Rethinking Fistula Preservation in Anorectal Malformation Surgery: A Histopathological Perspective

Abstract

Objective This study aims to assess the histopathological characteristics of the fistulous tissue in males with anorectal malformation (ARM) to determine its suitability for use in constructing a neoanus.

Methods This prospective observational study included male ARM patients with recto-urethral fistula. All other types were excluded. The tissue specimens comprised 0.5 to 2.0 cm of the most distal part of the rectal pouch and the fistulous tissue. Hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections were prepared. Histological features, viz. internal sphincter, anal grand and crypts, ganglion cells, presence of subepithelial fibrosis, thickened nerve trunks, and metaplasia, were evaluated.

Results Of 65 patients of ARM admitted, 24 met the inclusion criteria. Gross and microscopic internal sphincter was not found in any sample. The anal mucosa was visualized in all samples; however, crypts were irregular and distorted architecture was seen in 4 (16.67%) samples. Urothelial metaplasia was identified in 10 (41.67%) samples. Adequate ganglion cells were seen only in 6 (25%) samples. Significant submucosal fibrosis was seen in all samples. Thickened nerve trunks were identified in 4 (16.67%) samples.

Conclusions All normal anal histological features could not be found together in the fistula tissue. With the absence of normal features, such as internal anal sphincter muscles, and the presence of abnormal histopathological features, such as subepithelial fibrosis, thickened nerve trunks, and metaplasia, there are high chances of abnormal bowel function like constipation if the fistulous tissue is used for neoanus construction. It may have an impact on the quality of life of patients.

Keywords

anorectal malformation - fistula - histopathology - PSARP - surgery

Publication History

Received: 20 March 2024

Accepted: 13 August 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
16 August 2024

Article published online:
09 September 2024

• References

• 1 Murphy F, Puri P, Hutson JM, Holschneider AM. incidence and frequency of different types, and classification of anorectal malformations. In: Holschneioder AM, Hutson JM. eds. Anorectal Malformations in Children. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2006: 163-184
• 2 Rintala R, Lindahl H, Sariola H, Rapola J, Louhimo I. The rectourogenital connection in anorectal malformations is an ectopic anal canal. J Pediatr Surg 1990; 25 (06) 665-668
• 3 Frenckner B, Husberg B. Internal anal sphincter function after correction of imperforate anus. Pediatr Surg Int 1991; 6: 202-206
• 4 Lambrecht W, Kluth D, Lierse W. Epithelium and anal glands in rectal pouches and fistula. Histologic studies of swine with congenital anal atresia [in German]. Z Kinderchir 1989; 44 (01) 41-46
• 5 Uemura K, Fukuzawa H, Morita K, Okata Y, Yoshida M, Maeda K. Epithelial and ganglionic distribution at the distal rectal end in anorectal malformations: could it play a role in anastomotic adaptation?. Pediatr Surg Int 2021; 37 (02) 281-286
• 6 Gangopadhyay AN, Upadhyaya VD, Gupta DK, Agarwal DK, Sharma SP, Arya NC. Histology of the terminal end of the distal rectal pouch and fistula region in anorectal malformations. Asian J Surg 2008; 31 (04) 211-215
• 7 Holschneider AM, Pfrommer W, Gerresheim B. Results in the treatment of anorectal malformations with special regard to the histology of the rectal pouch. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1994; 4 (05) 303-309
• 8 Holschneider AM, Ure BM, Pfrommer W, Meier-Ruge W. Innervation patterns of the rectal pouch and fistula in anorectal malformations: a preliminary report. J Pediatr Surg 1996; 31 (03) 357-362
• 9 Conces MR, Beach S, Pierson CR, Prasad V. Submucosal nerve diameter in the rectum increases with age: an important consideration for the diagnosis of hirschsprung disease. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2022; 25 (03) 263-269
• 10 Pandey A, Singh A, Agarwal P, Gupta A, Rawat J, Kureel SN. a pilot study on histopathology of the jejunoileal atresia-can it be used as a guide to determine the length of adequate resection?. Clin Pathol 2019; 12: X19829263
• 11 Penninckx F, Kerremans R. Internal sphincter-saving in imperforate anus with or without fistula. A manometric study. Int J Colorectal Dis 1986; 1 (01) 28-32
• 12 Ruttenstock EM, Zani A, Huber-Zeyringer A, Höllwarth ME. Pre- and postoperative rectal manometric assessment of patients with anorectal malformations: should we preserve the fistula?. Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56 (04) 499-504
• 13 Meier-Ruge WA, Holschneider AM. Histopathologic observations of anorectal abnormalities in anal atresia. Pediatr Surg Int 2000; 16 (1–2): 2-7
• 14 Pandey A, Pandey P, Singh SP, Agarwal S, Gupta V, Verma R. Histology with immunohistochemistry of the fistula region in female anorectal malformation: can it be used for neo-anus reconstruction?. J Paediatr Child Health 2018; 54 (02) 177-182
• 15 Feng W, Mu H, Chen M. et al. Significance of searching for ganglia in the terminal rectum/fistula of complex anorectal malformations: Related to defecation function. Front Pediatr 2023; 11: 1124647
• 16 Lombardi L, Bruder E, Caravaggi F, Del Rossi C, Martucciello G. Abnormalities in “low” anorectal malformations (ARMs) and functional results resecting the distal 3 cm. J Pediatr Surg 2013; 48 (06) 1294-1300
• 17 Xiao H, Huang R, Cui DX, Xiao P, Diao M, Li L. Histopathologic and immunohistochemical findings in congenital anorectal malformations. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97 (31) e11675
• 18 Lambrecht W, Lierse W. The internal sphincter in anorectal malformations: morphologic investigations in neonatal pigs. J Pediatr Surg 1987; 22 (12) 1160-1168
• 19 Gangopadhyay AN, Pandey V, Gupta DK, Sharma SP, Kumar V, Verma A. Assessment and comparison of fecal continence in children following primary posterior sagittal anorectoplasty and abdominoperineal pull through for anorectal anomaly using clinical scoring and MRI. J Pediatr Surg 2016; 51 (03) 430-434
• 20 Rougraff A, Grayson BL, Ladd AP. Anorectal malformation and Hirschsprung disease in an otherwise healthy infant. J Pediatr Surg Case Rep 2022; 78: 102203