Eur J Pediatr Surg
DOI: 10.1055/a-2490-1156
Original Article

Utility of Urine Dipstick Testing in Pediatric Appendicitis: Assessing its Role in Identifying Complicated Cases and Retrocecal Appendicitis

Clara Månsson Biehl
1   Department of Clinical Sciences, Pediatrics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
,
Matilda Elliver
1   Department of Clinical Sciences, Pediatrics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
,
1   Department of Clinical Sciences, Pediatrics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
2   Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Skåne, Sweden
,
Martin Salö
1   Department of Clinical Sciences, Pediatrics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
3   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Skåne, Sweden
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Background Diagnosing appendicitis in children remains a challenge, and the role of urine dipstick is controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the association between abnormal urine dipstick results and appendicitis, particularly appendicitis severity and appendix position.

Methods A prospective cohort study was conducted from 2017 to 2021 at a tertiary hospital in Sweden. Children aged ≤ 15 years with suspected appendicitis were included. Logistic regression was used to assess associations between abnormal urine dipstick results and sex, age, peritonitis, body temperature, C-reactive protein, complicated appendicitis, and appendix position.

Results A total of 311 children with suspected appendicitis were included, with 193 (62%) diagnosed with appendicitis. Among these, 80 (41%) had complicated appendicitis. There was no difference in appendicitis rate between children with positive and normal urine dipstick results. Among children with appendicitis, 119 (62%) had positive urine dipstick results: 49% ketones, 29% erythrocytes, 23% protein, 19% leukocytes, and 2% nitrite. Multivariable analysis revealed that female sex (adjusted odds ratio: 2.41 [95% confidence interval, CI: 1.21–4.80], p = 0.013), retrocecal appendicitis (aOR: 2.39 [95% CI: 1.18–4.84], p = 0.015), and complicated appendicitis (aOR: 2.27 [1.01–5.13], p = 0.015) were significantly associated with abnormal urine dipstick results. Sensitivity and specificity of positive urine dipstick for complicated appendicitis was 56% (95% CI: 45–67%) and 64% (95% CI: 54–73%), respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.62 (95% CI: 0.54–0.70). Limitations in this study include potential unmeasured confounders such as hydration status and urinary tract infections.

Conclusion Abnormal urine dipstick results are common in children with appendicitis. Urine dipstick might help identify cases of complicated and retrocecal appendicitis.

Data Availability Statement

Data supporting the conclusions of this study will be made available by the corresponding author on reasonable request but may not be used by another part for research purposes.


Author Contributions

C.M.B. collected data, performed the statistical analyses, and drafted the manuscript. J.G. recruited patients and revised the statistical analyses and the manuscript. M.E. helped with the data collection and revised the statistical analyses and the manuscript. M.S. designed the study, supervised the statistical analysis and drafting of the manuscript, and revised the final manuscript.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 06 July 2024

Accepted: 24 November 2024

Article published online:
19 December 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 1990; 132 (05) 910-925
  • 2 Benabbas R, Hanna M, Shah J, Sinert R. Diagnostic accuracy of history, physical examination, laboratory tests, and point-of-care ultrasound for pediatric acute appendicitis in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Emerg Med 2017; 24 (05) 523-551
  • 3 Bundy DG, Byerley JS, Liles EA, Perrin EM, Katznelson J, Rice HE. Does this child have appendicitis?. JAMA 2007; 298 (04) 438-451
  • 4 Maita S, Andersson B, Svensson JF, Wester T. Nonoperative treatment for nonperforated appendicitis in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Surg Int 2020; 36 (03) 261-269
  • 5 Rawolle T, Reismann M, Minderjahn MI. et al. Sonographic differentiation of complicated from uncomplicated appendicitis. Br J Radiol 2019; 92 (1099) 20190102
  • 6 Fraser JD, Aguayo P, Sharp SW. et al. Accuracy of computed tomography in predicting appendiceal perforation. J Pediatr Surg 2010; 45 (01) 231-234 , discussion 234–4
  • 7 Whiting P, Westwood M, Watt I, Cooper J, Kleijnen J. Rapid tests and urine sampling techniques for the diagnosis of urinary tract infection (UTI) in children under five years: a systematic review. BMC Pediatr 2005; 5 (01) 4
  • 8 Shaikh N, Morone NE, Lopez J. et al. Does this child have a urinary tract infection?. JAMA 2007; 298 (24) 2895-2904
  • 9 Jones WG, Barie PS. Urological manifestations of acute appendicitis. J Urol 1988; 139 (06) 1325-1328
  • 10 Puskar D, Bedalov G, Fridrih S, Vucković I, Banek T, Pasini J. Urinalysis, ultrasound analysis, and renal dynamic scintigraphy in acute appendicitis. Urology 1995; 45 (01) 108-112
  • 11 Chen CY, Zhao LL, Lin YR, Wu KH, Wu HP. Different urinalysis appearances in children with simple and perforated appendicitis. Am J Emerg Med 2013; 31 (11) 1560-1563
  • 12 Avci MA, Akgün C, Uyanik MS. The relationship between abnormal urinalysis findings and appendicitis location. Int J Colorectal Dis 2023; 38 (01) 232
  • 13 Carr NJ. The pathology of acute appendicitis. Ann Diagn Pathol 2000; 4 (01) 46-58
  • 14 Cameron DB, Anandalwar SP, Graham DA. et al. Development and implications of an evidence-based and public health-relevant definition of complicated appendicitis in children. Ann Surg 2020; 271 (05) 962-968
  • 15 St Peter SD, Sharp SW, Holcomb III GW, Ostlie DJ. An evidence-based definition for perforated appendicitis derived from a prospective randomized trial. J Pediatr Surg 2008; 43 (12) 2242-2245
  • 16 Yamamoto M, Ando T, Kanai S, Natsume H, Miyake K, Mitsuya H. Abnormal urinalysis in acute appendicitis. Hinyokika Kiyo 1985; 31 (10) 1723-1725
  • 17 Teo S, Cheek JA, Craig S. Improving clean-catch contamination rates: a prospective interventional cohort study. Emerg Med Australas 2016; 28 (06) 698-703
  • 18 Pham XD, Sullins VF, Kim DY. et al. Factors predictive of complicated appendicitis in children. J Surg Res 2016; 206 (01) 62-66
  • 19 Wilson LM, Tam C, Wai Lai VK. et al. Practice variation in urine collection methods among pre-toilet trained children with suspected urinary tract infection: a systematic review. BMC Pediatr 2024; 24 (01) 294
  • 20 Elgendy A, Khirallah MG, Elsawaf M, Hassan HS, Ghazaly M. Acute appendicitis in children: is preoperative hyponatremia a predictive factor of perforation/gangrene? A prospective study. Pediatr Surg Int 2023; 39 (01) 281
  • 21 Stringer MD. Acute appendicitis. J Paediatr Child Health 2017; 53 (11) 1071-1076
  • 22 Arredondo Montero J, Bronte Anaut M, Bardají Pascual C, Antona G, López-Andrés N, Martín-Calvo N. Alterations and diagnostic performance of capillary ketonemia in pediatric acute appendicitis: a pilot study. Pediatr Surg Int 2022; 39 (01) 44