Download PDF
Int J Sports Med 2025; 46(01): 51-58
DOI: 10.1055/a-2408-7467
Training & Testing

Fractional utilization of the 10-minute treadmill test velocity in running performance

Dayanne Sampaio Antonio 
1   Department of Physical Education, Federal University of Parana, Curitiba, Brazil (Ringgold ID: RIN28122)
,
Maressa Priscilla Krause
2   Academic Department of Physical Education, Federal Technological University of Parana, Curitiba, Brazil (Ringgold ID: RIN74354)
,
Edilson Fernando de Borba 
1   Department of Physical Education, Federal University of Parana, Curitiba, Brazil (Ringgold ID: RIN28122)
,
Anderson Zampier Ulbrich
1   Department of Physical Education, Federal University of Parana, Curitiba, Brazil (Ringgold ID: RIN28122)
,
Cosme Franklim Buzzachera
3   Department of Public Health, Experimental Medicine and Forensic Science, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN28122)
,
Sergio Gregorio Silva
1   Department of Physical Education, Federal University of Parana, Curitiba, Brazil (Ringgold ID: RIN28122)
› Author AffiliationsSupported by: Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001
The authors express their gratitude to all the runners who participated in this research project. This research was supported in part by the Programa de Bolsas Universitárias de Santa Catarina (UNIEDU); and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) – Finance code 001.
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the applicability of the 10-minute submaximal treadmill test (T10 test), a self-paced test, in determining critical speed (CS) and predicting running performance. Specifically, we sought to identify the percentage of T10 velocity (vT10) that runners performed in official distance races, and to compare physiological and performance indicators between sexes. 60 recreational runners (n=34 males and n=26 females) underwent a maximum incremental test, the novel T10 test, and ran 1200-m and 2400-m on the track. Runners self-reported their best performance times. Generalized Linear Model was used to compare running performances between sexes. For both males and females, the %vT10 in 5 km, 10 km, and half-marathon races occurred at 107.5% and 106.5%, 99.9% and 100.8%, and 92.6% and 97.1%, respectively. There was no interaction effect (p=0.520) and no main effect of sex (p=0.443). There was a main effect of distance (p<0.001), indicating that %vT10 in the 5km race differed from that found in the 10 km race (p=0.012), as well as in the half-marathon (p<0.001). Our findings suggest that %vT10 values can be used to determine pace in recreational endurance runners for race distances regardless of sex.

Keywords

exercise intensity domains - endurance performance - critical velocity - endurance running


Publication History

Received: 24 June 2024

Accepted after revision: 02 September 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
03 September 2024

Article published online:
22 October 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Jones AM, Vanhatalo A. The ‘Critical Power’ Concept: Applications to Sports Performance with a Focus on Intermittent High-Intensity Exercise. Sports Med 2017; 47: 65-78
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Black MI, Jones AM, Blackwell JR. et al. Muscle metabolic and neuromuscular determinants of fatigue during cycling in different exercise intensity domains. J Appl Physiol 2017; 122: 446-459
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Kirby BS, Winn BJ, Wilkins BW. et al. Interaction of exercise bioenergetics with pacing behavior predicts track distance running performance. J Appl Physiol 2021; 131: 1532-1542
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Poole DC, Burnley M, Vanhatalo A. et al. Critical Power: An Important Fatigue Threshold in Exercise Physiology. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2016; 48: 2320-2334
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Jones AM, Burnley M, Black MI. et al. The maximal metabolic steady state: Redefining the ‘gold standard’. Physiol Rep 2019; 7: e14098
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Nixon RJ, Kranen SH, Vanhatalo A. et al. Steady-state V̇O2 above MLSS: Evidence that critical speed better represents maximal metabolic steady state in well-trained runners. Eur J Appl Physiol 2021; 121: 3133-3144
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Burnley M, Jones AM. Power-duration relationship: Physiology, fatigue, and the limits of human performance. Eur J Sport Sci 2018; 18: 1-12
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Jones AM, Vanhatalo A, Burnley M. et al. Critical Power: Implications for Determination of V˙O2max and Exercise Tolerance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2010; 42: 1876-1890
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Poole DC, Jones AM. Critical power: A paradigm-shift for benchmarking exercise testing and prescription. Exp Physiol. 2023 108. EP091126
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Podlogar T, Leo P, Spragg J. Using V̇O2max as a marker of training status in athletes – can we do better?. J Appl Physiol 2022; 133: 144-147
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 de Borba EF, Follador L, Barbosa SC. et al. T10 Test as an Alternative Method to Assess Critical Speed and its Potential Application to Runners. J Sci Sport Exerc 2022; 5: 369-377
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Meyler S, Bottoms L, Wellsted D. et al. Variability in exercise tolerance and physiological responses to exercise prescribed relative to physiological thresholds and to maximum oxygen uptake. Exp Physiol 2023; 108: 581-594
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Follador L, Borba EF, Silva SG. Relationship of critical speed derived from a 10-min submaximal treadmill test to 5-km and 10-km running performances. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2022; 47: 159-164
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Galán-Rioja MÁ, González-Mohíno F, Poole DC. et al. Relative Proximity of Critical Power and Metabolic/Ventilatory Thresholds: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Med 2020; 50: 1771-1783
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Kolbe T, Dennis SC, Selley E. et al. The relationship between critical power and running performance. J Sports Sci 1995; 13: 265-269
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Follador L, de Borba EF, Neto ALB. et al. A submaximal treadmill test to predict critical speed. J Sports Sci 2021; 39: 835-844
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Vanhatalo A, Jones AM, Burnley M. Application of critical power in sport. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2011; 6: 128-136
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Pringle JSM, Carter H, Doust JH. et al. Oxygen uptake kinetics during horizontal and uphill treadmill running in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol 2002; 88: 163-169
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Hair JF, Black WC, Sant’Anna AS. Análise multivariada de dados. 6a . Porto Alegre: Bookman; 2009
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 20 Vickers AJ, Vertosick EA. An empirical study of race times in recreational endurance runners. BMC Sports Sci, Med Rehabil 2016; 8: 26
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Guest NS, VanDusseldorp TA, Nelson MT. et al. International society of sports nutrition position stand: Caffeine and exercise performance. J Int Soc Sports Nutr 2021; 18: 1
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Kordi M, Menzies C, Galbraith A. Comparison of Critical Speed and D′ Derived From 2 or 3 Maximal Tests. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance 2019; 14: 685-688
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Jones AM, Doust JH. A 1% treadmill grade most accurately reflects the energetic cost of outdoor running. J Sports Sci 1996; 14: 321-327
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Tanaka H, Monahan KD, Seals DR. Age-predicted maximal heart rate revisited. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 153-156
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Howley ET, Bassett DR, Welch HG. Criteria for maximal oxygen uptake: Review and commentary. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995; 27: 1292-1301
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Beltz NM, Gibson AL, Janot JM. et al. Graded Exercise Testing Protocols for the Determination of V̇O2max: Historical Perspectives, Progress, and Future Considerations. J Sports Med 2016; 2016: 3968393
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Utter AC, Robertson RJ, Green JM. et al. Validation of the Adult OMNI Scale of Perceived Exertion for Walking/Running Exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004; 36: 1776-1780
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Billat VL, Flechet B, Petit B. et al. Interval training at V̇O2max: Effects on aerobic performance and overtraining markers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999; 31: 156-163
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Hill DW. The critical power concept. A review. Sports Med 1993; 16: 237-254
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Hopkins WG, Marshall SW, Batterham AM. et al. Progressive Statistics for Studies in Sports Medicine and Exercise Science. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009; 41: 3
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Cuk I, Nikolaidis PT, Villiger E. et al. Pacing in Long-Distance Running: Sex and Age Differences in 10-km Race and Marathon. Medicina (Kaunas) 2021; 57: 389
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Foster C, de Koning JJ, Hettinga FJ. et al. Competition Between Desired Competitive Result, Tolerable Homeostatic Disturbance, and Psychophysiological Interpretation Determines Pacing Strategy. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2023; 18: 335-346
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Bigliassi M. Neural basis of attentional focus during endurance exercise. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol 2021; 14: 74-101
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Hettinga FJ, Edwards AM, Hanley B. The Science Behind Competition and Winning in Athletics: Using World-Level Competition Data to Explore Pacing and Tactics. Front Sports Act Living 2019; 1: 11
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Ristanović L, Cuk I, Villiger E. et al. The pacing differences in performance levels of marathon and half-marathon runners. Front Psychol 2023; 14: 1273451
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Smyth B, Muniz-Pumares D. Calculation of Critical Speed from Raw Training Data in Recreational Marathon Runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2020; 52: 2637-2645
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Pettitt RW. Applying the Critical Speed Concept to Racing Strategy and Interval Training Prescription. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2016; 11: 842-847
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Palacin F, Poinsard L, Pycke JR. et al. A Pilot Study Using Entropy for Optimizing Self-Pacing during a Marathon. Entropy (Basel) 2023; 25: 1119
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Krause MP, Haile L, Antonio DS. et al. The Use of a Just Noticeable Difference Approach to Improve Perceptual Acuity Ability in Male Runners. Percept Mot Skills 2024; 131 00315125241252852
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Nimmerichter A, Novak N, Triska C. et al. Validity of Treadmill-Derived Critical Speed on Predicting 5000-Meter Track-Running Performance. K Strength Cond Res 2017; 31: 706-714
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Iannetta D, Inglis EC, Mattu AT. et al. A Critical Evaluation of Current Methods for Exercise Prescription in Women and Men. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2020; 52: 466-473
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Jamnick NA, Pettitt RW, Granata C. et al. An Examination and Critique of Current Methods to Determine Exercise Intensity. Sports Med 2020; 50: 1729-1756
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Denadai BS, Greco CC. Could middle- and long-distance running performance of well-trained athletes be best predicted by the same aerobic parameters?. Curr Res Physiol 2022; 5: 265-269
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Inoue A, Santos TM, Hettinga FJ. et al. The Impact of Sex and Performance Level on Pacing Behavior in a 24-h Ultramarathon. Front Sports Act Living 2019; 1: 11
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Casado A, González-Mohíno F, González-Ravé JM. et al. Pacing Profiles of Middle-Distance Running World Records in Men and Women. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18: 12589
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 Deaner RO, Addona V, Carter RE. et al. Fast men slow more than fast women in a 10 kilometer road race. PeerJ 2016; 4: e2235
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 47 Nikolaidis PT, Ćuk I, Knechtle B. Pacing of Women and Men in Half-Marathon and Marathon Races. Medicina (Kaunas) 2019; 55: 14
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 Coyle EF. Physiological Regulation of Marathon Performance. Sports Med 2007; 37: 306-311
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 49 March DS, Vanderburgh PM, Titlebaum PJ. et al. Age, Sex, and Finish Time as Determinants of Pacing in the Marathon. J Strength Cond Res 2011; 25: 386-391
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 50 Rapoport BI. Metabolic Factors Limiting Performance in Marathon Runners. PLoS Comput Biol 2010; 6: e1000960
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 51 Trubee NW, Vanderburgh PM, Diestelkamp WS. et al. Effects of Heat Stress and Sex on Pacing in Marathon Runners. J Strength Cond Res 2014; 28: 1673-1678
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 52 Bigliassi M, Filho E. Functional significance of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during exhaustive exercise. Biol Psychol 2022; 175: 108442
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 53 Croson R, Gneezy U. Gender Differences in Preferences. J Econ Lit 2009; 47: 448-474
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 54 Hubble C, Zhao J. Gender differences in marathon pacing and performance prediction. J Sport Anal 2016; 2: 19-36
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 55 Wagstaff CRD. Emotion regulation and sport performance. J Sport Exerc Psychol 2014; 36: 401-412
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 56 Selinger JC, Hicks JL, Jackson RW. et al. Running in the wild: Energetics explain ecological running speeds. Curr Biol 2022; 32: 2309-2315.e3
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 57 Smyth B. Fast starters and slow finishers: A large-scale data analysis of pacing at the beginning and end of the marathon for recreational runners. J Sport Anal 2018; 4: 229-242
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar