Innovative Projekte in der Schlaganfallmedizin

Heinrich Audebert

doi:10.1055/a-1511-4172

Notfallmedizin up2date, Table of Contents

Notfallmedizin up2date 2022; 17(04): 443-456
DOI: 10.1055/a-1511-4172

Neurologische Notfälle

Innovative Projekte in der Schlaganfallmedizin

Heinrich Audebert

Abstract

All articles of this category

Bei Einbeziehung neurologischer Fachexpertise werden durch das TeleNotarztsystem eine verbesserte Erkennung eines Schlaganfallereignisses und Triage ermöglicht. Durch eine Vorverlegung der Schlaganfalldiagnostik und der Thrombolyse bereits an den Notfallort verbessern mobile Stroke Units mit integriertem Computertomografen die Prognose von Patient*innen mit einem ischämischen Schlaganfall ([Abb. 1]). Technische Weiterentwicklungen eröffnen in der Zukunft möglicherweise die Perspektive, die spezifische Schlaganfallbehandlung auch auf normale Rettungswagen vorzuverlagern.

Schlüsselwörter

mobiles Interventionsteam - Thrombektomie - Stroke-Einsatz-Mobil - STEMO - Telemedizin - Flying Intervention Team - Mobile Stroke Unit - MSU - FIT

Full Text

References

Literatur
1 Murray CJ, Barber RM, Foreman KJ. GBD 2013 DALYs and HALE Collaborators. et al. Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 306 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 188 countries, 1990–2013: quantifying the epidemiological transition. Lancet 2015; 386: 2145-2191
2 GBD 2016 Stroke Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol 2019; 18: 439-458
3 Feigin VL, Forouzanfar MH, Krishnamurthi R. et al. Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990–2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2014; 383: 245-254
4 Aguiar de Sousa D, von Martial R, Abilleira S. et al. Access to and delivery of acute ischaemic stroke treatments: a survey of national scientific societies and stroke experts in 44 European countries. Eur Stroke J 2019; 4: 13-28
5 Handschu R, Littmann R, Reulbach U. et al. Telemedicine in emergency evaluation of acute stroke: interrater agreement in remote video examination with a novel multimedia system. Stroke 2003; 34: 2842-2846
6 Puetz V, Bodechtel U, Gerber JC. et al. Reliability of brain CT evaluation by stroke neurologists in telemedicine. Neurology 2013; 80: 332-338
7 Meyer BC, Raman R, Hemmen T. et al. Efficacy of site-independent telemedicine in the STRokE DOC trial: a randomised, blinded, prospective study. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7: 787-795
8 Audebert HJ, Kukla C, Clarmann von Claranau S. et al. Telemedicine for safe and extended use of thrombolysis in stroke: the Telemedic Pilot Project for Integrative Stroke Care (TEMPiS) in Bavaria. Stroke 2005; 36: 287-291
9 Audebert HJ, Kukla C, Vatankhah B. et al. Comparison of tissue plasminogen activator administration management between Telestroke Network hospitals and academic stroke centers: the Telemedical Pilot Project for Integrative Stroke Care in Bavaria/Germany. Stroke 2006; 37: 1822-1827
10 Schwab S, Vatankhah B, Kukla C. et al. Long-term outcome after thrombolysis in telemedical stroke care. Neurology 2007; 69: 898-903
11 Audebert HJ, Schenkel J, Heuschmann PU. et al. Effects of the implementation of a telemedical stroke network: the Telemedic Pilot Project for Integrative Stroke Care (TEMPiS) in Bavaria, Germany. Lancet Neurol 2006; 5: 742-748
12 Audebert HJ, Schultes K, Tietz V. et al. Long-term effects of specialized stroke care with telemedicine support in community hospitals on behalf of the Telemedical Project for Integrative Stroke Care (TEMPiS). Stroke 2009; 40: 902-908
13 Langhorne P, Ramachandra S. Stroke Unit Trialists’ Collaboration. Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke: network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; (04) CD000197
14 Barlinn J, Winzer S, Worthmann H. et al. Telemedizin in der Schlaganfallversorgung – versorgungsrelevant für Deutschland. Nervenarzt 2021; 92: 593-601
15 Saver JL, Goyal M, van der Lugt A. et al. Time to treatment with endovascular thrombectomy and outcomes from ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2016; 316: 1279-1288
16 Schlemm L, Endres M, Nolte CH. Bypassing the closest stroke center for thrombectomy candidates: what additional delay to thrombolysis is acceptable?. Stroke 2020; 51: 867-875
17 Abilleira S, Perez de la Ossa N, Jimenez X. et al. Transfer to the local stroke center versus direct transfer to endovascular center of acute stroke patients with suspected large vessel occlusion in the Catalan territory (RACECAT): study protocol of a cluster randomized within a cohort trial. Int J Stroke 2019; 14: 734-744
18 Pérez de la Ossa N, Abilleira S, Jovin TG. et al. Effect of Direct Transportation to Thrombectomy-Capable Center vs Local Stroke Center on Neurological Outcomes in Patients With Suspected Large-Vessel Occlusion Stroke in Nonurban Areas: The RACECAT Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2022; 327: 1782-1794
19 Audebert HJ, Clarmann von Clarenau S, Schenkel J. et al. Problemfeld der Notfallverlegungen beim Schlafanfall: Ergebnisse des telemedizinischen Pilotprojekts zur integrierten Schlaganfallversorgung in Südostbayern (TEMPiS). Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2005; 130: 2495-2500
20 Steinmetz H, Nabavi D, Faiss J. Prozesse der Rekanalisationstherapie kontinuierlich optimieren. Deutsche Schlaganfall-Gesellschaft 2021 Accessed September 30, 2021 at: https://www.dsg-info.de/images/stories/DSG/Intern/WeiterePDF/2021/DSG-Stellungnahme-Transport-zur-Thrombektomie.pdf
21 Wei D, Oxley TJ, Nistal DA. et al. Mobile interventional stroke teams lead to faster treatment times for thrombectomy in large vessel occlusion. Stroke 2017; 48: 3295-3300
22 Brekenfeld C, Goebell E, Schmidt H. et al. ‘Drip-and-drive’: shipping the neurointerventionalist to provide mechanical thrombectomy in primary stroke centers. J Neurointervent Surg 2018; 10: 932-936
23 Hubert GJ, Kraus F, Maegerlein C. et al. The “flying intervention team”: a novel stroke care concept for rural areas. Cerebrovasc Dis 2021; 50: 375-382
24 Hubert GJ, Hubert ND, Maegerlein C. et al. Association between use of a flying intervention team vs patient interhospital transfer and time to endovascular thrombectomy among patients with acute ischemic stroke in nonurban Germany. JAMA 2022; 327: 1795-1805
25 Goyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH. et al. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet 2016; 387: 1723-1731
26 Suzuki K, Matsumaru Y, Takeuchi M. et al. Effect of mechanical thrombectomy without vs with intravenous thrombolysis on functional outcome among patients with acute ischemic stroke: the SKIP randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2021; 325: 244-253
27 Zi W, Qiu Z, Li F. et al. Effect of endovascular treatment alone vs intravenous alteplase plus endovascular treatment on functional independence in patients with acute ischemic stroke: the DEVT randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2021; 325: 234-243
28 Yang J, Wu Y, Gao X. et al. Intraarterial versus intravenous tirofiban as an adjunct to endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2020; 51: 2925-2933
29 LeCouffe NE, Kappelhof M, Treurniet KM. et al. A randomized trial of intravenous alteplase before endovascular treatment for stroke. N Engl J Med 2021; 385: 1833-1844
30 Turc G, Tsivgoulis G, Audebert HJ. et al. European Stroke Organisation (ESO)-European Society for Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT) expedited recommendation on indication for intravenous thrombolysis before mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke and anterior circulation large vessel occlusion. J Neurointervent Surg 2022; 14: 209
31 Psychogios MN, Maier IL, Tsogkas I. et al. One-stop management of 230 consecutive acute stroke patients: report of procedural times and clinical outcome. J Clin Med 2019; 8: 2185
32 Sarraj A, Goyal N, Chen M. et al. Direct to angiography vs repeated imaging approaches in transferred patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy. JAMA Neurol 2021; 78: 916-926
33 Renu A, Millan M, San Roman L. et al. Effect of intra-arterial alteplase vs placebo following successful thrombectomy on functional outcomes in patients with large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke: the CHOICE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2022; 327: 826-835
34 Lees KR, Bluhmki E, von Kummer R. et al. Time to treatment with intravenous alteplase and outcome in stroke: an updated pooled analysis of ECASS, ATLANTIS, NINDS, and EPITHET trials. Lancet 2010; 375: 1695-1703
35 Gerloff C, Berlit P. Die DGN befürwortet das Telenotarzt-Konzept, fordert jedoch Einbindung einer neurologischen Expertise. Accessed July 03, 2022 at: https://dgn.org/neuronews/neuronews/die-dgn-befuerwortet-das-telenotarzt-konzept-fordert-jedoch-einbindung-einer-neurologischen-expertise/
36 Geisler F, Kunz A, Winter B. et al. Telemedicine in prehospital acute stroke care. J Am Heart Assoc 2019; 8: e011729
37 Winter B, Wendt M, Waldschmidt C. et al. 4G versus 3G-enabled telemedicine in prehospital acute stroke care. Int J Stroke 2019; 14: 620-629
38 Wahlgren N, Ahmed N, Davalos A. et al. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3–4.5 h after acute ischaemic stroke (SITS-ISTR): an observational study. Lancet 2008; 372: 1303-1309
39 Meretoja A, Strbian D, Mustanoja S. et al. Reducing in-hospital delay to 20 minutes in stroke thrombolysis. Neurology 2012; 79: 306-313
40 Hubert GJ, Meretoja A, Audebert H. et al. Comparison of stroke thrombolysis rates and delays in a centralized (Helsinki, Finland) and decentralized (Tempis Telestroke Unit Network, Germany) setting. International Journal of Stroke 2014; 9: 41-331
41 Fassbender K, Walter S, Liu Y. et al. “Mobile stroke unit” for hyperacute stroke treatment. Stroke 2003; 34: e44
42 Turc G, Hadziahmetovic M, Walter S. et al. Comparison of mobile stroke unit with usual care for acute ischemic stroke management: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol 2022; 79: 281-290
43 Ebinger M, Siegerink B, Kunz A. et al. Association between dispatch of mobile stroke units and functional outcomes among patients with acute ischemic stroke in Berlin. JAMA 2021; 325: 454-466
44 Grotta JC, Yamal JM, Parker SA. et al. Prospective, Multicenter, Controlled Trial of Mobile Stroke Units. N Engl J Med 2021; 385: 971-981
45 Ebinger M, Winter B, Wendt M. et al. Effect of the use of ambulance-based thrombolysis on time to thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2014; 311: 1622-1631
46 Wendt M, Ebinger M, Kunz A. et al. Improved prehospital triage of patients with stroke in a specialized stroke ambulance results of the pre-hospital acute neurological therapy and optimization of medical care in stroke study. Stroke 2015; 46: 740-745
47 Zhao H, Coote S, Easton D. et al. Melbourne mobile stroke unit and reperfusion therapy: greater clinical impact of thrombectomy than thrombolysis. Stroke 2020; 51: 922-930
48 Walter S, Audebert HJ, Katsanos AH. et al. European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines on mobile stroke units for prehospital stroke management. Eur Stroke J 2022; 7: XXVII-LIX
49 Bustamante A, Penalba A, Orset C. et al. Blood biomarkers to differentiate ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes. Neurology 2021; 96: e1928-e1939
50 Holscher T, Dunford JV, Schlachetzki F. et al. Prehospital stroke diagnosis and treatment in ambulances and helicopters-a concept paper. Am J Emerg Med 2013; 31: 743-747
51 Weatherall A, Poynter E, Garner A. et al. Near-infrared spectroscopy monitoring in a pre-hospital trauma patient cohort: an analysis of successful signal collection. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2020; 64: 117-123