Abformung ganzer Kiefer: Können Intraoralscanner mit der konventionellen Abformung mithalten?

Die Abformung von ganzen Kiefern oder Kieferabschnitten stellt mit der dreidimensionalen Erfassung intraoraler Strukturen die Basis zur Herstellung von Zahnersatz bzw. Hilfsmitteln wie Bohrschablonen, kieferorthopädischen Apparaturen oder Schienen dar. Somit entscheidet bereits die Qualität der Abformung über den späteren Behandlungserfolg [1].

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
12. August 2020

• Literatur

• 1 Wöstmann B. Abformmaterialien. In: Rosentritt M, Ilie N, Lohbauer U. Hrsg. Werkstoffkunde in der Zahnmedizin. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2018: 23-54
• 2 Wöstmann B, Powers J. Präzisionsabformungen – Ein Leitfaden für Theorie und Praxis. 3M. Im Internet (Stand: 24.06.2020): https://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/604457O/3m-health-care-academy-impressioning-compendium-german.pdf
• 3 Rekow ED. Digital Dentistry: A Comprehensive Reference and Preview of the Future. Surrey: Quintessence Publishing Company Limited; 2018
• 4 Joda T, Zarone F, Ferrari M. The complete digital workflow in fixed prosthodontics: a systematic review. BMC Oral Health 2017; 17: 124
• 5 Mangano F, Gandolfi A, Luongo G. et al. Intraoral scanners in dentistry: a review of the current literature. BMC Oral Health 2017; 17: 149
• 6 Goujat A, Abouelleil H, Colon P. et al. Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM inlay/onlay restorations: A systematic review of in vitro studies. J Prosthet Dent 2019; 121: 590-597.e3
• 7 Boeddinghaus M, Breloer ES, Rehmann P. et al. Accuracy of single-tooth restorations based on intraoral digital and conventional impressions in patients. Clin Oral Investig 2015; 19: 2027-2034
• 8 Chochlidakis KM, Papaspyridakos P, Geminiani A. et al. Digital versus conventional impressions for fixed prosthodontics: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2016; 116: 184-190.e12
• 9 Muallah J, Wesemann C, Nowak R. et al. Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral and extraoral scanners: an in vitro study using a new method of evaluation. Int J Comput Dent 2017; 20: 151-164
• 10 Ender A, Zimmermann M, Attin T. et al. In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods for obtaining quadrant dental impressions. Clin Oral Investig 2016; 20: 1495-1504
• 11 Ender A, Zimmermann M, Mehl A. Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro. Int J Comput Dent 2019; 22: 11-19
• 12 Kuhr F, Schmidt A, Rehmann P. et al. A new method for assessing the accuracy of full arch impressions in patients. J Dent 2016; 55: 68-74
• 13 Ender A, Attin T, Mehl A. In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods of obtaining complete-arch dental impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2016; 115: 313-320
• 14 Logozzo S, Zanettia EM, Franceschini G. et al. Recent advances in dental optics – Part I: 3D intraoral scanners for restorative dentistry. Opt Lasers Eng 2014; 54: 203-221
• 15 Schmidt A, Benedickt CR, Schlenz MA. et al. Torsion and linear accuracy in intraoral scans obtained with different scanning principles. J Prosthodont Res 2020; 64: 167-174
• 16 Müller P, Ender A, Joda T. et al. Impact of digital intraoral scan strategies on the impression accuracy using the TRIOS Pod scanner. Quintessence Int 2016; 47: 343-349
• 17 Ender A, Mehl A. Influence of scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning systems. Int J Comput Dent 2013; 16: 11-21
• 18 Passos L, Meiga S, Brigagão V. et al. Impact of different scanning strategies on the accuracy of two current intraoral scanning systems in complete-arch impressions: an in vitro study. Int J Comput Dent 2019; 22: 307-319
• 19 Rehmann P, Sichwardt V, Wöstmann B. Intraoral Scanning Systems: Need for Maintenance. Int J Prosthodont 2017; 30: 27-29
• 20 Arakida T, Kanazawa M, Iwaki M. et al. Evaluating the influence of ambient light on scanning trueness, precision, and time of intra oral scanner. J Prosthodont Res 2018; 62: 324-329
• 21 OʼToole S, Osnes C, Bartlett D. et al. Investigation into the accuracy and measurement methods of sequential 3D dental scan alignment. Dent Mater 2019; 35: 495-500
• 22 Haddadi Y, Bahrami G, Isidor F. Effect of Software Version on the Accuracy of an Intraoral Scanning Device. Int J Prosthodont 2018; 31: 375-376
• 23 Parfitt GJ. Measurement of the physiological mobility of individual teeth in an axial direction. J Dent Res 1960; 39: 608-618
• 24 Chang PK, Chen YC, Huang CC. et al. Distribution of micromotion in implants and alveolar bone with different thread profiles in immediate loading: a finite element study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012; 27: e96-e101
• 25 Winter W, Klein D, Karl M. Micromotion of Dental Implants: Basic Mechanical Considerations. J Med Eng 2013; 2013: 265412
• 26 Rau CT, Olafsson VG, Delgado AJ. et al. The quality of fixed prosthodontic impressions: An assessment of crown and bridge impressions received at commercial laboratories. J Am Dent Assoc 2017; 148: 654-660
• 27 Reich S, Yatmaz B, Raith S. Do “cut out-rescan” procedures have an impact on the accuracy of intraoral digital scans?. J Prosthet Dent 2020;
• 28 Jordan AR, Micheelis W. Fünfte Deutsche Mundgesundheitsstudie (DMS V). 2016. Köln: Deutscher Zahnärzte Verlag DÄV. Im Internet (Stand: 24.06.2020): https://www.bzaek.de/fileadmin/PDFs/dms/Zusammenfassung_DMS_V.pdf
• 29 Schlenz MA, Schmidt A, Wöstmann B. et al. In vitro comparison of analogue versus digital impressions of the periodontally compromised dentition focused on interdental areas. Int J Comput Dent 2019; 22: 131-138
• 30 Schlenz M, Rehmann P, Wöstmann B. Auf dem Weg zur digitalen Prothetik: Einblicke in den Praxisalltag. ZWR – Das Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt 2019; 128: 214-220