Download PDF
Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2022; 147(18): 1187-1194
DOI: 10.1055/a-1726-1315
Dossier

Nachsorge der Patienten nach infarktbedingtem kardiogenem Schock

Short- and long-term follow-up care in patients with infarction-related cardiogenic shock
Martin Ruß
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Der infarktbedingte kardiogene Schock (IKS) ist die schwerste Verlaufsform eines akuten Koronarsyndroms (ACS), mit sehr hohem Ressourcenverbrauch – insbesondere bei Einsatz temporärer mechanischer Unterstützungssysteme – und weiterhin sehr hoher Sterblichkeit zwischen 40 und 50 %. Die Langzeitprognose jedoch ist gut, wenn sowohl die intensivmedizinische Nachsorge, medikamentöse Therapiemaßnahmen und später auch Lebensstiländerungen greifen.

Abstract

Infarction-related cardiogenic shock is the most severe complication of an acute coronary syndrome, that still bears a high mortality up to 50 % and wastes a lot of resources of an intensive care unit, especially if extracorporeal assist devices are used.

In contrast to the adverse short-term outcome, patients fare a surprisingly well in the long range, both for survival and quality of life. Same as for the acute disease, which needs specific cardiologic and intensive care measures, long-term follow-up care needs a lot of medical and lifestyle interventions and treatments to obtain the best possible result for the patients. Since there is good evidence for cardiologic therapies from randomized controlled trials, high quality data to treat long-term sequalae of the stay on intensive care unit, are sparse.

Overall, follow-up care of survivors of infarction related cardiogenic shock includes the best available treatment of the coronary artery disease, intensified heart failure therapy of left and right heart dysfunction and evaluation for the risk of sudden cardiac death and treatment of sequelae of the intensive-care-unit stay.

Schlüsselwörter

infarktbedingter kardiogener Schock - Nachsorge - Herzinsuffizienz-Therapie - kardiovaskuläre Risikoreduktion

Key words

infarction-related cardiogenic shock - follow up - heart failure - cardiovascular risk reduction


Publication History

Article published online:
07 September 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Sleeper LA, Ramanathan K, Picard MH. et al. Functional status and quality of life after emergency revascularization for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 266-273
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Thiele H, Akin I, Sandri M. et al. PCI Strategies in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock. N Engl J Med 2017; 377 (25) 2419-2432
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Connolly SJ, Eikelboom JW, Bosch J. et al. Rivaroxaban with or without aspirin in patients with stable coronary artery disease: an international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2018; 391: 205-218
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Batra A, Kiefer F, Kopp I. et al. S3-Leitlinie: Rauchen und Tabakabhängigkeit: Screening, Diagnostik und Behandlung. Stand: 2021. AWMF-Register Nr. 076-006.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Fachgesellschaften aus Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz (D-A-CH). S3-Leitline zur kardiologischen Rehabilitation im deutschsprachigen Raum Europas – Deutschland, Österreich, Schweiz (D-A-CH). Stand: 2020. AWMF-Registernummer: 133-001.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Packer M, Anker SD, Butler J. et al. Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes with Empagliflozin in Heart Failure. N Engl J Med 2020; 383: 1413-1424
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Pfeffer MA, Claggett B, Lewis EF. et al. Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction. N Engl J Med 2021; 385: 1845-1855
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Solomon SD, McMurray JJV, Anand IS. et al. Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibition in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction. N Engl J Med 2019; 381: 1609-1620
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Pitt B, Remme W, Zannad F. et al. Eplerenone, a selective aldosterone blocker, in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 1309-1321
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Palau P, Seller J, Domínguez E. et al. Effect of β-Blocker Withdrawal on Functional Capacity in Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021; 78: 2042-2056
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Rasmussen AA, Larsen SH, Jensen M. et al. Prognostic impact of self-reported health on clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes 2021; 7: 397-406
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann FJ. et al. Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (IABP-SHOCK II): final 12 month results of a randomised, open-label trial. Lancet 2013; 382: 1638-1645
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar