Download PDF
neuroreha 2024; 16(04): 167-172
DOI: 10.1055/a-2427-7459
Schwerpunkt

KI-unterstützte Bewegungsanalyse in der Neurorehabilitation – Fiktion oder baldige Realität?

Anne Katrin Brust
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Das Gesundheitssystem befindet sich im demografischen Wandel, gleichzeitig lässt der medizinische Fortschritt der letzten Jahrzehnte die Nachfrage nach Gesundheitsdienstleistungen anwachsen. Angesichts knapper werdender Ressourcen müssen innovative Lösungen und Technologien weiterentwickelt werden, um die Verfügbarkeit von Gesundheitsdienstleistungen zu gewährleisten. Die vorgestellten Technologien können wertvolle Ansätze liefern, um Krankheitsverläufe und Therapiefortschritte engmaschig und mithilfe selbstlernender Methoden der KI zu dokumentieren.



Publication History

Article published online:
02 December 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Bohannon RW, Andrews AW, Smith MB. Rehabilitation goals of patients with hemiplegia. Int J Rehabil Res 1988; 11: 181
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Hornby TG, Reisman DS, Ward IG. et al. Clinical practice guideline to improve locomotor function following chronic stroke, incomplete spinal cord injury, and brain injury. J Neurol Phys Ther JNPT 2020; 44: 49-100
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Mehrholz J, Pohl M, Kugler J. et al. The improvement of walking ability following stroke. Dtsch Arzteblatt Int 2018; 115: 639-645
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Elsner B, Mehrholz J. et al. Gehen Sie zurück auf Los. neuroreha 2019; 11: 59-64
    Thieme ConnectSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Shafrin J, Sullivan J. et al. The association between observed mobility and quality of life in the near elderly. PLOS ONE 2017; 12: 1-13
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Davis JC, Stirling B. et al. Mobility and cognition are associated with wellbeing and health related quality of life among older adults: A cross-sectional analysis of the Vancouver Falls Prevention Cohort. BMC Geriatr 2015; 15: 75-75
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Higgs J, Jones MA, Loftus S. et al. Clinical reasoning in the health professions. 3rd ed. London: Elsevier Health Sciences UK; 2014
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 8 Klemme B, Siegmann G. Clinical Reasoning. 2. Aufl. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2015
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 9 Elsner B, Mehrholz J. Algorithmen vs. Experten in der Neuroreha: Wer macht den besseren Job. neuroreha 2021; 13: 15-20
    Thieme ConnectSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Perry J. Pathologic gait. Instr Course Lect 1990; 39: 325-331
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Baker R, Esquenazi A, Benedetti MG. et al. Gait analysis: Clinical facts. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2016; 52: 560-574
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Muro-de-la-Herran A, Garcia-Zapirain B, Mendez-Zorrilla A. Gait analysis methods: An overview of wearable and non-wearable systems, highlighting clinical applications. Sensors 2014; 14: 3362-3394
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Baker R, Hart HM. Measuring walking. London: Mac Keith Press; 2013
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 14 McGinley JL, Baker R, Wolfe R. et al. The reliability of three-dimensional kinematic gait measurements: A systematic review. Gait & Posture 2009; 29: 360-369
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Wren TAL, Tucker CA, Rethlefsen SA. et al. Clinical efficacy of instrumented gait analysis: Systematic review 2020 update. Gait & Posture 2020; 80: 274-279
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Götz-Neumann K. Gehen verstehen. 4. Aufl. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2015
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 17 Zhang H, Li X, Gong Y. et al. Three-dimensional gait analysis and sEMG measures for robotic-assisted gait training in subacute stroke: A randomized controlled trial. BioMed Res Int 2023; 2023: 7563802
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Mukaino M, Ohtsuka K, Tanikawa H. et al. Clinical-oriented three-dimensional gait analysis method for evaluating gait disorder. J Vis Exp 2018;
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Lam WWT, Tang YM, Fong KNK. A systematic review of the applications of markerless motion capture (MMC) technology for clinical measurement in rehabilitation. J Neuroengineering Rehabil 2023; 20: 57
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Jeyasingh-Jacob J, Crook-Rumsey M, Shah H. et al. Markerless motion capture to quantify functional performance in neurodegeneration: Systematic review. JMIR Aging 2024; 7: e52582
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Kanko RM, Laende EK, Strutzenberger G. et al. Assessment of spatiotemporal gait parameters using a deep learning algorithm-based markerless motion capture system. J Biomech 2021; 122: 110414
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Wishaupt K, Schallig W, van Dorst MH. et al. The applicability of markerless motion capture for clinical gait analysis in children with cerebral palsy. Sci Rep 2024; 14: 11910
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Ben Gamra M, Akhloufi MA. A review of deep learning techniques for 2D and 3D human pose estimation. Image Vis Comput 2021; 114: 104282
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Cronin NJ. Using deep neural networks for kinematic analysis: Challenges and opportunities. J Biomech 2021; 123: 110460
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Mathis A, Schneider S, Lauer J. et al. A primer on motion capture with deep learning: Principles, pitfalls, and perspectives. Neuron 2020; 108: 44-65
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Wade L, Needham L, McGuigan P. et al. Applications and limitations of current markerless motion capture methods for clinical gait biomechanics. PeerJ 2022; 10: e12995
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Harsted S, Holsgaard-Larsen A, Hestbæk L. et al. Concurrent validity of lower extremity kinematics and jump characteristics captured in pre-school children by a markerless 3D motion capture system. Chiropr Man Ther 2019; 27: 39
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Kanko RM, Laende EK, Davis EM. et al. Concurrent assessment of gait kinematics using marker-based and markerless motion capture. J Biomech 2021; 127: 110665
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Horsak B, Eichmann A, Lauer K. et al. Concurrent validity of smartphone-based markerless motion capturing to quantify lower-limb joint kinematics in healthy and pathological gait. J Biomech 2023; 159: 111801
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Wren TAL, Isakov P, Rethlefsen SA. Comparison of kinematics between Theia markerless and conventional marker-based gait analysis in clinical patients. Gait & Posture 2023; 104: 9-14
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 D’Antonio E, Taborri J, Mileti I. et al. Validation of a 3D markerless system for gait analysis based on open pose and two RGB webcams. IEEE Sens J 2021; 21: 17064-17075
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Mehrholz J, Elsner B, Thomas S. Virtuelle Realität: Was ist im Einsatz?. neuroreha 2017; 09: 9-14
    Thieme ConnectSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Prajjwal P, Chandrasekar KK, Battula P. et al. The efficacy of virtual reality-based rehabilitation in improving motor function in patients with stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Med Surg 2024; 86: 5425-5438
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Huber M, Janssen C, Erzer Lüscher F. et al. Motorisches Lernen in der Neuroreha. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2023
    Thieme ConnectSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der Entwicklung im Gesundheitswesen und in der Pflege. Fachkräfte im Gesundheitswesen 2024; 332
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Horak F, King L, Mancini M. Role of body-worn movement monitor technology for balance and gait rehabilitation. Phys Ther 2015; 95: 461-470
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Happe L, Lau S, Koschate J. et al. Machbarkeit und Akzeptanz videobasierter Physiotherapie: Neues Versorgungsangebot für ältere Menschen während der COVID-19-Pandemie. Z Gerontol Geriatr 2021; 54: 346-352
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Langemak S. Telerehabilitation als Chance für eine bessere Versorgung während und nach der Pandemie. neuroreha 2021; 13: 32-34
    Thieme ConnectSearch in Google Scholar