Leveraging Novel Clinical Decision Support to Improve Preferred Language Documentation in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Abstract

Background Recognition of the patient and family's diverse backgrounds and language preference is critical for communicating effectively. In our hospital's electronic health record, a patient or family's identified language for communication is documented in a discrete field known as “preferred language.” This field serves as an interdepartmental method to identify patients with a non-English preferred language, creating a bolded banner for non-English speakers easily identifiable by health care professionals. Despite the importance of documenting preferred language to facilitate equitable care, this field is often blank.

Objectives Using the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Model for Improvement, our team sought to increase preferred language documentation within the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) from a baseline of 74% in September 2021 to above 90% within 6 months.

Methods A multidisciplinary team was assembled to address preferred language documentation. Our team incorporated guidance regarding preferred language documentation into a novel clinical decision support (CDS) tool aimed at addressing various safety and quality measures within the NICU. Our primary outcome metric was documentation of family's preferred language. Process measures included overall compliance with the CDS tool. A secondary outcome was the assessment of preferred language documentation accuracy.

Results The average rate of preferred language documentation increased from a baseline of 74 to 92% within 6 months and is currently sustained at 96%. Moreover, our follow-up assessments found that 100% of a random sample of contacted patients (n = 88) had their language preferences documented correctly. Overall compliance with the CDS tool remained at 85% throughout the project.

Conclusion Using a quality improvement framework coupled with a CDS initiative, our team was able to successfully and accurately improve preferred language documentation in our NICU. Future projects include strategies for more equitable care for patients with non-English preferences such as improved interpreter usage and discharge instructions in their preferred language.

Keywords

clinical decision support - preferred language - health care systems electronic health record - neonatal

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

The study was conducted under local institutional standards for quality improvement initiatives and therefore institutional review boards approval was not needed.

Publication History

Received: 05 October 2023

Accepted: 22 May 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
24 May 2024

Article published online:
31 July 2024

• References

• 1 Bharmal A, Earl N, Klaber B. Improving equity in inpatient paediatric services: a single-centre quality improvement project providing care in patients' preferred language. BMJ Paediatr Open 2022; 6 (01) e001525
• 2 U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey: Detailed languages spoken at home. Accessed July 20, 2023 at: https://data.census.gov/table?q=language&tid=ACSST1Y2021.S1601
• 3 Diamond L, Izquierdo K, Canfield D, Matsoukas K, Gany F. A systematic review of the impact of patient-physician non-English language concordance on quality of care and outcomes. J Gen Intern Med 2019; 34 (08) 1591-1606
• 4 Yeboah D, McDaniel C, Lion KC. Language matters: why we should reconsider the term “limited English proficiency”. Hosp Pediatr 2023; 13 (01) e11-e13
• 5 Ortega P, Shin TM, Martínez GA. Rethinking the term “limited English proficiency” to improve language-appropriate healthcare for all. J Immigr Minor Health 2022; 24 (03) 799-805
• 6 Hartford EA, Anderson AP, Klein EJ, Caglar D, Carlin K, Lion KC. The use and impact of professional interpretation in a pediatric emergency department. Acad Pediatr 2019; 19 (08) 956-962
• 7 Cohen AL, Rivara F, Marcuse EK, McPhillips H, Davis R. Are language barriers associated with serious medical events in hospitalized pediatric patients?. Pediatrics 2005; 116 (03) 575-579
• 8 Ngai KM, Grudzen CR, Lee R, Tong VY, Richardson LD, Fernandez A. The association between limited English proficiency and unplanned emergency department revisit within 72 hours. Ann Emerg Med 2016; 68 (02) 213-221
• 9 Levas MN, Cowden JD, Dowd MD. Effects of the limited English proficiency of parents on hospital length of stay and home health care referral for their home health care-eligible children with infections. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2011; 165 (09) 831-836
• 10 Thornton JD, Pham K, Engelberg RA, Jackson JC, Curtis JR. Families with limited English proficiency receive less information and support in interpreted intensive care unit family conferences. Crit Care Med 2009; 37 (01) 89-95
• 11 Lion KC, Gritton J, Scannell J. et al. Patterns and predictors of professional interpreter use in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatrics 2021; 147 (02) e20193312
• 12 Gupta KM, Campeggio D, Madu C. et al. Improving identification of interpreter need in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatrics 2023; 151 (03) e2022057330
• 13 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Inventory of Resources for Standardized Demographic and Language Data Collection. Accessed July 20, 2023 at: https://www.cms.gov/About-CMS/Agency-Information/OMH/Downloads/Data-Collection-Resources.pdf
• 14 Rajaram A, Thomas D, Sallam F, Verma AA, Rawal S. Accuracy of the preferred language field in the electronic health records of two Canadian hospitals. Appl Clin Inform 2020; 11 (04) 644-649
• 15 Klinger EV, Carlini SV, Gonzalez I. et al. Accuracy of race, ethnicity, and language preference in an electronic health record. J Gen Intern Med 2015; 30 (06) 719-723
• 16 Chin MH. Using patient race, ethnicity, and language data to achieve health equity. J Gen Intern Med 2015; 30 (06) 703-705
• 17 Ogrinc GS, Headrick LA, Barton AJ. et al. Fundamentals of Health Care Improvement: A Guide to Improving Your Patients' Care (4th edition). Joint Commission Resources and Institute for Healthcare Improvement;; 2022
• 18 Office of Innovation and Technology. City of Philadelphia: PHL Language Services Usage Dashboard. Accessed July 20, 2023 at: https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/51923768a6b14d5bb773bfcc1cf74cd1/?mc_cid=d55b2adff2&mc_eid=2fafe475a7
• 19 Carr LH, Padula M, Chuo J. et al. Improving compliance with a rounding checklist through low- and high-technology interventions: a quality improvement initiative. Pediatr Qual Saf 2021; 6 (04) e437
• 20 Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009; 42 (02) 377-381
• 21 Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL. et al; REDCap Consortium. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform 2019; 95: 103208
• 22 Chaparro JD, Beus JM, Dziorny AC. et al. Clinical decision support stewardship: best practices and techniques to monitor and improve interruptive alerts. Appl Clin Inform 2022; 13 (03) 560-568
• 23 Campbell R. The five “rights” of clinical decision support. J AHIMA 2013; 84 (10) 42-47 , quiz 48
• 24 Sun EY, Alvarez C, Callahan LF, Sheikh SZ. The disparities in patient portal use among patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: retrospective cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res 2022; 24 (08) e38802