Download PDF
Informationen aus Orthodontie & Kieferorthopädie 2024; 56(04): 245-249
DOI: 10.1055/a-2342-9032
Übersichtsartikel

Digitale Fertigung von Retainern mittels CAD/CAM

Digital production of retainers using Cad/Cam
Heba Gamal Bek
1   Private Praxis, Berlin
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

In der Kieferorthopädie spielt die Retention eine entscheidende Rolle, um sicherzustellen, dass die erreichten Zahn- und Kieferstellungen langfristig stabil bleiben. Nach Beendigung einer aktiven kieferorthopädischen Therapie ist es deshalb sinnvoll, das erzielte Behandlungsergebnis mittels festsitzenden oder herausnehmbaren Retentionsgeräten zu stabilisieren, um einerseits ein Rezidiv zu vermeiden [1] [2], aber auch, um eine Stabilität gegenüber altersbedingten Veränderungen der knöchernen Kieferbasen und von Zahnpositionen zu gewährleisten. Grundsätzlich hat jede Art von Retentionsgerät spezifische Vor- und Nachteile in Bezug auf die Anforderungen an die Compliance, Mundhygiene, den Komfort und die zuvor behandelte Fehlstellung.

Mit Fortschritten in der digitalen Technologie werden zudem neue Möglichkeiten zur Fertigung von festsitzenden und herausnehmbaren Retainern entwickelt. Im Vergleich zur direkten Chairside-Herstellung oder zum laborseitig manuell gefertigten Retainer hat die Integration der digital gefertigter Retainer in den klinischen Alltag signifikante Vorteile hinsichtlich Präzision, Effizienz und Anpassungsfähigkeit.

Abstract

In orthodontics, retention plays a decisive role in ensuring that the achieved tooth and jaw positions remain stable in the long term. After completion of active orthodontic treatment, it therefore makes sense to stabilize the treatment result achieved by means of fixed or removable retention appliances in order to prevent recurrence1–2, but also to ensure stability against age-related changes in the bony jaw bases and tooth positions. In principle, each type of retention appliance has specific advantages and disadvantages in terms of compliance requirements, oral hygiene, comfort and the previously treated malocclusion.

Advances in digital technology are also empowering new possibilities for the fabrication of fixed and removable retainers. Compared to direct chairside fabrication or manually fabricated retainers in the laboratory, the integration of digitally fabricated retainers into everyday clinical practice has significant advantages in terms of precision, efficiency and adaptability.

Schlüsselwörter

CAD/CAM - 3D-Druck - digitale Technologien

Keywords

CAD/CAM - 3D printing - digital technologies


Publication History

Article published online:
02 December 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Booth FA, Edelman JM, Proffit WR. Twenty-year follow-up of patients with permanently bonded mandibular canineto-canine retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 133: 70-76
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Cerny R. The reliability of bonded lingual retainers. Aust Orthod J 2007; 23: 24-29
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Butscher W, Riemeier F, Rubbert R. et al. Robot and method for bending orthodontic archwires and other medical devices. 2004 US Patents 6755064B2.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Littlewood S, Kandasamy S, Huang G. Retention and relapse in clinical practice. Aust Dent J 2017; 62: 51-57
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Zachrisson BU. Multistranded wire bonded retainers: from start to success. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015; 148: 724-727 lingual retainer: a randomized controlled trial. Korean J Orthodont 2020; 50(6): 373
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Padmos JAD. Epidemiologic study of orthodontic retention procedures. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018; 153: 496-504
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Kartal Y, Kaya B. Fixed orthodontic retainers: a review. Turk J Orthodont 2019; 32: 110
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Kravitz ND, Grauer D, Schumacher P. et al. Memotain: A CAD/CAM nickel-titanium lingual retainer. Am J Orthodont Dentofac Orthoped 2017; 151: 812-815
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Lee W, Vaid N. Incognito™ lite lingual orthodontic appliance: enhancing the scope of targeted mechanics with customized computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing therapy. APOS Trends Orthodont. 2015
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Park JH. Clinical applications of CBCT and 3D digital technology in orthodontics. J Korean Dental Assoc 2014; 52: 8-16
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Jasser N. Langzeit Dauerbelastungsvergleich von gefrästen Titan-Retainern mit breiter oder schmaler Klebestelle Danube Private University Krems 2019, Master of Science Kieferorthopädie (MSc)
    PubMed
  • 12 A meta-analysis of mandibular intercanine width in treatment and postretention. Dr. Anibal M. Silveira,University of Louisville School of Dentistry
    PubMed
  • 13 Cui FP, Park JJ, Kim SH. Accuracy of lingual fixed retainers fabricated using a CAD/CAM bending machine. Korean J Orthod 2024; 54: 257-263
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Maltha JC, von den Hoff JW. 2018. Biological basis for orthodonticrelapse. In Katsaros, C. and Eliades, T. (ed.), Stability, Retention and Relapse in Orthodontics. Quintessence Publishing; Berlin. chap 2:
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 15 Thilander B. Dentoalveolar development in subjects with normal occlusion. A longitudinal study between the ages of 5 and 31 years. European Journal of Orthodontics 2009; 31: 109-120
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 van Noort R. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater 2012; 28: 3-12 [PubMed]
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Kravitz ND, Groth C, Jones PE. et al Intraoral digital scanners. J Clin Orthod 2014; 48: 337-347 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Mangano F, Gandolfi A, Luongo G. et al Intraoral scanners in dentistry a review of the current literature. BMC Oral Health. 2017; 17: 149-149 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Groth C, Kravitz ND, Shirck JM. Incorporating three-dimensional printing in orthodontics. J Clin Orthod 2018; 52: 28-33 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Doldo T, Di Vece L, Ferrari Cagidiaco E. et al. A New Generation of Orthodontic retainer using 3d printing technology: clinical cases report. J Osseointegration 2018; 10: 142
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Kravitz ND, Grauer D, Schumacher P. et al. Memotain: a CAD/CAM nickel-titanium lingual retainer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2017; 151: 812-815
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Wolf M, Schumacher P, Jäger F. et al. Novel lingual retainer created using CAD/CAM technology: evaluation of its positioning accuracy. J Orofac Orthop 2015;
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Kravitz ND, Grauer D, Schumacher P. et al. Memotain: A CAD/CAM nickel-titanium lingual retainer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2017; 151: 812-815
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Alrawas MB, Kashoura Y, Tosun Ö. et al. Comparing the effects of CAD/CAM nickel-titanium lingual retainers on teeth stability and periodontal health with conventional fixed and removable retainers: a randomized clinical trial. Orthod Craniofac Res 2021; 24: 241-250
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 yoatcorp.com – YOAT Corporation: Orthodontic Wire Bending Technology
    PubMed