Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Play: Where Are We Now?

Abstract

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a commonly performed orthopaedic procedure, and it is crucial to assess an athlete's readiness to safely return to sports following ACLR to minimize the risk of reinjury. Despite this, determining optimal return to play (RTP) criteria following ACLR that is accurate, accessible, and reproducible remains challenging. This review aims to discuss commonly employed RTP criteria domains, including functional assessments, patient-reported outcomes, and psychological tests, as well as emerging technologies such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) that may play a role as a gold standard in RTP assessment. The findings of this review suggest RTP decision making after ACL surgery is nuanced and traditionally used objective measures do not perfectly predict RTS rates or clinical outcomes. In the future, a standardized MRI screening tool could help predict reinjury. The role of functional and psychological patient-reported outcome measures needs to defined, and objective criteria should be rigorously evaluated for whether they accurately screen an athlete's physical readiness and should be expanded to include more sport-specific movement analysis.

Keywords

knee - ACL - return to play - outcomes

Publication History

Received: 07 April 2023

Accepted: 15 July 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
17 July 2023

Article published online:
07 August 2023

• References

• 1 Zappia M, Capasso R, Berritto D. et al. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: MR imaging findings. Musculoskelet Surg 2017; 101 (Suppl 1( 23-35
• 2 Xu S, Cheema SG, Tarakemeh A. et al. Return to sport after primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: a survey of the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine. Kans J Med 2023; 16: 105-109
• 3 Bien DP, Dubuque TJ. Considerations for late stage ACL rehabilitation and return to sport to limit re-injury risk and maximize athletic performance. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2015; 10 (02) 256-271
• 4 van Melick N, van Cingel RE, Brooijmans F. et al. Evidence-based clinical practice update: practice guidelines for anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation based on a systematic review and multidisciplinary consensus. Br J Sports Med 2016; 50 (24) 1506-1515
• 5 Harris JD, Abrams GD, Bach BR. et al. Return to sport after ACL reconstruction. Orthopedics 2014; 37 (02) e103-e108
• 6 Herzog MM, Marshall SW, Lund JL, Pate V, Mack CD, Spang JT. Trends in incidence of ACL reconstruction and concomitant procedures among commercially insured individuals in the United States, 2002-2014. Sports Health 2018; 10 (06) 523-531
• 7 Cain Jr EL, Biggers MD, Beason DP, Emblom BA, Dugas JR. Comparison of anterior cruciate ligament graft isometry between paired femoral and tibial tunnels. J Knee Surg 2017; 30 (09) 960-964
• 8 Dhawan A, Gallo RA, Lynch SA. Anatomic tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2016; 24 (07) 443-454
• 9 Vignos MF, Smith CR, Roth JD. et al. Anterior cruciate ligament graft tunnel placement and graft angle are primary determinants of internal knee mechanics after reconstructive surgery. Am J Sports Med 2020; 48 (14) 3503-3514
• 10 Marchant BG, Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD, Fleckenstein C. Prevalence of nonanatomical graft placement in a series of failed anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Am J Sports Med 2010; 38 (10) 1987-1996
• 11 Lee MC, Seong SC, Lee S. et al. Vertical femoral tunnel placement results in rotational knee laxity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2007; 23 (07) 771-778
• 12 Komro J, Gonzales J, Marberry K, Main DC, Cramberg M, Kondrashov P. Fibrocartilaginous metaplasia and neovascularization of the anterior cruciate ligament in patients with osteoarthritis. Clin Anat 2020; 33 (06) 899-905
• 13 Amiel D, Kleiner JB, Roux RD, Harwood FL, Akeson WH. The phenomenon of “ligamentization”: anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autogenous patellar tendon. J Orthop Res 1986; 4 (02) 162-172
• 14 Scheffler SU, Unterhauser FN, Weiler A. Graft remodeling and ligamentization after cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008; 16 (09) 834-842
• 15 Wilk KE, Reinold MM, Hooks TR. Recent advances in the rehabilitation of isolated and combined anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Orthop Clin North Am 2003; 34 (01) 107-137
• 16 Bhatia S, Bell R, Frank RM. et al. Bony incorporation of soft tissue anterior cruciate ligament grafts in an animal model: autograft versus allograft with low-dose gamma irradiation. Am J Sports Med 2012; 40 (08) 1789-1798
• 17 Kraeutler MJ, Bravman JT, McCarty EC. Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus allograft in outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis of 5182 patients. Am J Sports Med 2013; 41 (10) 2439-2448
• 18 Mehta VM, Mandala C, Foster D, Petsche TS. Comparison of revision rates in bone-patella tendon-bone autograft and allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthopedics 2010; 33 (01) 12
• 19 Ellman MB, Sherman SL, Forsythe B, LaPrade RF, Cole BJ, Bach Jr BR. Return to play following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2015; 23 (05) 283-296
• 20 Widner M, Dunleavy M, Lynch S. Outcomes following ACL reconstruction based on graft type: are all grafts equivalent?. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2019; 12 (04) 460-465
• 21 Mouarbes D, Menetrey J, Marot V, Courtot L, Berard E, Cavaignac E. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes for quadriceps tendon autograft versus bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring-tendon autografts. Am J Sports Med 2019; 47 (14) 3531-3540
• 22 Gokeler A, Dingenen B, Hewett TE. Rehabilitation and return to sport testing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: where are we in 2022?. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2022; 4 (01) e77-e82
• 23 Gokeler A, Welling W, Benjaminse A, Lemmink K, Seil R, Zaffagnini S. A critical analysis of limb symmetry indices of hop tests in athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a case control study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2017; 103 (06) 947-951
• 24 Welling W, Benjaminse A, Seil R, Lemmink K, Gokeler A. Altered movement during single leg hop test after ACL reconstruction: implications to incorporate 2-D video movement analysis for hop tests. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018; 26 (10) 3012-3019
• 25 Wellsandt E, Failla MJ, Snyder-Mackler L. Limb symmetry indexes can overestimate knee function after anterior cruciate ligament injury. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2017; 47 (05) 334-338
• 26 Webster KE, Hewett TE. What is the evidence for and validity of return-to-sport testing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med 2019; 49 (06) 917-929
• 27 Welling W, Benjaminse A, Lemmink K, Gokeler A. Passing return to sports tests after ACL reconstruction is associated with greater likelihood for return to sport but fail to identify second injury risk. Knee 2020; 27 (03) 949-957
• 28 Nagelli CV, Webster KE, Di Stasi S, Wordeman SC, Hewett TE. The association of psychological readiness to return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and hip and knee landing kinematics. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2019; 68: 104-108
• 29 Ardern CL, Webster KE, Taylor NF, Feller JA. Return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the state of play. Br J Sports Med 2011; 45 (07) 596-606
• 30 Webster KE, Feller JA. Who passes return-to-sport tests, and which tests are most strongly associated with return to play after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?. Orthop J Sports Med 2020; 8 (12) 2325967120969425
• 31 Webster KE, Nagelli CV, Hewett TE, Feller JA. Factors associated with psychological readiness to return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Am J Sports Med 2018; 46 (07) 1545-1550
• 32 Paterno MV, Rauh MJ, Schmitt LC, Ford KR, Hewett TE. Incidence of contralateral and ipsilateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury after primary ACL reconstruction and return to sport. Clin J Sport Med 2012; 22 (02) 116-121
• 33 Zbrojkiewicz D, Vertullo C, Grayson JE. Increasing rates of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in young Australians, 2000-2015. Med J Aust 2018; 208 (08) 354-358
• 34 Kaplan Y, Witvrouw E. When is it safe to return to sport after ACL reconstruction? Reviewing the criteria. Sports Health 2019; 11 (04) 301-305
• 35 Ardern CL, Taylor NF, Feller JA, Webster KE. A systematic review of the psychological factors associated with returning to sport following injury. Br J Sports Med 2013; 47 (17) 1120-1126
• 36 Chaaban CR, Hearn D, Goerger B, Padua DA. Are elite collegiate female athletes PRIME for a safe return to sport after ACLR? An Investigation of Physical Readiness and Integrated Movement Efficiency (PRIME). Int J Sports Phys Ther 2022; 17 (03) 445-455
• 37 Ortiz A, Rosario-Canales M, Rodríguez A, Seda A, Figueroa C, Venegas-Ríos HL. Reliability and concurrent validity between two-dimensional and three-dimensional evaluations of knee valgus during drop jumps. Open Access J Sports Med 2016; 7: 65-73
• 38 Wilczyński B, Zorena K, Ślęzak D. Dynamic knee valgus in single-leg movement tasks. potentially modifiable factors and exercise training options. a literature review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17 (21) 17
• 39 Di Paolo S, Zaffagnini S, Tosarelli F. et al. A 2D qualitative movement assessment of a deceleration task detects football players with high knee joint loading. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2021; 29 (12) 4032-4040
• 40 Stearns KM, Pollard CD. Abnormal frontal plane knee mechanics during sidestep cutting in female soccer athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and return to sport. Am J Sports Med 2013; 41 (04) 918-923
• 41 Warth RJ, Zandiyeh P, Rao M. et al. Quantitative assessment of in vivo human anterior cruciate ligament autograft remodeling: a 3-dimensional UTE-T2* imaging study. Am J Sports Med 2020; 48 (12) 2939-2947
• 42 Barnes DA, Badger GJ, Yen YM. et al; BEAR Trial Team. Quantitative MRI biomarkers to predict risk of reinjury within 2 years after bridge-enhanced ACL restoration. Am J Sports Med 2023; 51 (02) 413-421
• 43 Chu CR, Williams AA. Quantitative MRI UTE-T2* and T2* show progressive and continued graft maturation over 2 years in human patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med 2019; 7 (08) 2325967119863056
• 44 Flannery SW, Beveridge JE, Proffen BL. et al; BEAR Trial Team. Predicting anterior cruciate ligament failure load with T₂* relaxometry and machine learning as a prospective imaging biomarker for revision surgery. Sci Rep 2023; 13 (01) 3524
• 45 Della Villa F, Di Paolo S, Santagati D. et al. A 2D video-analysis scoring system of 90° change of direction technique identifies football players with high knee abduction moment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2022; 30 (11) 3616-3625
• 46 Fones L, Kostyun RO, Cohen AD, Pace JL. Patient-reported outcomes, return-to-sport status, and reinjury rates after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in adolescent athletes: minimum 2-year follow-up. Orthop J Sports Med 2020; 8 (11) 2325967120964471
• 47 Zwolski C, Schmitt LC, Quatman-Yates C, Thomas S, Hewett TE, Paterno MV. The influence of quadriceps strength asymmetry on patient-reported function at time of return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2015; 43 (09) 2242-2249
• 48 Arundale AJH, Capin JJ, Zarzycki R, Smith A, Snyder-Mackler L. Functional and patient-reported outcomes improve over the course of rehabilitation: a secondary analysis of the ACL-SPORTS trial. Sports Health 2018; 10 (05) 441-452
• 49 Zarzycki R, Arhos E, Failla M, Capin J, Smith AH, Snyder-Mackler L. Association of the psychological response to the ACL-SPORTS training program and self-reported function at 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2021; 49 (13) 3495-3501