Transcranial Stimulation Improves Volume and Perceived Exertion but does not Change Power

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the acute effect of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) over the primary motor cortex (M1) on the volume, perceived exertion, and neuromuscular performance measurements in trained and untrained adults. Twenty-four male adults (12 trained and 12 untrained) participated in this single-blind, randomized, and sham-controlled study. The participants performed three back squat repetitions using the 15RM load with maximal concentric velocity to assess neuromuscular performance before tDCS and 30-min after resistance exercise. Next, they were randomly assigned to a-tDCS over M1 or the sham condition. Participants performed ten sets of parallel back squat with 15RM load and repetitions sustained to momentary muscular failure. The total number of repetitions was higher (p<0.05) and perceived exertion was lower (p<0.05) after a-tDCS in both groups. Peak power, velocity, and force decreased in both groups after the RE session (p<0.05), but with a higher rate in untrained individuals (p<0.05). No significant effect was found for peak power, peak velocity, and peak force (p>0.05). This study suggests that using a-tDCS may improve the total volume of repetitions and perceived exertion in trained and untrained individuals.

Key words

brain - strength training - neuroscience - rating of perceived exertion

Publication History

Received: 13 April 2020

Accepted: 03 November 2020

Article published online:
13 January 2021

• References

• 1 Okano AH, Fontes EB, Montenegro RA. et al. Brain stimulation modulates the autonomic nervous system, rating of perceived exertion and performance during maximal exercise. Br J Sports Med 2015; 49: 1213-1218
• 2 Edwards DJ, Cortes M, Wortman-Jutt S. et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation and sports performance. Front Hum Neurosci 2017; 11: 243
• 3 Frazer AK, Howatson G, Athtiainen JP. et al. Priming the motor cortex with anodal transcranial direct current stimulation affects the acute inhibitory corticospinal responses to strength training. J Strength Cond Res 2019; 33: 307-317
• 4 Mesquita PHC, Lage GM, Franchini E. et al. Bi-hemispheric anodal transcranial direct current stimulation worsens taekwondo-related performance. Hum Mov Sci 2019; 66: 578-586
• 5 DGDS Machado, Unal G, Andrade SM. et al. Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on exercise performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Stimul 2019; 12: 593-605
• 6 Montenegro R, Okano A, Cunha F. et al. Does pré-frontal córtex transcranial direct currnt stimulation influence the oxygen uptake at rest and post-exercise?. Int J Sports Med 2014; 35: 459-464
• 7 Hazime FA, da Cunha RA, Soliaman RR. et al. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) increases isometric strength of shoulder rotators muscles in handball players. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2017; 12: 402-407
• 8 Vargas VZ, Baptista AF, Pereira GOC. et al. Modulation of isometric quadriceps strength in soccer players with transcranial direct current stimulation: A crossover study. J Strength Cond Res 2018; 32: 1336-1341
• 9 Kamali AM, Saadi ZK, Yahyavi SS. et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation to enhance athletic performance outcome in experienced bodybuilders. PLoS One 2019; 14: e0220363
• 10 Cogiamanian F, Marceglia S, Ardolino G. et al. Improved isometric force endurance after transcranial direct current stimulation over the human motor cortical areas. Eur J Neurosci 2007; 26: 242-249
• 11 Flood A, Waddington G, Keegan RJ. et al. The effects of elevated pain inhibition on endurance exercise performance. PeerJ 2017; 5: e3028
• 12 Angius L, Pageaux B, Hopker J. et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation improves isometric time to exhaustion of the knee extensors. Neuroscience 2016; 339: 363-375
• 13 Lattari E, Campos C, Lamego MK. et al. Can transcranial direct current stimulation improve muscle power in individuals with advanced resistance training experience?. J Strength Cond Res 2020; 34: 97-103
• 14 Dissanayaka T, Zoghi M, Farrell M. et al. Does transcranial electrical stimulation enhance corticospinal excitability of the motor cortex in healthy individuals? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Neurosci 2017; 46: 1968-1990
• 15 Stepniewska I, Preuss TM, Kaas JH. Thalamic connections of the primary motor cortex (M1) of owl monkeys. J Comp Neurol 1994; 349: 558-582
• 16 Mauger AR. Fatigue is a pain—the use of novel neurophysiological techniques to understand the fatigue-pain relationship. Front Physiol 2013; 4: 104
• 17 Stevens CJ, Mauger AR, Hassmèn P. Endurance performance is influenced by perceptions of pain and temperature: Theory, applications and safety considerations. Sports Med 2018; 48: 525-537
• 18 Zourdos M, Klemp A, Dolan D. et al. Novel resistance training-specific rating of perceived exertion scale measuring repetitions in reserve. J Strength Cond Res 2016; 30: 267-275
• 19 Foster C, Florhaug JA, Franklin J. et al. A new approach to monitoring exercise training. J Strength Cond Res 2001; 15: 109-115
• 20 Lattari E, Oliveira BRR, Monteiro Júnior RS. et al. Acute effects of single dose transcranial direct current stimulation on muscle strength: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2018; 13: e0209513
• 21 Holgado D, Zandonai T, Ciria LF. et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the left prefrontal cortex does not affect time-trial self-paced cycling performance: evidence from oscillatory brain activity and power output. PLoS One 2019; 14: e0210873
• 22 Harriss DJ, Macsween A, Atkinson G. Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2020 update. Int J Sports Med 2019; 40: 813-817
• 23 Kenttä G, Hassmén P. Overtraining and recovery. A conceptual model. Sports Med 1998; 26: 1-16
• 24 Angius L, Hopker J, Mauger AR. The ergogenic effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on exercise performance. Front Physiol 2017; 8: 90
• 25 Fonseca FS, Costa BV, Ferreira MEC. et al. Acute effects of equated volume-load resistance training leading to muscular failure versus non-failure on neuromuscular performance. J Exerc Sci Fit 2020; 18: 94-100
• 26 Cohen J. Quantitative methods in psychology: A power primer. Psychol Bull 1992; 112: 155-159
• 27 Silva-Cavalcante MD, Couto PG, Azevedo RA. et al. Mental fatigue does not alter performance or neuromuscular fatigue development during self-paced exercise in recreationally trained cyclists. Eur J Appl Physiol 2018; 118: 2477-2487
• 28 Pareja-Blanco F, Rodríguez-Rosell D, Sánchez-Medina L. et al. Effects of velocity loss during resistance training on athletic performance, strength gains and muscle adaptations. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2017; 27: 724-735
• 29 Sánchez-Medina L, González-Badillo JJ, Perez CE. et al. Velocity-and power-load relationships of the bench pull vs. bench press exercises. Int J Sports Med 2014; 35: 209-216
• 30 Schoenfeld BJ, Contreras B, Krieger J. et al. Resistance training volume enhances muscle hypertrophy but not strength in trained men. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2019; 51: 94-103
• 31 Esco MR, Flatt AA, Nakamura FY. Initial weekly HRV response is related to the prospective change in VO₂max in female soccer players. Int J Sports Med 2016; 37: 436-441