J Knee Surg 2025; 38(03): 110-114
DOI: 10.1055/a-2413-3876
Special Focus Section

Does Resurfacing the Patella Increase the Risk of Extensor Mechanism Injury within the First 2 Years after Total Knee Arthroplasty?

David E. DeMik
1   Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
1   Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Emily Jimenez
2   American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont, Illinois
,
Kyle J. Mullen
2   American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont, Illinois
,
Jess H. Lonner
1   Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Chad A. Krueger
1   Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Extensor mechanism injury (EMI) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a potentially catastrophic complication and may lead to significant morbidity or need for revision reconstructive procedures. Patellar resurfacing (PR), while commonly performed during TKA, reduces overall patella bone stock and may increase the risk of EMI after TKA. The purpose of this study was to assess if PR in elderly patients raises the risk for subsequent EMI.

The American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR) was queried to identify Medicare patients ≥65 years old undergoing primary elective TKA for osteoarthritis between January 2012 and March 2020. Patient age, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) were collected. Records were subsequently merged with Medicare claims records and evaluated for the occurrence of patella fracture, quadriceps tendon rupture, or patellar tendon rupture based on International Classification of Diseases 9 and 10 (ICD 9/10) diagnosis codes within 2 years of TKA. Patients were stratified based on whether PR occurred or not (NR). Logistic regression was used to determine the association between PR and EMI.

A total of 453,828 TKA were eligible for inclusion and 428,644 (94.45%) underwent PR. The incidence of PR decreased from 96.06% in 2012 to 92.35% in 2022 (p < 0.001). Patients undergoing PR were more often female (60.93 vs. 58.50%, p < 0.001) and had a lower mean CCI (3.09 [1.10] vs. 3.16 [1.20], p < 0.001). Odds for EMI did not differ based on whether PR was performed (odds ratio [OR]: 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65–1.11, p = 0.2246). Increasing age (OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.05–1.07, p < 0.0001]) and CCI (OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.95–1.19, p = 0.0009) were associated with EMI.

PR is commonly performed during TKA in the United States and was not found to increase odds for EMI within 2 years of TKA in patients ≥65 years old. Increased age and medical comorbidity were associated with higher odds for subsequent EMI.

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 12 April 2024

Accepted: 09 September 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
11 September 2024

Article published online:
04 October 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Sloan M, Premkumar A, Sheth NP. Projected volume of primary total joint arthroplasty in the U.S., 2014 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2018; 100 (17) 1455-1460
  • 2 Livshetz I, Sussman BH, Papas V. et al. Analyzing the burden of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States between 2009 and 2016. J Knee Surg 2023; 36 (02) 121-131
  • 3 Heckmann N, Ihn H, Stefl M. et al. Early results from the American Joint Replacement Registry: a comparison with other national registries. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34 (7S): S125-134.e1
  • 4 Pavlou G, Meyer C, Leonidou A, As-Sultany M, West R, Tsiridis E. Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: does design matter? A meta-analysis of 7075 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93 (14) 1301-1309
  • 5 Pilling RW, Moulder E, Allgar V, Messner J, Sun Z, Mohsen A. Patellar resurfacing in primary total knee replacement: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94 (24) 2270-2278
  • 6 Maradit-Kremers H, Haque OJ, Kremers WK. et al. Is selectively not resurfacing the patella an acceptable practice in primary total knee arthroplasty?. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (04) 1143-1147
  • 7 Longo UG, Ciuffreda M, Mannering N, D'Andrea V, Cimmino M, Denaro V. Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33 (02) 620-632
  • 8 Deroche E, Batailler C, Swan J. et al. No difference between resurfaced and non-resurfaced patellae with a modern prosthesis design: a prospective randomized study of 250 total knee arthroplasties. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2022; 30 (03) 1025-1038
  • 9 Zmistowski BM, Fillingham YA, Salmons HI, Ward DT, Good RP, Lonner JH. Routine patellar resurfacing during total knee arthroplasty is not cost-effective in patients without patellar arthritis. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34 (09) 1963-1968
  • 10 Fitzpatrick CK, Kim RH, Ali AA, Smoger LM, Rullkoetter PJ. Effects of resection thickness on mechanics of resurfaced patellae. J Biomech 2013; 46 (09) 1568-1575
  • 11 Reuben JD, McDonald CL, Woodard PL, Hennington LJ. Effect of patella thickness on patella strain following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1991; 6 (03) 251-258
  • 12 Meding JB, Fish MD, Berend ME, Ritter MA, Keating EM. Predicting patellar failure after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008; 466 (11) 2769-2774
  • 13 Chalidis BE, Tsiridis E, Tragas AA, Stavrou Z, Giannoudis PV. Management of periprosthetic patellar fractures. A systematic review of literature. Injury 2007; 38 (06) 714-724
  • 14 Goldberg VM, Figgie III HE, Inglis AE. et al. Patellar fracture type and prognosis in condylar total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988; (236) 115-122
  • 15 Sheth NP, Pedowitz DI, Lonner JH. Periprosthetic patellar fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89 (10) 2285-2296
  • 16 Dobbs RE, Hanssen AD, Lewallen DG, Pagnano MW. Quadriceps tendon rupture after total knee arthroplasty. Prevalence, complications, and outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87 (01) 37-45
  • 17 Rand JA, Morrey BF, Bryan RS. Patellar tendon rupture after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989; (244) 233-238
  • 18 Abolghasemian M, Samiezadeh S, Sternheim A, Bougherara H, Barnes CL, Backstein DJ. Effect of patellar thickness on knee flexion in total knee arthroplasty: a biomechanical and experimental study. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (01) 80-84
  • 19 Ortiguera CJ, Berry DJ. Patellar fracture after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84 (04) 532-540
  • 20 Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, Rubash HE. Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; (356) 144-153
  • 21 Ritter MA, Herbst SA, Keating EM, Faris PM, Meding JB. Patellofemoral complications following total knee arthroplasty. Effect of a lateral release and sacrifice of the superior lateral geniculate artery. J Arthroplasty 1996; 11 (04) 368-372
  • 22 Boyd Jr AD, Ewald FC, Thomas WH, Poss R, Sledge CB. Long-term complications after total knee arthroplasty with or without resurfacing of the patella. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993; 75 (05) 674-681
  • 23 Rosenberg AG, Andriacchi TP, Barden R, Galante JO. Patellar component failure in cementless total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988; (236) 106-114
  • 24 Stulberg SD, Stulberg BN, Hamati Y, Tsao A. Failure mechanisms of metal-backed patellar components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988; (236) 88-105
  • 25 Keating EM, Haas G, Meding JB. Patella fracture after post total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; (416) 93-97
  • 26 Burnett RSJ, Boone JL, Rosenzweig SD, Steger-May K, Barrack RL. Patellar resurfacing compared with nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. A concise follow-up of a randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91 (11) 2562-2567
  • 27 Ali A, Lindstrand A, Nilsdotter A, Sundberg M. Similar patient-reported outcomes and performance after total knee arthroplasty with or without patellar resurfacing. Acta Orthop 2016; 87 (03) 274-279
  • 28 Shon O-J, Kim GB. Does the degree of intraoperatively identified cartilage loss affect the outcomes of primary total knee arthroplasty without patella resurfacing? A prospective comparative cohort study. Knee Surg Relat Res 2022; 34 (01) 36
  • 29 Choi KY, In Y, Kim MS, Sohn S, Koh IJ. Is the patient aware of the difference between resurfaced and nonresurfaced patella after bilateral total knee arthroplasty? A systematic review of simultaneous bilateral randomized trials. Knee Surg Relat Res 2022; 34 (01) 4
  • 30 Deans J, Scuderi GR. Classification and management of periprosthetic patella fractures. Orthop Clin North Am 2021; 52 (04) 347-355
  • 31 Berry DJ. Epidemiology: hip and knee. Orthop Clin North Am 1999; 30 (02) 183-190
  • 32 Grace JN, Sim FH. Fracture of the patella after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988; (230) 168-175
  • 33 Tria Jr AJ, Harwood DA, Alicea JA, Cody RP. Patellar fractures in posterior stabilized knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994; (299) 131-138
  • 34 Windsor RE, Scuderi GR, Insall JN. Patellar fractures in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1989; 4: S63-S67
  • 35 Derman PB, Fabricant PD, David G. The role of overweight and obesity in relation to the more rapid growth of total knee arthroplasty volume compared with total hip arthroplasty volume. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96 (11) 922-928
  • 36 Porter KR, Illgen RL, Springer BD. et al. Is American Joint Replacement Registry data representative of national data? A comparative analysis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2022; 30 (01) e124-e130