J Reconstr Microsurg
DOI: 10.1055/a-2491-3564
Original Article

Sociodemographic Status Impacts Ambulatory Outcomes in Lower Extremity Flap Reconstruction

1   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
2   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
,
Artur Manasyan
1   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
2   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
,
Idean Roohani
1   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
2   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
,
Erin Wolfe
1   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
,
David A. Daar
1   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
,
Joseph N. Carey
1   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Background There is a lack of literature regarding the effects of language barriers, socioeconomic status, racial disparities, and travel distance to the hospital on the outcomes of lower extremity (LE) flap reconstruction. Consequently, this study assesses the potential influence of these factors on ambulation within this specific patient demographic.

Methods A retrospective review was performed between 2007 and 2022 of patients who underwent LE reconstruction with tissue flap placement at a single institution. The primary outcome was ambulation status, with cohorts compared between those who were ambulatory versus nonambulatory. Covariates included race, age, gender, primary language, distance from patient home to hospital, socioeconomic status (determined using area deprivation index [ADI]), and flap characteristics. Outcomes were assessed with multivariable logistic regression.

Results A total of 242 patients who underwent LE flap reconstruction during the study period. The average time to final ambulatory status was 7.0 months (standard deviation: 11.0), with 51.7% requiring either a wheelchair or assistance device and 48.4% being fully ambulatory at final follow-up. The average state ADI for the cohort was 5.8, with Hispanic patients having significantly higher deprivation indexes (6.3 vs. 5.6, p < 0.001). Multiple logistic regression demonstrated that when controlling for numerous covariates, patients in the highest 15th percentile of deprivation were significantly less likely to be fully ambulatory at final follow-up (odds ratio: 0.22, 95% confidence interval: 0.061–0.806, p = 0.022).

Conclusion The current study emphasizes the substantial impact of socioeconomic disparities on postoperative outcomes in LE flap reconstruction. The finding that patients in the highest 15th percentile of deprivation were less likely to achieve full ambulation underscores the need to prioritize socioeconomic factors in clinical consideration and highlights a crucial avenue for future research.



Publication History

Received: 08 August 2024

Accepted: 23 November 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
28 November 2024

Article published online:
26 December 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Song CT, Koh K, Tan BK, Goh T. Free-flap lower extremity reconstruction: a cohort study and meta-analysis of flap anastomotic outcomes between perforator and nonperforator flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg 2018; 34 (06) 455-464
  • 2 Pu LLQ. Free flaps in lower extremity reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 2021; 48 (02) 201-214
  • 3 Hughes K, Olufajo OA, White K. et al. The influence of socioeconomic status on outcomes of lower extremity arterial reconstruction. J Vasc Surg 2022; 75 (01) 168-176
  • 4 Stankowski TJ, Schumacher JR, Hanlon BM. et al. Barriers to breast reconstruction for socioeconomically disadvantaged women. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2022; 195 (03) 413-419
  • 5 Card EB, Zimmerman CE, Kalmar CL. et al. Visual resources for postoperative care to overcome language and cultural barriers. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021; 148 (06) 1075e-1079e
  • 6 Kozlov N, Benzon HT. Role of gender and race in patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction. Anesthesiol Clin 2020; 38 (02) 417-431
  • 7 Bibbo C. A novel limb salvage technique of external fixation protection of lower extremity plastic reconstructions with immediate postoperative ambulation (bibbo flap and frame technique). Clin Podiatr Med Surg 2021; 38 (01) 55-71
  • 8 Kind A. Neighborhood Atlas - home. Accessed January 9, 2024 at: https://www.neighborhoodatlas.medicine.wisc.edu/
  • 9 Kind AJH, Jencks S, Brock J. et al. Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and 30-day rehospitalization: a retrospective cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2014; 161 (11) 765-774
  • 10 Hagan MJ, Sastry RA, Feler J. et al. Neighborhood-level socioeconomic status, extended length of stay, and discharge disposition following elective lumbar spine surgery. N Am Spine Soc J 2022; 12: 100187
  • 11 Hagan MJ, Sastry RA, Feler J. et al. Neighborhood-level socioeconomic status predicts extended length of stay after elective anterior cervical spine surgery. World Neurosurg 2022; 163: e341-e348
  • 12 Rios-Diaz AJ, Habarth-Morales T, Isch EL. et al. Unplanned 180-day readmissions and healthcare utilization after immediate breast reconstruction for breast cancer. J Reconstr Microsurg 2024;
  • 13 Chiang SN, Finnan MJ, Varagur K, Skolnick GB, Sacks JM, Christensen JM. The association between breast cancer related lymphedema and area deprivation index. J Reconstr Microsurg 2023; 39 (06) 444-452
  • 14 Moshal T, Roohani I, Stanton EW. et al. Does side matter? The impact of free flap harvest laterality on ambulatory function in lower extremity traumatic reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2024;
  • 15 Joo H, Fernández A, Wick EC, Moreno Lepe G, Manuel SP. Association of language barriers with perioperative and surgical outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6 (07) e2322743
  • 16 Stolarski AE, Alonso A, Aly S. et al. The impact of English proficiency on outcomes after bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc 2022; 36 (10) 7385-7391
  • 17 Medhekar AN, Mix DS, Aquina CT. et al. Outcomes for critical limb ischemia are driven by lower extremity revascularization volume, not distance to hospital. J Vasc Surg 2017; 66 (02) 476-487.e1
  • 18 Natale-Pereira A, Enard KR, Nevarez L, Jones LA. The role of patient navigators in eliminating health disparities. Cancer 2011; 117 (15, Suppl): 3543-3552
  • 19 Tho PC, Ang E. The effectiveness of patient navigation programs for adult cancer patients undergoing treatment: a systematic review. JBI Database Syst Rev Implement Reports 2016; 14 (02) 295-321
  • 20 Brodersen F, Wagner J, Uzunoglu FG, Petersen-Ewert C. Impact of preoperative patient education on postoperative recovery in abdominal surgery: a systematic review. World J Surg 2023; 47 (04) 937-947
  • 21 Darville-Beneby R, Lomanowska AM, Yu HC. et al. The impact of preoperative patient education on postoperative pain, opioid use, and psychological outcomes: a narrative review. Can J Pain 2023; 7 (02) 2266751
  • 22 Castillo RC, MacKenzie EJ, Archer KR, Bosse MJ, Webb LX. LEAP Study Group. Evidence of beneficial effect of physical therapy after lower-extremity trauma. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89 (10) 1873-1879
  • 23 Kim KG, Tirrell AR, Dekker PK. et al. The need to improve patient-centered outcome reporting following lower extremity flap reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37 (09) 764-773