Endoscopy 2025; 57(03): 272-281
DOI: 10.1055/a-2378-9533
Systematic review

Endoluminal radiofrequency ablation with stenting versus stenting alone in patients with malignant biliary obstruction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

Authors

  • Daryl Ramai

    1   Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN14434)
  • Marcello Maida

    2   Gastroenterology, S. Elia - Raimondi Hospital, Caltanissetta, Italy
    3   Medicine and Surgery, Kore University of Enna, Enna, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN217140)
  • Eric R. Smith

    4   Medicine, Baylor Scott & White Health, Dallas, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN423342)
  • Yichen Wang

    5   Hospital Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN14640)
  • Marco Spadaccini

    6   Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
    7   IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
  • Melissa Previtera

    8   Donald C. Harrison Health Sciences Library, University of Cincinnati Libraries, Cincinnati, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN491495)
  • Saurabh Chandan

    9   Gastroenterology and Hepatology, CHI Health Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN25095)
  • Yuting Huang

    10   Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN156400)
  • Salih Tokmak

    11   Gastroenterology, Duzce University, Duzce, Turkey (Ringgold ID: RIN121595)
  • Peter Bhandari

    12   Medicine, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN5945)
  • Jason DuBroff

    1   Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN14434)
  • Christopher Ko

    1   Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN14434)
  • John D. Morris

    1   Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN14434)
  • Giovanni Marasco

    13   Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN9296)
    14   Medicine, IRCSS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
  • Stefano Francesco Crinó

    15   Diagnostic and Interventional Endoscopy of Pancreas, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN19051)
  • Antonio Facciorusso

    16   Medical Sciences, Section of Gastroenterology, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN18972)
  • Benedetto Mangiavillano

    17   Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Istituto Clinico Mater Domini Casa di Cura Privata SpA, Castellanza, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN9348)
  • Mouen A Khashab

    18   Therapeutic Endoscopy, Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions Campus, Baltimore, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN1501)


Graphical Abstract

Preview

Abstract

Background

Endoluminal radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a palliative treatment for patients suffering from malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of RFA on stent patency, patient survival, and adverse events.

Methods

Major databases were searched through December 2023 for patients who had undergone stenting with or without RFA for extrahepatic MBO. A random-effects model was used for analysis, with results expressed as relative risk ratios (RRs) with 95%CIs.

Results

Nine RCTs involving 750 subjects with MBO (374 RFA plus stent vs. 376 stent only) were included. Meta-analysis revealed similar risks of stent patency at 3 months (RR 1.01, 95%CI 0.92–1.11; I 2 = 4%) for RFA plus stenting vs. stent only. Meta-analysis showed improved survival at 6 months (RR 0.84, 95%CI 0.73–0.96; I 2 = 21%; P = 0.01) for RFA plus stenting vs. stent only. Subgroup analysis comparing plastic vs. uncovered metal stents showed that stent patency was unaffected at 3 months (RR 1.06, 95%CI 0.91–1.23; I 2 = 17%). Subgroup analysis showed that patients with cholangiocarcinoma experienced an overall survival benefit with RFA plus stenting vs. stenting alone (P < 0.001); however, stent patency remained unaffected (P = 0.08). An increased incidence of cholecystitis was noted with RFA plus stenting vs. stenting alone (5.1% [95%CI 3.1%–7.8%] vs. 0.3% [95%CI 0.01%–1.5%], respectively).

Conclusion

Combining endoluminal RFA and stenting may improve overall survival in patients with MBO. RFA did not significantly impact stent patency.

Supplementary Material



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 20. Februar 2024

Angenommen nach Revision: 02. August 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
02. August 2024

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
06. November 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany