Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg
DOI: 10.1055/a-2332-0150
Invited Review

Upper Extremity Diaphyseal Osseous Gap Reconstruction with Free Vascularized Bone Flaps: A Scoping Review

Hani I. Naga 
1   Division of Hand Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
2   Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
,
Joshua Kim 
1   Division of Hand Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
2   Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
,
Kristina Dunworth
1   Division of Hand Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
2   Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
,
Nicholas Oleck
1   Division of Hand Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
2   Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
,
Emmanuel Emovon
1   Division of Hand Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
2   Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
,
Margaret Graton
3   Department of Medical Library, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina
,
Suhail K. Mithani
1   Division of Hand Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
2   Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Reconstruction of upper extremity osseous diaphyseal defects often requires complex reconstructions. In this study, we characterized and summarized the available literature on free vascularized bone flap (VBF) reconstruction for upper extremity diaphyseal defects.

Methods A scoping review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews was conducted. A literature search of major electronic databases was conducted to identify journal articles relating to the management of VBF reconstruction of upper limb long bone defects. Articles with patient-level data were included. Descriptive statistics were performed using Python.

Results Overall, 364 patients were included in this study. The most common indications for VBFs included atrophic nonunion (125, 34.3%), postoncologic resection (125, 34.3%), septic nonunion (56, 15.4%), and trauma (36, 9.9%). Mean defect size was 8.53 ± 5.14 cm. A total of 67 (18.4%) cases had defects < 6 cm, and 166 cases (45.6%) had defects > 6 cm. The fibula was the most utilized VBF (272, 74.73%), followed by the medial femoral condyle flap (69, 18.96%). Overall, primary union rate was 87.1%. Subsequent flap fracture rate was 3.3%. There were only two (0.6%) VBF losses reported in the included cases, and donor-site complications were similarly rare (17, 4.7%).

Conclusion VBF reconstruction is often utilized for postoncologic defects and recalcitrant nonunions. The fibula is the most utilized VBF, but the medial femoral condyle flap is used frequently for smaller defects. VBF reconstruction demonstrates high union rates and low flap fracture rate across indications.

Keywords

upper extremity - osseous defects - fibula - vascularized bone - microsurgery

Note

S.K.M. serves as a consultant for Restor3D.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 25 November 2023

Accepted: 05 May 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
23 May 2024

Article published online:
21 June 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 DeCoster TA, Gehlert RJ, Mikola EA, Pirela-Cruz MA. Management of posttraumatic segmental bone defects. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2004; 12 (01) 28-38
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Dahl MT, Morrison S. Segmental bone defects and the history of bone transport. J Orthop Trauma 2021; 35 (Suppl. 04) S1-S7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Weiland AJ. Current concepts review: vascularized free bone transplants. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1981; 63 (01) 166-169
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Kusnezov N, Dunn JC, Stewart J, Mitchell JS, Pirela-Cruz M. Acute limb shortening for major near and complete upper extremity amputations with associated neurovascular injury: a review of the literature. Orthop Surg 2015; 7 (04) 306-316
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Klifto CS, Gandi SD, Sapienza A. Bone graft options in upper-extremity surgery. J Hand Surg Am 2018; 43 (08) 755-761.e2
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Vail TP, Urbaniak JR. Donor-site morbidity with use of vascularized autogenous fibular grafts. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996; 78 (02) 204-211
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Pirela-Cruz MA, DeCoster TA. Vascularized bone grafts. Orthopedics 2013; 17 (05) 407-412
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Avraham T, Franco P, Brecht LE. et al. Functional outcomes of virtually planned free fibula flap reconstruction of the mandible. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 134 (04) 628e-634e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Ackerman DB, Rose PS, Moran SL, Dekutoski MB, Bishop AT, Shin AY. The results of vascularized-free fibular grafts in complex spinal reconstruction. J Spinal Disord Tech 2011; 24 (03) 170-176
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Jones Jr DB, Rhee PC, Bishop AT, Shin AY. Free vascularized medial femoral condyle autograft for challenging upper extremity nonunions. Hand Clin 2012; 28 (04) 493-501
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Chen CM, Disa JJ, Lee HY. et al. Reconstruction of extremity long bone defects after sarcoma resection with vascularized fibula flaps: a 10-year review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (03) 915-924 , discussion 925–926
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Awad ME, Altman A, Elrefai R, Shipman P, Looney S, Elsalanty M. The use of vascularized fibula flap in mandibular reconstruction; a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of the observational studies. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2019; 47 (04) 629-641
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hollenbeck ST, Komatsu I, Woo S. et al. The current role of the vascularized-fibular osteocutaneous graft in the treatment of segmental defects of the upper extremity. Microsurgery 2011; 31 (03) 183-189
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Ferreira N, Saini AK, Birkholtz FF, Laubscher M. Management of segmental bone defects of the upper limb: a scoping review with data synthesis to inform decision making. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2021; 31 (05) 911-922
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W. et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med 2018; 169 (07) 467-473
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Peters MDJ, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Munn Z, Tricco AC, Khalil H. Chapter 11: Scoping reviews. In: Aromataris E, Munn Z. (eds). JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI; 2020. DOI: 10.46658/JBIMES-20-12
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Harris CR, Millman KJ, van der Walt SJ. et al. Array programming with NumPy. Nature 2020; 585 (7825) 357-362
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Virtanen P, Gommers R, Oliphant TE. et al; SciPy 1.0 Contributors. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat Methods 2020; 17 (03) 261-272
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Ring D, Allende C, Jafarnia K, Allende BT, Jupiter JB. Ununited diaphyseal forearm fractures with segmental defects: plate fixation and autogenous cancellous bone-grafting. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86 (11) 2440-2445
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Luo TD, Nunez Jr FA, Lomer AA, Nunez Sr FA. Management of recalcitrant osteomyelitis and segmental bone loss of the forearm with the Masquelet technique. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2017; 42 (06) 640-642
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Borzunov DY, Kolchin SN, Malkova TA. Role of the Ilizarov non-free bone plasty in the management of long bone defects and nonunion: problems solved and unsolved. World J Orthop 2020; 11 (06) 304-318
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Shaffer JW, Field GA, Goldberg VM, Davy DT. Fate of vascularized and nonvascularized autografts. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1985; (197) 32-43
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Shaffer JW, Davy DT, Field GA, Bensusan JS. Temporal analysis of vascularized and nonvascularized rib grafts in canine spine surgery. Spine 1989; 14 (07) 727-732
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Dell PC, Burchardt H, Glowczewskie Jr FP. A roentgenographic, biomechanical, and histological evaluation of vascularized and non-vascularized segmental fibular canine autografts. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985; 67 (01) 105-112
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Foster RD, Anthony JP, Sharma A, Pogrel MA. Vascularized bone flaps versus nonvascularized bone grafts for mandibular reconstruction: an outcome analysis of primary bony union and endosseous implant success. Head Neck 1999; 21 (01) 66-71
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Aibinder WR, Wagner ER, Bishop AT, Shin AY. Bone grafting for scaphoid nonunions: is free vascularized bone grafting superior for scaphoid nonunion?. Hand (N Y) 2019; 14 (02) 217-222
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Ribak S, Medina CEG, Mattar Jr R, Ulson HJR, Ulson HJ, Etchebehere M. Treatment of scaphoid nonunion with vascularised and nonvascularised dorsal bone grafting from the distal radius. Int Orthop 2010; 34 (05) 683-688
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Fuchs B, Steinmann SP, Bishop AT. Free vascularized corticoperiosteal bone graft for the treatment of persistent nonunion of the clavicle. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2005; 14 (03) 264-268
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Dell PC, Sheppard JE. Vascularized bone grafts in the treatment of infected forearm nonunions. J Hand Surg Am 1984; 9 (05) 653-658
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Beredjiklian PK, Hotchkiss RN, Athanasian EA, Ramsey ML, Katz MA. Recalcitrant nonunion of the distal humerus: treatment with free vascularized bone grafting. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; (435) 134-139
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Malizos KN, Zalavras CG, Soucacos PN, Beris AE, Urbaniak JR. Free vascularized fibular grafts for reconstruction of skeletal defects. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2004; 12 (05) 360-369
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Richard MJ, DiPrinzio EV, Lorenzana DJ, Whitlock KG, Hein RE, Urbaniak JR. Outcomes of free vascularized fibular graft for post-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Injury 2021; 52 (12) 3653-3659
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Berend KR, Gunneson EE, Urbaniak JR. Free vascularized fibular grafting for the treatment of postcollapse osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85 (06) 987-993
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Garvey PB, Chang EI, Selber JC. et al. A prospective study of preoperative computed tomographic angiographic mapping of free fibula osteocutaneous flaps for head and neck reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (04) 541e-549e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Guidi M, Guzzini M, Civitenga C. et al. Multifactorial analysis of treatment of long-bone nonunion with vascularized and nonvascularized bone grafts. J Hand Microsurg 2022; 15 (02) 106-115
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Higgins JP, Bürger HK. Osteochondral flaps from the distal femur: expanding applications, harvest sites, and indications. J Reconstr Microsurg 2014; 30 (07) 483-490
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Kaiser D, Levin LS. Medial femoral condyle free flap for persistent osseous nonunion of the first metatarsophalangeal joint: a preliminary report of a new surgical indication for the medial femoral condyle free flap. Foot Ankle Orthop 2023; 8 (03) 24 730114231191135
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Karunaratne YG, Romeo PB. Vascularized reconstruction of recalcitrant clavicular nonunion with the medial femoral condyle free flap: a systematic review of the literature. J Hand Microsurg 2024; 16 (01) 100016
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 DeKeyser GJ, Bailey TL, Higgins TF, Tyser AR. Treatment of recalcitrant femoral shaft nonunion with medial femoral condyle pedicled autograft: technical trick. J Orthop Trauma 2022; 36 (02) e80-e80
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Guzzini M, Ciclamini D, Arioli L. et al. Correlation between risk factors and healing times in long bone nonunions treated with corticoperiosteal flap from the medial femoral condyle. J Reconstr Microsurg 2023; 39 (07) 502-507
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar