Int J Sports Med 2020; 41(13): 921-928
DOI: 10.1055/a-1179-5849
Training & Testing

Effect of Velocity Loss on Strength Performance in Bench Press Using a Weight Stack Machine

Authors

  • Luis Rodiles-Guerrero

    1   Physical Performance & Sports Research Center, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain
  • Fernando Pareja-Blanco

    1   Physical Performance & Sports Research Center, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain
    2   Faculty of Sport Sciences, Department of Sports and Computers Sciences, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain
  • Juan Antonio León-Prados

    1   Physical Performance & Sports Research Center, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain
    2   Faculty of Sport Sciences, Department of Sports and Computers Sciences, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain
Preview

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the effects of three different velocity loss thresholds (10%: VL10, 30%: VL30 and 50%: VL50) on maximal strength and velocity at different intensities during bench press using a weight stack machine (WSM-BP). Forty-five men were randomly assigned to three groups: VL10 (n=15), VL30 (n=15) and VL50 (n=15), which followed a 5-week (15 sessions) velocity-based WSM-BP program. Assessments performed Pre- and Post-training included: a) estimated one-repetition maximum (1RM) in WSM-BP; b) average velocity attained against all absolute loads common to Pre- and Post-training tests in WSM-BP; c) average velocity attained against all absolute loads that were lifted equal to or faster than 0.8 m·s−1 at Pre-training (light loads); and d) average velocity attained against all absolute loads that were lifted slower than 0.8 m·s−1 at Pre-training (heavy loads). All groups showed significant improvements in 1RM, velocity against all loads, and velocity against heavy loads (P<0.001–0.01). However, only the VL10 group showed significant enhancements in velocity against light loads (P=0.05). Therefore, the VL10 group showed a higher training efficiency compared to VL30 and VL50 interventions, since it obtained similar benefits by performing fewer repetitions.



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 10. Februar 2020

Angenommen: 01. Mai 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
15. Juli 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany