Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2219-4901
ChatGPT and Rhinoplasty Recovery: An Exploration of AI's Role in Postoperative Guidance
Abstract
The potential applications of artificial intelligence (AI) in health care have garnered significant interest in recent years. This study presents the first published exploration of ChatGPT, an AI language model, as a tool for providing postoperative guidance during rhinoplasty recovery. The primary objective was to shed light on the role of ChatGPT in augmenting patient care during the critical postoperative phase. Using the Rhinobase database, standardized questions were formulated to evaluate AI-generated responses addressing pain management, swelling, bruising, and potential asymmetries. Results demonstrated that ChatGPT has the potential to enhance patient education and alleviate emotional distress by providing general information and reassurance during the recovery process. However, the study emphasized that AI should not replace personalized advice from qualified health care professionals. This pioneering investigation offers valuable insights into the integration of AI and human expertise, paving the way for optimized postrhinoplasty recovery care.
Publication History
Accepted Manuscript online:
29 November 2023
Article published online:
10 January 2024
© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Stokel-Walker C, Van Noorden R. What ChatGPT and generative AI mean for science. Nature 2023; 614 (7947) 214-216
- 2 Amisha, Malik P, Pathania M, Rathaur VK. Overview of artificial intelligence in medicine. J Family Med Prim Care 2019; 8 (07) 2328-2331
- 3 Xie Y, Seth I, Hunter-Smith DJ, Rozen WM, Ross R, Lee M. Aesthetic surgery advice and counseling from artificial intelligence: a rhinoplasty consultation with ChatGPT. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2023; 47 (05) 1985-1993
- 4 Swamy RS, Most SP. Preoperative, anesthetic, and postoperative care for rhinoplasty patients. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2009; 17 (01) 7-13 , v
- 5 Apaydin F, Akyildiz S, Hecht DA, Toriumi DM. Rhinobase: a comprehensive database, facial analysis, and picture-archiving software for rhinoplasty. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2009; 11 (03) 209-211
- 6 Erişir F, Tahamiler R. Lateral osteotomies in rhinoplasty: a safer and less traumatic method. Aesthet Surg J 2008; 28 (05) 518-520
- 7 Ghorbani F, Ahmadi H, Davar G. Patient dissatisfaction following rhinoplasty: a 10-year experience in Iran. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2023; 45 (01) 7
- 8 Surowitz JB, Most SP. Complications of rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2013; 21 (04) 639-651
- 9 Bagheri SC. Primary cosmetic rhinoplasty. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2012; 24 (01) 39-48
- 10 Jones HE, Faulkner HR, Losken A. The psychological impact of aesthetic surgery: a mini-review. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum 2022; 4: ojac077
- 11 Sharif-Askary B, Carlson AR, Van Noord MG, Marcus JR. Incidence of postoperative adverse events after rhinoplasty: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 145 (03) 669-684
- 12 Thompson AC. Nasal tip numbness following rhinoplasty. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1987; 12 (02) 143-144