Download PDF
Facial Plast Surg 2022; 38(06): 540-545
DOI: 10.1055/a-1877-9371
Original Article

Facelift Techniques: An Overview

Kerem Sami Kaya 
1   Private Practice at FACEISTANBUL, Istanbul, Turkey
,
Ozcan Cakmak
1   Private Practice at FACEISTANBUL, Istanbul, Turkey
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Facelift techniques can be classified according to the depth and extent of the dissection applied. Imbrication and plication of the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) referred to as “SMAS lifts” or “classical facelifts” are the most commonly used techniques. Plication techniques involve in-folding of the SMAS and suture suspension without any SMAS incision whereas imbrication techniques involve a SMAS incision with a portion of the SMAS either removed or transposed with or without limited sub-SMAS dissection. Aging changes in the lower face and neck can be successfully treated with SMAS lift techniques. However, there is no lifting effect at midface level or improvement in the nasolabial folds since the retaining (zygomatic cutaneous and masseteric cutaneous) ligaments that prevent the transmission of traction to the malar portion of the facelift dissection are not released. Extended facelift techniques involve surgical release of these ligaments, and produce combined, balanced, and harmonious rejuvenation of the midface, cheek, and lower face without requiring a separate midface lift procedure. There are different techniques having similar extended midface dissections with some variations: The extended SMAS technique involves a long skin flap and a distinct SMAS flap dissected and pulled separately. The high SMAS technique has a similar dissection but involves a higher SMAS flap along the superior border of the zygomatic arch. The deep plane facelift involves undermining of skin-SMAS flap as a single unit following a more limited subcutaneous dissection. In the composite plane facelift, in addition to deep plane facelift dissection, the lower part of the orbicularis oculi muscle is also dissected and included in the flap. As they have a single unit, deep and composite flap facelifts allow excellent blood supply to the overlying skin. In this article, various facelift techniques are discussed in detail in line with the relevant surgical anatomy.

Keywords

facelift - rhytidectomy - SMAS lift - deep plane facelift - composite plane facelift


Publication History

Accepted Manuscript online:
16 June 2022

Article published online:
23 December 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Skoog T. Plastic Surgery: New Methods and Refinements. Philadelphia, WB Saunders: 1974
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Mitz V, Peyronie M. The superficial musculo-aponeurotic system (SMAS) in the parotid and cheek area. Plast Reconstr Surg 1976; 58 (01) 80-88
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Hamra ST. Composite rhytidectomy and the nasolabial fold. Clin Plast Surg 1995; 22 (02) 313-324
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Owsley JQ. Lifting the malar fat pad for correction of prominent nasolabial folds. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 91 (03) 463-474 , discussion 475–476
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Barton Jr FE. The SMAS and the nasolabial fold. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 89 (06) 1054-1057 , discussion 1058–1059
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Stuzin JM, Baker TJ, Gordon HL, Baker TM. Extended SMAS dissection as an approach to midface rejuvenation. Clin Plast Surg 1995; 22 (02) 295-311
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Hamra ST. The deep-plane rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990; 86 (01) 53-61 , discussion 62–63
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Hamra ST. Composite rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 90 (01) 1-13
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Surgical Anatomy of the Face. 2nd edition.. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Larrabee WF J, Makielski KH, Henderson JL.; 2004: 49-57
  • 10 Jacono AA, Alemi AS, Russell JL. A meta-analysis of complication rates among different SMAS facelift techniques. Aesthet Surg J 2019; 39 (09) 927-942
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Furnas DW. The retaining ligaments of the cheek. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989; 83 (01) 11-16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Cakmak O, Emre IE, Özücer B. Surgical approach to the thick nasolabial folds, jowls and heavy neck-how to approach and suspend the facial ligaments. Facial Plast Surg 2018; 34 (01) 59-65
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Mendelson BC. Anatomic study of the retaining ligaments of the face and applications for facial rejuvenation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2013; 37 (03) 513-515
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Stuzin JM. MOC-PSSM CME article: face lifting. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121 (1, Suppl): 1-19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Stuzin JM, Baker TJ, Gordon HL. The relationship of the superficial and deep facial fascias: relevance to rhytidectomy and aging. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 89 (03) 441-449 , discussion 450–451
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Mendelson BC. Surgery of the superficial musculoaponeurotic system: principles of release, vectors, and fixation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 107 (06) 1545-1552 , discussion 1553–1555, 1556–1557, 1558–1561
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Hamra ST. Building the composite face lift: a personal odyssey. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138 (01) 85-96
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Cakmak O, Emre IE. Surgical anatomy for extended facelift techniques. Facial Plast Surg 2020; 36 (03) 309-316
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Marten TJ. High SMAS facelift: combined single flap lifting of the jawline, cheek, and midface. Clin Plast Surg 2008; 35 (04) 569-603 , vi–vii
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Cakmak O, Özücer B, Aktekin M, Özkurt FE, Al-Salman R, Emre IE. Modified composite-flap facelift combined with finger-assisted malar elevation (FAME): a Cadaver study. Aesthet Surg J 2018; 38 (12) 1269-1279
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Mustoe TA, Rawlani V, Zimmerman H. Modified deep plane rhytidectomy with a lateral approach to the neck: an alternative to submental incision and dissection. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (01) 357-370
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Jacono AA, Bryant LM, Ahmedli NN. A novel extended deep plane facelift technique for jawline rejuvenation and volumization. Aesthet Surg J 2019; 39 (12) 1265-1281
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Jacono AA, Talei B. Vertical neck lifting. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2014; 22 (02) 285-316
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Feldman JJ. Corset platysmaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990; 85 (03) 333-343
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Webster RC, Smith RC, Papsidero MJ, Karolow WW, Smith KF. Comparison of SMAS plication with SMAS imbrication in face lifting. Laryngoscope 1982; 92 (8 Pt 1): 901-912
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Tonnard P, Verpaele A, Monstrey S. et al. Minimal access cranial suspension lift: a modified S-lift. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109 (06) 2074-2086
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Tonnard PL, Verpaele A, Gaia S. Optimising results from minimal access cranial suspension lifting (MACS-lift). Aesthetic Plast Surg 2005; 29 (04) 213-220 , discussion 221
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Saylan Z. Purse string-formed plication of the SMAS with fixation to the zygomatic bone. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110 (02) 667-671 , discussion 672–673
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Baker DC. Lateral SMASectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 100 (02) 509-513
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Barton Jr FE. The “high SMAS” face lift technique. Aesthet Surg J 2002; 22 (05) 481-486
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Jacono AA, Parikh SS. The minimal access deep plane extended vertical facelift. Aesthet Surg J 2011; 31 (08) 874-890
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Hamra ST. A study of the long-term effect of malar fat repositioning in face lift surgery: short-term success but long-term failure. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110 (03) 940-951 , discussion 952–959
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Hamra ST. The zygorbicular dissection in composite rhytidectomy: an ideal midface plane. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102 (05) 1646-1657
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Cakmak O. Clarification regarding the modified finger-assisted malar elevation (FAME) technique. Aesthet Surg J 2019; 39 (05) NP161-NP162
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Mendelson BC, Muzaffar AR, Adams Jr WP. Surgical anatomy of the midcheek and malar mounds. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110 (03) 885-896 , discussion 897–911
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar