PDF herunterladen
Int J Sports Med 2020; 41(10): 696-704
DOI: 10.1055/a-1122-8995
Orthopedics & Biomechanics

Evolution of Functional Recovery using Hop Test Assessment after ACL Reconstruction

Alexandre J.M. Rambaud 
1   Univ Lyon, UJM-Saint-Etienne, Laboratoire Interuniversitaire de Biologie de la Motricité, EA 7424, F-42023 Saint-Etienne, France
2   SFMKS-Lab, SFMKS, Pierrefitte/Seine, France
,
Jérémy Rossi
1   Univ Lyon, UJM-Saint-Etienne, Laboratoire Interuniversitaire de Biologie de la Motricité, EA 7424, F-42023 Saint-Etienne, France
,
Thomas Neri
1   Univ Lyon, UJM-Saint-Etienne, Laboratoire Interuniversitaire de Biologie de la Motricité, EA 7424, F-42023 Saint-Etienne, France
3   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France
,
Pierre Samozino
4   Univ Savoie Mont Blanc, Laboratoire Interuniversitaire de Biologie de la Motricité, EA 7424, F-73000 Chambéry, France
,
Pascal Edouard
1   Univ Lyon, UJM-Saint-Etienne, Laboratoire Interuniversitaire de Biologie de la Motricité, EA 7424, F-42023 Saint-Etienne, France
5   Department of Exercise and clinical Physiology -Sports Medicine Unit, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France
› Institutsangaben
Funding: This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate improvements in functional performance through the use of the Limb Symmetry Index of Single and Triple Hop tests between 12 and 52 weeks after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, and to compare these values with usual time-based and performance-based criteria used during the return to sport continuum. Repeated functional assessments using Single and Triple Hop Tests at 12, 16, 22, 26, 39 and 52 postoperative weeks were evaluated. At each session, the median and interquartile range of Limb Symmetry Index of tests were calculated and compared with the usual criteria: return to participation:≥85%, between 12–16 w; return to play:≥90%, between 26–39 w. The results indicate that the median increased over time to 39 postoperative weeks and then stabilized. For Single Hop Test, wide variability was seen at 12 and 16 weeks (interquartile range=20%); this was lower from 22 to 52 weeks (interquartile range=8–6%). At 12 weeks for Single Hop Test, the median was 83.6% and did not meet>85% criteria for return to participation. Hop tests could be interesting functional tests to follow the functional recovery and help decision-making regarding return to participation and return to play.

Key words

knee - ACLR - one-leg hop tests - lower limb capacities - functional testing - return to sport

Appendix



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 15. November 2019

Angenommen: 08. Februar 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
12. Mai 2020

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Stuttgart · New York

 

  • References

  • 1 Collins JE, Katz JN, Donnell-Fink LA. et al. Cumulative incidence of Acl reconstruction after Acl injury in adults role of age, sex, and race. Am J Sports Med 2013; 41: 544-549
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Prodromos CC, Han Y, Rogowski J. et al. A meta-analysis of the incidence of anterior cruciate ligament tears as a function of gender, sport, and a knee injury-reduction regimen. Arthroscopy 2007; 23: 1320-1325
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Frobell RB, Roos HP, Roos EM. et al. Treatment for acute anterior cruciate ligament tear: Five year outcome of randomised trial. BMJ 2013; 346: f232
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 van Melick N, Hoogeboom T, Pronk Y. et al. Only 19% of pivoting athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction meets return-to-play (RTP) criteria when their physical therapist releases them to RTP. Phys Ther Sport 2017; 28: e20-e21
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Ardern CL, Glasgow P, Schneiders A. et al. 2016 Consensus statement on return to sport from the First World Congress in Sports Physical Therapy, Bern. Br J Sports Med 2016; 50: 853-864
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Cascio BM, Culp L, Cosgarea AJ. Return to play after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Sports Med 2004; 23: 395-408
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Rambaud AJM, Ardern CL, Thoreux P. et al. Criteria for return to running after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a scoping review. Br J Sports Med 2018; 52: 1437-1444
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Grindem H, Snyder-Mackler L, Moksnes H. et al. Simple decision rules can reduce reinjury risk by 84% after ACL reconstruction: the Delaware-Oslo ACL cohort study. Br J Sports Med 2016; 50: 804-808
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Gokeler A, Welling W, Zaffagnini S. et al. Development of a test battery to enhance safe return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25: 192-199
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Kyritsis P, Bahr R, Landreau P. et al. Likelihood of ACL graft rupture: not meeting six clinical discharge criteria before return to sport is associated with a four times greater risk of rupture. Br J Sports Med 2016; 50: 946-U84
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Barber-Westin SD, Noyes FR. Objective criteria for return to athletics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and subsequent reinjury rates: A systematic review. Phys Sportsmed 2011; 39: 100-110
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 van Melick N, van Cingel REH, Brooijmans F. et al. Evidence-based clinical practice update: practice guidelines for anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation based on a systematic review and multidisciplinary consensus. Br J Sports Med 2016; 50: 1506-1515
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Abrams GD, Harris JD, Gupta AK. et al. Functional performance testing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review. Orthop J Sports Med 2014; 2: 2325967113518305
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Logerstedt DS, Snyder-Mackler L, Ritter RC. et al. Knee stability and movement coordination impairments: knee ligament sprain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2010; 40: A1-A37
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Fitzgerald GK, Lephart SM, Hwang JH. et al. Hop tests as predictors of dynamic knee stability. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2001; 31: 588-597
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Clark NC. Functional performance testing following knee ligament injury. Phys Ther Sport 2001; 2: 91-105
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Shaw T, Chipchase LS, Williams MT. A users guide to outcome measurement following ACL reconstruction. Phys Ther Sport 2004; 5: 57-67
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Noyes FR, Barber SD, Mangine RE. Abnormal lower limb symmetry determined by function hop tests after anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Am J Sports Med 1991; 19: 513-518
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Barber SD, Noyes FR, Mangine R. et al. Rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction: Function Testing. Orthopedics 1992; 15: 969-974
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Munro AG, Herrington LC. Between-session reliability of four hop tests and the agility T-Test. J Strength Cond Res 2011; 25: 1470-1477
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Wilk KE, Arrigo C, Andrews JR. et al. Rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the female athlete. J Athl Train 1999; 34: 177-193
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Barber-Westin SD, Noyes FR. Factors used to determine return to unrestricted sports activities after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg 2011; 27: 1697-1705
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Thomeé R, Werner S. Return to sport. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 19: 1795-1797
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Davies WT, Myer GD, Read PJ. Is it time we better understood the tests we are using for return to sport decision making following ACL reconstruction? A critical review of the hop tests. Sports Med 2020; 50: 485-495
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Harriss D, Macsween A, Atkinson G. Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2020 update. Int J Sports Med 2020; 40: 813-817
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Tegner Y, Lysholm J. Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop 1985; 43-49
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Marx RG, Stump TJ, Jones EC. et al. Development and evaluation of an activity rating scale for disorders of the knee. Am J Sports Med 2001; 29: 213-218
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Bohannon RW. Measuring knee extensor muscle strength. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 80: 13-18
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Sturgill LP, Snyder-Mackler L, Manal TJ. et al. Interrater reliability of a clinical scale to assess knee joint effusion. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2009; 39: 845-849
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Rambaud AJM, Semay B, Samozino P. et al. Criteria for Return to Sport after Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction with lower reinjury risk (CR’STAL study): protocol for a prospective observational study in France. BMJ Open 2017; 7: e015087
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 31 Reid A, Birmingham TB, Stratford PW. et al. Hop testing provides a reliable and valid outcome measure during rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Phys Ther 2007; 87: 337-349
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 32 Hopper DM, Strauss GR, Boyle JJ. et al. Functional recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a longitudinal perspective. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89: 1535-1541
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 33 Cleveland WS. Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. J Am Stat Assoc 1979; 74: 829-836
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 34 Cupido C, Peterson D, Sutherland MS. et al. Tracking patient outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Physiother Can 2014; 66: 199-205
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 35 Hegedus EJ, McDonough S, Bleakley C. et al. Clinician-friendly lower extremity physical performance measures in athletes: a systematic review of measurement properties and correlation with injury, part 1. The tests for knee function including the hop tests. Br J Sports Med 2015; 49: 642-648
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 36 Hamilton RT, Shultz SJ, Schmitz RJ. et al. Triple-hop distance as a valid predictor of lower limb strength and power. J Athl Train 2008; 43: 144-151
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 37 Nyberg B, Granhed H, Peterson K. et al. Muscle strength and jumping distance during 10 years post ACL reconstruction. Isokinet Exerc Sci 2006; 14: 363-370
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 38 Birchmeier T, Lisee C, Geers B. et al. Reactive strength index and knee extension strength characteristics are predictive of single-leg hop performance after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Strength Cond Res 2019; 33: 1201-1207
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 39 Harput G, Kilinc HE, Ozer H. et al. Quadriceps and hamstring strength recovery during early neuromuscular rehabilitation after ACL Hamstring-Tendon autograft reconstruction. J Sport Rehabil 2015; 24: 398-404
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 40 Logerstedt D, Lynch A, Axe MJ. et al. Symmetry restoration and functional recovery before and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013; 21: 859-868
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 41 Losciale JM, Zdeb RM, Ledbetter L. et al. The association between passing return-to-sport criteria and second anterior cruciate ligament injury risk: A systematic review with meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2019; 49: 43-54
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 42 Webster KE, Hewett TE. What is the evidence for and validity of return-to-sport testing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med 2019; 49: 917-929
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 43 Paterno MV, Huang B, Thomas S. et al. Clinical factors that predict a second acl injury after acl reconstruction and return to sport: Preliminary development of a clinical decision algorithm. Orthop J Sports Med 2017; 5: 232596711774527
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 44 Herrington L, Myer G, Horsley I. Task based rehabilitation protocol for elite athletes following Anterior Cruciate ligament reconstruction: a clinical commentary. Phys Ther Sport 2013; 14: 188-198
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 45 Ebrahimzadeh MH, Makhmalbaf H, Golhasani-Keshtan F. et al. The international knee documentation committee (IKDC) subjective short form: a validity and reliability study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23: 3163-3167
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 46 Shelbourne KD, Barnes AF, Gray T. Correlation of a single assessment numeric evaluation (SANE) rating with modified cincinnati knee rating system and IKDC subjective total scores for patients after ACL reconstruction or knee arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med 2012; 40: 2487-2491
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar