Evaluation of a single-use gastroscope in patients presenting with suspected upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: a pilot feasibility study (One-Scope I)

Abstract

Background Outbreaks of multidrug-resistant bacteria due to contaminated duodenoscopes and infection risks during the COVID-19 pandemic have driven the development of single-use endoscopes. The first single-use gastroscope is now available in Europe. Besides waste disposal and cost issues, the infection risk and performance remain unclear. We aimed to evaluate a single-use gastroscope in patients with signs of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Methods 20 consecutive patients presenting with clinical signs of upper gastrointestinal bleeding between October and November 2022 were included in this case series. The primary aim was technical success, defined as access to the descending duodenum and adequate assessment of the upper gastrointestinal tract for the presence of a bleeding site.

Results The primary aim was achieved in 19/20 patients (95 %). The bleeding site was identified in 18 patients. A therapeutic intervention was performed in six patients (two cap-mounted clips, one standard hemostatic clip, two variceal band ligations, one hemostatic powder, two adrenaline injections); technical and clinical success were achieved in all six patients. Two crossovers to a standard gastroscope occurred.

Conclusions Use of single-use gastroscopes may be feasible for patients presenting for urgent endoscopic evaluation and treatment of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Publication History

Received: 22 December 2022

Accepted after revision: 09 May 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
09 May 2023

Article published online:
12 July 2023

• References

• 1 Shahid HM, Bareket R, Tyberg A. et al. Comparing the safety and efficacy of two commercially available single-use duodenoscopes: a multicenter study. J Clin Gastroenterol 2022; DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001752.
• 2 Bang JY, Hawes R, Varadarajulu S. Equivalent performance of single-use and reusable duodenoscopes in a randomised trial. Gut 2021; 70: 838-844
• 3 Kim S, Muthusamy VR. Current practice of duodenoscope reprocessing. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2016; 18: 54
• 4 Beilenhoff U, Biering H, Blum R. et al. Reprocessing of flexible endoscopes and endoscopic accessories used in gastrointestinal endoscopy: Position Statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates (ESGENA) – update 2018. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 1205-1234
• 5 Rauwers AW, Voor In’t Holt AF, Buijs JG. et al. High prevalence rate of digestive tract bacteria in duodenoscopes: a nationwide study. Gut 2018; 67: 1637-1645
• 6 Ren-Pei W, Hui-Jun X, Ke Q. et al. Correlation between the growth of bacterial biofilm in flexible endoscopes and endoscope reprocessing methods. Am J Infect Control 2014; 42: 1203-1206
• 7 Bang JY, Sutton B, Hawes R. et al. Concept of disposable duodenoscope: at what cost?. Gut 2019; 68: 1915-1917
• 8 Luo X, Ji M, Zhang S. et al. Disposable versus reusable gastroscopes: a prospective randomized noninferiority trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 96: 250-261
• 9 Namburar S, von Renteln D, Damianos J. et al. Estimating the environmental impact of disposable endoscopic equipment and endoscopes. Gut 2022; 71: 1326-1331
• 10 Rodriguez de Santiago E, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Pohl H. et al. Reducing the environmental footprint of gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates (ESGENA) Position Statement. Endoscopy 2022; 54: 797-826