Unilateral Ectasia 5 Years after KLEx in the Absence of Recognized Risk Factors: A Clinical Case Report

Introduction

Keratorefractive lenticule extraction (KLEx) is the preferred refractive surgical method for the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism, with its frequency of application steadily increasing [1]. Compared to laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), KLEx offers several advantages, including the absence of flap-related complications, reduced damage to the subbasal nerve plexus, and a lower incidence of dry eye [2]. Furthermore, the risk of ectasia, one of the most serious complications associated with corneal refractive surgery, is considered lower with KLEx [2]. The reduced risk of ectasia associated with KLEx is theoretically attributed to the preservation of the collagen network in the anterior stroma, the smaller vertical incision required compared to LASIK, and the higher proportion of residual uncut stromal tissue [2], [3]. Conversely, clinical studies indicate that the changes in biomechanical parameters following LASIK and KLEx are comparable [4], [5]. Currently, no in vivo clinical evidence supports the theoretical superiority of KLEx in reducing the risk of ectasia relative to LASIK. To date, literature reports indicate that ectasia developed in 24 eyes of 13 patients following KLEx, with 12 of these eyes lacking any preoperative risk factors [1], [6], [7]. In this case report, we describe a patient with preoperative normal corneal topography who developed unilateral ectasia following KLEx. Our objective was to highlight the necessity for comprehensive studies that investigate the impact of KLEx on corneal biomechanics in a more detailed manner.

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 03. November 2024

Angenommen: 15. Januar 2025

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
27. März 2025

• References

• 1 Moshirfar M, Tukan AN, Bundogji N. et al. Ectasia after corneal refractive surgery: a systematic review. Ophthalmol Ther 2021; 10: 753-776
• 2 Moshirfar M, McCaughey MV, Reinstein DZ. et al. Small-incision lenticule extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg 2015; 41: 652-665
• 3 Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) history, fundamentals of a new refractive surgery technique and clinical outcomes. Eye Vis (Lond) 2014; 1: 3
• 4 Kanellopoulos AJ. Comparison of corneal biomechanics after myopic small-incision lenticule extraction compared to LASIK: an ex vivo study. Clin Ophthalmol 2018; 12: 237-245
• 5 Sefat SMM, Wiltfang R, Bechmann M. et al. Evaluation of changes in human corneas after femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) using non-contact tonometry and ultra-high-speed camera (Corvis ST). Curr Eye Res 2016; 41: 917-922
• 6 Hernández-Chavarría C, Benedetti M, De Oteyza GG. et al. Bilateral Corneal Ectasia 3 Years After Small Incision Lenticule Extraction in a Borderline Case. Cornea 2022; 41: 359-362
• 7 Morales Flores N, Pérez-Solórzano S, Kahuam-López N. et al. Ectasia After SMILE Lacking Perceivable Risk Factors. J Refract Surg Case Rep 2022; 2: e63-e67
• 8 Sachdev G, Sachdev MS, Sachdev R. et al. Unilateral corneal ectasia following small-incision lenticule extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg 2015; 41: 2014-2018
• 9 Pazo EE, McNeely RN, Arba-Mosquera S. et al. Unilateral ectasia after small-incision lenticule extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg 2019; 45: 236-241
• 10 Sinha Roy A, Dupps jr. WJ, Roberts CJ. Comparison of biomechanical effects of small-incision lenticule extraction and laser in situ keratomileusis: finite-element analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2014; 40: 971-980
• 11 Agca A, Ozgurhan EB, Demirok A. et al. Comparison of corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK: a prospective fellow eye study. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2014; 37: 77-80
• 12 Randleman JB, Woodward M, Lynn MJ. et al. Risk assessment for ectasia after corneal refractive surgery. Ophthalmology 2008; 115: 37-50
• 13 Santhiago MR, Smadja D, Gomes BF. et al. Association between the percent tissue altered and post–laser in situ keratomileusis ectasia in eyes with normal preoperative topography. Am J Ophthalmol 2014; 158: 87-95
• 14 Ong HS, Farook M, Tan BBC. et al. Corneal ectasia risk and percentage tissue altered in myopic patients presenting for refractive surgery. Clin Ophthalmol 2019; 13: 2003-2015
• 15 Moshirfar M, Albarracin JC, Desautels JD. et al. Ectasia following small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): a review of the literature. Clin Ophthalmol 2017; 11: 1683-1688