Anwendung von lingualen Apparaturen in der kieferorthopädischen Praxis

Festsitzende kieferorthopädische Behandlungsapparaturen haben viele Vorteile: Sie ermöglichen dreidimensionale Zahnbewegungen, sind weitgehend von der Patientenkooperation unabhängig, und der Behandler hat ein Maximum an Kontrolle über den mehrphasigen Therapieverlauf. Dabei ist es zunächst theoretisch gleich, ob die Attachments lingual oder vestibulär fixiert sind. Dieser Beitrag stellt vollständig individualisierte linguale Apparaturen vor.

Schlüsselwörter

Torquekontrolle - Setup - Interbracketabstand - Bogenform - Lernprozess

• Literatur

• 1 Wiechmann D. A new bracket system for lingual orthodontic treatment. Part 1: Theoretical background and development. J Orofac Orthop 2002; 63: 234-245
• 2 Grauer D, Proffit WR. Accuracy in tooth positioning with a fully customized lingual orthodontic appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 140: 433-443
• 3 Lossdörfer S, Bieber C, Schwestka-Polly R. et al. Analysis of the torque capacity of a completely customized lingual appliance of the next generation. Head Face Med 2014; 10: 4
• 4 van der Veen MH, Attin R, Schwestka-Polly R. et al. Caries outcomes after orthodontics treatment with fixed appliances: do lingual brackets make a difference?. Eur J Oral Sci 2010; 118: 298-303
• 5 Geron S, Romano R, Brosh T. Vertical forces in labial and lingual orthodontics applied on maxillary incisors – a theoretical approach. Angle Orthod 2004; 74: 195-201
• 6 Archambault A, Major TW, Carey JP. et al. A comparison of torque expression between stainless steel, titanium molybdenum alloy, and copper nickel titanium wires in metallic self-ligating brackets. Angle Orthod 2010; 80: 884-889
• 7 Cash AC, Good SA, Curtis RV. et al. An evaluation of slot size in orthodontic brackets – are standards as expected?. Angle Orthod 2004; 74: 450-453
• 8 Creekmore TD. Dr. Thomas D. Creekmore on torque. J Clin Orthod 1979; 13: 305-310
• 9 Fischer-Brandies H, Orthuber W, Es-Souni M. et al. Torque transmission between square wire and bracket as a function of measurement, form and hardness parameters. J Orofac Orthop 2000; 61: 258-265
• 10 Harzer W, Bourauel C, Gmyrek H. Torque capacity of metal and polycarbonate brackets with and without a metal slot. Eur J Orthod 2004; 26: 435-441
• 11 Hemingway R, Williams RL, Hunt JA. et al. The influence of bracket type on the force delivery of Ni-Ti archwires. Eur J Orthod 2001; 23: 233-241
• 12 Huang Y, Keilig L, Rahimi A. et al. Numeric modeling of torque capabilities of self-ligating and conventional brackets. J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 136: 638-643
• 13 Morina E, Eliades T, Pandis N. et al. Torque expression of self-ligating brackets compared with conventional metallic, ceramic, and plastic brackets. Eur J Orthod 2008; 30: 233-238
• 14 Schudy GF, Schudy FF. Interbracket space and interbracket distance: critical factors in clinical orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989; 96: 281-294
• 15 Stamm T, Wiechmann D, Heinecken A. et al. Relation between second and third order problems in lingual orthodontic treatment. J Ling Orthod 2000; 1: 5-11
• 16 Creekmore T. Lingual orthodontics – its renaissance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989; 96: 120-137
• 17 Sifakakis I, Pandis N, Makou M. et al. A comparative assessment of torque generated by lingual and conventional brackets. Eur J Orthod 2013; 35: 375-380
• 18 Knosel M, Jung K, Gripp-Rudolph L. et al. Changes in incisor third-order inclination resulting from vertical variation in lingual bracket placement. Angle Orthod 2009; 79: 747-754
• 19 Siekmann H, Trexler A, Wiechmann D. Das Finishing bei kieferorthopädischer Behandlung mit einer vollständig individuellen lingualen Apparatur. Inf Orthod Kieferorthop 2012; 44: 81-86 doi:10.1055/s-0032-1321813