates
,
Abuelgasim Elrasheed
1   National Rehabilitation Center, UAE, Shakhbout City, United Arab Emirates
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received 27 May 2019
revised 24 November 2019

accepted 06 December 2019

Publication Date:
30 January 2020 (online)

Abstract

Introduction Compliance with sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone (SL-BUP/NX) is associated with higher abstinence from illicit opioid use. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has been recommended for adherence monitoring of buprenorphine (BUP) maintenance treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD), but to date there have been no reported clinical applications. In this TDM feasibility study, we investigated BUP assay precision in 15 adults with OUD who had been stabilized on buprenorphine/naloxone.

Methods Using solid phase extraction, BUP recovery was contrasted at 100 mMol and 1 Molar of acetic acid wash solution. Precision was determined by applying the condition generating highest recovery using 0.2 ng/mL and 10 ng/mL standards. Four blood samples were drawn to examine the BUP peak and trough plasma concentrations, and BUP elimination rate was estimated. BUP recovery was examined again in a random sample and contrasted with the concentration predicted applying first-order kinetics.

Results Higher BUP recovery was achieved with 1 Molar wash (94.3%; p=0.05). Precision ranged from 15–20%. The estimated limit of detection (LoD) and limit of quantitation (LoQ) were 0.02 and 0.069 ng/mL, respectively. BUP peak and trough concentrations were successfully examined, and BUP trough concentrations were replicated confirming steady state. BUP concentrations were predicted at a variance of −7.20% to 1.54 %.

Conclusions TDM for BUP maintenance treatment of OUD is feasible, and simple adjustment of the assay conditions enhances BUP recovery.

Supporting Information