Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2487-5111
Best Practice Guidelines – DEGUM Recommendations on Breast Ultrasound
Part III/2 – Special Clinical Indications Article in several languages: English | deutsch- 4 Breast ultrasound during pregnancy and lactation
- 5 Breast ultrasound in men
- References
Abstract
Breast ultrasound has been established for many years as an important method in addition to mammography for clarifying breast findings. The goal of the Best Practice Guidelines Part III of the DEGUM breast ultrasound working group is to provide colleagues working in senology with information regarding the specific medical indications for breast ultrasound in addition to the current ultrasound criteria and assessment categories published in part I and the additional and optional sonographic diagnostic methods described in part II. The value of breast ultrasound for specific indications including follow-up, evaluation of breast implants, diagnostic workup of dense breast tissue, diagnostic workup during pregnancy and lactation, and the diagnostic workup of breast findings in men is discussed. Each section after the general information section contains a description of specific pathologies, followed by a short summary and DEGUM recommendations for the particular indications. The latest S3 guidelines and AGO guidelines were taken into consideration.
#
4 Breast ultrasound during pregnancy and lactation
4.1 General information
Endocrine factors result in complex changes in breast tissue over an entire lifetime [1]. During pregnancy, physiological adaptations in preparation for subsequent lactation begin as early as the first trimester due to the increase in HCG (human choriongonadotropin). The proliferation of terminal ductulo-lobular units (TDLUs) represents a central mechanism. The glandular tissue subsequently increases compared to the lipomatous and mesenchymal portions of the breast ([Fig. 1]) [2]. An increase in secretion can be detected beginning in the third trimester at the latest so that the lobules and milk ducts fill with colostrum ([Fig. 2]) [3]. These changes affect the appearance of normal tissue and pathological changes on diagnostic imaging [4].
As a result of the increase in the parenchyma during pregnancy and lactation, increased breast density is seen on B-mode ultrasound analogous to DEGUM parenchyma categories c and d. At the same time, ductal and lobular hyperplasia occurs. This development begins focally in the first trimester so that hyperplastic areas alternate with unchanged parenchyma on the ultrasound image. During the lactation phase, the lactating parenchyma is at its maximum size and has a slightly hyperechoic, homogeneous aspect since the numerous lobules are directly adjacent to one another ([Fig. 3], [4], [5]). The central milk ducts are visibly dilated on ultrasound and filled with fluid ([Fig. 6]). A general increase in vascularization can be visualized on Doppler ultrasound ([Fig. 7]).
#
4.2 Specific pathologies
Lactating adenomas, fibroadenomas, cysts, lobular hyperplasia, galactoceles, abscesses, fibrolipomas, lipomas, and hamartomas are the most common benign focal findings that occur over the course of a pregnancy and lactation ([Fig. 8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]).
Breast cancers that arise over the course of a pregnancy, over the course of the year following delivery, or during the lactation period are defined as pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC). Approximately 0.1 % of all pregnancies are associated with a cancer during this time period [5] [6]. PABC is a serious disease and has an incidence of 10 to 35 cases per 100 000 pregnancies [7] [8].
The prognosis of pregnancy-associated breast cancer depends largely on early diagnosis. Delayed detection and a subsequent delay in the start of treatment can affect the outcome for the affected patient [9].
Pregnancy-associated changes in breast tissue result in an increase in breast density and subsequently in reduced mammography sensitivity of 62–80 % [8]. As a result, evaluation of the breast tissue is also limited on breast ultrasound but a sensitivity of approx. 93 % has been described in studies [10]. Therefore, breast ultrasound has primary importance for the diagnosis of breast diseases in this phase of life.
Breast cancer usually presents with the known typical sonographic malignancy criteria during pregnancy and lactation. However, it must be taken into consideration that the sonomorphology of PABC can imitate benign findings due to the younger age of these patients, the tumor biology, and the changes in the surrounding tissue [4] [10] [11]. Thus, dorsal acoustic enhancement instead of attenuation or acoustic shadowing can be seen more frequently in PABC compared to non-PABC (63.2 % versus 12.0–15.4 %) ([Fig. 14]) [12].
#
4.3 Invasive diagnostic workup of the breast during pregnancy and lactation
Accelerated core needle biopsy (ACNB) can be performed during pregnancy and lactation [8]. Weaning prior to the procedure is not necessary. In lactating women, the breast should be emptied before the intervention (breastfeeding/breast pump) and the patient should be informed of the increased risk of milk fistulas, bleeding, and hematomas. In the second and third trimesters and in the lactation phase, the use of established local anesthesias like bupivacaine and ropivacaine is allowed [13]. During lactation, it must be taken into consideration that injection of a local anesthesia into the parenchyma and the milk ducts is to be avoided and infiltration is to be limited to the greatest extent possible to the skin in accordance with the label of the Rote Liste Service GmbH [14]. In this way, direct absorption of the local anesthesia into the mother's milk can be largely avoided. Ultrasound gel and disinfectant residue on the skin must be completely removed after the intervention and prior to the next feeding.
#
4.4 Conclusion and DEGUM recommendations
-
The diagnostic accuracy of breast ultrasound is limited during pregnancy and lactation but is superior to that of mammography.
-
It is safe to use breast ultrasound during pregnancy and lactation.
-
During pregnancy and lactation, breast ultrasound should be used as the primary diagnostic method in the case of mammary gland changes.
-
The sonomorphology of PABC can deviate from the usual malignancy criteria.
-
Suspicious and unclear changes on ultrasound must be clarified according to the typical procedure used outside the pregnancy and lactation period.
-
An automated cutting needle biopsy (ACNB) should be performed in the case of a corresponding indication during pregnancy and lactation in compliance with the precautionary measures mentioned above.
#
#
5 Breast ultrasound in men
5.1 General information
The most common reasons for a man to present for a diagnostic workup of the breast are unilateral or bilateral enlargement of the breast, a palpation finding, mastodynia, or cutaneous abnormalities [15]. Most changes are benign. Unilateral or bilateral gynecomastia is the most common change. Breast cancer in men is rare and comprises less than 1 % of all breast cancer cases [16]. Since the diagnosis is often first made at an advanced stage, suspicious axillary lymph nodes (approx. 50 %) are often the first indication. Therefore, the prognosis can be worse than in a woman.
Breast tissue in men is comprised almost exclusively of fat tissue with a few atrophic milk ducts and stromal tissue. Men do not have any Cooperʼs ligaments. Most of the breast tissue is retroareolar and can be more or less pronounced. The location and size of the male breast is greatly affected by the major and minor pectoral muscles ([Fig. 15]).
The diagnostic workup of the male breast includes inspection, palpation, breast ultrasound, and mammography when necessary. Contrast-enhanced methods can be used for certain medical questions.
In the case of men under the age of 40 with a palpation finding in the breast, breast ultrasound should be performed as the primary diagnostic method [17].
The practical implementation of breast ultrasound in men is the same as in women and includes the examination of both breasts and the axillae [22] [23].
Mammography is almost always technically feasible in men.
In the case of findings that are suspicious on ultrasound and/or mammography, an interventional diagnostic workup for histological confirmation is indicated.
#
5.2 Specific pathologies
5.2.1 Benign sonographic findings in men
Gynecomastia and pseudogynecomastia
In contrast to pseudogynecomastia (lipomastia) with only a collection of fat tissue in the breast region, gynecomastia involves hypertrophy of the breast tissue.
Gynecomastia is the result of a disruption of the estrogen-androgen balance and can be clinically symptomatic or asymptomatic [17]. In certain life phases, gynecomastia can be physiological (e. g. in newborns, during puberty, and in old age). The pathological types have different causes that result in an imbalance in hormone levels [17]. Mechanical causes are also discussed [18].
The most common clinical symptoms of gynecomastia are breast pain, breast enlargement, and/or a palpation finding. Symptoms can be unilateral or bilateral.
A differentiation between nodular, dendritic, and diffuse forms of gynecomastia is made.
Nodular gynecomastia indicates the early florid phase of ductal and stromal proliferation (less than 1 year). Disk-shaped or fan-shaped hypoechoic tissue is seen in the subareolar region on ultrasound ([Fig. 16]).
The term dendritic gynecomastia is used to refer to a fibrotic latent phase and is seen in patients with a symptomatic increase in breast tissue for more than 1 year. The subareolar areas of increased density stretch in the shape of fingers or flames into the tissue ([Fig. 17]).
Diffuse gynecomastia is similar to heterogeneously dense female breast tissue ([Fig. 18], [19]).
Pseudogynecomastia or lipomastia is more common in overweight men. It is characterized by the collection of fat tissue in the breast region with an increase in the volume of the breast. Fat tissue and connective tissue septa are seen on ultrasound ([Fig. 20]).
#
Abscess
Brest abscesses are rare in men [19]. The etiology is usually unclear. Predisposing factors include trauma (e. g., nipple piercing), obesity, smoking, diabetes, and infectious diseases that lower the immune response (including HIV, tuberculosis, brucellosis). Clinically, an abscess appears with swelling that is tender when palpated and is often accompanied by erythema. Abscesses usually occur in a retromamillary or perimamillary location. An antibiogram should be created for targeted therapy.
On ultrasound, an abscess appears as an irregular usually complex cystic-solid lesion with unclear borders (anechoic/hypoechoic focal findings with hyperechoic regions). The findings usually have good perfusion. The overlying cutis is typically thickened and the ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes have reactive changes with an enlarged cortical structure ([Fig. 21]).
#
Epidermoid cyst
Epidermoid cysts are benign changes located in the dermis or adjacent thereto corresponding to a cystic mass lined with squamous epithelium and filled with keratin lamellae.
In the ultrasound examination, these cysts appear as round/oval, circumscribed lesions with homogeneous or heterogeneous echogenicity. These cysts can also have dorsal acoustic enhancement and internal echogenic foci. A sometimes visible stalk between the dermal origin and the dorsally displaced epidermoid cyst is indicative of this entity ([Fig. 22]). A punch biopsy with rupture of the cyst can result in local inflammation with an abscess. Symptomatic epidermoid cysts should be completely removed surgically.
#
Lipoma/Fibrolipoma
A lipoma is a circumscribed mass comprised of mature fat tissue that is usually located in subcutaneous fat tissue and is typically asymptomatic. When palpated, it feels like a soft, mobile, fluctuating finding under the skin. The etiology is unclear. Obesity is not a risk factor.
On ultrasound, lipomas appear as hyperechoic or isoechoic circumscribed oval focal findings parallel to the skin and bordered by a thin capsule of connective tissue ([Fig. 23]).
#
Myofibroblastoma
Myofibroblastoma of the breast is a rare benign mesenchymal tumor. On imaging, myofibroblastomas tend to have benign characteristics, have smooth borders, be hypoechoic, and have an appearance similar to fibroadenomas ([Fig. 24]).
#
#
5.2.2 Malignant sonographic findings in men
Primary malignancy
Breast cancer
Breast cancer in men comprises less than 1 % of all cases of breast cancer.
80 % of carcinomas are ductal invasive carcinomas (NST). The second most common histology (approx. 5 %) is the papillary carcinoma, which presents as complex cystic-solid focal findings [20].
In the case of breast cancer in men, genetic testing is recommended since mutation of the BRCA 1/2 genes was able to be detected in 11 % of cases without a positive family history [21]. A positive breast cancer history of a first degree relative, hyperestrogenism, Klinefelter syndrome, advanced age, and irradiation of the chest wall in the past are considered further risk factors.
Typical clinical changes include a painless palpation finding, nipple inversion, possible secretion, skin thickening, and abnormal axillary lymph nodes.
The sonographic appearance and evaluation criteria are identical to those of breast cancer in women. The diagnostic workup and treatment largely correspond to that of breast cancer in women with a few exceptions ([Fig. 25], [26]).
#
#
Secondary malignancies
Metastases
Apart from primary breast cancers, only 0.5–3 % of metastases are in the breast regardless of sex, with 5 % of cases occurring in men. The most common primary malignancies that cause metastases in the breast are melanoma followed by non-Hodgkin lymphoma, pulmonary cancer, sarcoma, and gastric, renal, and prostate cancers.
Since lymph node metastases on levels I–III can occur after various primary tumors, no direct conclusion about the primary tumor can be made. Therefore, histological confirmation is necessary ([Fig. 27]).
#
#
#
#
5.3 Conclusion and DEGUM recommendations
-
The examination techniques and the DEGUM malignancy criteria, parenchyma categories, and finding categories are to be applied uniformly for ultrasound in both men and women. These are described in the DEGUM Best Practice Guidelines for Breast Ultrasound Part I.
-
Gynecomastia is the most common change in the male breast. A differentiation is made between nodular, dendritic, and diffuse types.
-
Pseudogynecomastia (lipomastia) typically occurs in overweight patients and should be differentiated from true gynecomastia.
-
The same methods and treatment regimens used for women are available for the diagnostic workup and treatment of breast cancer in men. A delayed diagnosis and the consequently worse prognosis should be avoided.
-
Genetic counselling should be offered to all men with breast cancer even in the case of a negative family history [S3 guidelines].
#
#
#
-
References
- 1 Wojcinski S, Cassel M, Farrokh A. et al. Variations in the Elasticity of Breast Tissue During the Menstrual Cycle Determined by Real-time Sonography. J. Ultrasound Med 2012; 31 (01) 63-72
- 2 Russo I, Medado J, Russo J. Endocrine influences on the mammary gland. In: Jones TC, Mohr U, Hunt RD. (eds) Integumenz and Mammary Glands. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 1989: 252-266
- 3 Stavros AT. Breast Anatomy: The Basis for Understanding Sonography. In Breast Ultrasound. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004: 56-108
- 4 Ahn BY, Kim HH, Moon WK. et al. Pregnancy- and lactation-associated breast cancer: Mammographic and sonographic findings. J. Ultrasound Med 2003; 22 (05) 491-497
- 5 Petrek JA. Breast Cancer during Pregnancy. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1994; 74 (Suppl. 01) 518-527
- 6 Smith LH, Danielsen B, Allen ME. et al. Cancer associated with obstetric delivery: results of linkage with the California cancer registry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189 (04) 1128-1135
- 7 Van Calsteren K, Amant F. Cancer during pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2014; 93 (05) 443-446
- 8 Woo JC, Yu T, Hurd TC. Breast cancer in pregnancy:a literature review. Arch Surg 2003; 138 (01) 91-98
- 9 Nettleton J, Long J, Kuban D. et al. Breast cancer during pregnancy: quantifying the risk of treatment delay. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87 (03) 414-418
- 10 Samuels TH, Liu FF, Yaffe M. et al. Gestational breast cancer. Can Assoc Radiol J 1998; 49 (03) 172-180
- 11 Wojcinski S, Stefanidou N, Hillemanns P. et al. The biology of malignant breast tumors has an impact on the presentation in ultrasound: an analysis of 315 cases. BMC Womens Health 2013; 13: 47
- 12 Wojcinski S, Soliman AA, Schmidt J. et al. Sonographic features of triple-negative and non-triple-negative breast cancer. J. Ultrasound Med 2012; 31 (10) 1531-1541
- 13 Pharmakovigilanz- und Beratungszentrum für Embryonaltoxikologie. Embryotox – Arzneimittelsicherheit in Schwangerschaft und Stillzeit. 2023 https://www.embryotox.de/
- 14 Rote Liste Service GmbH. Fachinfo-Service. 2003 https://www.fachinfo.de/
- 15 Lattin GE Jr, Jesinger RA, Mattu R. et al. From the radiologic pathology archives: diseases of the male breast: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 2013; 33 (02) 461-489
- 16 https://www.krebsdaten.de/Krebs/DE/Content/Publikationen/Krebs_in_Deutschland/kid_2023/kid_2023_c50_brust.pdf?__blob=publicationFile
- 17 Niell BL, Lourenco AP, Moy L. Expert Panel on Breast Imaging. et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria Evaluation of the Symptomatic Male Breast. J Am Coll Radiol 2018; 15 (Suppl. 11) S313-S320
- 18 Kuhne HP, Egler S, Lenz S. et al. Gynecomastia in German Soldiers: etiology and pathology. GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW 2012; 1: Doc03
- 19 Gochhait D, Dehuri P, Umamahesweran S. et al. Breast Abscess Mimicking Breast Carcinoma in Male. J Midlife Health 2018; 9 (01) 39-40
- 20 Giordano SH. A review of the diagnosis and management of male breast cancer. Oncologist 2005; 10 (07) 471-479
- 21 Rolfes M, Borde J, Möllenhoff K. et al. Prevalence of Cancer Predisposition Germline Variants in Male Breast Cancer Patients: Results of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14 (13) 3292
- 22 Berg WA, Bandos AI, Mendelson EB. et al. Ultrasound as the Primary Screening Test for Breast Cancer: Analysis From ACRIN 6666. J Natl Cancer Inst 2015; 108 (04) djv367
- 23 Ohuchi N, Suzuki A, Sobue T. et al. Sensitivity and specificity of mammography and adjunctive ultrasonography to screen for breast cancer in the Japan Strategic Anti-cancer Randomized Trial (J-START): a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2016; 387: 341-348
Correspondence
Publication History
Received: 13 March 2024
Accepted after revision: 05 October 2024
Article published online:
14 January 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Wojcinski S, Cassel M, Farrokh A. et al. Variations in the Elasticity of Breast Tissue During the Menstrual Cycle Determined by Real-time Sonography. J. Ultrasound Med 2012; 31 (01) 63-72
- 2 Russo I, Medado J, Russo J. Endocrine influences on the mammary gland. In: Jones TC, Mohr U, Hunt RD. (eds) Integumenz and Mammary Glands. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 1989: 252-266
- 3 Stavros AT. Breast Anatomy: The Basis for Understanding Sonography. In Breast Ultrasound. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004: 56-108
- 4 Ahn BY, Kim HH, Moon WK. et al. Pregnancy- and lactation-associated breast cancer: Mammographic and sonographic findings. J. Ultrasound Med 2003; 22 (05) 491-497
- 5 Petrek JA. Breast Cancer during Pregnancy. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1994; 74 (Suppl. 01) 518-527
- 6 Smith LH, Danielsen B, Allen ME. et al. Cancer associated with obstetric delivery: results of linkage with the California cancer registry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189 (04) 1128-1135
- 7 Van Calsteren K, Amant F. Cancer during pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2014; 93 (05) 443-446
- 8 Woo JC, Yu T, Hurd TC. Breast cancer in pregnancy:a literature review. Arch Surg 2003; 138 (01) 91-98
- 9 Nettleton J, Long J, Kuban D. et al. Breast cancer during pregnancy: quantifying the risk of treatment delay. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87 (03) 414-418
- 10 Samuels TH, Liu FF, Yaffe M. et al. Gestational breast cancer. Can Assoc Radiol J 1998; 49 (03) 172-180
- 11 Wojcinski S, Stefanidou N, Hillemanns P. et al. The biology of malignant breast tumors has an impact on the presentation in ultrasound: an analysis of 315 cases. BMC Womens Health 2013; 13: 47
- 12 Wojcinski S, Soliman AA, Schmidt J. et al. Sonographic features of triple-negative and non-triple-negative breast cancer. J. Ultrasound Med 2012; 31 (10) 1531-1541
- 13 Pharmakovigilanz- und Beratungszentrum für Embryonaltoxikologie. Embryotox – Arzneimittelsicherheit in Schwangerschaft und Stillzeit. 2023 https://www.embryotox.de/
- 14 Rote Liste Service GmbH. Fachinfo-Service. 2003 https://www.fachinfo.de/
- 15 Lattin GE Jr, Jesinger RA, Mattu R. et al. From the radiologic pathology archives: diseases of the male breast: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 2013; 33 (02) 461-489
- 16 https://www.krebsdaten.de/Krebs/DE/Content/Publikationen/Krebs_in_Deutschland/kid_2023/kid_2023_c50_brust.pdf?__blob=publicationFile
- 17 Niell BL, Lourenco AP, Moy L. Expert Panel on Breast Imaging. et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria Evaluation of the Symptomatic Male Breast. J Am Coll Radiol 2018; 15 (Suppl. 11) S313-S320
- 18 Kuhne HP, Egler S, Lenz S. et al. Gynecomastia in German Soldiers: etiology and pathology. GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW 2012; 1: Doc03
- 19 Gochhait D, Dehuri P, Umamahesweran S. et al. Breast Abscess Mimicking Breast Carcinoma in Male. J Midlife Health 2018; 9 (01) 39-40
- 20 Giordano SH. A review of the diagnosis and management of male breast cancer. Oncologist 2005; 10 (07) 471-479
- 21 Rolfes M, Borde J, Möllenhoff K. et al. Prevalence of Cancer Predisposition Germline Variants in Male Breast Cancer Patients: Results of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14 (13) 3292
- 22 Berg WA, Bandos AI, Mendelson EB. et al. Ultrasound as the Primary Screening Test for Breast Cancer: Analysis From ACRIN 6666. J Natl Cancer Inst 2015; 108 (04) djv367
- 23 Ohuchi N, Suzuki A, Sobue T. et al. Sensitivity and specificity of mammography and adjunctive ultrasonography to screen for breast cancer in the Japan Strategic Anti-cancer Randomized Trial (J-START): a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2016; 387: 341-348