Evaluating the Clinical Reliability and Reference Values of the International Outcome Inventory for Cochlear Implants in the Department of Defense Population

Abstract

Background Hearing loss significantly affects an individual's well-being, communication, social interaction, and quality of life. Cochlear implants serve as a viable management option. Given the variability in the impact of impairment, self-report measures are crucial for evaluating the perceived benefits of management options.

Purpose The study aims to assess the reliability of the International Outcome Inventory for Cochlear Implants (IOI-CI) and establish evaluative cutoffs. This questionnaire evaluates patient's satisfaction with cochlear implants and contributes to the understanding of their experiences, addressing the increasing interest among cochlear implant clinicians.

Research Design The design relies on electronic medical databases within the Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense systems. After identification of eligibility, recruitment was based on participants responding to mailed study documents. This research adopts a descriptive approach of the analysis of questionnaire responses as well as quantitatively evaluating the reliability.

Study Sample Forty-nine service members, Veterans, and their dependents, including 32 men and 17 women, participated in the study. The participants had a mean age of 68.0 years, with cochlear implants ranging from 6 months to 2 years postinitial stimulation. The majority had a unilateral cochlear implant with a hearing aid on the contralateral ear.

Data Collection and Analysis Data collected involved mailing baseline study packets, including the IOI-CI questionnaire, to potential participants identified through medical databases. Participants indicated consent by returning the study packet. Follow-up packets were sent at a later time. Intraclass correlation coefficients were utilized for test–retest reliability and generalized linear models (GLM) for exploring the impact of clinical and demographic factors. Data were analyzed using R.

Results The ICC revealed a good level of agreement (ICC = 0.84) between baseline and follow-up assessments for the IOI-CI total score. The GLM did not identify significant factors influencing IOI-CI scores. Evaluative values were established, indicating total scores between 18 and 35 as within the range of general satisfaction with a cochlear implant for this questionnaire.

Conclusion The study contributes valuable insights into the reliability of the IOI-CI and establishes evaluative cutoffs, aiding clinicians in assessing cochlear implant users' experiences and satisfaction.

Keywords

cochlear implants - surveys and questionnaires - consumer behavior

Publication History

Received: 30 January 2024

Accepted: 10 July 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
18 July 2024

Article published online:
23 December 2024

• References

• 1 Heine C, Browning CJ. Communication and psychosocial consequences of sensory loss in older adults: overview and rehabilitation directions. Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24 (15) 763-773
• 2 Hickson L, Scarinci N. Older adults with acquired hearing impairment: applying the ICF in rehabilitation. Semin Speech Lang 2007; 28 (04) 283-290
• 3 Mick P, Kawachi I, Lin FR. The association between hearing loss and social isolation in older adults. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014; 150 (03) 378-384
• 4 Cox R, Hyde M, Gatehouse S. et al. Optimal outcome measures, research priorities, and international cooperation. Ear Hear 2000; 21 (4, Suppl): 106S-115S
• 5 Cox RM, Alexander GC. The International Outcome Inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA): psychometric properties of the English version. Int J Audiol 2002; 41 (01) 30-35
• 6 Bennett RJ, Jayakody DM, Eikelboom RH, Atlas MD. Self-reported cochlear implant management skills: development and validation of the self-administered Cochlear Implant Management Skills (CIMS-self) survey. Clin Otolaryngol 2017; 42 (01) 164-171
• 7 Hinderink JB, Krabbe PF, Van Den Broek P. Development and application of a health-related quality-of-life instrument for adults with cochlear implants: the Nijmegen cochlear implant questionnaire. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 123 (06) 756-765 [published correction appears in Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017;156(2):391]
• 8 Markodimitraki LM, Stegeman I, Thomeer HGXM. Cochlear implant awareness: development and validation of a patient reported outcome measure. Front Neurosci 2022; 16: 830768
• 9 Cox RM, Alexander GC, Beyer CM. Norms for the international outcome inventory for hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol 2003; 14 (08) 403-413
• 10 Smith SL, Noe CM, Alexander GC. Evaluation of the International Outcome Inventory for hearing aids in a veteran sample. J Am Acad Audiol 2009; 20 (06) 374-380
• 11 Hallberg LR, Ringdahl A, Holmes A, Carver C. Psychological general well-being (quality of life) in patients with cochlear implants: importance of social environment and age. Int J Audiol 2005; 44 (12) 706-711
• 12 Caposecco A, Hickson L, Pedley K. Cochlear implant outcomes in adults and adolescents with early-onset hearing loss. Ear Hear 2012; 33 (02) 209-220
• 13 VHA Cochlear Implant Advisory Board. VHA and DOD prosthetic clinical management program clinical practice recommendations for prescription of cochlear implants [Internet]. 2022 . Accessed July 17, 2024 at: https://hearing.health.mil/For-Providers/Standards-and-Clinical-Practice-Guidelines/Cochlear-Implant-Clinical-Practice-Recommendations
• 14 R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2022. . Accessed July 17, 2024 at: https://www.R-project.org/
• 15 Gamer M, Lemon J, Fellows I, Singh P. Irr: various coefficients of interrater reliability and agreement. R package version 0.84.1 2019. Accessed July 17, 2024 at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=irr
• 16 Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 2016; 15 (02) 155-163 [published correction appears in J Chiropr Med 2017;16(4):346]
• 17 Revelle W. Psych: procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research. Northwestern University, Evanston, IL. R package version 2.3.3. 2023. Accessed July 17, 2024 at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych
• 18 Lüdecke D, Ben-Shachar MS, Patil I, Waggoner P, Makowski D. Performance: an R package for assessment, comparison and testing of statistical models. J Open Source Softw 2021; 6 (60) 3139
• 19 Noble W. Extending the IOI to significant others and to non-hearing-aid-based interventions. Int J Audiol 2002; 41 (01) 27-29