Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2368-9074
Ultrasonography education for master in physiotherapy students – teaching master in physiotherapy students ultrasonography to be used in their daily work
Martin Bach Jensen GP, PhD, Professora, Camilla Aakjær Andersen, MD, PhD, Associate Professora, Steffan Wittrup McPhee Christensen PT, PhD, Associate Professorb, c, Michael Skovdal Rathleffa, b PT, PhD, Professor, and Jens Lykkegaard Olesen specialist in rheumatology and internal medicine, PhD, Professor.
aCenter for General Practice at Aalborg University, Denmark
bDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Denmark
cDepartment of Physiotherapy, University College of Northern Denmark, Denmark.
In 2019 Aalborg University, Denmark, started a new 2-year full-time master program in musculoskeletal physiotherapy. It aims at bachelors of physiotherapy with or without previous clinical experience. As ultrasonography is increasingly used in physiotherapy practice, the new program includes an elective course on musculoskeletal ultrasonography during the 3rd semester.
The course has high priority and a large curriculum constituting a 10 ECTS credits module. It comprises 200 hours of self-study including theoretical and practical sessions, and roughly 100 hours of classroom lectures and supervised hands-on workshops. Considerable teacher capacity is allocated making a hands-on student-to teacher ratio off 4–6:1 possible. Ultrasonography equipment is available for self-study practice between sessions and the students are required to upload 180 scans for review by the teachers.
The overarching teaching principle is small-group problem-based learning. Students work in groups of 2–3 sharing a single scanner. Ultimately, the course aims to cover relevant clinical areas and achieving a minimum of EFSUM level 1 competence and for some elements level 2. (See [Table 1] for details).
AIMS[1] |
Knowledge |
Have knowledge about the musculoskeletal system, including structural and functional anatomy relevant to diagnostic muscular-skeletal ultrasonography |
Have in-depth knowledge of using ultrasonography for diagnosing common musculoskeletal conditions in the extremities and trunk (abdominal wall, pelvic floor, sacroiliac joint, spinal joints) |
Have in-depth knowledge of how to appropriately interpret findings on ultrasonography images |
Skills |
Understands indications and contraindications for using ultrasonography, as well as when ultrasonography is not appropriate and referral to other imaging modalities should be considered. |
On the basis of other clinical findings perform an ultrasonography and integrate this into differential diagnostic considerations |
Competences |
Can use ultrasonography to aid in diagnosing common musculoskeletal disorders and identifying abnormal findings |
TEACHING FORMS |
|
Teaching material |
|
Examination |
|
1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v = wiKezqxjyNg (assessed 25 August 2024)
2 https://www.essr.org/subcommittees/ultrasound/ (assessed 20 August 2024)
To enhance the students’ understanding of clinical diagnostic application, teaching sessions are relocated from the university to a general practice clinic midway and at the end of the semester. At the clinic approximately 10 patients are lined up for examination. They are selected to have various pathologies related to what had been covered in the lectures at the university leading up to the clinical visit. The small groups of students rotate between patients, conducting first a brief interview followed by basic clinical examination, and finally an ultrasonography scan. In addition, the small groups work with clinical cases from their daily practice and hand in a written assignment of 20 clinical cases, including a description of the patients’ history, findings from the clinical tests, and performance of the ultrasonography examination.
Training in evidence-based use of ultrasonography is a key component of the course. With this in mind, the course includes 2 problem-based assignments, where each group has to define and work with a self-selected clinical question regarding the use of ultrasonography, e. g. for patients seen in primary care, how sensitive and specific is ultrasonography in diagnosing median nerve compression compared to an electroneurogram? The groups then had to identify learning resources and identify relevant literature before producing a written report followed by a plenum presentation.
To enhance the students’ ability to communicate and condense knowledge, they have to transform their literature review findings into a practical guidance for their peers. This was achieved by creating one-page action cards[1] that outlined how to scan, expected findings and interpretation of these as well as possible pitfalls. These action cards are presented and discussed in plenum.
To introduce students to interventional procedures, the course includes a half-day session where students are trained in free-hand ultrasonography-guided steering of a needle. Initially, training entailed aiming the needle at waterfilled ballons and other artefacts embedded in gelatine. Later, the students perform procedures on joints in the distal legs of pig cadavers.
Since its inception, the course has been completed 4 times and the students consistently rate their learning outcomes to be very high. From the teachers’ perspective it is fulfilling to engage in a course that integrates and advances clinical and academic skills. The review of the students’ ultrasonography images is rather laborious, and it has been considered if this could be changed to a supervised peer-to-peer evaluation in the future. Other aspects, which have not yet been explored and could potentially enhance learning outcomes while reducing teacher involvement are using more on-line material, flipped classroom, webinars etc.
Plan for a scanning session covering an anatomical area (half a day) |
|
Plan for the semester |
|
|
1 Inspired by a productive failure approach we let them scan the curriculum of the day prior to the teaching session. See https://youtu.be/VOKJmg34wME (assessed 20 August 2024)
#
1 http://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/pdf/10.1055/a-2055–6554.pdf (assessed 20 August 2024)
Publication History
Article published online:
10 October 2024
© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany