Knöpfologie in der B-Bild-Sonografie

Optimale sonografische Bildgebung setzt gute Kenntnisse der Ultraschallphysik, der wichtigsten Gerätefunktionen und Einstellmöglichkeiten voraus. Darüber hinaus muss die Bilddokumentation überzeugend sein. Diese Übersicht hilft dem Anwender, „sein“ Ultraschallgerät vom Einschalten über die Bildoptimierung bis zur Speicherung immer gut „im Griff“ zu haben – ohne jedes technische oder physikalische Detail hinter den „Knöpfen“ komplett zu verstehen.

Kernaussagen

• Die sonografische Bildgebung setzt eine gute Kenntnis der wichtigsten Gerätefunktionen und Einstellmöglichkeiten voraus.

• Geräteeinstellungen müssen an die spezielle Anwendung, an patientenindividuelle Gegebenheiten und die Sehgewohnheiten des Untersuchers adaptiert werden.

• Die Geräteeinstellung beginnt nach der Patientendateneingabe mit der passenden Schallkopfwahl und dem Preset. Während der systematischen Untersuchung erfolgen ständige Korrekturen von Bildtiefe, Fokus, Gain und Tiefenausgleich (DGC).

• Die Bilddokumentation muss umfassend sein und klinische Partner überzeugen können. Die Dokumentation erfolgt mit im Bild sichtbaren Piktogrammen. Pathologika werden in 2 Ebenen vermessen.

• Die Kenntnis von Artefakten ist wichtig, um Fehleinschätzungen zu vermeiden.

• Die B-Bild-Sonografie als Fortsetzung der körperlichen Untersuchung hat sich als einfaches und kostengünstiges Untersuchungsverfahren bewährt.

• Die Anwendungsmöglichkeiten des Ultraschalls erstrecken sich über nahezu alle medizinischen Fachbereiche. Die Sonografie erlaubt die Real-Time-Durchführung gezielter interventioneller Maßnahmen.

• Die Sonografie wird zunehmend curricular bereits während des Medizinstudiums gelehrt.

Schlüsselwörter

Bildqualität - Bildoptimierung - Terminologie - Geräteeinstellung - Sendefrequenz

Publication History

Article published online:
24 August 2020

• Literatur

• 1 Tuma J, Jenssen C, Moller K. et al. [Ultrasound artifacts and their diagnostic significance in internal medicine and gastroenterology – part 1: B-mode artifacts]. Z Gastroenterol 2016; 54: 433-450
• 2 Stevens SS. On the psychophysical law. Psychol Rev 1957; 64: 153-181
• 3 Jenssen C, Tuma J, Moller K. et al. [Ultrasound artifacts and their diagnostic significance in internal medicine and gastroenterology – part 2: color and spectral Doppler artifacts]. Z Gastroenterol 2016; 54: 569-578
• 4 Dietrich CF, Mathis G, Blaivas M. et al. Lung artefacts and their use. Med Ultrason 2016; 18: 488-499
• 5 Dietrich CF, Mathis G, Blaivas M. et al. Lung B-line artefacts and their use. J Thorac Dis 2016; 8: 1356-1365
• 6 Desser TS, Jeffrey RB. Tissue harmonic imaging techniques: physical principles and clinical applications. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2001; 22: 1-10
• 7 Horng A, Reiser M, Clevert DA. [Current developments in vascular ultrasound]. Radiologe 2009; 49: 998-1004
• 8 Clevert DA, Helck A, Paprottka PM. et al. [Latest developments in ultrasound of the liver]. Radiologe 2011; 51: 661-670
• 9 Sidhu PS, Cantisani V, Deganello A. et al. Role of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in Paediatric Practice: An EFSUMB Position Statement. Ultraschall Med 2017; 38: 33-43
• 10 Piscaglia F, Wilson SR, Lyshchik A. et al. American College of Radiology Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (CEUS LI-RADS) for the diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a pictorial essay. Ultraschall Med 2017; 38: 320-324
• 11 Kono Y, Lyshchik A, Cosgrove D. et al. Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS^®): the official version by the American College of Radiology (ACR). Ultraschall Med 2017; 38: 85-86
• 12 Kim TK, Noh SY, Wilson SR. et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) 2017 – a review of important differences compared to the CT/MRI system. Clin Mol Hepatol 2017; 23: 280-289
• 13 Dietrich CF, Greis C. [How to perform contrast enhanced ultrasound]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2016; 141: 1019-1024
• 14 Dietrich CF, Bamber J, Berzigotti A. et al. EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Use of Liver Ultrasound Elastography, Update 2017 (Long Version). Ultraschall Med 2017; 38: e16-e47
• 15 Dietrich CF, Bamber J, Berzigotti A. et al. EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Use of Liver Ultrasound Elastography, Update 2017 (Short Version). Ultraschall Med 2017; 38: 377-394
• 16 Dong Y, Sirli R, Ferraioli G. et al. Shear wave elastography of the liver – review on normal values. Z Gastroenterol 2017; 55: 153-166
• 17 Gatenby JC, Hoddinott JC, Leeman S. Phasing out speckle. Phys Med Biol 1989; 34: 1683-1689
• 18 Jenssen C, Lauer NJ, Burmester E. „Art meets Science“ – Gedanken zu Schnittstellen zwischen Kunst und Wissenschaft und zum Zusammenhang von Informationsgehalt und ästhetischer Faszination in Endoskopie und Bildgebung. Endoskopie heute 2013; 26: 2-12
• 19 Entrekin RR, Porter BA, Sillesen HH. et al. Real-time spatial compound imaging: application to breast, vascular, and musculoskeletal ultrasound. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2001; 22: 50-64
• 20 Dietrich CF, Caspary WF. [SieScape–panorama imaging. Clinical value?]. Internist (Berl) 2000; 41: 24-28
• 21 Dietrich CF. [3D real time contrast enhanced ultrasonography, a new technique]. Rofo 2002; 174: 160-163
• 22 Dietrich CF. 3D abdominal sonography. Electromedica 2001; 69: 23-29
• 23 Dietrich CF. 3D-Sonographie im Abdomen. Electromedica 2001; 69: 23-29
• 24 Sienz M, Ignee A, Dietrich CF. [Sonography today: reference values in abdominal ultrasound: aorta, inferior vena cava, kidneys]. Z Gastroenterol 2012; 50: 293-315
• 25 Sienz M, Ignee A, Dietrich CF. [Reference values in abdominal ultrasound - biliopancreatic system and spleen]. Z Gastroenterol 2011; 49: 845-870
• 26 Sienz M, Ignee A, Dietrich CF. [Reference values in abdominal ultrasound - liver and liver vessels]. Z Gastroenterol 2010; 48: 1141-1152
• 27 Ignee A, Boerner N, Bruening A. et al. Duplex sonography of the mesenteric vessels – a critical evaluation of inter-observer variability. Z Gastroenterol 2016; 54: 304-311
• 28 Ignee A, Gebel M, Caspary WF. et al. [Doppler imaging of hepatic vessels - review]. Z Gastroenterol 2002; 40: 21-32
• 29 Dietrich CF, Ignee A, Seitz KH. et al. [Duplex sonography of visceral arteries]. Ultraschall Med 2001; 22: 247-257
• 30 Cui XW, Hocke M, Jenssen C. et al. Conventional ultrasound for lymph node evaluation, update 2013. Z Gastroenterol 2014; 52: 212-221
• 31 Ignee A, Jenssen C, Hocke M. et al. Contrast-enhanced (endoscopic) ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound elastography in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Endosc Ultrasound 2017; 6: 55-60
• 32 Dong Y, Jurgensen C, Puri R. et al. Ultrasound imaging features of isolated pancreatic tuberculosis. Endosc Ultrasound 2018; 7: 119-127
• 33 Dong Y, DʼOnofrio M, Hocke M. et al. Autoimmune pancreatitis: Imaging features. Endosc Ultrasound 2018; 7: 196-203
• 34 Dighe M, Barr R, Bojunga J. et al. Thyroid ultrasound: state of the art part 1 - thyroid ultrasound reporting and diffuse thyroid diseases. Med Ultrason 2017; 19: 79-93
• 35 Dighe M, Barr R, Bojunga J. et al. Thyroid ultrasound: state of the art. Part 2 - focal thyroid lesions. Med Ultrason 2017; 19: 195-210
• 36 Dietrich CF, Dong Y, Jenssen C. et al. Serous pancreatic neoplasia, data and review. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23: 5567-5578
• 37 Friedrich-Rust M, Vorlaender C, Dietrich CF. et al. Evaluation of strain elastography for differentiation of thyroid nodules: results of a prospective DEGUM multicenter study. Ultraschall Med 2016; 37: 262-270
• 38 Dietrich CF, Jenssen C, Herth FJ. Endobronchial ultrasound elastography. Endosc Ultrasound 2016; 5: 233-238
• 39 Cui XW, Friedrich-Rust M, De Molo C. et al. Liver elastography, comments on EFSUMB elastography guidelines 2013. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19: 6329-6347
• 40 Dietrich CF, Dong Y. Shear wave elastography with a new reliability indicator. J Ultrason 2016; 16: 281-287
• 41 Frohlich E, Hofmann J, Debove I. et al. [Pictocam instead of Pictogram - a quality improvement study in abdominal ultrasound imaging]. Z Med Phys 2016; 26: 251-258
• 42 Dietrich CF, Rudd L, Saftiou A. et al. The EFSUMB website, a great source for ultrasound information and education. Med Ultrason 2017; 19: 102-110
• 43 Dietrich CF, Rudd L. The EFSUMB website, a guide for better understanding. Med Ultrason 2013; 15: 215-223
• 44 Dietrich CF, Ignee A, Greis C. et al. Artifacts and pitfalls in contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the liver. Ultraschall Med 2014; 35: 108-125 quiz 126–127
• 45 Dietrich CF, Ignee A, Hocke M. et al. Pitfalls and artefacts using contrast enhanced ultrasound. Z Gastroenterol 2011; 49: 350-356
• 46 Cosgrove D, Barr R, Bojunga J. et al. WFUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Use of Ultrasound Elastography: Part 4. Thyroid. Ultrasound Med Biol 2017; 43: 4-26
• 47 Barr RG, Cosgrove D, Brock M. et al. WFUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Use of Ultrasound Elastography: Part 5. Prostate. Ultrasound Med Biol 2017; 43: 27-48
• 48 Chiorean L, Barr RG, Braden B. et al. Transcutaneous ultrasound: elastographic lymph node evaluation. Current clinical applications and literature review. Ultrasound Med Biol 2016; 42: 16-30
• 49 Dietrich CF, Bojunga J. [Ultrasound of the thyroid]. Laryngorhinootologie 2016; 95: 87-104
• 50 Barr RG, Nakashima K, Amy D. et al. WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: part 2: breast. Ultrasound Med Biol 2015; 41: 1148-1160
• 51 Shiina T, Nightingale KR, Palmeri ML. et al. WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: part 1: basic principles and terminology. Ultrasound Med Biol 2015; 41: 1126-1147
• 52 Kan QC, Cui XW, Chang JM. et al. Strain ultrasound elastography for liver diseases. J Hepatol 2015; 63: 534
• 53 Ferraioli G, Filice C, Castera L. et al. WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: part 3: liver. Ultrasound Med Biol 2015; 41: 1161-1179
• 54 Dietrich CF, Jenssen C, Arcidiacono PG. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound: Elastographic lymph node evaluation. Endosc Ultrasound 2015; 4: 176-190
• 55 Piscaglia F, Nolsoe C, Dietrich CF. et al. The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Practice of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS): update 2011 on non-hepatic applications. Ultraschall Med 2012; 33: 33-59
• 56 Claudon M, Dietrich CF, Choi BI. et al. Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver – update 2012: a WFUMB-EFSUMB initiative in cooperation with representatives of AFSUMB, AIUM, ASUM, FLAUS and ICUS. Ultraschall Med 2013; 34: 11-29
• 57 Claudon M, Dietrich CF, Choi BI. et al. Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver – update 2012: A WFUMB-EFSUMB initiative in cooperation with representatives of AFSUMB, AIUM, ASUM, FLAUS and ICUS. Ultrasound Med Biol 2013; 39: 187-210
• 58 Bamber J, Cosgrove D, Dietrich CF. et al. EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Part 1: Basic principles and technology. Ultraschall Med 2013; 34: 169-184
• 59 Cosgrove D, Piscaglia F, Bamber J. et al. EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Part 2: Clinical applications. Ultraschall Med 2013; 34: 238-253
• 60 Dietrich CF. EFSUMB guidelines 2015 on interventional ultrasound. Med Ultrason 2015; 17: 521-527
• 61 Lorentzen T, Nolsoe CP, Ewertsen C. et al. EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part I. General Aspects (Long Version). Ultraschall Med 2015; 36: E1-14
• 62 Lorentzen T, Nolsoe CP, Ewertsen C. et al. EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part I. General Aspects (Short Version). Ultraschall Med 2015; 36: 464-472
• 63 Sidhu PS, Brabrand K, Cantisani V. et al. EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part II. Diagnostic Ultrasound-Guided Interventional Procedures (Long Version). Ultraschall Med 2015; 36: E15-35
• 64 Sidhu PS, Brabrand K, Cantisani V. et al. EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part II. Diagnostic Ultrasound-Guided Interventional Procedures (Short Version). Ultraschall Med 2015; 36: 566-580
• 65 Dietrich CF, Lorentzen T, Appelbaum L. et al. EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part III - Abdominal Treatment Procedures (Long Version). Ultraschall Med 2016; 37: E1-E32
• 66 Dietrich CF, Lorentzen T, Appelbaum L. et al. EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part III - Abdominal Treatment Procedures (Short Version). Ultraschall Med 2016; 37: 27-45
• 67 Jenssen C, Hocke M, Fusaroli P. et al. EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part IV - EUS-guided Interventions: General aspects and EUS-guided sampling (Long Version). Ultraschall Med 2016; 37: E33-E76
• 68 Jenssen C, Hocke M, Fusaroli P. et al. EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part IV - EUS-guided interventions: General Aspects and EUS-guided Sampling (Short Version). Ultraschall Med 2016; 37: 157-169
• 69 Fusaroli P, Jenssen C, Hocke M. et al. EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part V. Ultraschall Med 2016; 37: 77-99
• 70 Fusaroli P, Jenssen C, Hocke M. et al. EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part V - EUS-Guided Therapeutic Interventions (short version). Ultraschall Med 2016; 37: 412-420
• 71 Jenssen C, Brkljacic B, Hocke M. et al. EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part VI – Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Interventions. Ultraschall Med 2016; 37: 473-476
• 72 Dietrich CF, Lorentzen T, Sidhu PS. et al. An Introduction to the EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS). Ultraschall Med 2015; 36: 460-463
• 73 Dietrich CF, Horn R, Morf S. et al. Ultrasound-guided central vascular interventions, comments on the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology guidelines on interventional ultrasound. J Thorac Dis 2016; 8: E851-E868
• 74 Dietrich CF, Horn R, Morf S. et al. US-guided peripheral vascular interventions, comments on the EFSUMB guidelines. Med Ultrason 2016; 18: 231-239
• 75 Mohaupt MG, Arampatzis S, Atkinson N. et al. Comments and extensions to EFSUMB guidelines on renal interventional ultrasound (INVUS). Med Ultrason 2016; 18: 351-361