Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2333-8774
Construction of Three Novel Oxygen-Containing Cagelike Frameworks and Synthesis of their Energetic Derivatives
This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22075144).
Abstract
Organic cagelike frameworks are important and versatile skeletons for developing prospective energetic compounds because of their high intrinsic density, symmetry, stability, and derivability. Herein, we show the construction of three novel cagelike frameworks including dioxaadamantane, dioxaproadamantane, and dioxatwistane from 9-oxabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane-2,6-diene. In addition, their energetic derivatives were also prepared and characterized. Compared with our previous works, the introduction of more oxygen atoms into the framework gives the corresponding energetic derivative a better oxygen balance, significantly higher density, and detonation properties. These results imply that the oxygen-containing framework has the potential to be used for preparing new 3D energetic compounds with superior energy performance.
Key words
cagelike compounds - oxygen-containing frameworks - energetic compounds - synthesis - performance - oxidative cyclization - oxidation - nitrationSupporting Information
- Supporting information for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2333-8774.
- Supporting Information
Publication History
Received: 13 May 2024
Accepted after revision: 27 May 2024
Accepted Manuscript online:
27 May 2024
Article published online:
06 June 2024
© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References and Notes
- 1a Fischer D, Klapötke TM, Stierstorfer J. Angew. Chem Int. Ed. 2015; 54: 10299
- 1b Fershtat LL, Makhova NN. ChemPlusChem 2020; 85: 13
- 1c Wang Y, Song S.-W, Huang C, Qi X.-J, Wang K.-C, Liu Y.-J, Zhang Q.-H. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019; 7: 19248
- 1d Zlotin SG, Churakov AM, Egorov MP, Fershtat LL, Klenov MS, Kuchurov IV, Makhova NN, Smirnov GA, Tomilov YV, Tartakovsky VA. Mendeleev Commun. 2021; 31: 731
- 2a Zhang W.-Q, Zhang J.-H, Deng M.-C, Qi X.-J, Nie F.-D, Zhang Q.-H. Nat. Commun. 2017; 8: 1
- 2b Zhou J, Zhang J.-L, Wang B.-Z, Qiu L.-L, Xu R.-Q, Sheremetev AB. FirePhysChem 2022; 2: 83
- 2c Zlotin SG, Dalinger IL, Makhova NN, Tartakovsky VA. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2020; 89: 1
- 3a Agrawal JP. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 1998; 24: 1
- 3b Pagoria PF, Lee GS, Mitchell AR, Schmidt RD. Thermochim. Acta 2002; 384: 187
- 3c Yang J.-Q, Wang G.-X, Gong X.-D, Zhang J.-G, Wang YA. ACS Omega 2018; 3: 9739
- 3d Zhong K, Zhang C.-Y. Chem. Eng. J. 2024; 483: 149202
- 4a Jones ML, Lee E. J. Energ. Mater. 1997; 15: 193
- 4b Tisdale JT, Hill LG, Duque AL. Powder Technol. 2022; 396: 152
- 5a Kumar P. Def. Technol. 2018; 14: 661
- 5b Venkatachalam S, Santhosh G, Ninan K. Propellants, Explos., Pyrotech. 2004; 29: 178
- 6a Lee JS, Hsu CK, Chang CL. Thermochim. Acta 2002; 392173
- 6b Ye C.-C, An Q, Zhang W.-Q, Goddard WA. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019; 123: 9231
- 6c Shi Y.-H, Chang Q, Song T.-S, Yin M.-L, Zhang L, Cao X.-F, Wei A.-X, Cao X. Chem. Eng. J. 2024; 479: 147394
- 7a Guo S.-T, Liu J, Qian W, Zhu W.-H, Zhang C.-Y. Energ. Mater. Front. 2021; 2: 292
- 7b Zhang C.-Y, Jiao F.-B, Li H.-Z. Cryst. Growth Des. 2018; 18: 5713
- 7c Muravyev NV, Meerov DB, Monogarov KA, Melnikov IN, Kosareva EK, Fershtat LL, Sheremetev AB, Dalinger IL, Fomenkov IV, Pivkina AN. Chem. Eng. J. 2021; 421: 129804
- 8a Song Q.-G, Zhang L, Mo Z.-Y. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2023; 31: 286
- 8b Li C.-Y, Li H, Zong H.-H, Huang Y.-L, Gozin M, Sun C.-Q, Zhang L. iScience 2020; 23: 100944
- 8c Song Q.-G, Zhang L, Mo Z.-Y. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2022; 24: 19252
- 9 Zhang M.-X, Eaton PE, Gilardi R. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000; 39: 401
- 10a Wen L.-Y, Yu T, Lai W.-P, Shi J.-W, Liu M.-C, Liu Y.-Z, Wang B.-Z. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2021; 12: 11591
- 10b Kumari A, Chaudhary AK, Rajasekhar K. Spectrochim. Acta, Part A 2020; 241: 118597
- 10c Hussein AK, Zeman S, Elbeih A. Thermochim. Acta 2018; 660: 110
- 10d Yang L.-J, Wu J.-Y, Geng D.-S, Wang F.-P, Huang Y.-X, Chen L. Combust. Flame 2019; 202: 303
- 11 Sollott GP, Gilbert EE. J. Org. Chem. 1980; 45: 5405
- 12a Ling Y.-F, Zhang P.-P, Sun L, Lai W.-P, Luo J. Synthesis 2014; 46: 2225
- 12b Ling Y.-F, Ren X.-L, Lai W.-P, Luo J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2015; 1541
- 12c Zhang J, Hou T.-J, Zhang L, Luo J. Org. Lett. 2018; 20: 7172
- 12d Zhou Q, Cai R.-B, Li H, Liu Y.-Z, Li B, Hou T.-J, Zhu L, Wang G.-X, Zhang Y, Luo J. Org. Chem. Front. 2023; 10: 2551
- 13 Kotha S, Salman M, Lal S, Cheekatla SR, Ansari S. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2023; 12: e202300060
- 14a Zhou Q, Zhu L.-Y, Cai R.-B, Li H, Luo J. FirePhysChem 2023; 3: 11
- 14b Liu Y.-Z, Cai R.-B, Hou T.-J, Wang G.-X, Luo J. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2023; 31: 325
- 15 CCDC 2335732, 2335726 and 2335727 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for compounds 12, 13, and 19, respectively. The data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/structures
- 16a Costa MB, Martins MP, Araújo HC, Resck IS. J. Brazil. Chem. Soc. 2018; 29: 74
- 16b Hegemann K, Fröhlich R, Haufe G. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004; 2181
- 17a Spackman MA, Jayatilaka D. CrystEngComm 2009; 11: 19
- 17b Johnson ER, Keinan S, Mori-Sánchez P, Contreras-García J, Cohen AJ, Yang W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010; 132: 6498
- 18 Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Scalmani G, Barone V, Mennucci B, Petersson GA, Nakatsuji H, Caricato M, Li X, Hratchian HP, Izmaylov AF, Bloino J, Zheng G, Sonnenberg JL, Hada M, Ehara M, Toyota K, Fukuda R, Hasegawa J, Ishida M, Nakajima T, Honda Y, Kitao O, Nakai H, Vreven T, Montgomery JA, Peralta JE, Ogliaro F, Bearpark M, Heyd JJ, Brothers E, Kudin KN, Staroverov VN, Kobayashi R, Normand J, Raghavachari K, Rendell A, Burant JC, Iyengar SS, Tomasi J, Cossi M, Rega N, Millam JM, Klene M, Knox JE, Cross JB, Bakken V, Adamo C, Jaramillo J, Gomperts R, Stratmann RE, Yazyev O, Austin AJ, Cammi R, Pomelli C, Ochterski JW, Martin RL, Morokuma K, Zakrzewski VG, Voth GA, Salvador PJ, Dannenberg J, Dapprich S, Daniels AD, Farkas Ö, Foresman JB, Ortiz JV, Cioslowski J, Fox DJ. Gaussian 09W, Revision A.02. Gaussian, Inc; Wallingford CT: 2009
- 19a Lee CT, Yang W.-T, Parr RG. Phys. Rev. B 1988; 37: 785
- 19b Becke AD. J. Chem. Phys. 1992; 97: 9173
- 19c Hariharan PC, Pople JA. Theor. Chim. Acta 1973; 28: 213
- 20 Kamlet MJ, Jacobs SJ. J. Chem. Phys. 1968; 48: 23
- 21 Diols 9–11: General Procedure Diene 7 (4.9 g, 0.04 mol) and formic acid (1.9 mL, 0.05 mol) were added sequentially to a 100 mL three-neck flask. Under ice bath conditions, a 30% hydrogen peroxide aqueous solution (30 mL) was slowly added dropwise into the reaction mixture. After completion of the addition, the reaction mixture was warmed to room temperature and reacted for 30 min. Then the temperature was raised to 50 °C for reflux reaction for 48 h. The reaction mixture was adjusted to a KI/starch indicator paper with no color change by adding saturated sodium bisulfite solution. Then, it was extracted with ethyl acetate (6 × 30 mL). The organic phase was concentrated using a rotary evaporator and a pale yellow liquid was obtained. The crude product was subjected to silica gel column chromatography and eluted with petroleum ether/ethyl acetate (V/V = 1:1). This process yielded product 9 (3.3 g, 48%) as a white solid, along with the formation of product 10 (0.34 g, 5%) and product 11 (0.48 g, 7%). 2,6-Dioxaadamantane-4,8-diol (9) 1H NMR (500 MHz, methanol-d 4): δ = 3.96–3.82 (m, 4 H), 3.76–3.66 (m, 2 H), 2.54 (ddd, J = 13.43, 5.19, 1.48 Hz, 2 H), 1.75–1.66 (m, 2 H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, methanol-d 4): δ = 71.9, 70.1, 68.3, 29.1. IR (thin film): ν = 3345, 2929, 1076, 1056, 1036, 1020, 1001, 804, 767, 754, 685, 652, 475, 430 cm–1. Anal. Calcd for C8H12O4: C, 55.81; H, 7.03. Found: C, 55.98; H, 7.21. 2,7-Dioxaprotoadamantane-4,10-diol (10) 1H NMR (500 MHz, methanol-d 4): δ = 4.49 (d, J = 5.52 Hz, 1 H), 4.09–4.04 (m, 1 H), 3.93 (dd, J = 9.18, 2.51 Hz, 1 H), 3.42–3.37 (m, 1 H), 3.02–2.96 (m, 1 H), 2.92 (d, J = 4.18 Hz, 1 H), 2.09 (td, J = 9.39, 8.98, 3.56 Hz, 2 H), 1.96–1.89 (m, 2 H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, methanol-d 4): δ = 82.1, 77.2, 74.3, 71.1, 58.9, 57.9, 29.8, 26.7. IR (thin film): ν = 3378, 3304, 2986, 2940, 2900, 1042, 1023, 977, 962, 808, 784, 715, 649, 515 cm–1. Anal. Calcd for C8H12O4: C, 55.81; H, 7.03. Found: C, 56.03; H, 7.27. 2,7-Dioxa-twistane-4,10-diol (11) 1H NMR (500 MHz, methanol-d 4): δ = 4.35 (d, J = 6.83 Hz, 2 H), 4.11 (d, J = 2.25 Hz, 2 H), 3.23–3.13 (m, 2 H), 1.96–1.89 (m, 2 H), 1.82 (dd, J = 6.55, 1.67 Hz, 2 H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, methanol-d 4): δ = 83.1, 73.9, 58.4, 27.0. IR (thin film): ν = 3345, 2937, 1071, 1055, 1033, 1024, 1002, 898, 810, 749, 686, 418 cm–1. Anal. Calcd for C8H12O4: C, 55.81; H, 7.03. Found: C, 55.94; H, 7.18. General Procedure for Nitration In a reaction flask, acetic acid (0.6 mL) and acetic anhydride (0.2 mL) were combined, and then HNO3 (0.24 mL, 98%) was added while maintaining the reaction temperature below 5 °C (0 °C in this case). The reaction mixture was stirred for 20 min. Then, the diol (172 mg, 1 mmol) was added slowly in portions. After stirring for 4 h at room temperature, the reaction mixture was poured into a mixture of ice and water (10 mL). Ethyl acetate (10 mL) was added, and the mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 10 mL). The organic layer was washed with brine, dried with Na2SO4, and filtered. The solvent was removed under vacuum, and the resulting residue was purified by flash column chromatography on silica gel with petroleum ether/ethyl acetate (V/V = 15:1). 2,6-Dioxaadamantane-4,8-diyldinitrate (12) White solid; yield 243 mg (93%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, chloroform-d): δ = 5.03 (d, J = 4.48 Hz, 2 H), 4.37–4.26 (m, 4 H), 2.49 (dd, J = 14.00, 5.29 Hz, 2 H), 2.01 (dd, J = 14.01, 4.29 Hz, 2 H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, chloroform-d): δ = 76.1, 66.6, 65.3, 29.3. IR (thin film): ν = 2982, 2896, 1630, 1307, 1274, 1247, 1064, 1034, 1009, 902, 853, 748, 719, 680, 622, 479, 448 cm–1. Anal. Calcd for C8H10N2O8: C, 36.65; H, 3.84; N, 10.69. Found: C, 36.73; H, 3.91; N, 10.54. 2,7-Dioxaprotoadamantane-4,10-diyldinitrate (13) White solid; yield 233 mg (89%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, chloroform-d): δ = 5.60 (t, J = 6.11 Hz, 1 H), 4.81 (d, J = 4.66 Hz, 1 H), 4.71 (t, J = 5.09 Hz, 1 H), 4.58 (d, J = 3.65 Hz, 1 H), 4.40 (t, J = 4.31 Hz, 1 H), 4.23 (d, J = 8.37 Hz, 1 H), 2.44 (d, J = 12.54 Hz, 1 H), 2.37 (ddd, J = 6.27, 4.22, 1.90 Hz, 2 H), 1.77 (dt, J = 12.65, 4.38 Hz, 1 H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, chloroform-d): δ = 80.1, 74.6, 74.4, 73.9, 72.9, 69.2, 33.8, 30.1. IR (thin film): ν = 2982, 2896, 1636, 1281, 1270, 1067, 1042, 994, 931, 842, 809, 752, 689, 639, 617, 444 cm–1. Anal. Calcd for C8H10N2O8: C, 36.65; H, 3.84; N, 10.69. Found: C, 36.82; H, 3.87; N, 10.64. 2,7-Dioxatwistane-4,10-diyldinitrate (14) White solid; yield 241 mg (92%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, chloroform-d): δ = 5.51 (q, J = 4.95 Hz, 2 H), 4.25 (t, J = 3.10 Hz, 2 H), 4.12 (t, J = 4.14 Hz, 2 H), 2.27 (t, J = 3.80 Hz, 4 H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, chloroform-d): δ = 75.0, 69.3, 68.0, 30.5. IR (thin film): ν = 2978, 1632, 1621, 1324, 1269, 1224, 1061, 1031, 865, 848, 828, 797, 755, 697, 613 cm–1. Anal. Calcd for C8H10N2O8: C, 36.65; H, 3.84; N, 10.69. Found: C, 36.78; H, 3.95; N, 10.57. 2-Oxaadamantane-4,8-diyl dinitrate (20) White solid; yield 247 mg (95%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, chloroform-d): δ = 5.15 (t, J = 3.71 Hz, 2 H), 4.07 (t, J = 4.31 Hz, 2 H), 2.30 (d, J = 4.83 Hz, 2 H), 2.14 (dd, J = 13.94, 3.96 Hz, 2 H), 2.09–2.02 (m, 2 H), 1.91 (d, J = 3.48 Hz, 2 H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, chloroform-d): δ = 79.8, 66.3, 30.9, 28.6, 24.8. IR (thin film): ν = 2964, 2949, 884, 1633, 1614, 1270, 1027, 974, 860, 842, 831, 753, 694 cm–1. General Procedure for Oxidation In a reaction flask, 2-iodoxybenzoic acid (1.12 g, 4.0 mmol) was added to a solution of the diol (172 mg, 1 mmol) in ethyl acetate (20 mL), and the mixture was stirred magnetically at 80 °C. After 12 h of reaction, the resulting suspension was filtered through Celite and washed with ethyl acetate (20 mL). The solvent was removed under vacuum, and the resulting residue was purified by flash column chromatography on silica gel with petroleum ether/ethyl acetate (V/V = 2:1). 2,7-Dioxaprotoadamantane-4,10-dione (16) White solid; yield 91 mg (54%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, chloroform-d): δ = 5.01 (t, J = 3.39 Hz, 1 H), 4.73 (d, J = 6.21 Hz, 1 H), 4.46 (d, J = 8.53 Hz, 1 H), 4.40 (d, J = 3.98 Hz, 1 H), 2.90 (dd, J = 18.05, 8.54 Hz, 1 H), 2.80 (d, J = 17.96 Hz, 1 H), 2.60 (d, J = 12.98 Hz, 1 H), 2.37 (ddd, J = 13.12, 6.27, 2.85 Hz, 1 H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, chloroform-d): δ = 202.0, 200.8, 82.7, 81.6, 79.0, 78.3, 40.8, 40.6. IR (thin film): ν = 3303, 1738, 1713, 1233, 1102, 1068, 1036, 1024, 1004, 975, 905, 897, 822, 789, 726, 590, 637. Anal. Calcd for C8H8O4: C, 57.14; H, 4.80. Found: C, 57.32; H, 4.97. 2,7-Dioxatwistane-4,10-dione (17) Light yellow oil; yield 114 mg (68%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, chloroform-d): δ = 4.69 (dt, J = 6.00, 2.86 Hz, 2 H), 3.53 (s, 2 H), 2.35 (d, J = 3.16 Hz, 4 H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, chloroform-d): δ = 202.4, 84.3, 55.2, 28.2. IR (thin film): ν = 3380, 2960, 1723, 1709, 1634, 1061, 1023, 947, 923, 862, 824, 779, 586 cm–1. Anal. Calcd for C8H8O4: C, 57.14; H, 4.80. Found: C, 57.27; H, 4.95. Synthesis of Tetranitro Derivatives The ketone (168 mg, 1 mmol) was dissolved in methanol (15 mL) and treated with hydroxylamine hydrochloride (278 mg, 4 mmol) and sodium acetate (492 mg, 6.0 mmol). The resulting mixture was stirred for 12 h. Brine (5 mL) was added, and the mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic phases were dried with sodium sulfate. The solvent was removed under vacuum. A mixture of the crude product, urea (360 mg, 6.0 mmol), Na2SO4 (5 g), and dichloromethane (20 mL) was stirred and heated to 50 °C. A solution of N2O5 (650 mg, 6.0 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (10 mL) was added dropwise over 5 min, during which time a green color initially appeared and then faded as more N2O5 was added. The reaction mixture was stirred for an additional 30 min and then poured into an ice-cold saturated solution of sodium bicarbonate (10 mL). The organic layer was washed with brine, dried with Na2SO4, and filtered. The solvent was removed under vacuum, and the resulting residue was purified by flash column chromatography on silica gel with petroleum ether/ethyl acetate (V/V = 10:1). 4,4,10,10-Tetranitro-2,7-dioxaprotoadamantane (18) White solid; yield 154 mg (48%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, acetone-d 6): δ = 5.79 (d, J = 9.77 Hz, 2 H), 5.57 (d, J = 3.60 Hz, 1 H), 5.25 (t, J = 3.14 Hz, 1 H), 3.81 (dd, J = 17.58, 9.13 Hz, 1 H), 3.06 (d, J = 17.54 Hz, 1 H), 2.60 (ddd, J = 14.07, 6.55, 2.74 Hz, 1 H), 2.26 (dd, J = 14.14, 1.34 Hz, 1 H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, acetone-d 6): δ = 115.4, 114.9, 78.8, 78.2, 75.5, 70.9, 36.0, 30.8. IR (thin film): ν = 1567, 1310, 1066, 1032, 835, 826, 801 cm–1. Anal. Calcd for C8H8N4O10: C, 30.01; H, 2.52; N, 17.50. Found: C, 30.27; H, 2.64; N, 17.61. 4,4,10,10-Tetranitro-2,7-dioxa-twistane (19) White solid; yield 166 mg (52%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, acetone-d 6): δ = 5.47 (d, J = 2.95 Hz, 2 H), 4.88 (dd, J = 5.15, 3.07 Hz, 2 H), 3.66 (dd, J = 16.23, 5.14 Hz, 2 H), 3.36 (d, J = 16.23 Hz, 2 H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, acetone-d 6): δ = 115.8, 73.8, 68.7, 33.5. IR (thin film): ν = 1567, 1310, 1066, 1032, 835, 826, 801 cm–1. Anal. Calcd for C8H8N4O10: C, 30.01; H, 2.52; N, 17.50. Found: C, 30.19; H, 2.57; N, 17.44.