Download PDF
J Am Acad Audiol 2023; 34(01/02): 001-010
DOI: 10.1055/a-1996-1227
Research Article

Validation of the Mandarin Chinese Translation of the “Meaning of Life” in Patients with Hearing Loss or Tinnitus

Yufei Xie   *
1   Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China
,
Yu Wang   *
1   Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China
,
Tao Pan
1   Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China
,
Richard Tyler
2   Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background There is an increasing need to evaluate the quality of life of individuals who are hearing impaired. However, most of the generic “quality of life” questionnaires do not include communication-related questions. Recently, a new “Meaning of Life” (MOL) questionnaire was developed to measure quality of life based on everyday issues, enabling a comprehensive evaluation of tinnitus patients and cochlear implant users. A Mandarin Chinese version of this questionnaire for the Mandarin-speaking population is needed. Many of the existing Mandarin Chinese questionnaires currently in use are not effectively assessing hearing-related conditions.

Purpose We aimed to translate and validate the MOL questionnaire into Mandarin Chinese to make it applicable as a tool for measuring quality of life in patients with hearing loss or tinnitus.

Research Design For this study, the original version of the MOL questionnaire was translated into the Mandarin Chinese language. A prospective cohort study was then performed on adults with hearing loss or tinnitus to preliminarily examine the reliability and validity of the Mandarin Chinese version.

Study Sample A total of 206 Mandarin-speaking subjects with hearing loss or tinnitus were included in the study and divided into three groups according to their chief complaints: group B included patients suffering from both hearing loss and tinnitus (N = 113), group T contained patients with tinnitus alone (N = 49), and group H was composed of patients with hearing loss alone (N = 44).

Data Collection and Analysis The Mandarin version of the MOL (C-MOL) was administered to the participants. The reliability of the C-MOL was evaluated using Cronbach's α and item total correlation coefficients. Exploratory factor analysis was performed to examine the relationships among the questions. Correlations between the patient characteristics and total scores were tested.

Results The Cronbach's α coefficient of C-MOL was 0.921. Four factors were identified by exploratory factor analysis: (1) mental state and positive outlook; (2) friendship; (3) physical health; and (4) hearing and negative experience. The total scores of groups B, T, and H were 76.4 (standard deviation [SD] = 13.5), 81.3 (SD = 10.6), and 82.4 (SD = 12.5), respectively. The total score was correlated with the affected ears (r = 0.179, p < 0.05), age (r = 0.179, p < 0.05), hearing of the better ear (r = 0.188, p < 0.01), and educational background (r = 0.181, p < 0.01).

Conclusion The Mandarin Chinese version of the MOL questionnaire showed good reliability. It can be used to quantify the quality of life of patients with hearing loss or tinnitus.

Keywords

hearing loss - tinnitus - quality of life - questionnaire - Mandarin population

* The authors Yufei Xie and Yu Wang contributed equally to this article.




Publication History

Received: 18 January 2022

Accepted: 27 October 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
10 December 2022

Article published online:
26 September 2024

© 2024. American Academy of Audiology. This article is published by Thieme.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 GBD 2017 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2018; 392 (10159): 1789-1858
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Baguley D, McFerran D, Hall D. Tinnitus. Lancet 2013; 382 (9904): 1600-1607
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 McCormack A, Edmondson-Jones M, Somerset S, Hall D. A systematic review of the reporting of tinnitus prevalence and severity. Hear Res 2016; 337: 70-79
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Wilson BS, Tucci DL, Merson MH, O'Donoghue GM. Global hearing health care: new findings and perspectives. Lancet 2017; 390 (10111): 2503-2515
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Lins L, Carvalho FM. SF-36 total score as a single measure of health-related quality of life: scoping review. SAGE Open Med 2016; 4: 20 50312116671725
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Wong LL, Cheng LK. Quality of life in older Chinese-speaking adults with hearing impairment. Disabil Rehabil 2012; 34 (08) 655-664
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Ye X, Zhu D, Chen S, He P. The association of hearing impairment and its severity with physical and mental health among Chinese middle-aged and older adults. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2020; 18 (01) 155
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Hay-McCutcheon MJ, Hyams A, Yang X, Parton J. Hearing loss and social support in urban and rural communities. Int J Audiol 2018; 57 (08) 610-617
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Newman CW, Jacobson GP, Spitzer JB. Development of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996; 122 (02) 143-148
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Kuk FK, Tyler RS, Russell D, Jordan H. The psychometric properties of a tinnitus handicap questionnaire. Ear Hear 1990; 11 (06) 434-445
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Tyler R, Ji H, Perreau A, Witt S, Noble W, Coelho C. Development and validation of the tinnitus primary function questionnaire. Am J Audiol 2014; 23 (03) 260-272
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Meikle MB, Henry JA, Griest SE. et al. The Tinnitus Functional Index: development of a new clinical measure for chronic, intrusive tinnitus. Ear Hear 2012; 33 (02) 153-176
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Ventry IM, Weinstein BE. The hearing handicap inventory for the elderly: a new tool. Ear Hear 1982; 3 (03) 128-134
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Violan C, Foguet-Boreu Q, Flores-Mateo G. et al. Prevalence, determinants and patterns of multimorbidity in primary care: a systematic review of observational studies. PLoS One 2014; 9 (07) e102149
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Brazier J, Tsuchiya A. Preference-based condition-specific measures of health: what happens to cross programme comparability?. Health Econ 2010; 19 (02) 125-129
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Wilson C, Lewis P, Stephens D. The short form 36 (SF36) in a specialist tinnitus clinic. Int J Audiol 2002; 41 (04) 216-220
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Nondahl DM, Cruickshanks KJ, Dalton DS. et al. The impact of tinnitus on quality of life in older adults. J Am Acad Audiol 2007; 18 (03) 257-266
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Dalton DS, Cruickshanks KJ, Klein BEK, Klein R, Wiley TL, Nondahl DM. The impact of hearing loss on quality of life in older adults. Gerontologist 2003; 43 (05) 661-668
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Sung YK, Li L, Blake C, Betz J, Lin FR. Association of hearing loss and loneliness in older adults. J Aging Health 2016; 28 (06) 979-994
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Yang Y, Longworth L, Brazier J. An assessment of validity and responsiveness of generic measures of health-related quality of life in hearing impairment. Qual Life Res 2013; 22 (10) 2813-2828
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Arnoldner C, Lin VY, Bresler R. et al. Quality of life in cochlear implantees: comparing utility values obtained through the Medical Outcome Study Short-Form Survey-6D and the Health Utility Index Mark 3. Laryngoscope 2014; 124 (11) 2586-2590
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Summerfield AQ, Barton GR. UK Cochlear Implant Study Group. Sensitivity of EQ-5D-3L, HUI2, HUI3, and SF-6D to changes in speech reception and tinnitus associated with cochlear implantation. Qual Life Res 2019; 28 (05) 1145-1154
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Wang P, Chong SL, Tan RL, Luo N. A hearing bolt-on item increased the measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L in a community-based hearing loss screening program. . Eur J Health Econ 2022
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Feeny D, Furlong W, Torrance GW. et al. Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the health utilities index mark 3 system. Med Care 2002; 40 (02) 113-128
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Maes IHL, Joore MA, Cima RFF, Vlaeyen JW, Anteunis LJC. Assessment of health state in patients with tinnitus: a comparison of the EQ-5D and HUI mark III. Ear Hear 2011; 32 (04) 428-435
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Tyler R, Perreauf A, Mohr A-M, Ji H, Mancini PC. An exploratory step toward measuring the “Meaning of Life” in patients with tinnitus and in cochlear implant users. J Am Acad Audiol 2020; 31 (04) 277-285
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Jacobson GP. Quantifying the “Meaning of Life”. J Am Acad Audiol 2020; 31 (04) 245
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 2000; 25 (24) 3186-3191
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Huh DA, Choi YH, Ji MS, Moon KW, Yoon SJ, Sohn JR. Comparison of pure-tone average methods for estimation of hearing loss caused by environmental exposure to lead and cadmium: does the pure-tone average method which uses low-frequency ranges underestimate the actual hearing loss caused by environmental lead and cadmium exposure?. Audiol Neurotol 2018; 23 (05) 259-269
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Arian Nahad H, Rouzbahani M, Jarollahi F. et al. Translation, validity, and reliability of a Persian version of the Iowa tinnitus handicap questionnaire. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol 2014; 26 (75) 79-88
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Langguth B, Landgrebe M, Schlee W. et al. Different patterns of hearing loss among tinnitus patients: a latent class analysis of a large sample. Front Neurol 2017; 8: 46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Xiong B, Liu Z, Liu Q. et al. Missed hearing loss in tinnitus patients with normal audiograms. Hear Res 2019; 384: 107826
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Wakabayashi S, Oishi N, Shinden S, Ogawa K. Factor analysis and evaluation of each item of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory. Head Face Med 2020; 16 (01) 4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 St-Onge MP, Grandner MA, Brown D. et al; American Heart Association Obesity, Behavior Change, Diabetes, and Nutrition Committees of the Council on Lifestyle and Cardiometabolic Health; Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young; Council on Clinical Cardiology; and Stroke Council. Sleep duration and quality: impact on lifestyle behaviors and cardiometabolic health: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2016; 134 (18) e367-e386
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Zhu X, Chen Y, Tang X. et al. Sexual experiences of Chinese patients living with an ostomy. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2017; 44 (05) 469-474
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar