The Relationship between Ergometric Treadmill or Bicycle Performance and Isokinetic Trunk Strength – A Retrospective Analysis

Abstract

The relationship between trunk strength and athletic performance is well known. In the past, trunk strength and athletic performance were measured in field tests. Previous studies encouraged sport-specific analyses. The goal of this study was to investigate whether there is a relation between ergometrically measured treadmill or bicycle endurance and isokinetic trunk strength. This retrospective analysis included 1334 bicycle and 1838 treadmill ergometry examinations in 1149 subjects. Bicycle and treadmill ergometer performance were analysed in relation to isokinetic trunk strength. Statistics were performed by Pearson correlation and mixed or generalised linear models. Higher treadmill and bicycle power correlated with higher isokinetic trunk strength, with highest absolute trunk strength in the treadmill group. For both running and cycling endurance, a positive correlation with trunk strength could be quantified in regression models. Increased ergometry endurance and lower flexion/extension ratios are connected weakly. Ergometry performance had the strongest correlation with extension trunk strength (r=0.312–0.398 for bicycle ergometry and r=0.168–0.229 for treadmill ergometry, p<0.001). We encourage prospective studies using both kinds of ergometry to evaluate the effect of trunk strengthening to enhance sport-specific endurance performance. Weight-adapted trunk strength values showed overall greater correlation to trunk strength and we recommend the use of weight-adapted values.

Key words

trunk strength - endurance - ergometry - athletic performance - training

• References

• 1 Beattie K, Kenny IC, Lyons M. et al. The effect of strength training on performance in endurance athletes. Sports Med 2014; 44: 845-865
• 2 Prieske O, Muehlbauer T, Granacher U. The Role of trunk muscle strength for physical fitness and athletic performance in trained individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med 2016; 46: 401-419
• 3 Nesser TW, Huxel KC, Tincher JL. et al. The relationship between core stability and performance in division i football players. J Strength Cond Res 2008; 22: 1750-1754
• 4 Nesser TW, Lee WL. The Relationship between core strength and performance in division I female soccer players. JEP online 2009; 12: 21-28
• 5 Sharrock C, Cropper J, Mostad J. et.al. A pilot study of core stability and athletic performance: Is there a relationship?. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2011; 6: 63-74
• 6 Vera-Garcia FJ, López-Plaza D, Juan-Recio C. et al. Tests to measure core stability in laboratory and field settings: reliability and correlation analyses. J Appl Biomech 2019; 35: 223-231
• 7 Willson JD, Dougherty CP, Ireland ML. et al. Core stability and its relationship to lower extremity function and injury. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2005; 13: 316-325
• 8 Gruther W, Wick F, Paul B. et al. Diagnostic accuracy and reliability of muscle strength and endurance measurements in patients with chronic low back pain. J Rehabil Med 2009; 41: 613-619
• 9 Greve JM, Terreri AS, Plapler PG. Evaluation of isokinetic trunk flexion and extension in normal sportsman and sedentary people. Rev Hosp Clin 1997; 52: 154-158
• 10 Weltman A, Snead D, Stein P. et al. Reliability and validity of a continuous incremental treadmill protocol for the determination of lactate threshold, fixed blood lactate concentrations, and ̇VO ₂ max. Int J Sports Med 1990; 11: 26-32
• 11 Van Hooren B, Fuller JT, Buckley JD. et al. Is motorized treadmill running biomechanically comparable to overground running? a systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-over studies. Sports Med 2020; 50: 785-813
• 12 Hughson RL, Orok CJ, Staudt LE. A high velocity treadmill running test to assess endurance running potential. Int J Sports Med 1984; 5: 23-25
• 13 Jones AM, Doust JH. A 1% treadmill grade most accurately reflects the energetic cost of outdoor running. J Sports Sci 1996; 14: 321-327
• 14 Davies B, Daggett A, Jakeman P. et al. Maximum oxygen uptake utilising different treadmill protocols. Br J Sports Med 1984; 18: 74-79
• 15 Andersson E, Swärd L, Thorstensson A. Trunk muscle strength in athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1988; 20: 587-593
• 16 Ben Moussa Zouita A, Ben Salah FZ, Dziri C. et al. Comparison of isokinetic trunk flexion and extension torques and powers between athletes and nonathletes. J Exerc Rehabil 2018; 14: 72-77
• 17 Anthierens A, Olivier N, Thevenon A. et al. Trunk muscle aerobic metabolism responses in endurance athletes, combat athletes and untrained men. Int J Sports Med 2019; 40: 434-439
• 18 Abdallah AA, Mohamed NA, Hegazy MA. A comparative study of core musculature endurance and stregth between soccer players with and without lower extremity sprain and strain injury. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2019; 14: 525-536
• 19 Muyor JM, López-Miñarro PA, Alacid F. Spinal posture of thoracic and lumbar spine and pelvic tilt in highly trained cyclists. J Sports Sci Med 2011; 10: 355-361
• 20 Usabiaga J, Crespo R, Iza I. et al. Adaptation of the lumbar spine to different positions in bicycle racing. Spine 1997; 22: 1965-1969
• 21 So RCH, Ng JKF, Ng GYF. Muscle recruitment pattern in cycling: a review. Phys Ther Sport 2005; 6: 89-96
• 22 Schache AG, Bennell KL, Blanch PD. et al. The coordinated movement of the lumbo–pelvic–hip complex during running: a literature review. Gait Posture 1999; 10: 30-47
• 23 Schache AG, Blanch P, Rath D. et al. Three-dimensional angular kinematics of the lumbar spine and pelvis during running. Hum Mov Sci 2002; 21: 273-293
• 24 Behm DG, Cappa D, Power GA. Trunk muscle activation during moderate- and high-intensity running. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2009; 34: 1008-1016
• 25 Nichols TR. A biomechanical perspective on spinal mechanisms of coordinated muscular action: an architecture principle. Acta Anat (Basel) 1994; 151: 1-13
• 26 Drum SN, Rappelt L, Donath L. Trunk and upper body fatigue adversely affect running economy: a three-armed randomized controlled crossover pilot trial. Sports (Basel) 2019; 7: 195
• 27 Burnett AF, Cornelius MW, Dankaerts W. et al. Spinal kinematics and trunk muscle activity in cyclists: a comparison between healthy controls and non-specific chronic low back pain subjects – a pilot investigation. Man Ther 2004; 9: 211-219
• 28 Okada T, Huxel KC, Nesser TW. Relationship between core stability, functional movement, and performance. J Strength Cond Res 2011; 25: 252-261
• 29 Sasaki S, Tsuda E, Yamamoto Y. et al. Core-muscle training and neuromuscular control of the lower limb and trunk. J Athl Train 2019; 54: 959-969
• 30 Faria EW, Parker DL, Faria IE. The science of cycling: physiology and training – Part 1. Sports Med 2005; 35: 285-312
• 31 Löllgen H, Leyk D. Exercise testing in sports medicine. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2018; 115: 409-416
• 32 Cohen J. (2013). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. 2013. London: Routledge;
• 33 Rostami M, Ansari M, Noormohammadpour P. et al. Ultrasound assessment of trunk muscles and back flexibility, strength and endurance in off-road cyclists with and without low back pain. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2015; 28: 635-644
• 34 Marsden M. Lower back pain in cyclists : a review of epidemiology, pathomechanics and risk factors : review article. Int SportMed J 2010; 11: 216-225
• 35 Streisfeld GM, Bartoszek C, Creran E. et al. Relationship between body positioning, muscle activity, and spinal kinematics in cyclists with and without low back pain: a systematic review. Sports Health 2017; 9: 75-79
• 36 Van Hoof W, Volkaerts K, O’Sullivan K. et al. Cognitive functional therapy intervention including biofeedback for LBP during cycling. A single case study. Sport & Geneeskunde 2011; 44: 20-26
• 37 Riley P, Dicharry J, Franz J. et al. A kinematics and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008; 40: 1093-1100
• 38 Preece SJ, Mason D, Bramah C. The coordinated movement of the spine and pelvis during running. Hum Mov Sci 2016; 45: 110-118
• 39 Slocum DB, James SL. Biomechanics of running. JAMA 1968; 205: 721-728
• 40 Gosselink R, Troosters T, Decramer M. Exercise testing: why, which and how to interpret. Breathe (Sheff) 2004; 1: 120-129
• 41 Delitto A, Crandell CE, Rose SJ. Peak torque-to-body weight ratios in the trunk: a critical analysis. Phys Ther 1989; 69: 138-143
• 42 Arstila M, Impivaara O, Mäki J. New ergometric reference values for clinical exercise tests. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1990; 50: 747-755
• 43 Yu H, Jiang S, Land KC. Multicollinearity in hierarchical linear models. Soc Sci Res 2015; 53: 118-136
• 44 Zinke F, Warnke T, Gäbler M. et al. Effects of isokinetic training on trunk muscle fitness and body composition in world-class canoe sprinters. Front Physiol 2019; 10: 21
• 45 Rodriguez-Perea A, Chirosa Ríos LJ, Martinez-Garcia D. et al. Reliability of isometric and isokinetic trunk flexor strength using a functional electromechanical dynamometer. PeerJ 2019; 7: e7883
• 46 García-Vaquero MP, Barbado D, Juan-Recio C. et al. Isokinetic trunk flexion–extension protocol to assess trunk muscle strength and endurance: Reliability, learning effect, and sex differences. J Sport Health Sci 2020; 9: 692-701
• 47 Hoppe MW, Freiwald J, Baumgart C. et al. Relationship between core strength and key variables of performance in elite rink hockey players. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2015; 55: 150-157