Download PDF
J Knee Surg
DOI: 10.1055/a-2333-1490
Original Article

Factors Associated with Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Focus on Athletes Who Desire Preinjury Level of Sport

Yusuke Kawanishi 
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Mizuho-Ku, Nagoya, Japan
,
Makoto Kobayashi
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Mizuho-Ku, Nagoya, Japan
,
Sanshiro Yasuma 
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Mizuho-Ku, Nagoya, Japan
,
Hiroaki Fukushima
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Mizuho-Ku, Nagoya, Japan
,
Jiro Kato
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Mizuho-Ku, Nagoya, Japan
,
Atsunori Murase
2   Kasugai Joint & Sports Orthopedic Clinic, Kasugai, Japan
,
Tetsuya Takenaga
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Mizuho-Ku, Nagoya, Japan
,
Masahito Yoshida
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Mizuho-Ku, Nagoya, Japan
,
Gen Kuroyanagi
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Mizuho-Ku, Nagoya, Japan
,
Yohei Kawaguchi
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Mizuho-Ku, Nagoya, Japan
,
Hideki Murakami
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Mizuho-Ku, Nagoya, Japan
,
Masahiro Nozaki
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Mizuho-Ku, Nagoya, Japan
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Introduction In most previous studies investigating return to preinjury level of sport (RTPS) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), whether patients continue aiming for RTPS not only before but also after ACLR was unclear because environmental and social factors were not considered. Herein, we aimed to evaluate factors associated with RTPS among athletes who desired to achieve RTPS even after ACLR, excluding patients who no longer desire this goal owing to environmental and social factors.

Methods Ninety-two patients who underwent primary double-bundle ACLR with a minimum 2-year follow-up and desired to achieve RTPS before surgery were retrospectively enrolled. Twelve (13%) patients who no longer desired to achieve RTPS after ACLR owing to environmental and social factors were excluded. Sixty-nine patients were included in the final cohort. At the final follow-up, the patients were split into two groups: those who achieved (R group) or did not achieve (N group) RTPS based on patient self-assessment. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Lysholm scores were also determined. The anterior tibial translation in the Lachman test and acceleration and external rotational angular velocity (ERAV) in the pivot shift test were measured at the hardware removal operation.

Results Significant differences were observed for preinjury level of sports between the groups (p < 0.05). The rate of RTPS in competitive athletes was lower than that in recreational athletes (20/46: 43% vs. 16/22: 73%; p =.037). Lysholm score, KOOS symptom, pain, and quality of life showed higher values in the R group than in the N group (p < 0.050). Acceleration was significantly lower in the R group than in the N group (p = 0.028).

Conclusion Competitive level of sports is a risk factor for failure to achieve RTPS. The postoperative functional outcomes in the group that achieved RTPS showed more favorable results. These results provide important information to enable the surgeons to consider the appropriate surgical plan for competitive athletes who desire to achieve RTPS after ACLR.

Keywords

return to preinjury sport level - pivot shift test - anterior cruciate ligament - quantitative measurement

Ethics Approval

All procedures were performed at the dissection room of the Nagoya City University and ethical approval was obtained (IRB number 60–18–0154).




Publication History

Received: 28 April 2023

Accepted: 23 May 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
24 May 2024

Article published online:
14 June 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Barber-Westin SD, Noyes FR. Factors used to determine return to unrestricted sports activities after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2011; 27 (12) 1697-1705
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Kyritsis P, Bahr R, Landreau P, Miladi R, Witvrouw E. Likelihood of ACL graft rupture: not meeting six clinical discharge criteria before return to sport is associated with a four times greater risk of rupture. Br J Sports Med 2016; 50 (15) 946-951
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Ardern CL, Webster KE, Taylor NF, Feller JA. Return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the state of play. Br J Sports Med 2011; 45 (07) 596-606
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Ardern CL, Taylor NF, Feller JA, Whitehead TS, Webster KE. Psychological responses matter in returning to preinjury level of sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Am J Sports Med 2013; 41 (07) 1549-1558
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Toale JP, Hurley ET, Hughes AJ. et al. The majority of athletes fail to return to play following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction due to reasons other than the operated knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2021; 29 (11) 3877-3882
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Faleide AGH, Magnussen LH, Bogen BE. et al. Association between psychological readiness and knee laxity and their predictive value for return to sport in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2021; 49 (10) 2599-2606
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Webster KE, McPherson AL, Hewett TE, Feller JA. Factors associated with a return to preinjury level of sport performance after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Am J Sports Med 2019; 47 (11) 2557-2562
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Harris JD, Abrams GD, Bach BR. et al. Return to sport after ACL reconstruction. Orthopedics 2014; 37 (02) e103-e108
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Müller U, Krüger-Franke M, Schmidt M, Rosemeyer B. Predictive parameters for return to pre-injury level of sport 6 months following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23 (12) 3623-3631
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Nawasreh Z, Logerstedt D, Cummer K, Axe M, Risberg MA, Snyder-Mackler L. Functional performance 6 months after ACL reconstruction can predict return to participation in the same preinjury activity level 12 and 24 months after surgery. Br J Sports Med 2018; 52 (06) 375
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Piefer JW, Pflugner TR, Hwang MD, Lubowitz JH. Anterior cruciate ligament femoral footprint anatomy: systematic review of the 21st century literature. Arthroscopy 2012; 28 (06) 872-881
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Kawanishi Y, Nozaki M, Kobayashi M. et al. Preoperative knee instability affects residual instability as evaluated by quantitative pivot-shift measurements during double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med 2020; 8 (10) 2325967120959020
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kawanishi Y, Kobayashi M, Yasuma S. et al. Anterolateral ligament reconstruction in addition to primary double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction for grade 3 pivot shift improves residual knee instability during surgery. J Exp Orthop 2021; 8 (01) 51
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Murase A, Nozaki M, Kobayashi M. et al. Comparison of quantitative evaluation between cutaneous and transosseous inertial sensors in anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee: a cadaveric study. J Orthop Sci 2017; 22 (05) 874-879
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Petrigliano FA, Borgstrom PH, Kaiser WJ, McAllister DR, Markolf KL. Measurements of tibial rotation during a simulated pivot shift manoeuvre using a gyroscopic sensor. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23 (08) 2237-2243
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Hefti F, Müller W, Jakob RP, Stäubli HU. Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1993; 1 (3–4): 226-234
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Novaretti JV, Franciozi CE, Forgas A, Sasaki PH, Ingham SJM, Abdalla RJ. Quadriceps strength deficit at 6 months after ACL reconstruction does not predict return to preinjury sports level. Sports Health 2018; 10 (03) 266-271
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Muller B, Yabroudi MA, Lynch A. et al. Defining thresholds for the patient acceptable symptom state for the IKDC subjective knee form and KOOS for patients who underwent ACL reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2016; 44 (11) 2820-2826
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software “EZR” for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 2013; 48 (03) 452-458
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Ardern CL, Webster KE, Taylor NF, Feller JA. Return to the preinjury level of competitive sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: two-thirds of patients have not returned by 12 months after surgery. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39 (03) 538-543
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Jerre R, Ejerhed L, Wallmon A, Kartus J, Brandsson S, Karlsson J. Functional outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in recreational and competitive athletes. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2001; 11 (06) 342-346
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Nakamura K, Koga H, Sekiya I. et al. Evaluation of pivot shift phenomenon while awake and under anaesthesia by different manoeuvres using triaxial accelerometer. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25 (08) 2377-2383
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 van Brakel WH, Anderson AM, Mutatkar RK. et al. The participation scale: measuring a key concept in public health. Disabil Rehabil 2006; 28 (04) 193-203
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Yasuma S, Nozaki M, Murase A. et al. Anterolateral ligament reconstruction as an augmented procedure for double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction restores rotational stability: quantitative evaluation of the pivot shift test using an inertial sensor. Knee 2020; 27 (02) 397-405
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Chen J, Xu C, Cho E, Huangfu X, Zhao J. Reconstruction for chronic ACL tears with or without anterolateral structure augmentation in patients at high risk for clinical failure: a randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2021; 103 (16) 1482-1490
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Rosenstiel N, Praz C, Ouanezar H. et al. Combined anterior cruciate and anterolateral ligament reconstruction in the professional athlete: clinical outcomes from the scientific anterior cruciate ligament network international study group in a series of 70 patients with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Arthroscopy 2019; 35 (03) 885-892
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Beletsky A, Naami E, Lu Y. et al. The patient acceptable symptomatic state in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: predictors of achievement. Arthroscopy 2021; 37 (02) 600-605
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar