Anwendungen der künstlichen Intelligenz in der Abdominalbildgebung

Künstliche Intelligenz (KI) dringt in immer mehr Lebensbereiche vor – auch in der Radiologie hat sie längst Einzug gehalten. Dieser Beitrag erläutert Grundlagen des maschinellen Lernens, neuronaler Netzwerke sowie des Forschungsfelds „Radiomics“. Darüber hinaus liegt der Fokus auf KI-Modellen in der Abdominalbildgebung: Welche Erfolge gibt es, was sind die Limitationen und wie lassen sie sich überwinden?

Schlüsselwörter

künstliche Intelligenz - maschinelles Lernen - Abdominalbildgebung - Faltungsnetzwerke - Radiomics

• Literatur

• 1 Sullivan DC, Obuchowski NA, Kessler LG. et al. Metrology standards for quantitative imaging biomarkers. Radiology 2015; 277: 813-825
• 2 Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H. Radiomics: Images are more than pictures, they are data. Radiology 2016; 278: 563-577
• 3 Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J. et al. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the quantitative imaging network. Magn Reson Imaging 2012; 30: 1323-1341
• 4 Yushkevich PA, Piven J, Hazlett HC. et al. User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: Significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage 2006; 31: 1116-1128
• 5 Bodalal Z, Trebeschi S, Nguyen-Kim TDL. et al. Radiogenomics: bridging imaging and genomics. Abdom Radiol 2019; 44: 1960-1984
• 6 McKinney SM, Sieniek M, Godbole V. et al. International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening. Nature 2020; 577: 89-94
• 7 Aerts HJ, Velazquez ER, Leijenaar RT. et al. Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach. Nat Commun 2014; 5: 4006
• 8 Bilic P, Christ PF, Vorontsov E. et al. The Liver Tumor Segmentation Benchmark (LiTS). arXiv:1901.04056. 13th January 2019. Im Internet (Stand: 20.10.2021): http://arxiv.org/abs/1901.04056
• 9 Graffy PM, Sandfort V, Summers RM. et al. Automated liver fat quantification at nonenhanced abdominal CT for population-based steatosis assessment. Radiology 2019; 293: 334-342
• 10 Ryu H, Shin SY, Lee JY. et al. Joint segmentation and classification of hepatic lesions in ultrasound images using deep learning. Eur Radiol 2021; 31: 8733-8742
• 11 Schelb P, Kohl S, Radtke JP. et al. Classification of cancer at prostate MRI: Deep Learning versus clinical PI-RADS Assessment. Radiology 2019; 293: 607-617
• 12 Greer MD, Lay N, Shih JH. et al. Computer-aided diagnosis prior to conventional interpretation of prostate mpMRI: An international multi-reader study. Eur Radiol 2018; 28: 4407-4417
• 13 Zhao X, Xie P, Wang M. et al. Deep learning-based fully automated detection and segmentation of lymph nodes on multiparametric-MRI for rectal cancer: A multicentre study. EBioMedicine 2020; 56: 102780
• 14 Bustin A, Fuin N, Botnar RM. et al. From compressed-sensing to artificial intelligence-based cardiac MRI reconstruction. Front Cardiovasc Med 2020; 7: 17
• 15 Roberts M, Driggs D, Thorpe M. et al. Common pitfalls and recommendations for using machine learning to detect and prognosticate for COVID-19 using chest radiographs and CT scans. Nat Mach Intell 2021; 3: 199-217
• 16 Stupple A, Singerman D, Celi LA. The reproducibility crisis in the age of digital medicine. NPJ Digit Med 2019; 2: 2
• 17 Russakovsky O, Deng J, Su H. et al. ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge. Int J Comput Vis 2015; 115: 211-252
• 18 Obermeyer Z, Powers B, Vogeli C. et al. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science 2019; 366: 447-453
• 19 Larrazabal AJ, Nieto N, Peterson V. et al. Gender imbalance in medical imaging datasets produces biased classifiers for computer-aided diagnosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2020; 117: 12592-12594
• 20 The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). Im Internet (Stand: 20.10.2021): http://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection/data-protection-eu_de
• 21 Winkler JK, Fink C, Toberer F. et al. Association between surgical skin markings in dermoscopic images and diagnostic performance of a deep learning convolutional neural network for melanoma recognition. JAMA Dermatol 2019; 155: 1135-1141
• 22 Byra M, Styczynski G, Szmigielski C. et al. Adversarial attacks on deep learning models for fatty liver disease classification by modification of ultrasound image reconstruction method. 2020 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS) 2020; 1-4
• 23 Zwanenburg A, Leger S, Vallières M. et al. The image biomarker standardisation initiative. arXiv:1612.07003v11. 17th December 2019. Im Internet (Stand: 20.10.2021): http://arxiv.org/abs/1612.07003
• 24 Da-Ano R, Masson I, Lucia F. et al. Performance comparison of modified ComBat for harmonization of radiomic features for multicenter studies. Sci Rep 2020; 10: 10248
• 25 Kaissis GA, Makowski MR, Rückert D. et al. Secure, privacy-preserving and federated machine learning in medical imaging. Nat Mach Intell 2020; 2: 305-311
• 26 Ziller A, Usynin D, Remerscheid NW. et al. Differentially private federated deep learning for multi-site medical image segmentation. arXiv:2107.02586. 6th July 2021. Im Internet (Stand: 20.10.2021): http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.02586
• 27 Koker T, Mireshghallah F, Titcombe T. et al. U-Noise: Learnable noise masks for interpretable image segmentation. arXiv:2101.05791. 20th January 2021. Im Internet (Stand: 20.10.2021): http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.05791