Alkene versus Aryl Chlorination in Asymmetric Hypervalent Iodine Catalysis: A Case Study

Andreas M. Arnold; Julia Binder; Martin Kretzschmar; Tanja Gulder

doi:10.1055/a-2201-7326

Synlett, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Synlett 2024; 35(09): 1001-1006
DOI: 10.1055/a-2201-7326

cluster

Chemical Synthesis and Catalysis in Germany

Alkene versus Aryl Chlorination in Asymmetric Hypervalent Iodine Catalysis: A Case Study

Andreas M. Arnold

^aInstitute of Organic Chemistry, Leipzig University, Johannisallee 29, 04103 Leipzig, Germany

^bDepartment of Chemistry, Technical University of Munich, Lichtenbergstraße 4, 85748 Garching, Germany

,

Julia Binder

^aInstitute of Organic Chemistry, Leipzig University, Johannisallee 29, 04103 Leipzig, Germany

^bDepartment of Chemistry, Technical University of Munich, Lichtenbergstraße 4, 85748 Garching, Germany

,

Martin Kretzschmar

^aInstitute of Organic Chemistry, Leipzig University, Johannisallee 29, 04103 Leipzig, Germany

,

Tanja Gulder ∗

^aInstitute of Organic Chemistry, Leipzig University, Johannisallee 29, 04103 Leipzig, Germany

^bDepartment of Chemistry, Technical University of Munich, Lichtenbergstraße 4, 85748 Garching, Germany

› Institutsangaben

Abstract

Alle Artikel dieser Rubrik

Abstract

Hypervalent λ³-iodanes have become a prominent tool for halofunctionalizations of alkenes. Despite many examples of asymmetric fluorinations reported lately, the corresponding enantioselective chlorination reactions using iodoresorcinol-based catalysts are significantly less developed, with only one example known to date. Here, we show how competing aromatic chlorination of the iodoarene catalyst is a significant obstacle in these transformations, hinting towards a conceptual issue with this well-established catalyst class for enantioselective chlorinations. Consequently, the reaction conditions and the catalyst design must be adapted to facilitate an effective chirality transfer. Hence, attention should be paid when selecting the oxidizing agent, the stoichiometry, and careful reaction analysis must be conducted to identify the factual catalytically active species.

Key words

chlorination - hypervalent iodane catalysis - asymmetric reactions - iodoresorcinols - rearrangement

Volltext

Referenzen

References and Notes

1a Grelier G, Darses B, Dauban P. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2018; 14: 1508
1b Berthiol F. Synthesis 2015; 47: 587
1c Lassaletta JM. Nat. Commun. 2020; 11: 3787

2a Satheeshkumar RK, Sai PP, Gowravaram S, Reddy BV. S. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2019; 1687
2b Chen C, Wang X, Yang T. Front. Chem. 2020; 8: 849
2c Rahman AU, Zarshad N, Zhou P, Yang W, Li G, Ali A. Front. Chem. 2020; 8: 523
2d Xu Y, Hu JT, Yan J. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2012; 23: 891
2e Yakura T, Fujiwara T, Yamada A, Nambu H. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2018; 14: 971
2f Kohlhepp SV, Gulder T. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016; 45: 6270

3a Uyanik M, Ishihara K. Chem. Commun. 2009; 2086
3b Ballaschk F, Kirsch SF. Green Chem. 2019; 21: 5896
3c Thottumkara AP, Bowsher MS, Vinod TK. Org. Lett. 2005; 7: 2933

4a Uyanik M, Yasui T, Ishihara K. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013; 52: 9215
4b Pouységu L, Deffieux D, Quideau S. Tetrahedron 2010; 66: 2235
4c Quideau S, Pouységu L, Peixoto PA, Deffieux D. Phenol Dearomatization with Hypervalent Iodine Reagents. In Hypervalent Iodine Chemistry Topics in Current Chemistry, Vol. 373. Wirth T. Springer; Cham: 2016: 25-74

5a Tohma H, Kita Y. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2004; 346: 111
5b Murphy GK, Gulder T. Hypervalent Iodine Fluorination for Preparing Alkyl Fluorides (Stoichiometrically and Catalytically). In Fluorination. Hu J, Umemoto T. Springer; Singapore: 2018: 1-32
5c Du Y, Zhang B, Li X, Guo B. Chem. Commun. 2020; 56: 14119

6a Hypervalent Iodine Chemistry. In Topics in Current Chemistry, Vol. 373. Wirth T. Springer; Cham: 2016
6b Zhdankin VV. Hypervalent Iodine Chemistry: Preparation, Structure, and Synthetic Applications of Polyvalent Iodine Compounds. Wiley; Chichester: 2013
6c Yoshimura A, Zhdankin VV. Chem. Rev. 2016; 116: 3328
6d Silva JL. F, Olofsson B. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2011; 28: 1722
6e Arnold AM, Ulmer A, Gulder T. Chem. Eur. J. 2016; 22: 8728

7a Parra A. Chem. Rev. 2019; 119: 12033
7b Yusubov MS, Zhdankin VV. Resource-Efficient Technologies 2015; 1: 49
7c Dohi T, Kita Y. Chem. Commun. 2009; 2073
7d Ghosh S, Pradhan S, Chatterjee I. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2018; 14: 1244

8a Li Y, Hari DP, Vita MV, Waser J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016; 55: 4436
8b Hari DP, Caramenti P, Waser J. Acc. Chem. Res. 2018; 51: 3212
8c Boelke A, Finkbeiner P, Nachtsheim BJ. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2018; 14: 1263
8d Ghosh MK, Rajkiewicz AA, Kalek M. Synthesis 2019; 51: 359
8e Han Z.-Z, Zhang C.-P. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2020; 362: 4256
8f Nicolaou KC, Simmons NL, Ying Y, Heretsch PM, Chen JS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011; 133: 8134

9a Kong W, Casimiro M, Fuentes N, Merino E, Nevado C. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013; 52: 13086
9b Duddupudi AL, Pandey P, Vo H, Welsh CL, Doerksen RJ, Cuny GD. J. Org. Chem. 2020; 85: 7549
9c Jiang X, Zhu W, Yang L, Zheng Z, Yu C. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2019; 2268
9d Martínez C, Muñiz K. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015; 54: 8287
9e Geary GC, Hope EG, Stuart AM. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015; 54: 14911
9f Binder J, Biswas A, Gulder T. Chem. Sci. 2023; 14: 3907

10a Zhao Z, Peng Z, Zhao Y, Liu H, Li C, Zhao J. J. Org. Chem. 2017; 82: 11848
10b Brown M, Kumar R, Rehbein J, Wirth T. Chem. Eur. J. 2016; 22: 4030
10c Singh FV, Wirth T. Synthesis 2013; 45: 2499

11 Jia K, Zhang F, Huang H, Chen Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016; 138: 1514

12a Merritt EA, Olofsson B. Synthesis 2011; 517
12b Stockhammer L, Schörgenhumer J, Mairhofer C, Waser M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2021; 82
12c Lex TR, Swasy MI, Whitehead DC. J. Org. Chem. 2015; 80: 12234
12d Kiefl GM, Gulder T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020; 142: 20577

13a Woerly EM, Banik SM, Jacobsen EN. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016; 138: 13858
13b Haubenreisser S, Wöste TH, Martínez C, Ishihara K, Muñiz K. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016; 55: 413
13c Fujita M, Yoshida Y, Miyata K, Wakisaka A, Sugimura T. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010; 49: 7068
13d Sharma HA, Mennie KM, Kwan EE, Jacobsen EN. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020; 142: 16090
13e Molnár IG, Gilmour R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016; 138: 5004
13f Scheidt F, Schäfer M, Sarie JC, Daniliuc CG, Molloy JJ, Gilmour R. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018; 57: 16431
13g Uyanik M, Yasui T, Ishihara K. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010; 49: 2175
13h Uyanik M, Yasui T, Ishihara K. Tetrahedron 2010; 66: 5841
13i Kong W, Feige P, de Haro T, Nevado C. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013; 52: 2469
13j Romero RM, Souto JA, Muñiz K. J. Org. Chem. 2016; 81: 6118
13k Eisenberger P, Gischig S, Togni A. Chem. Eur. J. 2006; 12: 2579

14 Roberts I, Kimball GE. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1937; 59: 947

15a Cresswell AJ, Eey ST.-C, Denmark SE. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015; 54: 15642
15b Petrone DA, Ye J, Lautens M. Chem. Rev. 2016; 116: 8003
15c Saikia I, Borah AJ, Phukan P. Chem. Rev. 2016; 116: 6837

16a Ulmer A, Brunner C, Arnold AM, Pöthig A, Gulder T. Chem. Eur. J. 2016; 22: 3660
16b Andries-Ulmer A, Brunner C, Rehbein J, Gulder T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018; 140: 13034
16c Stodulski M, Goetzinger A, Kohlhepp SV, Gulder T. Chem. Commun. 2014; 50: 3435
16d Yan T, Zhou B, Xue X.-S, Cheng J.-P. J. Org. Chem. 2016; 81: 9006
16e Banik SM, Medley JW, Jacobsen EN. Science 2016; 353: 51

17 Stodulski M, Kohlhepp SV, Raabe G, Gulder T. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2016; 2170

18a Fabry DC, Stodulski M, Hoerner S, Gulder T. Chem. Eur. J. 2012; 18: 10834
18b Braddock DC, Cansell G, Hermitage SA. Chem. Commun. 2006; 2483

19 Ulmer A, Stodulski M, Kohlhepp SV, Patzelt C, Pöthig A, Bettray W, Gulder T. Chem. Eur. J. 2015; 21: 1444
20 Patzelt C, Pöthig A, Gulder T. Org. Lett. 2016; 18: 3466
21 Singh FV, Shetgaonkar SE, Krishnan M, Wirth T. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2022; 51: 8102

22a Li X, Chen P, Liu G. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2018; 14: 1813
22b Muniz K. Acc. Chem. Res. 2018; 51: 1507
22c Muñiz K, Barreiro L, Romero RM, Martínez C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017; 139: 4354
22d Lee JH, Choi S, Hong KB. Molecules 2019; 24: 2634
22e Claraz A, Masson G. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2018; 16: 5386
22f Sarie JC, Thiehoff C, Neufeld J, Daniliuc CG, Gilmour R. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020; 59: 15069
22g Farid U, Wirth T. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012; 51: 3462

23 Sarie JC, Neufeld J, Daniliuc CG, Gilmour R. ACS Catal. 2019; 9: 7232
24 Tania Tania, Molino A, Sharp-Bucknall L, Wilson DJ. D, Dutton JL. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2022; 20: 8454
25 Starting material (200 μmol, 1.0 equiv), 101 mg CsCl (600 μmol, 3.0 equiv), and 78.0 mg Selectfluor (220 μmol, 1.1 equiv) were dissolved in 900 μL abs. DCM together with 190 μL HFIP. The solution was cooled to –20 °C, and the catalyst was added. Upon completion, 2 mL sat. aq. Na₂S₂O₃ was added, and the mixture was poured into brine and extracted with DCM (2 × 10 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over MgSO₄, and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure.

26a Podgoršek A, Iskra J. Molecules 2010; 15: 2857
26b Zielinska A, Skulski L. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004; 45: 1087

Zusatzmaterial

Supporting Information