Endoscopy
DOI: 10.1055/a-2546-4853
Innovations and brief communications

Partial ampullary endoscopic mucosal resection in patients with difficult biliary cannulation: a prospective cohort study

1   Department of Gastroenterology, Internal Medicine, Duzce University, Duzce, Turkey
,
Mehmet Fuat Cetin
2   General Surgery, Duzce University, Duzce, Turkey
,
Abdullatif Sirin
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Internal Medicine, Duzce University, Duzce, Turkey
,
Sevki Konur
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Internal Medicine, Duzce University, Duzce, Turkey
,
Serkan Torun
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Internal Medicine, Duzce University, Duzce, Turkey
› Author Affiliations


Abstract

Background

The rescue techniques available for cannulation failure are few in number and have severe limitations. We recently described partial ampullary endoscopic mucosal resection (PA-EMR) as a novel technique for difficult biliary cannulation. We aimed to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of PA-EMR for patients with difficult biliary cannulation in a larger cohort.

Methods

We conducted a prospective cohort study at our tertiary care referral hospital. We recorded demographic factors, procedure-related characteristics, and adverse event rates in patients with difficult biliary cannulation who underwent PA-EMR.

Results

Between June 2021 and June 2022, we performed 1073 consecutive endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures on 962 patients; 40 patients (12 male, 28 female, with a mean age of 68.1 [SD 4] years) had difficult biliary cannulation and underwent PA-EMR. Technical success was 100%, and none of the patients required a second session. None of the patients had an adverse event, and we encountered no 30-day mortality. The most typical indication was bile duct stones (60%; n = 24), followed by periampullary tumors (15%; n = 6). The total procedure time was 923 (range 392–1224) seconds.

Conclusion

PA-EMR was an effective and safe rescue technique in patients with difficult biliary cannulation.



Publication History

Received: 18 October 2024

Accepted after revision: 25 February 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
25 February 2025

Article published online:
11 April 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Maruta S, Sugiyama H, Ogasawara S. et al. “Salvage techniques” are the key to overcoming difficult biliary cannulation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Sci Rep 2022; 12: 13627
  • 2 Fung BM, Pitea TC, Tabibian JH. Difficult biliary cannulation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: an overview of advanced techniques. Eur Med J Hepatol 2021; 2022; 9: 73-82
  • 3 Guzmán-Calderón E, Martinez-Moreno B, Casellas JA. et al. Transpancreatic precut papillotomy versus double-guidewire technique in difficult biliary cannulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2021; 9: E1758-E1767
  • 4 Tokmak S, Cetin MF, Torun S. Feasibility and safety of partial ampullary endoscopic mucosal resection: a novel technique for difficult biliary cannulation (with video). Surg Endosc 2023; 37: 471-478
  • 5 Testoni PA, Mariani A, Aabakken L. et al. Papillary cannulation and sphincterotomy techniques at ERCP: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 657-683
  • 6 Tokmak S, Cetin MF, Torun S. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the very elderly by using a combination of intravenous midazolam, ketamine, and pethidine. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2021; 21: 887-892
  • 7 Haraldsson E, Lundell L, Swahn F. et al. Endoscopic classification of the papilla of Vater. Results of an inter- and intraobserver agreement study. United European Gastroenterol J 2017; 5: 504-510
  • 8 Yue P, Zhu KX, Wang HP. et al. Clinical significance of different periampullary diverticulum classifications for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography cannulation. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26: 2403-2415
  • 9 Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L. et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 446-454
  • 10 Mukai S, Itoi T, Baron TH. et al. Indications and techniques of biliary drainage for acute cholangitis in updated Tokyo Guidelines 2018. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2017; 24: 537-549
  • 11 Pécsi D, Farkas N, Hegyi P. et al. Transpancreatic sphincterotomy is effective and safe in expert hands on the short term. Dig Dis Sci 2019; 64: 2429-2444
  • 12 Wen J, Li T, Lu Y. et al. Comparison of efficacy and safety of transpancreatic septotomy, needle-knife fistulotomy or both based on biliary cannulation unintentional pancreatic access and papillary morphology. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2019; 18: 73-78
  • 13 Sriram PV, Rao GV, Nageshwar RD. The precut – when, where and how? A review. Endoscopy 2003; 35: S24-S30
  • 14 Choudhary A, Winn J, Siddique S. et al. Effect of precut sphincterotomy on post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20: 4093-4101
  • 15 Itoi T, Ryozawa S, Katanuma A. et al. Clinical practice guidelines for endoscopic papillectomy. Dig Endosc 2022; 34: 394-411
  • 16 Johnson G, Webster G, Boškoski I. et al. Curriculum for ERCP and endoscopic ultrasound training in Europe: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement. Endoscopy 2021; 53: 1071-1087
  • 17 Fernandes J, Canena J, Alexandrino G. et al. Outcomes of single-endoscopist-performed needle-knife fistulotomy for selective biliary access in 842 consecutive patients: learning curve and changes over a 14-year period in a retrospective study. Scand J Gastroenterol 2021; 56: 1363-1370
  • 18 Sadeghi A, Arabpour E, Movassagh-Koolankuh S. et al. Primary needle-knife fistulotomy versus standard transpapillary technique for cannulation of long-size papilla: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2024; 15: e00788
  • 19 Maharshi S, Sharma SS. Early precut versus primary precut sphincterotomy to reduce post-ERCP pancreatitis: randomized controlled trial (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93: 586-593
  • 20 Ferlitsch M, Hassan C, Bisschops R. et al. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline – update 2024. Endoscopy 2024; 56: 516-545
  • 21 Alsakarneh S, Brotherton T, Jaber F. et al. Needle-knife fistulotomy versus needle-knife papillotomy in difficult biliary cannulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology Res 2024; 17: 101-108
  • 22 Han SY, Baek DH, Kim DU. et al. Primary needle-knife fistulotomy for preventing post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: importance of the endoscopist’s expertise level. World J Clin Cases 2021; 16: 4166-4177
  • 23 Jang SI, Kim DU, Cho JH. et al. Primary needle-knife fistulotomy versus conventional cannulation method in a high-risk cohort of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2020; 115: 616-624
  • 24 Jin YJ, Jeong S, Lee DH. Utility of needle-knife fistulotomy as an initial method of biliary cannulation to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis in a highly selected at-risk group: a single-arm prospective feasibility study. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 84: 808-813