Moderne Crossektomie Schritt für Schritt

Die moderne Crossektomie der V. saphena magna stellt ein sicheres und effektives Verfahren zur Behandlung der Stammvarikose dar. Die Qualität der Operationstechnik ist maßgebend für einen langfristigen Therapieerfolg. Wesentliche Merkmale sind: Operieren in Tumeszenz-Lokalanästhesie und Techniken zur Rezidivprophylaxe. Unter Einbeziehung aller relevanten Aspekte wird die moderne Operation der V. saphena magna Schritt für Schritt beschrieben.

Abstract

Besides the development of new minimal invasive approaches, such as endovenous laser and radiofrequency ablation procedures, the so-called modern surgery with flush ligation and stripping represents a secure and at least equally effective treatment option for great saphenous vein incompetence. For long-term success, some details of the surgical technique are decisive to prevent recurrent saphenofemoral incompetence: precise sonographic examination for a correct diagnosis, exact preoperative mapping of the vein courses for orientation and exactly performed surgical procedure, surgery in tumescent local anesthesia and the use of certain surgical items such as suturing the cross stump and closing the cribriform fascia. Involving all relevant aspects this article describes the surgical procedure of modern crossectomy and stripping of the great saphenous vein step by step.

Schlüsselwörter

Crossektomie - Stripping - V. saphena magna - Tumeszenz-Lokalanästhesie - Rezidivprophylaxe - Operationstechnik

Keywords

high ligation - flush ligation - crossectomy - stripping - great saphenous vein - tumescent local anesthesia - recurrence prophylaxis - surgical technique

Publication History

Article published online:
30 August 2024

• Literatur

• 1 Rabe E, Guex JJ, Puskas A. et al. VCP Coordinators. Epidemiology of chronic venous disorders in geographically diverse populations: results from the Vein Consult Program. Int Angiol 2012; 31: 105-115
• 2 Chang SL, Huang YL, Lee MC. et al. Association of varicose veins with incident venous thromboembolism and peripheral artery disease. JAMA 2018; 319: 807-817 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2018.0246.
• 3 Darvall KA, Bate GR, Adam DJ. et al. Generic health-related quality of life is significantly worse in varicose vein patients with lower limb symptoms independent of CEAP clinical grade. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2012; 44: 341-344 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.06.022.
• 4 De Maeseneer MG, Kakkos SK, Aherne T. et al. European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2022 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Chronic Venous Disease of the Lower Limbs. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2022; 63: 184-267 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.12.024. (PMID: 35027279)
• 5 Pannier F, Noppeney T, Alm J. et al. S2k-guidelines: diagnosis and treatment of varicose veins. Hautarzt 2022; 73 (Suppl. 01) 1-44 DOI: 10.1007/s00105-022-04977-8. (PMID: 35438355)
• 6 Eggen CAM, Alozai T, Pronk P. et al. Ten-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial comparing saphenofemoral ligation and stripping of the great saphenous vein with endovenous laser ablation (980 nm) using local tumescent anesthesia. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2022; 10: 646-653 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2021.08.008.
• 7 Hamann SAS, Giang J, De Maeseneer MGR. et al. Five year results of great saphenous vein treatment: A Meta-Analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2017; 54: 760-770 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.08.034. (PMID: 29033337)
• 8 Van der Velden SK, Biemans AA, De Maeseneer MG. et al. Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial of conventional surgery, endovenous laser ablation and ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy in patients with great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg 2015; 102: 1184-1194 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9867.
• 9 De Maeseneer MG, Philipsen TE, Vandenbroeck CP. et al. Closure of the cribriform fascia: an efficient anatomical barrier against postoperative neovascularisation at the saphenofemoral junction? A prospective study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007; 34: 361-366 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2007.03.020. (PMID: 17513142)
• 10 Frings N, Nelle A, Tran P. et al. Reduction of neoreflux after correctly performed ligation of the saphenofemoral junction. A randomized trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2004; 28: 246-252 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2004.05.015. (PMID: 15288626)
• 11 Frings N, Brümmer L, Prinz N. et al. Possibilities to prevent recurrent varicose veins after surgery. Phlebologie 2019; 48: 32-3 DOI: 10.1055/a-0800-9988.
• 12 Mendoza E. Does suture material influence recurrence rate after crossectomy?. Phlebologie 2020; 49: 144-151 DOI: 10.1055/a-1155-3072.
• 13 Papapostolou G, Altenkämper H, Bernheim C. et al. The LaVaCro-Study: Long-term results following saphenofemoral ligation and stripping of the great saphenous vein. First year results. Phlebologie 2013; 42: 253-260 DOI: 10.12687/phleb2139-5-2013.
• 14 Rass K, Gerontopoulou SA. Open and endovenous treatment of recurrent saphenous vein incompetence. Gefässchirurgie 2022; 27: 108-116 DOI: 10.1007/s00772-022-00865-6.
• 15 Sommer B, Augustin M, Schöpf E. et al. Tumeszenz-Lokalanästhesie. Ein neues Verfahren der Lokalanästhesie. Dt. Ärztebl 2001; 98: A545-548
• 16 Frings N, Glowacki P, Greiner A. et al. Off-label use in the case of tumescent local anaesthesia for endovascular and operative procedures. What are the key issues?. Phlebologie 2016; 45: 234-238 DOI: 10.12687/phleb2316-4-2016.
• 17 Frings N, Frings AC, Tran P. et al. Reduction of neoreflux at the saphenofemoral junction by extensive crossectomy. Phlebologie 2010; 40: 325-328 DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1622327.