Synlett
DOI: 10.1055/a-2413-0587
letter
Special Issue to Celebrate the 75th Birthday of Prof. B. C. Ranu

A Concise Asymmetric Total Synthesis of (+)-8-Epigrosheimin via Catalyst-Free Tandem Allylboration–Lactonization

Dhananjoy Maity
a   Centre of Biomedical Research, Sanjay Gandhi Post-Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences Campus, Raebareli Road, Lucknow 226014, India
b   University of Kalyani, Kalyani, Nadia, West Bengal 741235, India
,
Ramkrishna Maity
a   Centre of Biomedical Research, Sanjay Gandhi Post-Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences Campus, Raebareli Road, Lucknow 226014, India
,
b   University of Kalyani, Kalyani, Nadia, West Bengal 741235, India
,
Saumen Hajra
a   Centre of Biomedical Research, Sanjay Gandhi Post-Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences Campus, Raebareli Road, Lucknow 226014, India
› Author Affiliations
This work was supported by the Council of Scientific & Industrial Research (CSIR), India (CSIR-EMR grant, 02(0398)/21/EMR-II) and the Centre of Biomedical Research, Intra Mural Research Grant (CBMR-IMR grant, CBMR/IMR/0002/2021).


Dedicated to Professor B. C. Ranu on the occasion of his 75th birthday

Abstract

A concise and scalable asymmetric synthesis of (+)-8-epigrosheimin is reported in nine steps using only three column chromatographic purifications with an overall yield 47.0% from (R)-(–)-carvone. Two synthetic routes are evaluated by catalyst-free tandem allylboration–lactonization of two carvone-derived aldehydes and subsequent ene cyclization, where strategy via Lee–Lay aldehyde is found to be more effective for 8-epigrosheimin.

Supporting Information



Publication History

Received: 09 August 2024

Accepted after revision: 10 September 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
10 September 2024

Article published online:
09 October 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References and Notes

  • 1 Ando M, Ibayashi K, Minami N, Nalmjra T, Isogal K, Yoshimlir H. J. Nat. Prod. 1994; 57: 433
    • 2a Hu X, Musacchio AJ, Shen X, Tao Y, Maimone TJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019; 141: 14904
    • 2b Andersen TB, López CQ, Manczak T, Martinez K, Simonsen HT. Molecules 2015; 20: 6113
    • 2c Ghantous A, Gali-Muhtasib H, Vuorela H, Saliba NA, Darwiche N. Drug Discovery Today 2010; 15: 668
    • 2d Li J, Li S, Guo J, Li Q, Long J, Ma C, Ding Y, Yan C, Li L, Wu Z, Zhu H, Li KK, Wen L, Zhang Q, Xue Q, Zhao C, Liu N, Ivanov I, Luo M, Xi R, Long H, Wang PG, Chen Y. J. Med. Chem. 2018; 61: 4155
  • 3 Scotti MT, Fernandes MB, Ferreire MJ. P, Emerenciano VP. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2007; 15: 2927
  • 4 Brill ZG, Condakes ML, Ting CP, Maimone TJ. Chem. Rev. 2017; 117: 11753
  • 5 Fernandes RA, Moharana S, Khatun GN. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2023; 21: 6652
  • 6 Kisiel W, Zielińska K, Joshi SP. Phytochemistry 2000; 54: 763
  • 7 Barbetti P, Casinovi CG, Santurbano B, Longo R. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 1979; 44: 3123
  • 8 Yang H, Qiao X, Li F, Ma H, Xie L, Xu X. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009; 50: 1110
  • 9 Yang H, Gao Y, Qiao X, Xie L, Xu X. Org. Lett. 2011; 13: 3670
  • 10 Hajra S, Acharyya S, Mandal A, Maity R. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2017; 15: 6401
    • 11a Lee E, Lim JW, Yoon CH, Sung Y.-S, Kim YK. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997; 119: 8391
    • 11b Oliver SF, Hogenauer K, Simic O, Antonello A, Smith MD, Ley SV. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003; 42: 5996
  • 12 Maity R, Hajra S. Org. Lett. 2022; 24: 4745
  • 13 Hajra S, Garai S, Hazra S. Org. Lett. 2017; 19: 6530
  • 14 Bera M, Sen B, Garai S, Hajra S. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2023; 21: 8749
  • 15 Johnson TC, Chin MR, Han T, Shen JP, Rana T, Siegel D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016; 138: 6068

    • For a review, see:
    • 16a Hall DG. Synlett 2007; 1644

    • For selected examples, see:
    • 16b Kennedy JW. J, Hall DG. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002; 124: 11586
    • 16c Kennedy JW. J, Hall DG. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002; 124: 898
    • 16d Kennedy JW. J, Hall DG. J. Org. Chem. 2004; 69: 4412
    • 16e Ramachandran PV, Pratihar D, Biswas D, Srivastava A, Reddy MV. R. Org. Lett. 2004; 6: 481
    • 16f Elford TG, Arimura Y, Yu SH, Hall DG. J. Org. Chem. 2007; 72: 1276
    • 16g Ramachandran PV, Pratihar D. Org. Lett. 2007; 9: 2087
    • 16h Elford TG, Hall DG. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010; 132: 1488
    • 16i Feng J, Lei X, Bao R, Li Y, Xiao C, Hu L, Tang Y. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017; 56: 16323
  • 17 Synthesis of Compound 13 Trifluoroethanol (15 mL) was stirred with a mixture of solid anhydrous NaHCO3 and a pinch of solid anhydrous MgSO4 and filtered through a sintered glass funnel. A solution of (R)-carvone-derived aldehyde 2 (1.7 g, 5.95 mmol, 1.3 equiv.) and O-TBS allylboronate 4 (1.7 g, 4.75 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) in pretreated trifluoroethanol (10 mL) were charged in a sealed tube and it was heated to 90 °C in a pre-heated oil bath. After 3.0 days, the reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature. Trifluoroethanol was removed in vacuo and recovered for reuse in the next batch. The crude materials were dissolved in a 1:1 mixture of THF (20 mL) and MeOH (20 mL). 1(N) HCl (10 mL) was then added and stirred at rt for 3 h. The reaction mixture was diluted with a saturated aqueous KH2PO4 solution and extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 150 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo affords crude oil. The purification of crude product using flash chromatography (silica gel, EtOAc/PE = 3:2) yielded lactone alcohol 13 (0.88 g, 3.2 mmol, 70%) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 6.29 (d, J = 2.7 Hz, 1 H), 5.69 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1 H), 4.93 (s, 1 H), 4.86 (s, 1 H), 4.38 (dd, J = 5.2, 2.6 Hz, 1 H), 4.22 (m, 1 H), 3.72 (dd, J = 6.3, 10.7 Hz, 2 H), 3.11–3.01 (m, 1 H), 2.95 (m, 1 H), 2.14–1.89 (m, 4 H), 1.78 (s, 3 H), 1.71 (dd, J = 13.1, 6.2 Hz, 2 H), 1.12 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 170.5, 144.0, 136.3, 123.2, 112.9, 81.0, 74.4, 64.0, 50.7, 46.2, 45.5, 39.2, 38.3, 23.4, 16.2. [α]D 25 46.25 (c 0.16, CHCl3). HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C15H23O4 [M + H]+: 267.1591; found: 267.1585; C15H22NaO4 [M + Na]+: 289.1410; found: 289.1403.
  • 18 Synthesis of (+)-8-Epigrosheimin 1 from Compound 13 To a stirred solution of lactone alcohol 13 (0.12 g, 0.45 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) in CH2Cl2 (4.5 mL) at 0 °C Dess–Martin periodinane (0.76 g, 1.8 mmol, 4.0 equiv.) and H2O (0.032 mL, 1.8 mmol, 4.0 equiv.) were added successively. The mixture was stirred at rt for 6 h. After the total consumption of lactone alcohol 13, saturated aqueous NaHCO3 was added dropwise, followed by a saturated aqueous Na2S2O3 solution. Two layers were separated after standing. The aqueous layer was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 5 mL). First, the combined organic layers were washed with NaHCO3, then brine, dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and filtered. The CH2Cl2 solution (ca. 20 mL) was charged in a flame-dried two-neck round-bottomed flask and flashed with Ar. The reaction mixture was stirred for ca. 0.5 h at –78 °C. Et2AlCl (0.5 mL, 0.45 mmol, 1.0 equiv., 0.9 M in toluene) was added dropwise. After 0.5 h, a saturated aqueous KH2PO4 solution was added and stirred at rt for 2 h. Finally, the aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 15 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo afforded crude product. The purification of the crude mixture using flash chromatography (silica gel, MeOH/CH2Cl2 = 1:50) yielded 1 (80 mg, 0.31 mmol, 78%; dr >99:1) as a white solid; mp 132–135 °C, lit.8 137–138 °C (diethyl ether/petroleum ether); [[α]D 25 30.5 (c 0.24, CHCl3), lit.8 [α]D 25 31.5 ± 1 (c 0.1, CHCl3). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 6.45 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, 1 H), 5.68 (d, J = 3.0 Hz, 1 H), 5.09 (s, 1 H), 4.84 (s, 1 H), 4.55 (t, J = 9.2 Hz, 1 H), 4.46 (s, 1 H), 3.17–3.12 (m, 1 H), 3.06 (td, J = 8.1, 3.3 Hz, 1 H), 2.69 (dd, J = 13.9, 3.0 Hz, 1 H), 2.60–2.54 (m, 2 H), 2.50 (dd, J =13.7, 4.1 Hz, 1 H) 2.39–2.24 (m, 2 H), 1.28 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 219.2, 169.5, 143.8, 136.2, 122.2, 116.2, 81.2, 66.2, 50.5, 48.7, 47.3, 46.8, 44.0, 40.1, 14.4. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C15H18NaO4 [M + Na]+: 285.1097; found: 285.1085.
  • 19 Fernandes RA, Ramakrishna GV. J. Org. Chem. 2024; 89: 815
  • 20 Synthesis of (+)-8-Epigrosheimin 1 from Compound 16 To a stirred solution of 16 (0.03 g, 0.12 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) in CH2Cl2 (3 mL) at 0 °C, m-CPBA (65 wt%, 0.03 g, 0.12 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) was added to it at the same temperature. The resulting suspension was stirred for 1 h at the same temperature. After complete consumption 16, the reaction was quenched with saturated Na2SO3 solution (30 mL). The aqueous phase was extracted with CH2Cl2 (2 × 5 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with saturated NaHCO3, brine, dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated to afford crude epoxide product 17. The crude product 17 was used directly in the next step. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 6.41 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1 H), 5.57 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, 1 H), 5.00 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 1 H), 4.84 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 1 H), 4.40 (dd, J = 11.2, 8.3 Hz, 1 H), 4.29 (td, J = 8.0, 3.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.37 (s, 1 H), 3.04–2.92 (m, 2 H), 2.74 (dd, J = 13.6, 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 2.28 (dd, J = 11.3, 8.4 Hz, 1 H), 2.10–2.00 (m, 2 H), 1.83 (dd, J = 14.3, 11.0, 1 H), 1.59 (s, 3 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 169.6, 142.22, 135.5, 122.0, 117.6, 75.7, 66.5, 66.0, 63.3, 51.3, 49.4, 45.1, 37.2, 33.1, 18.4. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C15H18NaO4 [M + Na]+: 285.1097; found: 285.1085. The crude product 17 was used directly in the next step. To a stirred solution of epoxide (0.12 mmol) in dry CH2Cl2 (5 mL) at 0 °C, BF3·OEt2 (35 mg, 0.14 mmol, 2.0 equiv.) was added under nitrogen at the same temperature and stirred for 1 h. After complete consumption of 17 monitored by TLC, a saturated NaHCO3 solution was added to it to quench the reaction. The aqueous phase was extracted with CH2Cl2 (2 × 5 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with saturated NaHCO3, brine, dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated to afford crude product 1 (dr: 5:1). The purification of the crude product using flash chromatography (silica gel, MeOH/CH2Cl2 = 1:50) yielded 1 (22 mg, 0.084 mmol, 70%; dr >99:1) as a white solid.