Download PDF
Int J Sports Med 2021; 42(07): 638-644
DOI: 10.1055/a-1303-4255
Behavioural Sciences

Participation and Performance in the Oldest Ultramarathon–Comrades Marathon 1921–2019

Pantelis Theodoros Nikolaidis 
1   Exercise Physiology Laboratory, Nikaia, Greece
,
Beat Knechtle 
2   Gesundheitszentrum, St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
,
RodrigoLuiz Vancini
3   Centro de Educação Física e Desportos, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, Brazil
,
Margarida Gomes
4   Laboratory of Physical Activity and Health, Polytechnic Institute of Beja, Portugal
,
CaioVictor Sousa
5   Graduate Program in Physical Education, Universidade Católica de Brasília - UCB, Brasília, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Participation and performance trends have been analyzed for different ultramarathons for limited time periods. This study examined trends in participation and performance in the oldest ultramarathon in the world, the ‘Comrades Marathon’ (South Africa), during a century (1921−2019). Data from www.ultra-marathon.org on 100 000 unique finishers were analysed using different general linear models. Women represented 4.2% of the total sample (n=4152), and the first women ran this race in 1978. Before the year 1965, the number of participants in the race ranged between 5 and 35 athletes, then started to grow exponentially until mid 90’s. An increase in finishers in the 70 s mainly due to an increase in male athletes in age groups 30−39, 40−49 and 50−59 years was observed (p<0.001). A stable running speed for overall women and men but an improvement in performance for the annual top five women and men were shown (p<0.001). Male runners were faster than female runners for all age groups (p<0.001). While overall performance was not improved across years, the annual top five women and men were able to improve their performance over years.

Key words

age group - performance analysis - race time - sex difference - ultra-endurance


Publication History

Received: 21 May 2020

Accepted: 26 October 2020

Article published online:
01 December 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Shipway R, Kirkup N, Saayman M. et al. The economic impact of the Comrades Marathon. International Journal of Event and Festival Management 2012; 3: 220-235
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Folscher LL, Grant CC, Fletcher L. et al. Ultra-marathon athletes at risk for the female athlete triad. Sports Med Open 2015; 1: 29
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Dancaster CP, Whereat SJ. Fluid and electrolyte balance during the comrades marathon. S Afr Med J 1971; 45: 147-150
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Mann TN, Platt CE, Lamberts RP. et al. Faster heart rate recovery with increased RPE: Paradoxical responses after an 87-km ultramarathon. J Strength Cond Res 2015; 29: 3343-3352
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Boulter J, Noakes TD, Hew-Butler T. Acute renal failure in four Comrades Marathon runners ingesting the same electrolyte supplement: Coincidence or causation?. S Afr Med J 2011; 101: 876-878
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Peters EM, Shaik J, Kleinveldt N. Upper respiratory tract infection symptoms in ultramarathon runners not related to immunoglobulin status. Clin J Sport Med 2010; 20: 39-46
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Hagemann GJ, Rijke AM, Corr PD. Do knees survive the Comrades Marathon?. S Afr Med J 2008; 98: 873-876
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Nikolaidis PT, Knechtle B. Russians are the fastest and the youngest in the “Comrades Marathon”. J Sports Sci 2019; 37: 1387-1392
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Knechtle B, Nikolaidis PT. The age of the best ultramarathon performance - the case of the “Comrades Marathon”. Res Sports Med 2017; 25: 132-143
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Knechtle B, Nikolaidis PT. Physiology and pathophysiology in ultra-marathon running. Front Physiol 2018; 9: 634
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Cejka N, Rüst CA, Lepers R. et al. Participation and performance trends in 100-km ultra-marathons worldwide. J Sports Sci 2014; 32: 354-366
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Scheer V. Participation trends of ultra endurance events. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 2019; 27: 3-7
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Hoffman MD. Performance trends in 161-km ultramarathons. Int J Sports Med 2010; 31: 31-37
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Senefeld J, Smith C, Hunter SK. Sex differences in participation, performance, and age of ultramarathon runners. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2016; 11: 635-642
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Knechtle B, Scheer V, Nikolaidis PT. et al. Participation and performance trends in the oldest 100-km ultramarathon in the world. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17: 1719
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Tanaka H, Tarumi T, Rittweger J. Aging and physiological lessons from master athletes. Compr Physiol 2019; 10: 261-296
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Tanaka H. Aging of competitive athletes. Gerontology 2017; 63: 488-494
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Geard D, Reaburn PRJ, Rebar AL. et al. Masters athletes: Exemplars of successful aging?. J Aging Phys Activ 2017; 25: 490-500
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Lepers R, Stapley PJ. Master athletes are extending the limits of human endurance. Front Physiol 2016; 7: 613
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Austad SN. Sex differences in health and aging: A dialog between the brain and gonad?. Geroscience 2019; 41: 267-273
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Hunter SK. The relevance of sex differences in performance fatigability. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2016; 48: 2247-2256
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Knechtle B, Valeri F, Zingg MA. et al. What is the age for the fastest ultra-marathon performance in time-limited races from 6 h to 10 days?. Age 2014; 36: 9715-9715
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Nikolaidis PT, Knechtle B. Age of peak performance in 50-km ultramarathoners - is it older than in marathoners?. Open Access J Sports Med 2018; 9: 37-45
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Nikolaidis PT, Knechtle B. Performance in 100-km ultra-marathoners - At which age it reaches its peak? J Strength Cond Res 2020; 34: 1409–1415
  • 25 Spittler J, Oberle L. Current trends in ultramarathon running. Cur Sports Med Rep 2019; 18: 387-393
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Harriss DJ, MacSween A, Atkinson G. Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2020 Update. Int J Sports Med 2019; 40: 813-817
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Johansson RE, Adolph ST, Swart J et al. Accuracy of GPS sport watches in measuring distance in an ultramarathon running race. Int J Sports Sci Coach 2020; 15: 212–219
  • 28 Fornasiero A, Trabucchi P. et al. The energetics during the world’s most challenging mountain Ultra-Marathon-A case study at the Tor des Geants® . Front Physiol 2017; 8: 1003
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Hoogkamer W, Kipp S, Kram R. The biomechanics of competitive male runners in three marathon racing shoes: A randomized crossover study. Sports Med 2019; 49: 133-143
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Hunter I, McLeod A, Valentine D. et al. Running economy, mechanics, and marathon racing shoes. J Sports Sci 2019; 37: 2367-2373
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Fuller JT, Bellenger CR, Thewlis D. et al. The effect of footwear on running performance and running economy in distance runners. Sports Med 2015; 45: 411-422
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Kazimierczak M, Dąbrowska A, Adamczewska K. et al. The impact of modern ultramarathons on shaping the social identity of runners. The case study of karkonosze winter ultramarathon. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17: 116
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Knechtle B, Valeri F, Nikolaidis PT. et al. Do women reduce the gap to men in ultra-marathon running?. SpringerPlus 2016; 5: 672
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Willis SJ, Gellaerts J, Mariani B. et al. Level versus uphill economy and mechanical responses in elite ultra-trail runners. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2019; 14: 1001-1005
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Vernillo G, Brighenti A, Limonta E. et al. Effects of ultratrail running on skeletal-muscle oxygenation dynamics. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2017; 12: 496-504
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Waldvogel KJ, Nikolaidis PT, Di Gangi S. et al. Women reduce the performance difference to men with increasing age in ultra-marathon running. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019; 16: 2377
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Lara B, Salinero JJ, Del Coso J. The relationship between age and running time in elite marathoners is U-shaped. Age 2014; 36: 1003-1008
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Handelsman DJ, Hirschberg AL, Bermon S. Circulating testosterone as the hormonal basis of sex differences in athletic performance. Endocr Rev 2018; 39: 803-829
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Lötscher F, Löffel T, Steiner R. et al. Biologically relevant sex differences for fitness-related parameters in active octogenarians. Eur J Appl Physiol 2007; 99: 533-540
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar