A Disorder of Executive Function and Its Role in Language Processing

ABSTRACT

R. Martin and colleagues have proposed separate stores for the maintenance of phonological and semantic information in short-term memory. Evidence from patients with aphasia has shown that damage to these separable buffers has specific consequences for language comprehension and production, suggesting an interdependence between language and memory systems. This article discusses recent research on aphasic patients with limited-capacity short-term memories (STMs) and reviews evidence suggesting that deficits in retaining semantic information in STM may be caused by a disorder in the executive control process of inhibition, specific to verbal representations. In contrast, a phonological STM deficit may be due to overly rapid decay. In semantic STM deficits, it is hypothesized that the inhibitory deficit produces difficulty inhibiting irrelevant verbal representations, which may lead to excessive interference. In turn, the excessive interference associated with semantic STM deficits has implications for single-word and sentence processing, and it may be the source of the reduced STM capacity shown by these patients.

Semantic short-term memory - executive function - aphasia

REFERENCES

• 1 Saffran E M, Marin O SM. Immediate memory of word lists and sentences in a patient with deficient auditory short-term memory.  Brain Lang. 1975;  2 420-433
• 2 Martin N, Saffran E M. Language and auditory-verbal short-term memory impairments: evidence for common underlying processes.  Cogn Neuropsychol. 1997;  14 641-682
• 3 Martin R C, Lesch M F, Bartha M C. Independence of input and output phonology in word processing and short-term memory.  J Mem Lang. 1999;  40 3-29
• 4 Baddeley A. Working Memory. Oxford, United Kingdom; Clarendon Press 1986
• 5 Martin R C, He T. Semantic STM and its role in sentence processing: a replication.  Brain Lang. 2004;  89(1) 76-82
• 6 Vallar G, Papagno C. Neuropsychological impairments of short-term memory. In: Baddeley AD, Wilson B, Watts F Handbook of Memory Disorders. Chichester, United Kingdom; John Wiley 1995: 135-165
• 7 Martin R C, Romani C. Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension: a multiple-components view.  Neuropsychology. 1994;  8(4) 506-523
• 8 Martin R C, Shelton J R, Yaffee L S. Language processing and working memory: neuropsychological evidence for separate phonological and semantic capacities.  J Mem Lang. 1994;  33(1) 83-111
• 9 Romani C. Are there distinct input and output buffers? Evidence from aphasic patients with an impaired output buffer.  Lang Cognitive Proc. 1992;  7(2) 131-162
• 10 Freedman M L, Martin R C. Dissociable components of short-term memory and their relation to long-term learning.  Cogn Neuropsychol. 2001;  18 193-226
• 11 Hamilton A C, Martin R C. Dissociations among tasks involving inhibition: a single-case study.  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2005;  5 1-13
• 12 Martin R C, Lesch M F. Associations and dissociations between language impairment and list recall: implications for models of STM. In: Gathercole S Models of STM. Hove, United Kingdom; Erlbaum 1996: 149-178
• 13 Martin R C, Wu D, Freedman M, Jackson E F, Lesch M. An event-related fMRI investigation of phonological versus semantic STM.  Journal Neurolinguist. 2003;  16(4–5) 341-360
• 14 Martin R C, Freedman M L. Short-term retention of lexical-semantic representations: implications for speech production.  Memory. 2001;  9 261-280
• 15 Freedman M L, Martin R C, Biegler K. Semantic relatedness effects in conjoined noun phrase production: implications for the role of short-term memory.  Cogn Neuropsychol. 2004;  21 245-265
• 16 Martin R C, Miller M, Vu H. Lexical-semantic retention and speech production: Further evidence from normal and brain-damaged participants for a phrasal scope of planning.  Cogn Neuropsychol. 2004;  21 625-644
• 17 Miyake A, Friedman N P, Emerson M J, Witzki A H, Howerter A, Wager T D. The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “Frontal Lobe” tasks: a latent variable analysis.  Cognit Psychol. 2000;  41(1) 49-100
• 18 Baddeley A. The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory?.  Trends Cogn Sci. 2000;  4(11) 417-423
• 19 Collette F, Hogge M, Salmon E, Van der Linden M. Exploration of the neural substrates of executive functioning by functional neuroimaging.  Neuroscience. 2006;  139 209-221
• 20 Collette F, Salmon E, Van der Linden M et al.. Regional brain activity during tasks devoted to the central executive of working memory.  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 1999;  7 411-417
• 21 Badre D, Wagner A. Selection, integration, and conflict monitoring: assessing the nature and generality of prefrontal cognitive control mechanisms.  Neuron. 2004;  41 473-487
• 22 Martin R C, Cheng Y. Selection demands versus association strength in the verb generation task.  Psychon Bull Rev. 2006;  13 396-401
• 23 Thompson-Schill S L, D'Esposito M, Aguirre G K, Farah M J. Role of left inferior prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: a reevaluation.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;  94 14792-14797
• 24 Thompson-Schill S L, Swick D, Farah M J, D'Esposito M, Kan I P, Knight R T. Verb generation in patients with focal lesions: a neuropsychological test of neuroimaging findings.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;  95 15855-15860
• 25 Shivde G, Thompson-Schill S L. Dissociating semantic and phonological maintenance using fMRI.  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2004;  4(1) 10-19
• 26 Jonides J, Smith E E, Marshuetz C, Koeppe R A, Reuter-Lorenz P A. Inhibition in verbal working memory revealed by brain activation.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;  95(14) 8410-8413
• 27 Hasher L, Zacks R T, May C P. Inhibitory control, circadian arousal, and age. In: Gopher DE, Koriat K Attention and Performance XVII: Cognitive Regulation of Performance: Interaction of Theory and Application. Cambridge, MA; MIT Press 1999: 653-675
• 28 Jonides J, Marshuetz C, Smith E E, Reuter-Lorenz P A, Koeppe R A, Hartley A. Age differences in behavior and PET activation reveal differences in interference resolution in verbal working memory.  J Cogn Neurosci. 2000;  12(1) 188-196
• 29 Biegler K A, Crowther J E, Martin R C. Consequences of an inhibition deficit for word production and comprehension: evidence from the semantic blocking paradigm.  Cogn Neuropsychol. , In press
• 30 Schriefers H, Meyer A S, Levelt W JM. Exploring the time-course of lexical access in production: picture-word interference studies.  J Mem Lang. 1990;  29 86-102
• 31 Damian M F, Martin R C. Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production.  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1999;  25 345-361
• 32 Belke E, Meyer A S, Damian M F. Refractory effects in picture naming as assessed in a semantic blocking paradigm.  Q J Exp Psychol. 2005;  58A 667-692
• 33 Schnur T T, Schwartz M F, Brecher A, Hodgson C. Semantic interference during blocked-cyclic naming: evidence from aphasia.  J Mem Lang. 2006;  54 199-227
• 34 Gernsbacher M A, Faust M E. The mechanism of suppression: a component of general comprehension skill.  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1991;  17 245-262
• 35 Martin R C, Vuong L, Hull R. Impaired vs. preserved inhibitory processes in a patient with semantic short-term memory deficit.  Brain Lang. 2007;  103 169-170
• 36 Vallar G, Baddeley A D. Phonological short-term store, phonological processing, and sentence comprehension: a neuropsychological case study.  Cogn Neuropsychol. 1984;  1 121-141
• 37 Butterworth B, Campbell R, Howard D. The use of short-term memory: a case study.  Q J Exp Psychol A. 1986;  38 705-737

1 There is considerable controversy over the extent to which a phonological STM deficit has any consequences for comprehension. Although Vallar and Baddeley [36] demonstrated that their patient PV had difficulty with long, semantically reversible sentences, studies with other such patients have found good comprehension for these sentence types and for other sentences with complex syntactic structures. [37]