Navigation in der dentalen Implantologie

Durch Navigationsverfahren können dentale Implantate vor dem chirurgischen Eingriff virtuell 3-dimensional geplant werden und deren Position anschließend auf die klinische Situation am Patienten übertragen werden. Verschiedene Verfahren stehen hierzu zur Verfügung. Wie zuverlässig diese Verfahren sind und ob sie sich für die Praxis lohnen, zeigen die Autoren dieses Beitrags.

Publication History

Article published online:
19 April 2021

• Literatur

• 1 DʼHaese J, Ackhurst J, Wismeijer D. et al. Current state of the art of computer-guided implant surgery. Periodontol 2000 2017; 73: 121-133
• 2 Garber DA, Belser UC. Restoration-driven implant placement with restoration-generated site development. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1995; 16: 796 798–802, 804
• 3 Albrektsson T, Chrcanovic B, Ostman PO. et al. Initial and long-term crestal bone responses to modern dental implants. Periodontol 2000 2017; 73: 41-50
• 4 Romanos GE, Delgado-Ruiz R, Sculean A. Concepts for prevention of complications in implant therapy. Periodontol 2000 2019; 81: 7-17
• 5 Al Amri MD. Influence of interimplant distance on the crestal bone height around dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2016; 115: 278-282.e1
• 6 Staubli N, Walter C, Schmidt JC. et al. Excess cement and the risk of peri-implant disease – a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017; 28: 1278-1290
• 7 Bosshardt DD, Chappuis V, Buser D. Osseointegration of titanium, titanium alloy and zirconia dental implants: current knowledge and open questions. Periodontol 2000 2017; 73: 22-40
• 8 Wismeijer D, Joda T, Flugge T. et al. Group 5 ITI Consensus Report: Digital technologies. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018; 29 (Suppl. 16) 436-442
• 9 Al Yafi F, Camenisch B, Al-Sabbagh M. Is Digital Guided Implant Surgery Accurate and Reliable?. Dent Clin North Am 2019; 63: 381-397
• 10 Tahmaseb A, Wu V, Wismeijer D. et al. The accuracy of static computer-aided implant surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018; 29 (Suppl. 16) 416-435
• 11 Gargallo-Albiol J, Barootchi S, Salomo-Coll O. et al. Advantages and disadvantages of implant navigation surgery. A systematic review. Ann Anat 2019; 225: 1-10
• 12 Cassetta M, Altieri F, Giansanti M. et al. Is there a learning curve in static computer-assisted implant surgery? A prospective clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020; 49: 1335-1342
• 13 Cassetta M, Di Mambro A, Giansanti M. et al. How does an error in positioning the template affect the accuracy of implants inserted using a single fixed mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guide?. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014; 43: 85-92
• 14 Tahmaseb A, Wismeijer D, Coucke W. et al. Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014; 29 (Suppl) 25-42
• 15 Schnutenhaus S, Edelmann C, Rudolph H. et al. Retrospective study to determine the accuracy of template-guided implant placement using a novel nonradiologic evaluation method. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2016; 121: e72-e79
• 16 Zhou W, Liu Z, Song L. et al. Clinical Factors Affecting the Accuracy of Guided Implant Surgery-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2018; 18: 28-40
• 17 Li J, Chen Z, Chan HL. et al. Does flap opening or not influence the accuracy of semi-guided implant placement in partially edentulous sites?. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2019; 21: 1253-1261
• 18 Du Y, Wangrao K, Liu L. et al. Quantification of image artifacts from navigation markers in dynamic guided implant surgery and the effect on registration performance in different clinical scenarios. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2019; 34: 726-736
• 19 Vercruyssen M, Fortin T, Widmann G. et al. Different techniques of static/dynamic guided implant surgery: modalities and indications. Periodontol 2000 2014; 66: 214-227
• 20 Brief J, Edinger D, Hassfeld S. et al. Accuracy of image-guided implantology. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16: 495-501
• 21 Hoffmann J, Westendorff C, Gomez-Roman G. et al. Accuracy of navigation-guided socket drilling before implant installation compared to the conventional free-hand method in a synthetic edentulous lower jaw model. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16: 609-614
• 22 Kramer FJ, Baethge C, Swennen G. et al. Navigated vs. conventional implant insertion for maxillary single tooth replacement. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16: 60-68
• 23 Schnutenhaus S, Edelmann C, Knipper A. et al. Accuracy of dynamic computer-assited implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and in vitro studies. J Clin Med 2021; 10: 704
• 24 Liu SH, Cao CR, Lin WC. et al. Experimental and numerical simulation study of the thermal hazards of four azo compounds. J Hazard Mater 2019; 365: 164-177
• 25 Chen JT. A Novel Application of Dynamic Navigation System in Socket Shield Technique. J Oral Implantol 2019; 45: 409-415
• 26 Block MS, Emery RW. Static or Dynamic Navigation for Implant Placement-Choosing the Method of Guidance. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 74: 269-277
• 27 Ayoub A, Pulijala Y. The application of virtual reality and augmented reality in Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery. BMC Oral Health 2019; 19: 238
• 28 Schnitman PA, Hayashi C, Han RK. Why guided when freehand is easier, quicker, and less costly?. J Oral Implantol 2014; 40: 670-678
• 29 Greenstein G, Tarnow D. The mental foramen and nerve: clinical and anatomical factors related to dental implant placement: a literature review. J Periodontol 2006; 77: 1933-1943
• 30 Joda T, Derksen W, Wittneben JG. et al. Static computer-aided implant surgery (s-CAIS) analysing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), economics and surgical complications: A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018; 29 (Suppl. 16) 359-373
• 31 Tatakis DN, Chien HH, Parashis AO. Guided implant surgery risks and their prevention. Periodontol 2000 2019; 81: 194-208
• 32 Choi W, Nguyen BC, Doan A. et al. Freehand Versus Guided Surgery: Factors Influencing Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement. Implant Dent 2017; 26: 500-509
• 33 Behneke A, Burwinkel M, Behneke N. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 416-423
• 34 Nickenig HJ, Wichmann M, Hamel J. et al. Evaluation of the difference in accuracy between implant placement by virtual planning data and surgical guide templates versus the conventional free-hand method – a combined in vivo – in vitro technique using cone-beam CT (Part II). J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2010; 38: 488-493
• 35 Vercruyssen M, Coucke W, Naert I. et al. Depth and lateral deviations in guided implant surgery: an RCT comparing guided surgery with mental navigation or the use of a pilot-drill template. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015; 26: 1315-1320
• 36 Vercruyssen M, Cox C, Coucke W. et al. A randomized clinical trial comparing guided implant surgery (bone- or mucosa-supported) with mental navigation or the use of a pilot-drill template. J Clin Periodontol 2014; 41: 717-723
• 37 Varga jr. E, Antal M, Major L. et al. Guidance means accuracy: A randomized clinical trial on freehand versus guided dental implantation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2020; 31: 417-430
• 38 Schneider D, Sancho-Puchades M, Mir-Mari J. et al. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Conventional and Computer-Assisted Implant Planning and Placement in Partially Edentulous Patients. Part 4: Accuracy of Implant Placement. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2019; 39: e111-e122
• 39 Sun TM, Lee HE, Lan TH. Comparing Accuracy of Implant Installation with a Navigation System (NS), a Laboratory Guide (LG), NS with LG, and Freehand Drilling. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17: 2107
• 40 Aydemir CA, Arisan V. Accuracy of dental implant placement via dynamic navigation or the freehand method: A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2020; 31: 255-263
• 41 Jacobs R. Preoperative radiologic planning of implant surgery in compromised patients. Periodontol 2000 2003; 33: 12-25
• 42 Rosenfeld AL, Mandelaris GA, Tardieu PB. Prosthetically directed implant placement using computer software to ensure precise placement and predictable prosthetic outcomes. Part 2: rapid-prototype medical modeling and stereolithographic drilling guides requiring bone exposure. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006; 26: 347-353
• 43 Rosenfeld AL, Mandelaris GA, Tardieu PB. Prosthetically directed implant placement using computer software to ensure precise placement and predictable prosthetic outcomes. Part 1: diagnostics, imaging, and collaborative accountability. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006; 26: 215-221