Utilizing Perforator Propeller Flaps for Donor Site Closure: Harvesting Large Workhorse Flaps without Lingering Concerns

Abstract

Background Primary closure of donor sites following large flap harvest may not be feasible. The use of perforator propeller flap (PPF) in this setting is gaining popularity, successfully resurfacing the wound and lessening potential donor-site morbidity. In this study, we aimed to review our experience and outcomes using PPFs in donor-site coverage throughout the body.

Methods A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients who underwent one or more PPFs surgery for donor site resurfacing between February 2009 and December 2021. Flap and defect characteristics were summarized. Postoperative complications and perioperative factors were analyzed.

Results Fifty-five patients underwent donor-site reconstruction using 68 PPFs. Of the 55 primary donor sites, 44 were covered with a single PPF, 9 with two PPFs, and 2 with three PPFs. One flap experienced complete necrosis and four flaps experienced distal flap necrosis, leading to an overall complication rate of 9.1%. No risk factors were found to be statistically significantly associated with the complication. All secondary PPF donor sites were closed primarily. During the average follow-up period of 15.1 months, none of the patients developed contour deformities or functional impairments.

Conclusion The PPF technique can be safely and effectively used for donor-site closure with minimal complications. It greatly frees surgeons to harvest a large workhorse flap for demanding soft tissue defect reconstruction.

Keywords

donor-site closure - perforator propeller flap - large-sized defect

^* Both T.H. and N.K. contributed equally as co-first author.

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 28. Juni 2024

Angenommen: 23. November 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
28. November 2024

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
20. Dezember 2024

• References

• 1 Feng KM, Sudirman SR, Shih HS, Jeng SF. Experience on primary closure of fibular flap donor sites and development of an algorithm for closure based on different flap designs. Microsurgery 2020; 40 (07) 741-749
• 2 Pachón Suárez JE, Sadigh PL, Shih HS, Hsieh CH, Jeng SF. Achieving direct closure of the anterolateral thigh flap donor site-an algorithmic approach. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2014; 2 (10) e232
• 3 Deng C, Li H, Wei Z. et al. Various surgical techniques to create an aesthetic appearance at the donor site of anterolateral thigh free flaps based on the oblique branch: Twenty-one clinical case reports. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97 (07) e9885
• 4 Zang M, Zhu S, Chen B, Li S, Han T, Liu Y. Use of serial flap transfer technique in en bloc reconstruction of extensive soft tissue defects in the head and neck. J Craniofac Surg 2022; 33 (03) 809-813
• 5 Zang M, Zhu S, Chen B, Li S, Han T, Liu Y. Perforator propeller flap “relay” for distal lower extremity soft tissue reconstruction. J Foot Ankle Surg 2020; 59 (05) 1128-1132
• 6 Iida T, Yoshimatsu H, Koshima I. Reconstruction of anterolateral thigh defects using perforator-based propeller flaps. Ann Plast Surg 2017; 79 (04) 385-389
• 7 Sharma M, Balasubramanian D, Thankappan K. et al. Propeller flaps in the closure of free fibula flap donor site skin defects. Ann Plast Surg 2013; 71 (01) 76-79
• 8 Song D, Pafitanis G, Reissis D. et al. A sequential thoracoacromial artery perforator flap for reconstructing the donor site of sternocleidomastoid myocutaneous flaps: Extended indications and technical modifications. Ann Plast Surg 2020; 84 (06) 657-664
• 9 Azizeddin A, Choong PFM, Grinsell D. Reconstructive options for large back free flap donor sites. ANZ J Surg 2018; 88 (10) 1066-1070
• 10 Kedar DJ, Pak CJ, Suh HP, Hong JP. Propeller flaps in the posterior trunk. Semin Plast Surg 2020; 34 (03) 176-183
• 11 Kim SW, Lee WM, Kim JT, Kim YH. Vulvar and vaginal reconstruction using the “angel wing” perforator-based island flap. Gynecol Oncol 2015; 137 (03) 380-385
• 12 Liu Y, Zang M, Song B. et al. The 'buddy flap' concept of soft-tissue-defect reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011; 64 (11) 1475-1482
• 13 Zhang YX, Messmer C, Pang FK. et al. A novel design of the multilobed latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap to achieve primary donor-site closure in the reconstruction of large defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131 (05) 752e-758e
• 14 Hallock GG. The propeller flap version of the adductor muscle perforator flap for coverage of ischial or trochanteric pressure sores. Ann Plast Surg 2006; 56 (05) 540-542
• 15 Hernekamp JF, Cordts T, Kremer T, Kneser U. Perforator-based flaps for defect reconstruction of the posterior trunk. Ann Plast Surg 2021; 86 (01) 72-77
• 16 Hudson CS, Huang AT. Perforator-based propeller flaps for reconstruction of massive anterolateral thigh donor site wounds. Head Neck 2020; 42 (12) E49-E52
• 17 Kimata Y, Uchiyama K, Ebihara S. et al. Anterolateral thigh flap donor-site complications and morbidity. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106 (03) 584-589
• 18 Liu Y, Zang M, Wu L. et al. Improving the versatility of the latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap using the perforator propeller flap concept. Ann Plast Surg 2020; 84 (06) 689-696
• 19 Scaglioni MF, Franchi A, Fritsche E. Propeller flap donor site closure by means of another propeller flap: a case report and literature review. Microsurgery 2020; 40 (02) 252-257
• 20 Zhang YX, Hayakawa TJ, Levin LS, Hallock GG, Lazzeri D. The economy in autologous tissue transfer: part 1. The kiss flap technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (03) 1018-1030
• 21 Teo TC. The propeller flap concept. Clin Plast Surg 2010; 37 (04) 615-626 , vi
• 22 Lee KT, Kim A, Mun GH. Comprehensive analysis of donor-site morbidity following free thoracodorsal artery perforator flap harvest. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138 (04) 899-909
• 23 Zhao Y, Qiao Q, Liu Z. et al. Alternative method to improve the repair of the donor site of the anterolateral thigh flap. Ann Plast Surg 2002; 49 (06) 593-598
• 24 Zhang Y, Wang T, Liu Y, Dong J, Yang J, Xu H. Comparison of negative pressure dressing and conventional dressing in the management of skin grafts at the donor site of the latissimus dorsi flap. Wounds 2023; 35 (01) E69-E73
• 25 Pagliara D, Mangialardi ML, Vitagliano S, Pino V, Salgarello M. Improving outcomes in anterolateral thigh flap donor-site reconstruction using propeller flaps: a retrospective comparative study with skin grafting. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37 (05) 436-444
• 26 Silver AG, Baynosa RC. Utilization of a continuous external tissue expansion system to assist in primary closure of a large anterolateral thigh donor site defect. Case Rep Surg 2014; 2014: 860749
• 27 Wang X, Zhang Y, Ng SK. et al. Using modified skin-stretching technique as an alternative solution for the closure of moderate and extensive skin defects. Rejuvenation Res 2021; 24 (06) 407-416
• 28 Jiao X, Cui C, Ng SK. et al. The modified bilobed flap for reconstructing sacral decubitus ulcers. Burns Trauma 2020; 8: tkaa012
• 29 Scaglioni MF, Barth AA, Chen YC. Perforator flap based on the third perforator of the profunda femoris artery (PFA)-assisted closure of the free vertical posteromedial thigh (vPMT) flap donor site. Microsurgery 2018; 38 (07) 758-762
• 30 Shea P, O'Hara NN, Sprague SA. et al; Fluid Lavage in Open Wounds Investigators. Wound surface area as a risk factor for flap complications among patients with open fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 142 (01) 228-236
• 31 Bigdeli AK, Didzun O, Thomas B. et al. Combined versus single perforator propeller flaps for reconstruction of large soft tissue defects: a retrospective clinical study. J Pers Med 2022; 12 (01) 41
• 32 Pabst AM, Werkmeister R, Steegmann J, Hölzle F, Bartella A. Is there an ideal way to close the donor site of radial forearm free flaps?. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018; 56 (06) 444-452
• 33 Zheng Y, Hallock GG, Levin LS, Zhang Y, Min P. Mini-shaped kiss flap design for palmar and digital soft-tissue resurfacing. Plast Reconstr Surg 2024; 153 (02) 411-421
• 34 Wang Y, Jin S, Zang M. et al. Extensive defect reconstruction using multiple perforator propeller flaps in a jigsaw puzzle approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 2024; 154 (06) 1233e-1243e
• 35 He J, Qing L, Wu P, Zhou Z, Yu F, Tang J. Large wounds reconstruction of the lower extremity with combined latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap and flow-through anterolateral thigh perforator flap transfer. Microsurgery 2021; 41 (06) 533-542
• 36 Taylor GI. The angiosomes of the body and their supply to perforator flaps. Clin Plast Surg 2003; 30 (03) 331-342 , v
• 37 Elzawawy EM, Kelada MN. Posterior intercostal flap: an anatomical study and best flap design. World J Surg Oncol 2022; 20 (01) 244
• 38 Schmidt M, Moritz T, Shamiyeh A. et al. Posterior intercostal artery perforator flap for posterior trunk reconstruction: perforator mapping with high-resolution ultrasound and clinical application. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2019; 72 (05) 737-743
• 39 Ono S, Ohi H, Ogawa R. Imaging in propeller flap surgery. Semin Plast Surg 2020; 34 (03) 145-151
• 40 Song S, Jeong HH, Lee Y. et al. Direction of flap rotation in propeller flaps: does it really matter?. J Reconstr Microsurg 2019; 35 (08) 549-556
• 41 Hong JP, Hur J, Kim HB, Park CJ, Suh HP. The use of color duplex ultrasound for local perforator flaps in the extremity. J Reconstr Microsurg 2022; 38 (03) 233-237
• 42 Lee SH, Lee KT. High-frequency ultrasound-assisted perforator mapping enhances efficiency in microsurgical reconstruction using thin ALT and SCIP flaps. Microsurgery 2024; 44 (04) e31171
• 43 Han T, Khavanin N, Zhu S. et al. A comparison of handheld Doppler and indocyanine green angiography for perforator localization. Ann Plast Surg 2022; 89 (01) 89-94
• 44 Sisti A, D'Aniello C, Fortezza L. et al. Propeller flaps: a literature review. In Vivo 2016; 30 (04) 351-373