Download PDF
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base
DOI: 10.1055/a-2461-5538
Original Article

Pediatric Anatomy of the Anterior Clinoid Process on Computed Tomography Images

Emek Öykü Yıldızoğlu
1   Department of Anatomy, Gaziantep University, Health Sciences Institute, Gaziantep, Turkey
,
Erdal Özdemir
2   Department of Radiology, Mardin Training and Research Hospital, Mardin, Turkey
,
Rıdvan Çetin
3   Department of Neurosurgery, Mardin Training and Research Hospital, Mardin, Turkey
,
Baran Can Alpergin 
4   Department of Neurosurgery, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
,
Orhan Beger 
5   Department of Anatomy, Gaziantep University, Faculty of Medicine, Gaziantep, Turkey
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective To show the change in the anterior clinoid process (ACP) morphology in children with advancing age.

Methods Radiologic images of 180 subjects aged 1 to 18 years were included in the work. The length (ACPL), width (ACPW), and angle (ACPA) of ACP, and the distance (DisACPOS) of ACP to the optic strut (OS) were measured. ACP pneumatization and OS location types were noted.

Results ACPL, ACPW, and ACPA, and DisACPOS were measured as 12.34 ± 2.29 mm, 4.52 ± 1.03 mm, 26.26 ± 4.30°, and 5.10 ± 1.12 mm, respectively. ACP pneumatization was identified in 30 (8.3%) sides. Four types regarding its pneumatization were observed: Type 0 in 91.7% out of 360 sides, Type 1 in 2.5%, Type 2 in 3.6%, and Type 3 in 2.2%. Three configurations regarding OS location types were observed as follows: Type C in 3.6% out of 360 sides, Type D in 51.7%, and Type E in 44.7%. Linear function was calculated as y = 9.377 + 0.312 × age for ACPL, y = 3.716 + 0.084 × age for ACPW, and y = 3.808 + 0.136 × age for DisACPOS.

Conclusion ACPL, ACPW, and DisACPOS increased, but ACPA did not vary with advancing ages in children. OS was located more posteriorly in children compared with adults. Most of ACP pneumatization was seen after prepubescent period.

Keywords

anterior clinoid process - pneumatization - children - computed tomography - optic strut

Ethical Approval

This retrospective CT investigation and study was approved by Institution's Clinical Research Ethics Committee (no.: 2024/48, date: March 27, 2024).


Informed Consent

The need for informed consent from the patient was waived by the Institutional Review Board because of the retrospective nature of the study.


Author Contributions

E.Ö.Y. and O.B. conceived and designed the study. E.Ö.Y., R.Ç., and E.Ö. collected and analyzed the radiological data. B.C.A. and O.B. interpreted the results and contributed to the drafting of the manuscript. E.Ö.Y. and O.B. contributed equally to writing the main manuscript text. All authors critically reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.


Data Availability Statement

Available from the authors on request.




Publication History

Received: 10 October 2024

Accepted: 04 November 2024

Article published online:
26 November 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Güler TM, Yılmazlar S, Özgün G. Anatomical aspects of optic nerve decompression in transcranial and transsphenoidal approach. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2019; 47 (04) 561-569
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Onofrey CB, Tse DT, Johnson TE. et al. Optic canal decompression: a cadaveric study of the effects of surgery. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 23 (04) 261-266
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Maurer J, Hinni M, Mann W, Pfeiffer N. Optic nerve decompression in trauma and tumor patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1999; 256 (07) 341-345
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Taha AN, Erkmen K, Dunn IF, Pravdenkova S, Al-Mefty O. Meningiomas involving the optic canal: pattern of involvement and implications for surgical technique. Neurosurg Focus 2011; 30 (05) E12
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Locatelli M, Caroli M, Pluderi M. et al. Endoscopic transsphenoidal optic nerve decompression: an anatomical study. Surg Radiol Anat 2011; 33 (03) 257-262
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Beer-Furlan A, Evins AI, Rigante L. et al. Endoscopic extradural anterior clinoidectomy and optic nerve decompression through a pterional port. J Clin Neurosci 2014; 21 (05) 836-840
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Yilmazlar S, Saraydaroglu O, Korfali E. Anatomical aspects in the transsphenoidal-transethmoidal approach to the optic canal: an anatomic-cadaveric study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2012; 40 (07) e198-e205
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Locatelli M, Di Cristofori A, Draghi R. et al. Is complex sphenoidal sinus anatomy a contraindication to a transsphenoidal approach for resection of sellar lesions? Case series and review of the literature. World Neurosurg 2017; 100: 173-179
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Puzzilli F, Ruggeri A, Mastronardi L, Agrillo A, Ferrante L. Anterior clinoidal meningiomas: report of a series of 33 patients operated on through the pterional approach. Neuro-oncol 1999; 1 (03) 188-195
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Boyan N, Ozsahin E, Kizilkanat E. et al. Surgical importance of the morphometry of the anterior clinoid process, optic strut, caroticoclinoid foramen, and interclinoid osseous bridge. Neurosurg Q 2011; 21: 133-136
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Dolenc V. Direct microsurgical repair of intracavernous vascular lesions. J Neurosurg 1983; 58 (06) 824-831
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Kapur E, Mehić A. Anatomical variations and morphometric study of the optic strut and the anterior clinoid process. Bosn J Basic Med Sci 2012; 12 (02) 88-93
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Beger O, Taghipour P, Çakır S. et al. Fetal anatomy of the optic strut and prechiasmatic sulcus with a clinical perspective. World Neurosurg 2020; 136: e625-e634
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Beger O, Ten B, Balcı Y. et al. A computed tomography study of the prechiasmatic sulcus anatomy in children. World Neurosurg 2020; 141: e118-e132
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Rennert RC, Brandel MG, Steinberg JA. et al. Surgical relevance of pediatric anterior clinoid process maturation for anterior skull base approaches. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2021; 20 (03) E200-E207
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Wasserzug O, DeRowe A, Ringel B, Fishman G, Fliss DM. Open approaches to the anterior skull base in children: review of the literature. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2018; 79 (01) 42-46
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Weninger WJ, Müller GB. The parasellar region of human infants: cavernous sinus topography and surgical approaches. J Neurosurg 1999; 90 (03) 484-490
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 da Costa MDS, de Oliveira Santos BF, de Araujo Paz D. et al. Anatomical variations of the anterior clinoid process: a study of 597 skull base computerized tomography scans. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2016; 12 (03) 289-297
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Sabanciogullari V, Tastemur Y, Salk I, Dogruyol G, Cimen M. Assessment of dimensions of pneumatisation of the anterior clinoid process in middle Anatolian population by computed tomography. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2018; 77 (03) 558-563
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Suprasanna K, Ravikiran SR, Kumar A, Chavadi C, Pulastya S. Optic strut and para-clinoid region—assessment by multidetector computed tomography with multiplanar and 3 dimensional reconstructions. J Clin Diagn Res 2015; 9 (10) TC06-TC09
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Cecen A, Celikoglu E, Kale A. et al. Pre-operative measurement of the morphometry and angles of the anterior clinoid process (ACP) for aneurysm surgery. Int J Morphol 2016; 34: 1333-1338
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Adanir SS, Ceylan ES, İnceoğlu A. et al. Change in the location of the optic strut relative to the anterior clinoid process pneumatization. J Craniofac Surg 2022; 33 (06) 1924-1928
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Abuzayed B, Tanriover N, Biceroglu H. et al. Pneumatization degree of the anterior clinoid process: a new classification. Neurosurg Rev 2010; 33 (03) 367-373 , discussion 374
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Lee HY, Chung IH, Choi BY, Lee KS. Anterior clinoid process and optic strut in Koreans. Yonsei Med J 1997; 38 (03) 151-154
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Goodway JD, Ozmun JC, Gallahue DL. Understanding Motor Development: Infants, Children, Adolescents, Adults. 1st ed. Burlington:: Jones & Bartlett Learning;; 2019
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 26 Kerr RG, Tobler WD, Leach JL. et al. Anatomic variation of the optic strut: classification schema, radiologic evaluation, and surgical relevance. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2012; 73 (06) 424-429
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Abozed M, Alsulaiti G, Almannaei F, Raza A, El Beltagi A, Ayyad A. Anterior clinoid mucocele causing optic neuropathy: a case report and review of literature. eNeurologicalSci 2017; 7: 57-59
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Beretta F, Sepahi AN, Zuccarello M, Tomsick TA, Keller JT. Radiographic imaging of the distal dural ring for determining the intradural or extradural location of aneurysms. Skull Base 2005; 15 (04) 253-261 , discussion 261–262
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Guthikonda B, Tobler Jr WD, Froelich SC. et al. Anatomic study of the prechiasmatic sulcus and its surgical implications. Clin Anat 2010; 23 (06) 622-628
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Mikami T, Minamida Y, Koyanagi I, Baba T, Houkin K. Anatomical variations in pneumatization of the anterior clinoid process. J Neurosurg 2007; 106 (01) 170-174
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Nandapalan V, Watson ID, Swift AC. Beta-2-transferrin and cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhoea. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1996; 21 (03) 259-264
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Özalp H, Özgüral O, Alpergin BC. et al. Assessment of the anterior clinoid process and optic strut in Chiari malformation type I: a computed tomography study. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2023; 85 (03) 302-312
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Dagtekin A, Avci E, Uzmansel D. et al. Microsurgical anatomy and variations of the anterior clinoid process. Turk Neurosurg 2014; 24 (04) 484-493
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Beger O, Hamzaoğlu V, Özalp H. et al. Anatomy of the anterior clinoid process in human fetuses. J Craniofac Surg 2020; 31 (05) 1469-1473
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Huynh-Le P, Natori Y, Sasaki T. Surgical anatomy of the anterior clinoid process. J Clin Neurosci 2004; 11 (03) 283-287
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Andaluz N, Beretta F, Bernucci C, Keller JT, Zuccarello M. Evidence for the improved exposure of the ophthalmic segment of the internal carotid artery after anterior clinoidectomy: morphometric analysis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2006; 148 (09) 971-975 , discussion 975–976
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Cheng Y, Wang C, Yang F, Duan Y, Zhang S, Wang J. Anterior clinoid process and the surrounding structures. J Craniofac Surg 2013; 24 (06) 2098-2102
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Gupta N, Priya A. Anterior clinoid process and optic strut—a morphometric study. J Evol Med Dent Sci 2018; 7: 3577-3581
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Hayashi N, Masuoka T, Tomita T, Sato H, Ohtani O, Endo S. Surgical anatomy and efficient modification of procedures for selective extradural anterior clinoidectomy. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2004; 47 (06) 355-358
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Hunnargi S, Ray B, Pai SR, Siddaraju KS. Metrical and non-metrical study of anterior clinoid process in South Indian adult skulls. Surg Radiol Anat 2008; 30 (05) 423-428
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Lee HW, Park HS, Yoo KS, Kim KU, Song YJ. Measurement of critical structures around paraclinoidal area: a cadaveric morphometric study. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2013; 54 (01) 14-18
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Sibuor W, Cheruiyot I, Munguti J. et al. Morphology of the anterior clinoid process in a select Kenyan population. Anat J Africa 2018; 7 (01) 1132-1137
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Souza AD, Ankolekar VH, Nayak N, Hosapatna M, Souza AS. Morphometric study of anterior clinoid process and optic strut and the ossification of carotico-clinoid ligament with their clinical importance. J Clin Diagn Res 2016; 10 (04) AC05-AC07
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Cetinkaya EA, Koc K, Kucuk MF, Koc P, Muluk NB, Cingi C. Calculation of an optic nerve injury risk profile before sphenoid sinus surgery. J Craniofac Surg 2017; 28 (01) e75-e78
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Szmuda T, Sloniewski P, Baczalska A. et al. The pneumatisation of anterior clinoid process is not associated with any predictors that might be recognised preoperatively. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2013; 72 (02) 100-106
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar