Beyond Borders: A Global Microsurgery Training and Case Exposure Survey

Abstract

Background Microsurgery is essential in modern reconstructive surgery and plastic surgery training. Surgeon's proficiency and experience are crucial for effective microsurgical interventions. Despite anecdotal evidence of varying quality of microsurgery training globally, no empirical studies have investigated this. We conducted a global survey to investigate microsurgical training and clinical case exposure among plastic surgery trainees worldwide.

Methods An online survey was conducted using a secure platform to gather information on microsurgical case exposure and training among plastic surgery trainees between August 2020 and April 2021. Participants provided consent and completed a 37-question survey across four themes: clinical caseload, surgical exposure to microsurgery, microsurgical simulation training exposure, and barriers and opportunities.

Results A total of 202 responses were received, with most respondents in formal training programs (86.7%). The data highlighted regional variation in microsurgery case indications and flap types, with North America and Europe exhibiting the highest activity levels in microsurgery. Trainees in Asia have the highest cumulative practical exposure in microsurgery, followed by Australia and Oceania, and North America. Only 39.6% of respondents reported formal microsurgical simulation training, and almost one-third (29.7%) received no simulation training. Trainee access to practical experience is limited by several factors, including insufficient time and procedure complexity. Notably, practical experience was most commonly denied without reason being given.

Conclusion Our study highlights significant disparities in microsurgical training and exposure among plastic surgery trainees globally. Further research is needed to identify strategies for addressing these issues, given the growing demand for complex reconstructive microsurgery and its impact on health care inequalities.

Keywords

simulation training - international microsurgery survey - microsurgery training - access to training - health care inequalities

Disclosure

This manuscript has not been published elsewhere and is not under consideration by another journal. There are no previous publications or reports that may be regarded as redundant publication of this work. All authors have approved the manuscript and agree with its submission to this journal. We are not using any copyrighted information, patient's photographs, identifiers, or other protected health information in this article. No text, text boxes, figures, or tables in this article have been previously published or owned by another party. We have no commercial associations or financial relationships that might pose or create a conflict of interest.

Publication History

Received: 23 June 2023

Accepted: 24 August 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
29 August 2023

Article published online:
09 October 2023

• References

• 1 Satterwhite T, Son J, Carey J. et al. Microsurgery education in residency training: validating an online curriculum. Ann Plast Surg 2012; 68 (04) 410-414
• 2 Mueller MA, Pourtaheri N, Evans GRD. Microsurgery training resource variation among US Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency Programs. J Reconstr Microsurg 2019; 35 (03) 176-181
• 3 Ramachandran S, Ong YS, Chin AY, Song IC, Ogden B, Tan BK. Stepwise training for reconstructive microsurgery: the journey to becoming a confident microsurgeon in singapore. Arch Plast Surg 2014; 41 (03) 209-212
• 4 Selber JC, Chang EI, Liu J. et al. Tracking the learning curve in microsurgical skill acquisition. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (04) 550e-557e
• 5 Temple CLF, Ross DC. A new, validated instrument to evaluate competency in microsurgery: the University of Western Ontario Microsurgical Skills Acquisition/Assessment instrument [outcomes article]. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (01) 215-222
• 6 Vizcay M, Troisi L, Navia A. et al. Microsurgery training in Latin America: a survey of residents' experiences. Int Microsurg J 2022; 6 (02) 1
• 7 Blackwell KE, Brown MT, Gonzalez D. Overcoming the learning curve in microvascular head and neck reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 123 (12) 1332-1335
• 8 Culliford IV AT, Spector J, Blank A, Karp NS, Kasabian A, Levine JP. The fate of lower extremities with failed free flaps: a single institution's experience over 25 years. Ann Plast Surg 2007; 59 (01) 18-21 , discussion 21–22
• 9 Cho MJ, Halani SH, Davis J, Zhang AY. Achieving balance between resident autonomy and patient safety: analysis of resident-led microvascular reconstruction outcomes at a microsurgical training center with an established microsurgical training pathway. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2020; 73 (01) 118-125
• 10 Jubbal KT, Echo A, Spiegel AJ, Izaddoost SA. The impact of resident involvement in breast reconstruction surgery outcomes by modality: an analysis of 4,500 cases. Microsurgery 2017; 37 (07) 800-807
• 11 Allouni A, Dunne J, Collin T, Saleh D. A survey of microsurgery training among UK plastic surgery and maxillofacial surgery trainees. Microsurgery 2014; 34 (05) 419-420
• 12 Al-Bustani S, Halvorson EG. Status of microsurgical simulation training in plastic surgery: a survey of United States Program Directors. Ann Plast Surg 2016; 76 (06) 713-716
• 13 Reghunathan M, Zaldana-Flynn M, Rose J, Crisera CA, Reid CM. The ideal microsurgery fellowship: a survey of fellows and fellowship directors. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37 (02) 167-173
• 14 Sullivan BJ, Maliha S, Henderson PW. Microsurgery fellows' impression of clinical and educational offerings during fellowship year. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (03) 191-196
• 15 Evgeniou E, Walker H, Gujral S. The role of simulation in microsurgical training. J Surg Educ 2018; 75 (01) 171-181