Der anterolaterale Zugang in Seitenlage

Zur Implantation von Hüftgelenksendoprothetik stehen mehrere Zugangswege zur Verfügung, die in dieser Ausgabe der Zeitschrift beschrieben werden. Dieser Beitrag stellt den historischen Werdegang, die OP-technischen Schritte, die Ergebnisse und speziellen Risiken des anterolateralen Zugangs in Seitenlage vor.

Schlüsselwörter

Hüft-TEP - Zugang - Schenkelhalsfraktur - Koxarthrose

• Literatur

• 1 Wohlrab D, Droege JW, Mendel T. et al. Minimal-invasiver vs. transglutealer Hüftgelenkersatz. Orthopäde 2008; 37: 1121-1126
• 2 Bennett D, Ogonda L, Elliott D. et al. Comparison of immediate postoperative walking ability in patients receiving minimally invasive and standard-incision hip arthroplasty: a prospective blinded study. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22: 490-495
• 3 Berger RA, Jacobs JJ, Meneghini RM. et al. Rapid rehabilitation and recovery with minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (429) 239-247
• 4 Hartzband MA. Posterolateral minimal incision for total hip replacement: technique and early results. Orthop Clin North Am 2004; 35: 119-129
• 5 Dorr LD, Maheshwari AV, Long WT. et al. Early pain relief and function after posterior minimally invasive and conventional total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, blinded study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89: 1153-1160
• 6 Dorr LD, Thomas D, Long WT. et al. Psychologic reasons for patients preferring minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 458: 94-100
• 7 Bertin KC, Röttinger H. Anterolateral mini-incision hip replacement surgery: a modified Watson-Jones approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (429) 248-255
• 8 Laffosse JM, Chiron P, Molinier F. et al. Prospective and comparative study of the anterolateral mini-invasive approach versus minimally invasive posterior approach for primary total hip replacement. Early results. Int Orthop 2007; 31: 597-603
• 9 Röttinger H. Der minimal-invasive anterolaterale Zugang. Orthopäde 2006; 35: 708 710–715
• 10 Goosen JH, Kollen BJ, Castelein RM. et al. Minimally invasive versus classic procedures in total hip arthroplasty: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469: 200-208
• 11 Howell JR, Masri BA, Duncan CP. Minimally invasive versus standard incision anterolateral hip replacement: a comparative study. Orthop Clin North Am 2004; 35: 153-162
• 12 Hube R. Minimalinvasive Hüftendoprothetik. In: Krukemeyer G, Möllenhoff G. Hrsg. Endoprothetik. 3. Aufl.. Berlin: De Gruyter; 2012: 223-235
• 13 Picado CH, Garcia FL, Marques W. Damage to the superior gluteal nerve after direct lateral approach to the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 455: 209-211
• 14 Pospischill M, Kranzl A, Attwenger B. et al. Minimally invasive compared with traditional transgluteal approach for total hip arthroplasty: a comparative gait analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92: 328-337
• 15 Svensson O, Sköld S, Blomgren G. Integrity of the gluteus medius after the transgluteal approach in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1990; 5: 57-60
• 16 Müller M, Tohtz S, Springer I. et al. Randomized controlled trial of abductor muscle damage in relation to the surgical approach for primary total hip replacement: minimally invasiveanterolateral versus modified direct lateral approach. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2011; 131: 179-189
• 17 Hube R, Dienst M, von Roth P. Komplikationen nach minimal-invasiver Hüftendoprothetik. Orthopäde 2014; 43: 47-53
• 18 Parratte S, Pagnano MW. Muscle damage during minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: cadaver-based evidence that it is significant. Instr Course Lect 2008; 57: 231-234
• 19 von Roth P, Perka C, Mayr HO. et al. Reproducibility of femoral offset following short stem and straight stem total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2014; 37: e678-e684
• 20 Bal BS, Haltom D, Aleto T. et al. Early complications of primary total hip replacement performed with a two-incision minimally invasive technique. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88 Suppl 1 Pt 2: 221-233
• 21 Woo RY, Morrey BF. Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982; 64: 1295-1306
• 22 Graw BP, Woolson ST, Huddleston HG. et al. Minimal incision surgery as a risk factor for early failure of total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468: 2372-2376
• 23 Wan Z, Boutary M, Dorr LD. The influence of acetabular component position on wear in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2008; 23: 51-56
• 24 Kennon R, Keggi J, Zatorski LE. et al. Anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: beyond the minimally invasive technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86-A (Suppl. 02) 91-97
• 25 Matta JM, Ferguson TA. The anterior approach for hip replacement. Orthopedics 2005; 28: 927-928
• 26 McGrory BJ, Finch ME, Furlong PJ. et al. Inzision length correlates with patient weight, height, and gender when using a minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty. J Surg Orthop Adv 2008; 17: 77-81
• 27 Parvizi J, Sharkey PF, Pour AE. et al. Hip arthroplasty with minimally invasive surgery: a survey comparing the opinion of highly qualified experts vs. patients. Arthroplasty 2006; 21 (6 Suppl 2): 38-46
• 28 von Roth P, Olivier M, Preininger B. et al. BMI and gender do not influence surgical accuracy during minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int 2011; 21: 688-693
• 29 Smith TO, Blake V, Hing CB. Minimally invasive versus conventional exposure for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes. Int Orthop 2011; 35: 173-184