Change in Femoral Cartilage Cross-Sectional Area After Aerobic and Resistance Exercise

Abstract

We compared the immediate response and recovery of femoral cartilage morphology following aerobic or resistance exercise to a control condition. Fifteen healthy young males (23.9 years; 170.1 cm; 69.7 kg) visited the laboratory three separate days and randomly performed one of the 30-min exercise aerobic exercises (treadmill running), resistance exercises (leg presses, back squats, and knee extensions), or seated rest as the control, each followed by the 50-min recovery. Ultrasonographic images of the femoral cartilage cross-sectional area (CSA) were obtained before and after exercise and every 5 min thereafter. To test exercise effects over time, a mixed model analysis of variance and Tukey–Kramer post-hoc tests were performed (p<0.05). The femoral cartilage CSA was different (condition×time: F_34,742=4.30, p<0.0001) and the femoral cartilage CSA was decreased after the aerobic (−5.8%, p<0.0001) and the resistance (−3.4%, p=0.04) exercises compared to the pre-exercise levels. Deformed femoral cartilage CSA took 35 and 10 min to return to the pre-exercise levels after aerobic and resistance exercises (p+>+0.09), respectively. Thirty minutes of moderate exertion performing aerobic or resistance exercises immediately reduced the femoral cartilage CSA. A rest period ranging from 10 to 35 min was required for cartilage recovery after weight-bearing exercises.

Keywords

cartilage deformation - ultrasonography - running - weightlifting - blood lactate concentration

Publication History

Received: 07 January 2024

Accepted: 17 April 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
17 April 2024

Article published online:
01 June 2024

• References

• 1 Sophia Fox AJ, Bedi A, Rodeo SA. The basic science of articular cartilage: structure, composition, and function. Sports Health 2009; 1: 461-468
• 2 Hosseini SM, Wu Y, Ito K. et al. The importance of superficial collagen fibrils for the function of articular cartilage. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2014; 13: 41-51
• 3 Oinas J, Ronkainen A, Rieppo L. et al. Composition, structure and tensile biomechanical properties of equine articular cartilage during growth and maturation. Sci Rep 2018; 8: 1-12
• 4 Brody LT. Knee osteoarthritis: clinical connections to articular cartilage structure and function. Phys Ther Sport 2015; 16: 301-316
• 5 McNary SM, Athanasiou KA, Reddi AH. Engineering lubrication in articular cartilage. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2012; 18: 88-100
• 6 Halonen K, Mononen M, Jurvelin J. et al. Deformation of articular cartilage during static loading of a knee joint–experimental and finite element analysis. J Biomech 2014; 47: 2467-2474
• 7 Putignano C, Burris D, Moore A. et al. Cartilage rehydration: The sliding-induced hydrodynamic triggering mechanism. Acta Biomater 2021; 125: 90-99
• 8 Eckstein F, Lemberger B, Gratzke C. et al. In vivo cartilage deformation after different types of activity and its dependence on physical training status. Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64: 291-295
• 9 Petitjean N, Canadas P, Royer P. et al. Cartilage biomechanics: From the basic facts to the challenges of tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res A 2022; 111: 1067-1089
• 10 Eckstein F, Hudelmaier M, Putz R. The effects of exercise on human articular cartilage. J Anat 2006; 208: 491-512
• 11 Cao J, Zheng B, Meng X. et al. A novel ultrasound scanning approach for evaluating femoral cartilage defects of the knee: comparison with routine magnetic resonance imaging. J Orthop Surg Res 2018; 13: 1-12
• 12 Harkey MS, Blackburn JT, Davis H. et al. Ultrasonographic assessment of medial femoral cartilage deformation acutely following walking and running. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2017; 25: 907-913
• 13 Harkey MS, Blackburn JT, Hackney AC. et al. Comprehensively assessing the acute femoral cartilage response and recovery after walking and drop-landing: an ultrasonographic study. Ultrasound Med Biol 2018; 44: 311-320
• 14 Pfeiffer SJ, Davis-Wilson HC, Pexa B. et al. Assessing step count-dependent changes in femoral articular cartilage using ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med 2020; 39: 957-965
• 15 Bini RR, Bini AF. Effects of exercise mode in knee cartilage thickness. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2020; 24: 490-495
• 16 Moore AC, Burris DL. Tribological rehydration of cartilage and its potential role in preserving joint health. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2017; 25: 99-107
• 17 Brüggemann G-P, Brüggemann L, Heinrich K. et al. Biological tissue response to impact like mechanical loading. Footwear Sci 2011; 3: 13-22
• 18 Lee J, Lim J, Park S. et al. Morphological response in femoral cartilage during and after 40-min treadmill running at 7.5 km/h or 8.5 km/h. J Athl Train 2023;
• 19 Campos GE, Luecke TJ, Wendeln HK. et al. Muscular adaptations in response to three different resistance-training regimens: specificity of repetition maximum training zones. Eur J Appl Physiol 2002; 88: 50-60
• 20 Harriss D, Jones C, MacSween A. Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2022 update. Int J Sports Med 2022; 43: 1065-1070
• 21 Song K, Pietrosimone BG, Nissman DB. et al. Ultrasonographic measures of talar cartilage thickness associate with magnetic resonance-based measures of talar cartilage volume. Ultrasound Med Biol 2020; 46: 575-581
• 22 Borg G, Ljunggren G, Ceci R. The increase of perceived exertion, aches and pain in the legs, heart rate and blood lactate during exercise on a bicycle ergometer. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1985; 54: 343-349
• 23 Cohen J. The effect size. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 1988: 77-83
• 24 Han S, Lee H, Kim H. et al. A 6-week sprint interval training program changes anaerobic power, quadriceps moment, and subcutaneous tissue thickness. Int J Sports Med 2017; 38: 105-110
• 25 Gardner M, Altman D. Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing. BMJ 1986; 292: 746-750
• 26 Cutcliffe HC, DeFrate LE. Comparison of cartilage mechanical properties measured during creep and recovery. Sci Rep 2020; 10: 1547
• 27 Harkey MS, Little E, Thompson M. et al. Femoral cartilage ultrasound echo intensity associates with arthroscopic cartilage damage. Ultrasound Med Biol 2021; 47: 43-50
• 28 Lad NK, Liu B, Ganapathy PK. et al. Effect of normal gait on in vivo tibiofemoral cartilage strains. J Biomech 2016; 49: 2870-2876
• 29 Eckstein F, Tieschky M, Faber S. et al. Functional analysis of articular cartilage deformation, recovery, and fluid flow following dynamic exercise in vivo. Anat Embryol (Berl) 1999; 200: 419-424
• 30 Paranjape CS, Cutcliffe HC, Grambow SC. et al. A new stress test for knee joint cartilage. Sci Rep 2019; 9: 2283
• 31 Voinier S, Moore A, Benson JM. et al. The modes and competing rates of cartilage fluid loss and recovery. Acta Biomater 2022; 138: 390-397
• 32 Ateshian GA. The role of interstitial fluid pressurization in articular cartilage lubrication. J Biomech 2009; 42: 1163-1176
• 33 Kenney WL, Wilmore JH, Costill DL. Physiology of sport and exercise: Human Kinetics. 2021
• 34 Schoenfeld BJ. Potential mechanisms for a role of metabolic stress in hypertrophic adaptations to resistance training. Sports Medicine 2013; 43: 179-194
• 35 Akkaya S, Akkaya N, Ozcakar L. et al. Ultrasonographic evaluation of the femoral cartilage thickness after unilateral arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013; 21: 1104-1110
• 36 Naredo E, Acebes C, Möller I. et al. Ultrasound validity in the measurement of knee cartilage thickness. Ann Rheum Dis 2009; 68: 1322-1327
• 37 Hudelmaier M, Glaser C, Englmeier KH. et al. Correlation of knee-joint cartilage morphology with muscle cross-sectional areas vs. anthropometric variables. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 2003; 270: 175-184