A New Method for the Introduction of an Acylsulfonamide Moiety Applied to a 3-Substituted Functionalized Indole Framework ­Related to the Welwitindolinone Alkaloids

Abstract

The one-pot reaction between an α-formylcyclohexanone derivative and tosyl azide in the presence of rhodium trifluoroacetate dimer afforded an acylsulfonamide derivative. This transformation is proposed to arise from a domino mechanism involving the in situ generation, through the Regitz method, of an α-diazoketone, followed by its transformation into a rhodium carbenoid and its combination with N-tosylformamide, generated as a side product of the first step of the mechanism. Overall, this transformation leads to the generation of a C–N bond between the formyl carbon and the azide nitrogen adjacent to the sulfonyl group.

Key words

indoles - Michael addition - diazo compounds - rhodium catalysis - carbenoids - domino reaction

• References and Notes

• 1 Ammazzalorso A, De Filippis B, Giampietro L, Amoroso R. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2017; 90: 1094
• 2 Francisco KR, Varricchio C, Paniak TJ, Kozlowski MC, Brancale A, Ballatore C. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2021; 218: 113399

For reviews, see:
• 3a Avendaño C, Menéndez JC. Curr. Org. Synth. 2004; 1: 65
• 3b Menéndez JC. Top. Heterocycl. Chem. 2007; 11: 63
• 3c Brown LE, Konopelski JP. Org. Prep. Proced. Int. 2008; 40: 411
• 3d Wood JL. Nat. Chem. 2012; 4: 341
• 3e Huters AD, Styduhar ED, Garg NK. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012; 51: 3758
• 3f Bhat V, Dave A, MacKay JA, Rawal VH. In The Alkaloids: Chemistry and Biology, Vol. 73. Knölker H.-J. Academic Press, London, 2014; 65;
• 4a Bhat V, Allan KM, Rawal VH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011; 133: 5798
• 4b Bhat V, Rawal VH. Chem. Commun. 2011; 47: 9705
• 4c Allan KM, Kobayashi K, Rawal VH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012; 134: 1392
• 5a Huters AD, Quasdorf KW, Styduhar ED, Garg NK. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011; 133: 15797
• 5b Quasdorf KW, Huters AD, Lodewyk MW, Tantillo DJ, Garg NK. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012; 134: 1396
• 5c Weires NA, Styduhar ED, Baker EL, Garg NK. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014; 136: 14710
• 6 Komine K, Nomura Y, Ishihara J, Hatakeyama S. Org. Lett. 2015; 17: 3918
• 7a Fu T.-h, McElroy WT, Shamszad M, Martin SF. Org. Lett. 2012; 14: 3834
• 7b Fu T.-h, McElroy WT, Shamszad M, Heidebrecht RW. Jr, Gulledge B, Martin SF. Tetrahedron 2013; 69: 5588
• 8a Konopelski JP, Deng H, Schiemann K, Keane JM, Olmstead MM. Synlett 1998; 1105
• 8b Elliott GI, Konopelski JP, Olmstead MM. Org. Lett. 1999; 1: 1867
• 8c Elliott GI, Konopelski JP. Tetrahedron 2001; 57: 5683
• 8d Konopelski JP, Lin J, Wenzel PJ, Deng H, Elliott GI, Gerstenberger BS. Org. Lett. 2002; 4: 4121
• 8e Deng H, Konopelski JP. Org. Lett. 2001; 3: 3001
• 8f Xia J, Brown LE, Konopelski JP. J. Org. Chem. 2007; 72: 6885
• 8g López-Alvarado P, García-Granda S, Alvarez-Rúa C, Avendaño C. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002; 1702
• 8h Jung ME, Slowinski F. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001; 42: 6835
• 9a Wood JL, Moniz GA, Pflum DA, Stoltz BM, Holubec AA, Dietrich HJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999; 121: 1748
• 9b Wood JL, Holubec AA, Stoltz BM, Weiss MM, Dixon JA, Doan BD, Shamji MF, Chen JM, Heffron TP. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999; 121: 6326
• 9c Freeman DB, Holubec AA, Weiss MW, Dixon JA, Kakefuda A, Ohtsuka M, Inoue M, Vaswani RG, Ohki H, Doan BD, Reisman SE, Stoltz BM, Day JJ, Tao RN, Dieterich NA, Wood JL. Tetrahedron 2010; 66: 6647
• 9d MacKay JA, Bishop RL, Rawal VH. Org. Lett. 2005; 7: 3421
• 9e Baudoux J, Blake AJ, Simpkins NS. Org. Lett. 2005; 7: 4087
• 9f Greshock TJ, Funk RL. Org. Lett. 2006; 8: 2643
• 9g Lauchli R, Shea KJ. Org. Lett. 2006; 8: 5287
• 9h Boissel V, Simpkins NS, Bhalay G, Blake AJ, Lewis W. Chem. Commun. 2009; 1398
• 9i Boissel V, Simpkins NS, Bhalay G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009; 50: 3283
• 9j Tian X, Huters AD, Douglas CJ, Garg NK. Org. Lett. 2009; 11: 2349
• 9k Trost BM, McDougall PJ. Org. Lett. 2009; 11: 3782
• 9l Brailsford JA, Lauchli R, Shea KJ. Org. Lett. 2009; 11: 5330
• 9m Heidebrecht RW. Jr, Gulledge B, Martin SF. Org. Lett. 2010; 12: 2492
• 9n Ruiz M, López-Alvarado P, Menéndez JC. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2010; 8: 4521
• 9o Bhat V, MacKay JA, Rawal VH. Org. Lett. 2011; 13: 3214
• 9p Bhat V, MacKay JA, Rawal VH. Tetrahedron 2011; 67: 10097
• 9q Zhang M, Tang W. Org. Lett. 2012; 14: 3756
• 9r Ruiz M, López-Alvarado P, Menéndez JC. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2013; 2802
• 9s Lam SM, Wong WT, Chiu P. Org. Lett. 2017; 19: 4468
• 10 Bartoli G, Bosco M, Dalpozzo R, Giuliani A, Marcantoni E, Mecozzi T, Sambri L, Torregiani E. J. Org. Chem. 2002; 67: 9111
• 11 Yadav JS, Abraham S, Reddy BV. S, Sabitha G. Synthesis 2001; 2165
• 12 Kumar V, Kaur S, Kumar S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006; 47: 7001
• 13 Ma S, Yu S, Peng Z. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005; 3: 1933
• 14 Wang S.-Y, Ji S.-J, Loh T.-P. Synlett 2003; 2377
• 15 Ji S.-J, Wang S.-Y. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2005; 12: 339
• 16 2-[1-Methyl-1-(1-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]cyclohexanone (4b) A solution of 1-methylindole (2, R = Me; 1.0 g, 7.6 mmol), 2-isopropylidenecyclohexanone (3; 1.05 g, 7.6 mmol, 1 equiv), and PTSA (0.14 g, 0.76 mmol, 0.1 equiv) in absolute EtOH (20 mL) was irradiated in an ultrasound bath in an open flask for 3 h. CH₂Cl₂ (20 mL) was added, and the mixture was washed with H₂O (3 × 20 mL). The organic layer was dried (Na₂SO₄) and concentrated, and the residue was purified by chromatography [silica gel, PE–EtOAc (7:1)] to give a white solid; yield: 1.74 g (85%); mp 91–92 °C. IR (NaCl): 2934, 1707 (CO) cm^–1. ¹H NMR (250 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.80 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H, H-4′), 7.35 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1 H, H-7′), 7.27 (dt, J = 6.8 and 1 Hz, 1 H, H-6′), 7.14 (dt, J = 8.0 and 1.0 Hz, 1 H and H-5′), 6.88 (s, 1 H, H-2′), 3.78 (s, 3 H, NCH₃), 3.21 (dd, J = 12.0 and 4.2 Hz, 1 H, H-2), 2.61–2.3 (m, 2 H, H-6), 2.11–1.47 (m, 6 H, H-3, H-4 and H-5), 1.69 (s, 3 H, CH₃), 1.59 (s, 3 H, CH₃). ¹³C NMR (63 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 213.4 (CO), 138.2 (C-7a′), 126.6 (C-2′), 126.2 (C-3a′), 124.0 (C-3′), 121.5 (C-4′), 121.4 (C-6′), 118.7 (C-5′), 109.9 (C-7′), 58.5 (C-2), 44.8 (C-6), 37.2 [C(CH₃)₂], 33.0 (NCH₃), 31.3, 29.0, and 26.55 (C-3, C-4, & C-5), 27.6 and 23.7 (CH₃). Anal. Calcd for C₁₈H₂₃NO (M = 269.38): C, 80.26; H, 8.61; N, 5.20. Found: C, 79.90; H, 8.43; N, 5.27.
• 17a Lombardo L, Mander LN. Synthesis 1980; 368
• 17b King GR, Mander LN, Monck NJ. T, Morris JC, Zhang H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997; 119: 3828
• 18a Regitz M, Rüter J. Chem. Ber. 1968; 101: 1263
• 18b Mander L, McLachlan M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003; 125: 2400
• 19 (2Z)-2-(Hydroxymethylene)-6-[1-methyl-1-(1-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]cyclohexanone (5a)A solution of compound 4a (1.18 g, 4.4 mmol) in anhyd THF (50 mL) was added to a suspension of NaH (1.76 g, 40 mmol, 10 equiv) in anhyd THF (50 mL), and the resulting suspension was stirred at rt for 5 min, then cooled to 0 °C. HCO₂Et (3 mL, 37.8 mmol, 8.6 equiv) was added, and the suspension was stirred at 0 °C for 1 h and at rt for 3 h. MeOH (15 mL) was added, and the mixture was acidified with 2 M aq HCl to pH 1 and extracted with EtOAc (3 × 20 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine (20 mL), dried (Na₂SO₄), and concentrated to give an orange oil; yield: 1.3 g (99%). This was sufficiently pure to be used in the crude state for the next step. An analytical sample was obtained by chromatography [silica gel, PE–EtOAc (5:1)].IR (NaCl): 2932, 1620 (CO) cm^–1. ¹H NMR (250 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 8.63 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, 1 H, =CHOH), 7.84 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H, H-4′), 7.37 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H, H-7′), 7.29 (td, J = 7.9 and 1 Hz, 1 H, H-6′), 7.16 (td, J = 8.0 and 1.0 Hz, 1 H, H-5′), 6.85 (s, 1 H, H-2′), 3.80 (s, 1 H, N-CH₃), 3.28 (t, J = 8.4 Hz, 1 H, H-6), 2.41–2.11 (m, 2 H, H-3), 1.85 (s, 3 H, CH₃), 1.72 (dd, J = 7.6 and 2.6 Hz, 1 H, H-5), 1.48 (s, 3 H, CH₃), 1.48–1.20 (m, 3 H, H-5 and 2 H-4). ¹³C NMR (63 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 190.1 (C-1), 186.3 (=CHOH), 138.2 (C-7′a), 126.6 (C-3′a), 126.0 (C-2′), 124.0 (C-3′), 121.8 (C-6′), 121.3 (C-4′), 118.9 (C-5′), 111.9 (C-2), 109.9 (C-7′), 48.9 (C-6), 39.6 [C(CH₃)₂], 33.1 (N–CH₃), 30.2 [C(CH₃)₂], 26.6 (C-3), 24.8 (C-5*), 23.9 [C(CH₃)₂], 23.3 (C-4*). Anal. Calcd for C₁₉H₂₃NO₂ (M = 297.39): C, 76.73; H, 7.80; N, 4.71. Found: C 76.87; H, 7.62; N, 4.87
• 20 cis-3-[1-Methyl-1-(1-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]-N-tosyl-2-oxocyclohexanecarboxamide (7)Et₃N (270 μL, 2 equiv) was added to a solution of compound 5a (1.1 g, 3.74 mmol) in anhyd MeCN (25 mL). The solution was cooled to 0 °C in an ice bath and TsN₃ (958 mg, 1.3 equiv) was added. The mixture was stirred at rt for 24 h, then poured onto 1 M aq NaOH (30 mL). The solvent was removed under reduced pressure at rt, and H₂O (30 mL) was added to the residue. The aqueous phase was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 25 mL), and the combined organic layers were washed sequentially with 1 M aq NaOH (30 mL), H₂O (30 mL), and brine (30 mL) then dried (Na₂SO₄) and evaporated to dryness.In parallel, a 250 mL round-bottomed flask containing montmorillonite K-10 (10 g) was oven dried for 15 min, then cooled under an argon stream. Anhyd CH₂Cl₂ (100 mL) was then added under argon. Rh₂(TFA)₄ (10 mg, 0.4% mol) was added to the resulting suspension, and then a solution of the crude α-diazoketone 6 in anhyd CH₂Cl₂ (40 mL) was slowly added over 20 min. Immediately after the completion of the addition, the mixture was filtered through Celite covered with a thin layer of silica gel. The silica gel–Celite layer was washed with EtOAc (3 × 20 mL) and MeOH (2 × 20 mL), and the combined washings were evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by column chromatography [silica gel, PE–EtOAc (gradient from10:1 to 1:1)] to give a pale yellow oil; yield: 1.13 g (65%).IR (NaCl): 3248 (NH), 1710 (CO), 1631 and 1157 (SO₂) cm^–1. ¹H NMR (250 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 10.52 (s, NH), 7.90 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 2 H, H-3′′ and H-5′′), 7.55 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H, H-7′), 7.27 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 2 H, H-2′′ and H-6′′), 7.15 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H, H-4′), 7.14 (td, J = 7.2 and 1.2 Hz, 1 H, H-6′), 6.95 (td, J = 6.9 and 1.2 Hz, 1 H, H-5′), 6.72 (s, 1 H, H-2′), 3.65 (s, 3 H, NCH₃), 3.19 (dd, J = 12.8 and 5.4 Hz, 1 H, H-6), 3.05 (dd, J = 12.0 and 4.4 Hz, 1 H, H-2), 2.29 (s, 3 H, TosCH₃), 2.29–2.15, 2.83–1.26 (m, 6 H, H-3, H-4 and H-5), 1.48 (s, 3 H, CH₃), 1.40 (s, 3 H, CH₃). ¹³C NMR (63 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 211.4 (C₁=O), 168.4 (NHCO), 145.3 (C-4′′), 138.1 (C-7a′), 136.1 (C-1′′), 130.0 (C-5′′ and C-3′′), 128.9 (C-2′′ and C-6′′), 126.7 (C-2′), 125.8 (C-3a′), 123.0 (C-3′), 121.5 (C-6′), 121.1 (C-7′), 118.9 (C-5′), 110.0 (C-4′), 59.3 (C-2), 58.0 (C-6), 36.9 [C(CH₃)₂], 34.9, 32.1 and 25.7 (C-3, C-4 and C-5), 33.1 (N-CH₃), 27.0 (CH₃), 24.0 (CH₃) and 22.1 (TosCH₃). Analysis: Calculated for C₂₆H₃₀N₂O₄S (M = 466.59): C, 66.93; H, 6.48; N, 6.00. Found: C, 66.76. H, 6.45. N 5.99.
• 21 2-Diazo-6-[1-Methyl-1-(1-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]cyclohexanone (11)Et₃N (61 μL, 2 equiv) was added to a solution of compound 5a (250 mg, 0.85 mmol) in anhyd MeCN (8 mL). The solution was cooled to 0 °C in an ice bath and TsN₃ (215 mg, 1.3 equiv) was added. The mixture was stirred at rt for 24 h, then poured onto 1 M aq NaOH (8 mL). The solvent was removed under reduced pressure at rt, and H₂O (8 mL) was added to the residue. The aqueous phase was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 15 mL), and the combined organic layers were washed sequentially with 1 M aq NaOH (8 mL), H₂O (8 mL), and brine (8 mL), then dried (Na₂SO₄) and evaporated to dryness. The crude residue was purified by chromatography [silica gel, PE–EtOAc (5:1)] acetate to give a yellow oil; yield: 180 mg (73%).IR (NaCl): 2929, 2078 (N₂), 1613 (CO) cm^–1. ¹H NMR (250 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.65 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H, H-4′), 7.21 (dd, J = 7.8 and 1.1 Hz, 1 H, H-7′), 7.13 (td, J = 8.1 and 1.05 Hz, 1 H, H-6′), 6.99 (td, J = 6.87 and 1.2 Hz, 1 H, H-5′), 6.69 (s, 1 H, H-2′), 3.66 (s, 3 H, N-CH₃), 2.88 (dd, J = 10.6 and 6.1 Hz, 1 H, H-6), 2.62–2.43, 1.70–1.13 (2m, 6 H, H-3, H-4 and H-5), 1.72 (s, 3 H, CH₃), 1.33 (s, 3 H, CH₃). ¹³C NMR (63 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 197.3 (CO), 138.1 (C-7a′), 126.4 (C-3a′), 126.0 (C-2′), 123.9 (C-3′), 122.6 (C-6′), 121.3 (C-4′), 118.9 (C-5′), 109.8 (C-7′), 65.7 (C-N₂), 53.5 (C-6), 39.5 [C(CH₃)₂], 33.0 (N-CH₃), 30.0 (CH₃), 26.7 (C-3), 23.7 (CH₃), 23.2 and 22.5 (C-4 and C-5). Anal. Calcd for C₁₈H₂₁N₃O (M = 295.38): C, 73.19, H, 7.17, N, 14.23. Found: C, 73.25, H, 7.19, N, 14.22. .