Can Transvaginal Cervical Elastography predict the success of induction of labor with oxytocin?

Abstract

ObjectiveWe aimed to show whether elastography can be analternative, although the Bishop score used in the follow-up of labor induction success with oxytocin is a relative concept.

Material and methods This prospective case-control study includes 56 cases admitted to a tertiary maternity hospital for induction between March and June 2019. Cervical elastography was applied to patients before induction. Induction success in pregnant women who underwent induction with oxytocin was accepted to be greater than Bishop 9. The cases were divided into two groups as successful (n=28) and unsuccessful (n=28) induction, and their elastosonographic findings were compared.

ResultsIn 28 cases with successful induction (Bishop >9, and vaginal delivery occurred in 28), the mean stiffness of the cervix in measurements from four regions was 13.6 ±3.7 kPa in the measurement of the cervix with the elastography method before induction was started, while this value was measured as 14.9 ± 3.1 in cases where induction was unsuccessful (t- value: -1.321, p=0.194).

Conclusions Our study showed that pre-induction stiffness of the cervix cannot predict the success of labor induction with oxytocin. More studies with larger samples are needed to arrive at a decent conclusion. In addition, results can be more assuring with the developing technique and sensitivity of elastography.

Key words

labor induction - cervical elastography - oxytocin - pregnancy - bishop score

Publication History

Received: 09 February 2023

Accepted after revision: 04 April 2023

Article published online:
06 June 2023

• References

• 1 Finucane EM, Murphy DJ, Biesty LM. et al. Membrane sweeping for induction of labor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 2 (02) CD000451
• 2 Bakker JJH, Goes BY, Pel M. et al. Morning versus evening induction of labour for improving outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 2: CD007707
• 3 Middleton P, Shepherd E, Crowther CA.. Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 5: CD004945
• 4 Parker KJ, Doyley MM, Rubens DJ.. Imaging the elastic properties of tissue: the 20 year perspective. Phys Med Biol 2011; 56: R1-29
• 5 Garra BS.. Imaging and estimation of tissue elasticity by ultrasound. Ultrasound Q 2007; 23: 255-268
• 6 Balleyguier C, Ciolovan L, Ammari S. et al. Breast elastography: the technical process and its applications. Diag Interv Imaging 2013; 94: 503-513
• 7 Kim YN, Kwon JY, Kim EH.J.. Predicting labor induction success by cervical funneling in uncomplicated pregnancies. Obstet Gynaecol Res 2020; 46: 1077-1083
• 8 Tesemma MG, Sori DA, Gemeda DH.. High dose and low dose oxytocin regimens as determinants of successful labor induction: a multicenter comparative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020; 20: 232
• 9 Koc O, Duran B, Ozdemirci S. et al. Oxytocin versus sustained-release dinoprostone vaginal pessary for labor induction of unfavorable cervix with Bishop score 4 and 6: a randomized controlled trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2013; 39: 790-798
• 10 Balci O, Mahmoud AS, Ozdemir S. et al. Induction of labor with vaginal misoprostol plus oxytocin versus oxytocinalone. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2010; 110: 64-67
• 11 Wu X, Wang C, Li Y. et al. Cervical dilation balloon combined with intravenous drip of oxytocin for induction of term labor: a multicenter clinical trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2018; 297: 77-83
• 12 McFarlin B, Balash J, Kumar V. et al. Development of an ultrasonic method to detect cervical remodeling in vivo in full-term pregnant women. Ultrasound Med Biol 2015; 41: 2533-2539
• 13 Yang X, Ding Y, Mei J. et al. Second-trimester cervical shear wave elastography combined with cervical length for the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth. Ultrasound Med Biol 2022; 48: 820-829
• 14 Öcal FD, Çekmez Y, Erdoğdu E. et al. The utility of cervical elastosonography in prediction of cervical insufficiency: cervical elastosonography and cervical insufficiency. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2015; 28: 812-818
• 15 Park HS, Kwon H, Kwon JY. et al. Uterine cervical change at term examined using ultrasound elastography: A longitudinal study. J Clin Med 2020; 10: 75
• 16 Woo J, Ge W, Mancheri J. et al. Shear wave elastography: the relationship of the cervical stiffness with gestastional age and cervical length – a feasibility study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2022; 35: 9684-9693
• 17 Yo Y, Kotani Y, Shiro R. et al. Relationship between cervical elastography and spontaneous onset of labor. Sci Rep 2020; 10: 19685
• 18 Lu J, Cheng YKY, Ho SYS. et al. The predictive value of cervical shear wave elastography in the outcome of labor induction. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2020; 99: 59-68
• 19 Londero AP, Schmitz R, Bertozzi S. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of cervical elastography in predicting labor induction success: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Perinat Med 2016; 44: 167-178
• 20 Strobel MK, Eveslage M, Köster HA. et al. Cervical elastography strain ratio and strain pattern for the prediction of a successful induction of labour. J Perinat Med 2020; 49: 195-202
• 21 Zhou Y, Jin N, Chen Q. et al. Predictive value of cervical length by ultrasound and cervical strain elastography in labor induction at term. J Int Med Res 2021; 49: 300060520985338
• 22 Carlson LC, Romero ST, Palmeri ML. et al. Changes in shear wave speed pre- and post-induction of labor: a feasibility study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 46: 93-98
• 23 Swiatkowska-Freund M, Preis K.. Elastography of the uterine cervix: implications for success of induction of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 38: 52-56
• 24 Swiatkowska-Freund M, Preis K.. Cervical elastography during pregnancy: clinical perspectives. Int J Womens Health 2017; 9: 245-254